1
|
Nagai S, Witherspoon B, Nabhan C, Bennett CL. Biosimilar Epoetin in the United States: A View from the Southern Network on Adverse Reactions. Cancer Treat Res 2022; 184:41-51. [PMID: 36449186 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04402-1_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Biosimilar drugs, close copies of patented biologicals, are intended to provide access to less expensive, highly similar versions of reference (previously approved) biological agents (Kozlowski et al. in N Engl J Med 365:385-388, 2011). The biological epoetin accounts for $1.8 billion in drug spending annually worldwide (primarily for the treatment of anemia due to chronic kidney disease or anemia due to cancer chemotherapy.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumimasa Nagai
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Bartlett Witherspoon
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Chadi Nabhan
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Charles L Bennett
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bennett CL, Champigneulle O, Bennett A, Witherspoon B, Bove C. Fluoroquinolone-Associated Disability and Other Fluoroquinolone-Associated Serious Adverse Events: Unexpected Toxicities Have Emerged in Recent Years. Cancer Treat Res 2022; 184:1-39. [PMID: 36449185 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-04402-1_1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
This study describes cases of individuals who report adverse events following consumption of the most commonly prescribed fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics: ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or moxifloxacin. Fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics are some of the most widely prescribed antibiotics in the world. Although these antibiotics have been on the market for more than 20 years, a wide range of serious FQ-associated adverse events first became apparent in 2006 and continued to be recognized for the next 15 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles L Bennett
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Oscar Champigneulle
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Andrew Bennett
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Bartlett Witherspoon
- SONAR (Southern Network on Adverse Reactions) Program, University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA
| | - Cecilia Bove
- York College of Pennsylvania, York, PA, 17403, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen B, Nagai S, Armitage JO, Witherspoon B, Nabhan C, Godwin AC, Yang YT, Kommalapati A, Tella SH, DeAngelis C, Raisch DW, Sartor O, Hrushesky WJ, Ray PS, Yarnold PR, Love BL, Norris LB, Knopf K, Bobolts L, Riente J, Luminari S, Kane RC, Hoque S, Bennett CL. Regulatory and Clinical Experiences with Biosimilar Filgrastim in the U.S., the European Union, Japan, and Canada. Oncologist 2019; 24:537-548. [PMID: 30842244 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Biosimilar filgrastims are primarily indicated for chemotherapy-induced neutropenia prevention. They are less expensive formulations of branded filgrastim, and biosimilar filgrastim was the first biosimilar oncology drug administered in European Union (EU) countries, Japan, and the U.S. Fourteen biosimilar filgrastims have been marketed in EU countries, Japan, the U.S., and Canada since 2008, 2012, 2015, and 2016, respectively. We reviewed experiences and policies for biosimilar filgrastim markets in EU countries and Japan, where uptake has been rapid, and in the U.S. and Canada, where experience is rapidly emerging. U.S. regulations for designating biosimilar interchangeability are under development, and such regulations have not been developed in most other countries. Pharmaceutical substitution is allowed for new filgrastim starts in some EU countries and in Canada, but not Japan and the U.S. In EU countries, biosimilar adoption is facilitated with favorable hospital tender offers. U.S. adoption is reportedly 24%, while the second filgrastim biosimilar is priced 30% lower than branded filgrastim and 20% lower than the first biosimilar filgrastim approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Utilization is about 60% in EU countries, where biosimilar filgrastim is marketed at a 30%-40% discount. In Japan, biosimilar filgrastim utilization is 45%, primarily because of 35% discounts negotiated by Central Insurance and hospital-only markets. Overall, biosimilar filgrastim adoption barriers are small in many EU countries and Japan and are diminishing in Canada in the U.S. Policies facilitating improved U.S. adoption of biosimilar filgrastim, based on positive experiences in EU countries and Japan, including favorable insurance coverage; larger price discount relative to reference filgrastim pricing; closing of the "rebate trap" with transparent pricing information; formal educational efforts of patients, physicians, caregivers, and providers; and allowance of pharmaceutical substitution of biosimilar versus reference filgrastim, should be considered. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: We reviewed experiences and policies for biosimilar filgrastims in Europe, Japan, Canada, and the U.S. Postmarketing harmonization of regulatory policies for biosimilar filgrastims has not occurred. Acceptance of biosimilar filgrastims for branded filgrastim, increasing in the U.S. and in Canada, is commonplace in Japan and Europe. In the U.S., some factors, accepted in Europe or Japan, could improve uptake, including acceptance of biosimilars as safe and effective; larger cost savings, decreasing "rebate traps" where pharmaceutical benefit managers support branded filgrastim, decreased use of patent litigation/challenges, and allowing pharmacists to routinely substitute biosimilar for branded filgrastim.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Chen
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- William Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sumimasa Nagai
- Translational Research Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Bartlett Witherspoon
- College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Chadi Nabhan
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley C Godwin
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Y Tony Yang
- Center for Health Policy and Media Engagement, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA
| | - Anuhya Kommalapati
- School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sri Harsha Tella
- School of Medicine, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | | | - Dennis W Raisch
- College of Pharmacy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| | - Oliver Sartor
- Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - William J Hrushesky
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Paul S Ray
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Paul R Yarnold
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bryan L Love
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - LeAnn B Norris
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin Knopf
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Alameda Health System, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Laura Bobolts
- Oncology Analytics Inc., Plantation, Florida, USA
- Nova Southeastern University College of Pharmacy, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - Joshua Riente
- William Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Hematology, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Reggio Emilia, Italy
- Department of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Robert C Kane
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shamia Hoque
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Charles L Bennett
- South Carolina Center of Economic Excellence for Medication Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- William Jennings Bryan Dorn VA Medical Center, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huncharek M, Geschwind JF, Witherspoon B, McGarry R, Adcock D. Intravesical chemotherapy prophylaxis in primary superficial bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of 3703 patients from 11 randomized trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53:676-80. [PMID: 10941943 DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00203-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The impact of intravesical chemotherapy prophylaxis on recurrence of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is poorly defined. The objective of this report is to present a meta-analysis of the available clinical trial data to quantify the effect of intravesical chemotherapy on tumor recurrence following complete transurethral resection (TURB) in patients with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer. A prospective protocol outlining the above meta-analysis was initially developed followed by a thorough search of the existing published literature using strict eligibility criteria. Eleven randomized trials were found that met protocol specifications. These studies contained data on 3703 patients that were statistically combined using a fixed effects model (Peto). The outcome of interest was the proportion of patients recurring at 1, 2, and 3 years post-TURB. Combining all 11 studies using 1-year recurrence as the outcome measure yielded a Peto odds ratio (ORp) of 0.56, demonstrating a 44% reduction in 1-year recurrence among patients treated with intravesical chemotherapy versus those treated with TURB alone. A statistical test for heterogeneity (Q) showed these data to be heterogenous (the studies are not measuring an effect of the same size). Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine sources of heterogeneity. These tests suggest that chemotherapy treatment schedule may account for the wide variation in tumor recurrence rates across studies. When the available clinical trial data were stratified by duration of treatment, the meta-analysis showed that intravesical chemotherapy decreased tumor recurrence from 30% to 80% depending on the outcome of interest (i.e., recurrence at 1, 2, or 3 years post-TURB). Intravesical chemotherapy appears to have a major impact on decreasing the chance of recurrence of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. This is in contrast to prior analyses suggesting only modest efficacy in this clinical setting (i.e., on the order of a 14% reduction in recurrence).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Huncharek
- Uro-Oncology Project, Meta-Analysis Research Group, Columbia, SC, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|