Medical Student Note Quality on a Pediatrics Core Clerkship Differs by Service

Introduction Medical students rotate on various clinical disciplines with the same professional goal of learning medical documentation. This study investigated differences between medical student notes on inpatient general and subspecialty pediatric services by comparing note quality, length, and file time. Methods In a single-site, observational cohort study, medical students in the Core Clerkship in Pediatrics (CCP) from July 2020 to June 2021 participated in a note-writing didactic course. We compared notes from medical students completing their inpatient assignment on a general pediatric service to those who completed it on a pediatric subspecialty service. Primary outcomes were note quality measured by Physician Documentation Quality Instrument-9 (PDQI9), note length (measured by line count), and file time (measured by hours to completion since 6 AM on the morning of note initiation). Results We evaluated 84 notes from 84 medical students on the general pediatric services and 50 notes from 49 medical students on the pediatric subspecialty services. Note quality measured by PDQI9 was significantly higher for general pediatric service notes compared to pediatric subspecialty service notes (p = 0.03). General pediatric service notes were significantly shorter (p < 0.001). We found no difference in file time (p = 0.23). Conclusion Medical student notes on pediatric subspecialty services scored significantly lower in quality and were longer compared to general pediatric services, demonstrating the need for a more tailored note-writing curriculum and note template based on service.

Assessing the Impact of a Note-Writing Session and Standardized Note Template on Medical Student Note Length and Quality

PURPOSE

To determine whether a formal note-writing session and note template for medical students (MS) during the Core Clerkship in Pediatrics (CCP) increase note quality, shortens note length, and decreases time of documentation.

METHODS

In this single site, prospective study, MS participating in an 8-week CCP received a didactic session on note-writing in the electronic health record (EHR) and utilized EHR template developed for the study. We assessed note quality (measured by Physician Documentation Quality Instrument-9 [PDQI-9]), note length and note documentation time in this group compared to MS notes on the CCP in the prior academic year. We used descriptive statistics and Kruskal-Wallis tests for analysis.

RESULTS

We analyzed 121 notes written by 40 students in the control group and 92 notes writing by 41 students in the intervention group. Notes from the intervention group were more "up to date," "accurate," "organized," and "comprehensible" compared to the control group (P = 0.02, P = 0.04, P = 0.01, and P = 0.02, respectively). Intervention group notes received higher cumulative PDQI-9 scores compared to the control group (median score 38 (IQR 34-42) versus 36 (IQR 32-40) out of 45 total, P = 0.04). Intervention group notes were approximately 35% shorter than the control group notes (median 68.5 lines vs 105 lines, P < 0.0001) and were signed earlier than control group notes (median file time 316 minute vs 352 minute, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention successfully decreased note length, improved note quality based on standardized metrics, and reduced time to completion of note documentation.