Evaluation of childhood malignancies presenting with musculoskeletal manifestations from two different divisions: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the approaches of pediatric rheumatologists and pediatric hematologists to patients with similar musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints and to highlight the differences that general pediatricians should consider when referring patients to these specialties.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study involving the patients who applied to pediatric rheumatology centers with MSK complaints and were diagnosed with malignancy, as well as patients who were followed up in pediatric hematology centers with a malignancy diagnosis, and had MSK complaints at the time of admission.

RESULTS

A total of 142 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these patients, 83 (58.4%) applied to pediatric rheumatology centers, and 59 (41.6%) applied to pediatric hematology centers. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) was the most common diagnosis among the patients who applied to both centers, with 80 cases (56.3%). The median age of diagnosis was 87 (interquartile range, IQR: 48-140) months. The most common preliminary diagnosis in pediatric rheumatology centers was juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), with 37 cases (44.5%). MSK involvement was mainly seen as arthralgia, and bone pain. While arthralgia (92.7%) was the most common complaint in rheumatology centers, bone pain (88.1%) was more common in hematology centers. The most frequently involved joints were the knee (62.9%), ankle (25.9%), hip (25%), and wrist (14%). The most common laboratory abnormalities were high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), high C-reactive protein (CRP), anemia, and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and high LDH were statistically significantly more frequent in patients admitted to hematology centers than in patients admitted to rheumatology centers (p < 0.001, p=0.014, p=0.028, respectively). Patients who applied to rheumatology clinics were found to have statistically significantly higher CRP levels (p=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Malignancies may present with only MSK system complaints in childhood. Therefore, malignancies should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with MSK complaints.

Any Concern About Delays in the Diagnosis of Childhood Cancers During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

OBJECTIVE

The lockdown precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic led to concerns about the delayed diagnosis of malignancies. This study aimed to compare the duration of complaints at home and the presence of metastasis at diagnosis during the pre-pandemic and pandemic period in children with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All children diagnosed with cancer and followed up in our clinic between 2017 and 2022 were included. Patients with a diagnosis of acute/chronic leukemia were excluded. Age, gender, cancer type, duration of complaints, and presence of metastasis at diagnosis of the children were recorded. The duration of complaints and presence of metastasis at diagnosis were compared statistically before and after March 11, 2020, the start point of the COVID-19 pandemic in our country.

RESULTS

A total of 161 patients diagnosed with cancer were analyzed retrospectively; 61% of patients were males and 39% were females. These patients were diagnosed with brain tumors (23.6%), lymphomas (23%), neuroblastoma (13.7%), rhabdomyosarcomas (10.6%), Ewing's sarcoma (4.3%), osteosarcoma (3.7%), Wilm's tumor (3.7%), and germ cell tumors (3.1%). The duration of complaint was longer during the pandemic than before the pandemic (median: 45 days vs. 30 days) (P < .05). The presence of metastases at diagnosis was 45.3% in the prepandemic period, while it was 40% during the pandemic with no statistical difference (P > .5).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that the duration of complaint before diagnosis was longer during the pandemic, while this delay did not affect the metastasis rate at diagnosis in children with cancer. The high rates of distant metastases in newly diagnosed patients both before and during the pandemic suggest that more studies are needed to diagnose these patients earlier.

Approach to the patient with neutropenia in childhood

Neutrophils have an important role in host defense and acute inflammation. It is well known that susceptibility to infection increases when the neutrophil count is low. Neutropenia were classified as mild, moderate and severe according to the neutrophil counts, or acute and chronic depending on the duration of neutropenia, or congenital and acquired according to the mechanism. The patients with neutropenia are clinically different due to underlying mechanism, they have life- threatening infections or no infection may be observed. The most common cause of acquired neutropenia is viral infection, followed by drugs and autoimmune neutropenia. Congenital neutropenia are usually diagnosed by acute and life- threatening invasive bacterial and fungal infections. Immune system disorders and other systemic abnormalities may be accompanied or not. Recent years, novel single gen defects causing congenital neutropenia were defined through advanced genetic techniques. Molecular diagnosis is useful for risk stratification, choice of therapy and prognosis on follow- up. This review was prepared for pediatricians as a guide focused on approach neutropenia, which tests should be performed and when should be referred to a specialist.

Delivery room blood pressure percentiles of healthy, singleton, liveborn neonates

BACKGROUND

Arterial blood pressure (BP) is one of the four vital signs that reflect cardiovascular status in neonates. The present study aimed to obtain BP percentiles among healthy, singleton, liveborn neonates between 34 and 43 weeks of gestation who were less than 1 h old.

METHODS

BP measurements were taken after birth in supine-positioned neonates in the delivery room using an oscillometric device. A total of 982 well-nourished neonates who did not require resuscitation, were not fetally malnourished, were not admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and were without obvious congenital abnormalities were included in the study.

RESULTS

Sex- and type-of-delivery-specific 5th and 95th percentiles BP measurements were obtained for gestation. Mean BP values for systolic, diastolic and mean of term neonates were 63.98 ± 12.29 mmHg, 38.34 ± 11.06 mmHg and 49.32 ± 11.33 mmHg, and late preterm neonates were 61.80 ± 12.46 mmHg, 33.17 ± 9.97 mmHg and 46.52 ± 10.8 mmHg, respectively. There were weak but significant correlations between birthweight, birth length and head circumference and systolic, diastolic and mean arterial BP values (r = 0.20, r = 0.15 and r = 0.20, respectively, P < 0.001). Neonates who were delivered vaginally had higher mean BP values for systolic, diastolic and mean than neonates delivered by cesarean section (P < 0.05). Female neonates had higher systolic BP values than male neonates (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Data presented in this study include sex- and delivery-mode-specific BP percentile curves using an oscillometric method and serve as a valuable reference for physicians in dealing with the management of singleton, liveborn late preterm and term newborns in the delivery room intensive care.