Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multisciplinary Intervention to Reduce Bleeding Risk in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of a multidisciplinary program to reduce bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome through optimization of antithrombotic therapy.

METHODS

We designed a preintervention (PRE) and postintervention (POST) quasi-experimental study using a retrospective analysis of 2 cohorts. The first cohort was analyzed to detect correctable measures contributing to bleeding (PRE). Afterward, a quality improvement intervention with a bundle of recommendations was implemented. Finally, a second cohort of patients was evaluated to investigate the impact of the measures on bleeding reduction (POST). The impact on health outcomes was evaluated through comparison of the percentage of in-hospital bleeding events and 30-day readmissions between the 2 cohorts. The economic analysis took into account the costs associated with the implementation of the program and the cost-savings associated with the prevention of bleeding events and 30-day readmissions.

RESULTS

A total of 677 patients were included (377 in PRE and 300 in POST). The total bleeding rate was reduced after the implementation of the bundled intervention by 29.2% (31.6% in POST vs 22.3% in PRE; OR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.44-0.88) while 30-day readmission rates were 7.7% in PRE and 5% in POST (P=.20). The estimated avoided cost was €95 113.6 per year, meaning that €10.1 would be obtained in return for each euro invested during the first year and €36.3 during the following years.

CONCLUSIONS

This multidisciplinary program has proven to be effective in reducing bleeding events and is economically attractive.

Optimisation of antithrombotic therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome to reduce bleeding episodes

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary intervention to reduce the risk of bleeding associated with antithrombotic drugs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

We designed a pre-post quasi-experimental intervention study using retrospective cohorts. The first cohort was analysed to detect correctable measures contributing to bleeding (PRE: January-July 2010). Second, a bundle of interventions was implemented and third, a second cohort of patients was evaluated to investigate the impact of our measures in bleeding reduction (POST: September 2011-February 2012).

RESULTS

A total of 677 patients were included (377 in PRE and 300 in POST). The bundle of interventions was: Overdose avoidance measures: the percentage of patients overdosed was reduced by 66.3% (p < 0.001). Institutional protocol update to include the latest recommendations regarding bleeding prevention: In POST, the percentage of patients treated with fondaparinux increased (2.4% vs. 50.7%; p < 0.001). In PRE, 11 patients were treated with the combination of abciximab and bivalirudin; whereas in POST, only one patient received the combination (p = 0.016). Mandatory measurement of body weight: the percentage of patients with unknown body weight was reduced by 35% (p = 0.0001). In POST, the total bleeding rate was reduced by 29.2% (31.6% in PRE vs. 22.4%, p < 0.05, OR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.44-0.88). It was necessary to implement the interventions in 11 patients to prevent one bleeding episode (95% CI: 7-39).

CONCLUSION

The multidisciplinary programme has been effective in reducing bleeding episodes. The interventions were effective in reducing antithrombotic drugs overdosage, incorporating the use of fondaparinux to the NSTE-ACS therapeutic arsenal, limiting the use of bivalirudin with abciximab and obtaining body weight for most patients.