Effect of cerebral dopamine metabolism genetic polymorphism on patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL): An analysis of the E3805 CHAARTED trial

123

Background: QOL outcomes have been associated with specific genetic variants in neurotransmitter metabolism. One such variant associated with reduced symptoms in placebo studies is in the rs4680 SNP of Carboxy-O-Methyltransferase (COMT). This variant is associated with reduced COMT enzymatic activity, higher cerebral dopamine levels, and improved mood. The interaction between this germline variant and cancer-directed treatment on QOL is undefined. A priori, we hypothesized that the COMT rs4680 SNP would be associated with better pain and QOL patient reported outcomes (PROs), than wildtype (WT) COMT within the E3805 CHAARTED Trial. Methods: E3805 compared docetaxel + androgen deprivation therapy (ADT+D) vs ADT in patients with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). PROs were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Blood samples were genotyped prior to treatment. We compared PROs between patients with COMT WT vs rs4680 SNP within treatment arms longitudinally. PROs include Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) classified as: no (0), minimal (1), or more (≥2) pain, and BPI interference (range 0-10, 0= no pain or interference), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P, higher score= better QOL, clinically important difference (CID)= 6). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize QOL over time. Fisher’s exact test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and mixed effects models were used to evaluate the associations between SNP and QOL in each arm. Results: Of 790 participants, 550 with SNP data were included. In the ADT+D arm, SNPs were not associated with PROs at any time point. In contrast, in the ADT alone arm, when compared to WT, rs4680 was associated with less pain at 3 months, less interference at 3, 6 and 9 months, and better QOL at 6 months (met criteria for CID). Conclusions: The rs4680 SNP, often associated with higher cerebral dopamine levels and improved QOL, was associated with less pain and superior QOL among patients with mHSPC treated with ADT, but not chemohormonal therapy. This is the first hypothesis driven genotyping study to demonstrate that genetics are associated with QOL in patients with cancer, especially when treatment does not cause profound symptoms. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985 . [Table: see text]

Phase 2 study of the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib in patients (pts) with intermediate-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (IR-NMIBC) with FGFR3/2 alterations (alt) in THOR-2: Cohort 3 interim analysis

504

Background: Current treatments (tx) of papillary NMIBC are not selective. Novel tx can be assessed on measurable disease (eg, a marker lesion) to rapidly and directly assess antitumor efficacy. FGFR inhibitor therapy may improve outcomes for pts with IR-NMIBC with FGFR3/2alt. Erdafitinib (erda) is an oral selective pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer in adults with FGFR3/2alt who have progressed during or following ≥1 line of platinum-containing chemotherapy. THOR-2 (NCT04172675) is a multicohort phase 2 study of erda in pts with NMIBC. We report results in an exploratory cohort of pts with IR-NMIBC with FGFRalt (Cohort 3). Methods: Inclusion: age ≥18 y, with histologically confirmed NMIBC with FGFR3/2alt (local/central testing) and recurrent IR disease, with all previous tumors being low grade (Gr) (Gr 1-2), Ta/T1, no previous carcinoma in situ, risk of progression <5% in the next 2 y, and risk of recurrence >50%. All tumors were removed by transurethral resection of bladder tumor except for a marker lesion (single untouched 5-10 mm lesion). Pts received continuous oral erda 6 mg once daily without uptitration in 28-d cycles. Urine cytology was performed at the time of complete response (CR). Pts with a partial response (PR) or CR ≤3 mos of starting erda continued erda for up to a maximum of 2 y, until progressive disease, intolerable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, investigator decision to discontinue tx, or study closure. Primary exploratory end point: CR rate (CR = disappearance of the marker lesion without any new lesions; if there is a remnant of the marker lesion, no viable tumor should be seen on histopathological examination); key secondary end point: safety. Results: As of the data cutoff (Sep 2022) (median follow-up of 6.2 mos), 10/11 enrolled pts have received erda (enrolled population; median age: 66 y [range 47-77]; 9 Ta, 2 not staged). Pts received erda for a median duration of 2.9 mos (range 1.1-8.4). Efficacy (n=8 evaluable): 6 pts had CR (CR rate, 75.0%; 95% CI, 34.9-96.8%), and 1 had PR. Of 7 pts with CR or PR, median observed duration of response was 2.8 mos. Safety (≥1 dose of erda; n=10): the most common tx-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were hyperphosphatemia (90.0%; n=9), diarrhea (60.0%; n=6), dry mouth (50.0%; n=5), dry skin (30.0%; n=3), dysgeusia (30.0%; n=3), and constipation (30.0%; n=3). One pt had Gr ≥3 dysuria (10.0%) and 1 (10.0%) had Gr ≥3 tx-related diarrhea. One pt (10.0%) had Gr 1 tx-related central serous chorioretinopathy. No pts had tx-related serious TEAEs or tx-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation. No deaths occurred. Conclusions: Data from Cohort 3 of THOR-2 demonstrate efficacy in adult pts with IR-NMIBC with FGFRalt. Safety data were consistent with the known safety profile of erda. Clinical trial information: NCT04172675 .

Alliance A031902 (CASPAR): A randomized phase (ph) 3 trial of enzalutamide with rucaparib/placebo in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

TPS277

Background: Despite a growing number of treatment options for first-line mCRPC, approximately 40% of patients (pts) have radiographic progression within the first year. Co-inhibition of androgen receptor (AR) and PARP is a promising therapeutic strategy that leverages synthetic lethality induced by impaired double-strand DNA repair. Two phase III studies have shown improvement in radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in HRR-mutant pts with abiraterone + PARPi combinations vs abiraterone alone. However, the results in HRR-wild type pts are conflicting, with only one of the studies demonstrating a benefit with the abiraterone + PARPi combination. ENZ + RUCA has shown an acceptable safety profile & no significant drug-drug interactions (S-DDI) in a phase 1b trial. This allows its evaluation in mCRPC. Methods: CASPAR (A031902) is a phase 3 study in which 984 pts will be randomized on a 1:1 basis to ENZ plus RUCA/PBO. HRR gene aberration is not required for enrollment. All pts will undergo next-generation targeted exome sequencing from archival tumor tissue (new biopsy only required if no archival tissue is available). Treatment will be continued until disease progression and crossover is not allowed. Key eligibility criteria are age ≥ 18 years, ECOG PS 0-2, biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma, progressive (PSA or radiographic) disease per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 guidelines, measurable or non-measurable disease per RECIST 1.1, no prior treatment for mCRPC (prior docetaxel, abiraterone, darolutamide, or apalutamide in non-mCRPC setting is allowed), no significant uncontrolled comorbidity, and no medications with S-DDI with ENZ/RUCA. Hierarchical co-primary endpoints are overall survival (OS) and rPFS. The OS analysis will be undertaken as a primary endpoint if the rPFS endpoint is met. For a one-sided logrank test with a type 1 error rate equal to 0.025, the study has 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 in rPFS (median rPFS of 15 and 21 months in control and combination arms, respectively), and 80% power to detect an HR of 0.80 in OS (median OS of 32 and 40 months, respectively). Key secondary endpoints are rPFS and OS in pts with vs without pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 alterations; and differences in adverse events and quality of life (QOL) outcomes between the treatment arms. QOL assessments include Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P), Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF), and EQ-5D-5L. A key correlative endpoint is the sensitivity of ctDNA testing for HRR gene alterations. Enrollment began in July 2021 & the study is available for participation to all US-NCTN sites. Clinical trial information: NCT04455750 .

Alliance A031902 (CASPAR): A randomized, phase (ph) 3 trial of enzalutamide with rucaparib/placebo in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

TPS5107

Background: Despite a growing number of treatment options for first line mCRPC, approximately 40% of patients (pts) have radiographic progression within the first year. Androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibition increases genomic instability with double-strand DNA breaks & co-inhibition of AR & PARP induces synthetic lethality in multiple preclinical models. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene aberrations do not appear to be necessary for this synergy as demonstrated in a ph 3 clinical trial of abiraterone & olaparib where this combination improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in HRR-wild-type pts compared with abiraterone alone. A ph 1b trial has since shown that enzalutamide plus rucaparib has acceptable safety profile & no significant drug-drug interactions (S-DDI). Methods: CASPAR/A031902 (NCT04455750) is a ph 3 study in which 984 pts will be randomized 1:1 to enzalutamide plus rucaparib or placebo. HRR gene aberration is not required for enrollment. All pts will undergo next-generation targeted-exome sequencing from archival tumor tissue (new biopsy only required if no archival tissue available). Treatment will be continued until disease progression & crossover is not allowed. Key eligibility criteria are age ≥ 18 years, ECOG PS 0-2, biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma, progressive (PSA or radiographic) disease per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 guidelines, measurable or nonmeasurable disease per RECIST 1.1, no prior treatment for mCRPC (prior docetaxel, abiraterone, darolutamide, or apalutamide in non-mCRPC setting is allowed), no significant uncontrolled comorbidity, & no medications with S-DDI with enzalutamide/rucaparib. Hierarchical co-primary endpoints are rPFS & overall survival (OS). The OS analysis will be undertaken as a primary endpoint if the rPFS endpoint is met. For a one-sided logrank test with a type 1 error rate equal to 0.025, the study has 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 in rPFS (median rPFS of 15 & 21 months in control & combination arms, respectively) & 80% power to detect an HR of 0.80 in OS (median OS of 32 & 40 months, respectively). Key secondary endpoints are rPFS & OS in pts with vs without pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 alterations; & differences in adverse events & quality of life (QOL) outcomes between the treatment arms. QOL assessments include Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P), Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) & EQ-5D-5L. A key correlative endpoint is the sensitivity of ctDNA-based testing for alterations in HRR genes. Enrollment to CASPAR began in July 2021 & the study is available for participation to all US-NCTN sites with a projected enrollment of 3 years. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; U10CA180888. Clinical trial information: NCT04455750.

Atezolizumab (atezo) with or without Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) in patients (pts) with high-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC): Results from a phase Ib/II study

493

Background: Standard treatment (tx) for high-risk NMIBC is transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) followed by BCG induction and maintenance. However, ≈50% of pts experience recurrence and/or progression after tx and may be ineligible for or refuse cystectomy. The PD-L1/PD-1 pathway may be involved with immune escape in NMIBC following BCG exposure. Here, we report results of atezo (anti–PD-L1) ± BCG in BCG-unresponsive, high-risk NMIBC. Methods: This multicenter study (NCT02792192) enrolled pts with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC with carcinoma in situ who had repeat TURBT. Cohort 1A and 1B pts received atezo 1200 mg IV q3w for ≤96 wk. Cohort 1B pts also received standard BCG induction (qw × 6 doses) and maintenance (qw × 3 doses at 3 mo), with optional maintenance courses at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 30 mo. For cohort 1B only, de-escalation was allowed for ≤3 BCG dose levels (full dose 50 mg, 66% and 33% of full dose). Co-primary outcomes were safety and complete response (CR) rate at 6 mo (6-mo bladder biopsy required). Duration of CR and 3-mo CR rate (key secondary outcomes) and 12-mo CR rate (exploratory) were also shown. Results: Cohorts 1A and 1B enrolled 12 pts each. Median age was 74 y; most pts had ECOG PS 0 (n = 7 [58%] in each cohort). At data cutoff (Sep 29, 2020), median atezo tx duration was 22.7 wk in cohort 1A and 31.6 wk in 1B. Following dose de-escalation in cohort 1B, the recommended BCG dose was 50 mg. BCG dose modification/interruption occurred in 4 pts (33%) due to an AE. The most common reason for tx discontinuation was disease recurrence or progression in both cohorts. Three pts (25%) in cohort 1A had atezo-related Gr 3 AEs (most common: maculopapular rash, n = 2); no atezo- or BCG-related Gr ≥3 AEs were seen in cohort 1B. Three dose-limiting toxicities occurred (1 [8%] in cohort 1A and 2 [17%] in cohort 1B), all reported as AEs of special interest. No Gr 4/5 AEs were reported. CRs, which appeared durable, were seen in both cohorts (Table). Conclusions: In this first report of atezo + BCG in NMIBC, atezo as mono- and combination therapy was well tolerated, with no new safety signals or tx-related deaths. Preliminary data suggested clinically meaningful activity, especially with atezo + BCG, requiring confirmation in a larger setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02792192. [Table: see text]

The effect of prior docetaxel (DOC) treatment on efficacy and safety of apalutamide (APA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) from TITAN

89

Background: Addition of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors to ADT + DOC has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in pts with mCSPC. TITAN, a placebo-controlled phase 3 study, showed that APA + ADT improved overall survival (OS) and other clinical outcomes in mCSPC (Chi, J Clin Oncol 2021). This post hoc analysis of TITAN evaluated outcomes in pts who had received DOC prior to treatment with APA + ADT versus those who did not. Methods: In TITAN, 1052 pts were randomized 1:1 to APA (240 mg QD) or placebo added to ongoing ADT. We assessed radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), OS, and time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression in pts receiving DOC and ADT prior to adding APA vs those receiving only ADT plus APA. Outcomes by prior DOC were also assessed in pts with high- or low-volume disease at randomization (baseline [BL]) per adapted CHAARTED criteria, or those with matched BL characteristics. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to derive hazard ratios (HRs) and p values. rPFS was assessed using the first interim analysis cutoff (23 mo median follow-up); OS and time to PSA progression were assessed using the final analysis cutoff (44 mo median follow-up). Results: A total of 58/525 (11%) pts from the APA + ADT group had received DOC prior to randomization: 76% (n = 44) had high-volume disease, 62% (n = 36) had bone-only metastases, 16% (n = 9) had visceral metastases, and 59% (n = 34) had > 10 bone lesions. In the overall APA-treated population and in the subset of pts with high-volume disease, OS, rPFS, and time to PSA progression were similar in those who received prior DOC and those who did not (Table). Pts with low-volume disease also had similar results, although the number of pts was small. Clinical outcomes in pts with matched BL characteristics (including PSA and time from initial diagnosis to randomization, among others) were similar regardless of prior use of DOC (Table). The safety profile of APA was not substantially different between pts with or without prior DOC. Limitations of this analysis include lack of data on tumor volume and other disease characteristics at the initiation of prior DOC treatment; interpretation was based on small number of pts with prior DOC (only 11% of TITAN pts), most notably in the rPFS analysis. Conclusions: Prior use of DOC in pts with mCSPC did not further improve clinical benefits of APA + ADT in TITAN. Clinical trial information: NCT02489318. [Table: see text]

Alliance A031902 (CASPAR): A randomized, phase (ph) 3 trial of enzalutamide with rucaparib/placebo as novel therapy in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

TPS194

Background: Despite a growing number of treatment options for first line mCRPC, approximately 40% of patients (pts) have radiographic progression within the first year. Androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibition increases genomic instability with double-strand DNA breaks & co-inhibition of AR & PARP induces synthetic lethality in multiple preclinical models. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene aberrations do not appear to be necessary for this synergy as demonstrated in a ph 2 clinical trial of abiraterone & olaparib where this combination improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in HRR-wild-type pts compared with abiraterone alone. A ph 1b trial has since shown that enzalutamide plus rucaparib has acceptable safety profile & no significant drug-drug interactions (S-DDI). Methods: CASPAR/A031902 (NCT04455750) is a ph 3 study in which 984 pts will be randomized 1:1 to enzalutamide plus rucaparib or placebo. HRR gene aberration is not required for enrollment. All pts will undergo next-generation targeted-exome sequencing from archival tumor tissue (new biopsy only required if no archival tissue available). Treatment will be continued until disease progression & crossover is not allowed. Key eligibility criteria are age ≥ 18 years, ECOG PS 0-2, biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma, progressive (PSA or radiographic) disease per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 guidelines, measurable or nonmeasurable disease per RECIST 1.1, no prior treatment for mCRPC (prior docetaxel, abiraterone, darolutamide, or apalutamide in non-mCRPC setting is allowed), no significant uncontrolled comorbidity, & no medications with S-DDI with enzalutamide/rucaparib. Hierarchical co-primary endpoints are rPFS & overall survival (OS). The OS analysis will be undertaken as a primary endpoint if the rPFS endpoint is met. For a one-sided logrank test with a type 1 error rate equal to 0.025, the study has 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.71 in rPFS (median rPFS of 15 & 21 months in control & combination arms, respectively) & 80% power to detect an HR of 0.80 in OS (median OS of 32 & 40 months, respectively). Key secondary endpoints are rPFS & OS in pts with vs without pathogenic BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2 alterations; & differences in adverse events & quality of life (QOL) outcomes between the treatment arms. QOL assessments include Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P), Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPI-SF) & EQ-5D-5L. A key correlative endpoint is the sensitivity of ctDNA-based testing for alterations in HRR genes. Enrollment to CASPAR began in July 2021 & the study is available for participation to all US-NCTN sites with a projected enrollment of 3 years. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; U10CA180888; Clovis Oncology; http://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org Clinical trial information: NCT04455750.

Molecular alterations across sites of metastasis in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

287

Background: RCC has a distinct pattern of metastatic spread with common sites of metastasis including the lung, bone, and liver. Less common sites include the brain, adrenal gland, and pancreas. While the pattern of metastatic spread has prognostic significance, the biology driving tropism to specific organ sites has not been fully characterized. We utilized a multi-institutional real-world dataset to examine genomic alterations and transcriptional signatures across the spectrum of metastatic sites in patients with RCC. Methods: RCC tissue specimens derived from the kidney and distant metastatic sites were sequenced utilizing a commercially available Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified assay by Caris Life Sciences. Whole exome and transcriptome sequencing was performed. Molecular subgroups were defined according to the IMmotion151 metastatic RCC subtypes, with subgroups determined by a weighted average of gene expression levels. Molecular analysis and PD-L1 expression (SP142) were described by metastasis site. Results: 657 RCC samples from 653 patients underwent molecular profiling. The median age was 62 years (range 14-90) and the majority were male (70.6%). The most common histology was clear cell RCC (n = 509, 77.5%), followed by papillary (n = 63, 9.6%), chromophobe (n = 30, 4.6%), medullary (n = 8, 1.2%), collecting duct (n = 6, 0.9%), and mixed (n = 41, 6.2%). Specimen source included the kidney (n = 340, 51.8%), lung (n = 75, 11.4%), bone (n = 45, 6.8%), lymph nodes (n = 34, 5.2%), liver (n = 28, 4.3%), endocrine glands (adrenal, pancreas, and thyroid; n = 23, 3.5%), brain/CNS (n = 16, 2.4%), and other metastatic sites (n = 96, 14.6%). Compared to kidney, several genes were mutated at higher rates for select metastatic sites, including PBRM1 (59.5% bone, 59.1% endocrine, and 45.9% lung vs 33.8% kidney, p< 0.05) and KDM5C (27.8% endocrine, 29.2% lymph nodes, and 35.3% soft tissue vs 9.3% kidney, p< 0.05). When evaluating metastatic specimens versus kidney specimens, bone metastases had a significantly higher proportion of tumors classified as ‘Angio/stromal’ (n = 19, 42.2%; vs n = 52, 15.4%; p< 0.0001), while liver metastases had a higher proportion of the ‘complement/Ω-oxidation’ subgroup (n = 17, 60.7%; vs n = 48, 14.1%; p< 0.0001). PD-L1 expression in metastatic sites (range 6.8%-21.7%, with exception of 0% in GI; p= 0.09 to 0.99) was not significantly different from the kidney (16.6%). Conclusions: In our contemporary real-world analysis, we demonstrate differential patterns of molecular alterations among sites of metastasis in RCC. Our observations elucidate the biology underlying heterogeneous disease outcomes associated with site of metastasis. Application of predictive signatures by site of metastasis may help inform personalized therapy strategies in advanced RCC. Further studies are warranted to validate our findings.

PrE0807: A phase Ib feasibility trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab (N) without or with lirilumab (L) in cisplatin-ineligible patients (pts) with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC)

4518

Background: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) improves overall survival (OS) in MIBC, but about half of pts are cisplatin-unfit or refuse it. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce high pathologic complete response rate (ypT0N0). The combination of anti-PD-1 (N) and anti-KIR (L) is hypothesized to be safe and have significant activity based on the complementary and possibly synergistic roles in regulating adaptive and innate immune response in MIBC. Methods: This is a phase Ib multi-institutional trial in pts with localized MIBC treated with 2 neoadjuvant doses (4 weeks apart) of N alone (480 mg) in cohort 1 or N (480 mg) + L (240 mg) in cohort 2 prior to RC without adjuvant therapy (NCT03532451). Cohorts were enrolled sequentially and were not randomized. Key eligibility criteria included stage cT2-4aN0-1M0, ≥20% tumor content at TURBT and cisplatin-ineligibility (Galsky criteria) or refusal. Primary endpoint was safety manifested as rate of ≥G3 treatment related adverse events (TRAE) assessed in each cohort with CTCAE v5.0. Key secondary endpoints included the % of pts who had RC > 6 weeks after last neoadjuvant dose due to TRAE, CD8+ T cell density at RC, ypT0N0 and < ypT2N0 rates, CD8+ T cell density change between TURBT and RC, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and biomarkers in tumor tissue, blood and urine. Results: Among 43 pts enrolled (13 cohort 1, 30 cohort 2), median age was 75 (51-89), 67% were men, all had PS ECOG 0-1. Pts were cisplatin-ineligible due to impaired renal function (47%) and hearing loss (37%), while 14 % refused cisplatin. At baseline, 37 pts had cT2 stage, 2 had cN1 and 3 cNx. In cohort 1 and 2, 13 and 29 pts, respectively, completed intended neoadjuvant treatment, and 41/43 underwent RC (12/13 cohort 1, 29/30 cohort 2). One pt progressed to metastatic disease prior to RC (cohort 1) and 1 withdrew consent prior to being treated (cohort 2). Additionally, 1 patient was found to have cervical cancer at RC. Median time from last neoadjuvant dose to RC was 27 (95%CI: 24-29) days. There was no RC delayed > 6 weeks from treatment completion due to TRAE. G3 TRAEs occurred in 0% with N and 6.7% (90%CI 1.2-19.5%) in N+L (1: arthralgia, 1: gout, 2: hip pain) that all resolved. No G4/5 TRAEs occurred. Of 40 pts with MIBC and RC, ypT0N0 rates for N and N+L were 8% and 18%, while < ypT2N0 rates were 17% and 29%, respectively. Data on RFS and OS, and biomarker data were not yet mature. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant N alone and N+L combination prior to RC were safe, feasible and well tolerated in cisplatin-ineligible pts with MIBC, but ypT0N0 rates were unexpectedly low, especially with N alone. Two phase 3 trials (NCT03661320; NCT04209114) are evaluating the peri-operative role of N + chemotherapy +/- Linrodostat in cisplatin-fit and N +/- Bempeg in cisplatin unfit patients and are also assessing biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT03532451.

Outcomes of patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs): Associations with age, race, sex and smoking history

e16526

Background: ICIs have altered the therapeutic landscape in pts with aUC and new biomarkers are needed to better predict response and outcomes with ICIs. It is unclear whether demographics, such as race, age, sex and history of smoking, are associated with outcomes with ICIs. We hypothesized that specific demographic groups (sex, age, race, smoking history) would be associated with outcomes with ICIs in aUC. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study across 25 institutions. Data collected included demographic and clinicopathologic factors, response and outcomes. We calculated observed response rate (ORR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for specific demographic groups. We built multivariable models (logistic regression for ORR; Cox regression for PFS and OS) with all demographic groups to assess outcomes. Analysis was done for the overall population and stratified by treatment line (first line [1L]; salvage [2+L]). The stratified analysis was also adjusted for known prognostic risk scores (internally developed for 1L; Bellmunt for 2+L); p-value < 0.05 was significant. Results: We identified 1026 pts; 754, 744 and 780 were included in OS, ORR and PFS analysis. Overall, median age at ICI initiation was 70; 26% female; 75% White, 11% Hispanic, 5% Black, 8% other; 69% had smoking history; 28% with mixed histology; 17% with upper tract UC. In the unstratified analysis, age 65-74 (vs < 65) was significantly associated with higher ORR (32% vs 22%) and median PFS (5 vs 3 mo HR 0.8); otherwise no significant difference was noted among groups for ORR, PFS, OS in both the stratified and unstratified analyses (Table). Conclusions: We did not identify significant associations between age, sex, race or smoking history and ORR, PFS, OS with ICIs in pts with aUC. Limitations include retrospective nature, lack of randomization, possible selection and confounding factors. Further research is required to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers for ICI therapy in aUC.[Table: see text]

The role of androgen deprivation therapy on the clinical course of COVID-19 infection in men with prostate cancer

41

Background: TMPRSS2, a cell surface protease which is commonly upregulated in prostate cancer (PC) and regulated by androgens, is a necessary component for SARS-CoV2 cellular entry into respiratory epithelial cells. PC patients receiving ADT were reported to have a lower risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, whether ADT may have an impact on the severity of COVID-19 illness in this population is poorly understood. Methods: In this study performed across 7 US medical centers, we retrospectively evaluated patients with active PC and SARS-COV-2 viral detection by PCR between 03/01/20 and 05/31/20. We collected information on demographics; medical comorbidities; medications; PC Gleason score at initial diagnosis; presence of active disease, metastases, and castration resistance; ADT use as defined by GnRH analog or antagonist within 3 months or castration levels of testosterone < 50 ng/dL within 6 months of COVID-19 diagnosis, or history of bilateral orchiectomy; active non-ADT systemic therapies including, but not limited to, androgen-receptor-targeted therapies and chemotherapy; and COVID-19-related outcomes including hospitalization, supplemental oxygen use, mechanical ventilation requirement, WHO COVID-19 ordinal scale for clinical improvement, follow-up duration, and vital status. Multivariable mixed-effect logistic regression was performed to evaluate any difference in COVID-19 clinical outcomes between patients on and not on ADT. Survival analysis was done using adjusted Cox proportion-hazards regression model. All tests were two-sided at 0.05 significance level. Results: We identified 465 evaluable patients with median age of 71 (61-81) years. Median duration of follow-up was 60 (12-114.2) days. In this follow up period, there were 195 (41.9%) hospitalizations and 111 (23.9%) deaths. When adjusted for age, BMI, and PC clinical disease state, overall survival (HR 1.28 [95%CI 0.79-2.08], P = 0.32), hospitalization status (HR 1.07 [0.61-1.87], P = 0.82), supplemental oxygen use (HR 1.29 [0.77-2.17], P = 0.34), and use of mechanical ventilation (HR 1.07 [0.51-2.23], P = 0.87) were not statistically different between ADT and non-ADT cohorts. Similarly, in subgroup analysis, no statistical difference in overall survival was found between ADT and non-ADT cohorts for hospitalized patients (HR 1.42 [0.82-2.47], P = 0.21) and those receiving supplemental oxygen (HR 1.10 [0.65-1.85], P = 0.73). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort of PC patients, use of ADT prior to COVID-19 diagnosis does not protect against severe COVID-19 illness as defined by hospitalization, supplemental oxygen use, or death. Further preclinical work in understanding TMPRSS2 expression and androgen regulation in respiratory epithelial cells is needed. As well, longer clinical follow-up and additional clinical studies inclusive of prospective data are warranted to fully address this question.

Phase II clinical study of concurrent durvalumab and radiation therapy (DUART) followed by adjuvant durvalumab in patients with localized urothelial cancer of bladder: Results for primary analyses and survival. BTCRC-GU15-023

398

Background: Bladder cancer (BC) patients (pts) who are cisplatin ineligible/unfit for surgery, or locally advanced and unresectable have limited treatment options. DUART investigates if the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and checkpoint inhibitor, durvalumab (durva) is safe and effective in these pts. We recently reported that the combination was safe, tolerable and disease control rate (DCR) was 92% post durvaRT. Here we present interim efficacy data of our phase II study. Methods: Pts with pure or mixed urothelial bladder cancer (T2-4 N0-2 M0) were enrolled if their tumor was unresectable (35%), were unfit for surgery (50%) and/or cisplatin ineligible (89%). Primary endpoints: a) PFS at 1-yr b) DCR post adjuvant durva; Secondary endpoints: a) CR post durvaRT b) median PFS c) median OS. Pts were treated with durva (1500mg) Q4 wks x2 doses along with definitive RT (64.8Gy, 36 fractions over 7 wks) to the bladder and involved nodes followed by adjuvant durva Q4 wks x 1 yr. Response was evaluated with CT scan and cystoscopy+biopsy. Sample size was based on assumption that this regimen would increase 1 yr PFS by 25% compared to RT alone (50% to 75%); we assumed DCR of 75%. A total of 26 pts were needed to reach a statistical power of at least 80% at one-sided alpha of 5% and to allow for 10% drop out rate. Results: Twenty-six pts (19 males, 7 females) were enrolled, median age 74 yr (51-94). Sixty two percent of pts had >T2 disease, 31% had positive lymph nodes; 62% with unresectable tumor or were unfit for surgery due to comorbidities. At data cut off (9/30/2020) 20/26 pts were evaluable for DCR post adjuvant durva (3 pts with CR post durvaRT, did not get adjuvant therapy; 1 pt withdrew after 3 cycles for adjuvant durva and was on f/u with unconfirmed CR; 2 pts are still on adjuvant durva) and 25/26 for PFS and all 26 pts for OS. Post completion of adjuvant durva, DCR was seen in 70 % (14/20 with 10 CR; 3 PR; 1 SD; 6 PD). One-year probability of PFS was 73% (95% CI 56.4%, 94.4%), median PFS was 18.5 months. One-year OS probability was 83.8% (95% CI 70.4%, 99.7%) with two-year OS probability of 76.8 (95% CI 60.2%, 98%). Median OS has not been reached. We did not observe any correlation between clinical outcome and baseline tumor PD-L1 expression. Conclusions: DurvaRT followed by adjuvant durva demonstrated promising efficacy with 1-year PFS probability of 73%, 1- year OS probability of 83.8% and DCR of 70% in MIBC and locally advanced BC pts with comorbidities. Results will be updated prior to the final presentation. Efficacy was also seen in node (+) pts which led to the design of prospective randomized NCTN study. Induction chemo followed by chemo+durvaRT+ adjuvant durva vs. chemoRT combination is being evaluated in the ongoing EA8185 clinical trial (ECOG-ACRIN/NRG study) for node (+) BC pts. Clinical trial information: NCT02891161.

Angiogenic and T-effector subgroups identified by gene expression profiling (GEP) and propensity for PBRM1 and BAP1 alterations in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)

343

Background: With the emergence of multiple active treatment options in RCC, predictive biomarkers for optimal treatment selection are lacking. Gene expression data from IMmotion151 and Javelin Renal 101 clinical trials generated anti-angiogenic and immune signatures that warrant further validation. We aimed to describe the genomic and gene expression profiles in a multi-institutional database of patients with ccRCC, and its association with other biomarkers of interest. Methods: Whole transcriptome sequencing was performed for ccRCC patient samples submitted to a commercial CLIA-certified laboratory (Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ) from February 2019 to September 2020. Tumor GEP and hierarchical clustering based on the validated 66-gene signature (D’Costa et al, 2020) were used to identify patient subgroups. Samples from both primary tumors and metastatic sites were included. Results: A total of 316 patients with ccRCC, median age 62 (range 32-90), 71.8% men, were included. Tissue samples were obtained from primary tumor (46.5%), lung (12.3%), bone (9.5%), liver (4.7%) and other metastatic sites (27%). Gene expression analysis identified angiogenic, mixed and T-effector subgroups in 24.1%, 51.3% and 24.7%, respectively. Patients with angiogenic subgroup tumors compared to those with T-effector subgroup tumors were more likely to be older (63 versus 60 years, p=0.035), female (40.8% versus 16.7%, p=0.0009) and more frequently found in pancreatic/small bowel metastases (75% versus 12.5%, p=0.0103). Biomarkers of potential response to immunotherapy such as PD-L1 (p=0.0021), TMB (not significant), and dMMR/MSI-H status (not significant) were more frequent in the T-effector subgroup. PBRM1 mutations were more common in the angiogenic subgroup (62.0% vs 37.5%, p=0.0034) while BAP1 mutations were more common in the T-effector subgroup (18.6% versus 3.0%, p= 0.0035). Immune cell population abundance (e.g. NK cells, monocytes) and immune checkpoint gene expression (TIM-3, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA4) were also increased in the T-effector subgroup. Conclusions: Our hierarchical clustering results based on the 66-gene expression signature were concordant with results from prior studies. Patient subgroups identified by evaluation of angiogenic and T-effector signature scores exhibit significantly different mutations and immune profiles. These findings require prospective validation in future biomarker-selected clinical trials.

Severe-COVID-19 and mortality among patients (pts) with prostate cancer (PCa) receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)

39

Background: The presence of progressing cancer, male sex and advanced age have been shown to increase the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given that the androgen regulated gene TMPRSS2 has been implicated in SARS-CoV-2 viral entry, we hypothesized that ADT may improve COVID-19 outcomes. This analysis evaluated clinical outcomes of pts with PCa with concurrent SARS-CoV-2 infection and investigated the impact of ADT on occurrence of severe-COVID-19 and mortality. Methods: Data was obtained via the COVID-19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19), a multicenter registry including >120 cancer centers with de-identified data from pts with COVID-19 and cancer. Men with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and a primary diagnosis of prostate cancer were included: data cutoff of July 31, 2020. The primary endpoint was the development of severe-COVID-19 (death, ICU admission, or mechanical ventilation) among pts on ADT vs. those not on ADT at time of COVID-19 infection. Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality based on ADT use. Mortality and development of severe-COVID-19 were assessed in Pts grouped by therapy: 1st generation androgen receptor inhibitor (ARI-1), 2nd generation ARI (darolutamide, enzalutamide, apalutamide, ARI-2), abiraterone/prednisone, and chemotherapy. Propensity score matching was utilized. Logistic regression was utilized to adjust for age, ECOG PS, comorbidities, and race. Results: 589 pts were included; median follow-up was 42 days (IQR 25-90) and 62% (363/589) were hospitalized. Severe-COVID-19 developed in 28% of pts and the all-cause 30-day mortality rate was 19%. There was no significant difference in the development of severe-COVID-19 or 30-day mortality between Pts on ADT vs not on ADT, whether using descriptive statistics with the entire population or using the propensity score matched population (Table). Among the descriptive population, the numerical rates of severe-COVID-19 and mortality were lowest in Pts receiving ARI-2, but sample size was low. Conclusions: The overall 30-day mortality rate and percentage developing severe-COVID-19 were high. There was no statistical difference in the development of severe-COVID-19 or mortality based on receipt of ADT; however, this analysis is limited by the retrospective nature and small N after propensity-matching. [Table: see text]

Racial Diversity Among Histology of Renal Cell Carcinoma at an Urban Medical Center

BACKGROUND

Non-Hispanic blacks (NHB) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are more likely to have papillary RCC (pRCC) than non-Hispanic whites (NHW). Data on histologic subtypes in RCC in Hispanics (H) are also sparse. Previous studies have shown that pRCC is more prevalent in NHB than in NHW, but they analyzed predominantly NHW populations. The Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care (MECC) serves a predominantly NHB and H population in the Bronx, NY. We investigated histologic subtype specific associations with established RCC risk factors in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The MECC tumor registry was used to identify patients ≥ 18 years of age treated with partial or radical nephrectomy between January 2000 and December 2015. An institutional software program and individual chart review were used to obtain demographic data (including self-reported race, age, and sex), pathology data, and RCC risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, renal function, weight). Data were modeled by multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 1010 RCC cases were identified. Of these, 232 (23.0%) occurred in NHW, 383 (37.9%) NHB, 181 (17.9%) H, and 214 (21.2%) other. A total of 530 cases (52.5%) were clear cell (ccRCC) histology, 257 (25.4%) pRCC, 100 (9.9%) chromophobe (cRCC), and 123 (12.2%) other. Individuals with pRCC compared to ccRCC were more likely to be NHB than NHW (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.81-6.93) but were less likely to be female (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.72). Individuals with pRCC were also less likely to be H than NHW (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-0.99). Patients with cRCC were also more likely to be NHB than NHW (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.06-4.67).

CONCLUSION

In the MECC data set, histology of RCC varies by race, confirming earlier reports that non-ccRCC is more common in NHB than NHW. We also report that pRCC is less common in H than NHW.

Concurrent durvalumab and radiation therapy followed by adjuvant durvalumab in patients with locally advanced urothelial cancer of bladder (DUART): Btcrc-GU15-023

513

Background: Bladder cancer (BC) patients (pts) who are cisplatin ineligible/unfit for surgery, unresectable have limited treatment options. In this study, we investigate if the combination of radiation therapy (RT) and checkpoint inhibitor, durvalumab (durva) is safe and effective in these pts. Our results from phase (ph) Ib suggested that the combination was safe. Here we present the response rate post durvaRT and updated treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) amongst our evaluable pts in ph II. Methods: This is a single arm ph Ib-II study for T2-4 N0-2 M0 pts. The ph II primary endpoints a) PFS rate at 1 yr b) disease control rate (DCR); secondary endpoints were a) CR post durvaRT b) PFS c) OS. Pts were treated with durva (1500mg) Q4 wks x2 doses along with definitive RT (64.8Gy, 36 fractions over 7 wks) to the bladder and involved nodes followed by adjuvant durva Q4 wks x 1 yr. Response was evaluated with CT scan and cystoscopy+biopsy post durvaRT. We anticipated that durvaRT followed by durva would increase PFS at 1 yr from 50% to 75% when compared to RT; we assumed DCR of about 75%. A total of 26 pts were needed to reach a statistical power of at least 80% at one-sided alpha of 5% and to allow for 10% drop out rate. Results: Total N = 26 patients (male 19; female 7, median age 74yr). At the time of data cut off, 21/26 pts were evaluable for response post durvaRT. Post completion of durvaRT time point, clinical CR was seen in 15/21 pts (71.4%); PR 1/21 pts (4.7%); SD 4/21 (19%); PD 1/21 (4.7%). DCR was seen in 20/21 pts (95%) post durvaRT. Median follow up from D1 to last follow up was 6.1 mos. Grade ≥ 3 TRAE amongst 26 pts: anemia (1/26), lipase/amylase (1/26), immune nephritis (1/26), dyspnea (gr 4, copd/immune), fatigue (1/26), lymphopenia (6/26). Other TRAEs: Fatigue was the most common TRAE (16/26); UTI (5/26); cystitis (3/26). No fatal TRAEs were observed. Conclusions: DurvaRT demonstrated promising efficacy with clinical CR of 71.4% and DCR of 95% in unresectable, cisplatin ineligible locally advanced BC. It was generally well tolerated. Ph II study has completed accrual and longer-term results will further our understanding of this regimen’s efficacy in locally advanced BC. Clinical trial information: NCT02891161.

Genomic profiling of prostate cancer at a diverse academic center

64

Background: According to recent reports, ~1 in 4 patients with metastatic prostate cancer may harbor alterations in DNA damage repair (DDR) genes. Clinical trial data demonstrates that prostate cancer patients with DDR mutations may respond to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Less is known about the mutational profile in minority patients with prostate cancer. We sought to determine the genomic profile of prostate cancer in an ethnically diverse patient population at a single center. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of men with prostate cancer at the Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center who had next generation sequencing (NGS) with FoundationOne solid tumor testing between 2/2016 - 8/2019. Individual chart review was used to obtain clinical and demographic data including self-reported race/ethnicity. Results: NGS was attempted on archival tissue from 95 patients and results were obtained for 85. Among patients with results, the self-reported race/ethnicity was: Hispanic (H) 37.6%, Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) 52.9%, Non-Hispanic White (NHW) 4.7%, and Other (O) 4.7%. At the time of tissue sampling, 61 patients had metastatic disease and 10 were castration-resistant. 63 samples were from the prostate, 7 from bone, 7 from lymph node, 3 from liver and 5 from other soft tissue sites. The most commonly altered genes included: TP53 (26%), TMPRSS2-ERG fusion (23%), and PTEN (17%). Alterations in the androgen receptor were identified in 5 samples (all with CRPC). 32.8% had alterations in DDR genes including BRCA2 9 (10.6%), ATM 7 (8.2%), ATR 4 (4.7%), BRIP1 2 (2.3%), CDK12 3 (3.5%), FANCA 2 (2.3%), and PALB2 1 (1.2%). Alterations in mismatch repair genes (MSH2, MLH1, MSH6, PMS2) were present in 4 (4.7%) patients (3 of these were MSI-H). In samples where tumor mutational burden (TMB) was reported, 4 (4.7%) were TMB-high (3 MSI-H and 1 with POLE mutation). Conclusions: DDR gene mutations are common in this primarily minority population. As DDR mutations become more common in the CRPC setting, our data may underestimate the frequency of DDR mutations as only 10 patients had CRPC at the time of tissue sampling. Minority men, like all men, with prostate cancer should be considered for genomic analysis as results are likely to guide therapeutic decisions.

PrE0807 phase Ib feasibility trial of neoadjuvant nivolumab (N)/lirilumab (L) in cisplatin-ineligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC)

TPS4594

Background: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) improves outcomes but ~50% of patients (pts) are cisplatin-unfit. Anti-PD(L)1 agents can prolong overall survival (OS) in platinum-resistant advanced BC and have shown high pathologic complete response rate (pCR) and safety as single agent in phase II trials in the neoadjuvant setting. The combination of anti-PD-1 and anti-KIR agents is feasible and very attractive based on complementary and non-overlapping roles in regulating adaptive and innate immune response as well as impacting the function CD8+ T and NK-cells. Higher CD8+ T cell density (TCD) at RC tissue correlates with longer OS. We hypothesize, that combining anti-PD1 (N) with anti-KIR (L) is safe and feasible as neoadjuvant therapy in cisplatin-unfit pts and results in high CD8+ TCD at RC. Methods: Phase Ib multi-institutional trial evaluating 2 doses (4 weeks apart) of N alone or N+L in 2 cohorts; pts will be assigned sequentially to N (Cohort 1), and if there is no negative safety signal after the first 12 pts, subsequent pts will be assigned to N+L (Cohort 2). Key eligibility: cT2-4aN0-1M0 stage, ≥20% tumor at TURBT, adequate organ function, no autoimmune disease within 2 years, no concurrent invasive upper urinary tract carcinoma or other active cancer. Primary endpoint: safety based on CTCAE v5.0 measured as the rate of ≥G3 treatment related adverse events (AE). Key secondary endpoints: CD8+ TCD absolute and % change between TURBT and RC, % of pts who do not get RC within 6 weeks after neoadjuvant treatment due to treatment-related AE, % pCR, recurrence-free survival, and evaluation of biomarkers in tumor tissue, blood, urine. Rates of ≥Grade 3 AE with neoadjuvant treatment will be reported along with 90% exact binomial CI. In Cohort 1, maximum CI width is 0.51; in Cohort 2, it is 0.36. Our hypothesis is that the change in CD8+ TCD between TURBT and RC will be about 3 CD8+ T cells / 100 tumor cells within HPF. Up to 43 pts will be enrolled for 36 eligible, treated pts (12:N, 24:N+L). Cohort 1 and 2 have 81% and 98% power, respectively, to detect the hypothesized difference with 1-sided type I error rate of 0.05. Trial is open to accrual in US. Clinical trial information: NCT03532451.

Evaluating non-hormonal therapy in a phase II trial of SM-88 for rising PSA prostate cancer

83

Background: Absolute PSA change is an imperfect surrogate of clinical benefit; CTCs and PSA doubling time (DT) may also be used as a surrogate of progression (PD). Hormone therapy (HT) often leads to a rapid decline in PSA, however non-HT may be effective without causing a decline in absolute PSA or testosterone (T). SM-88, a non-HT novel combination Warburg effect therapy (amino acid analogue, CYP3a4 inducer, mTOR inhibitor and catalyst) does not affect T. We report outcomes leading to subsequent therapies of an ongoing PSA recurrent, non-metastatic PC trial. Methods: Prospective Phase II of rising PSA (per PCWG3), detectable CTCs, and no baseline lesions. Results: Since September 2016, 31 subjects enrolled with 17 on study for > 12 weeks. Mean age 68.9; BMI 28.7; 38% black and 62% post RT. Mean T increased 61 mg/dl from baseline 319 mg/dl (p=0.19). 82% (14/17) subjects experienced an improvement in PSA DT and 67% (10/15) experienced a decline in CTCs of >30%. Overall median PSA DT time on enrollment was 5.3 (1.4 – 37.6) and improved to 6.5 (Wilcoxon p=0.02) (see table). 3/4 subjects with PD failed to maintain a CTC drop >60% vs 2/17 without PD (p=.03); median time to nadir CTC was 3 cycles (1-7). Subjects avoiding subsequent therapy averaged a 50% CTC decline (15-100%). CTC and PSA DT effects were not correlated to T level. AEs possibly related to drug/unrelated were: No grade (G) 4 or 5; 0/1 G3; 1/7 G2; 13/19 G1. As reported elsewhere, typical HT-related side effects were not observed. Including all patients with >1 month of data, from initial diagnosis of PSA rise (median 9 months; 3-18), 96% (22/23) have remained metastases-free and 78% (18/23) remained free of additional HT (p<.05). Clinical trial information: NCT02796898. Conclusions: SM-88 may be a useful either before or as an additive to current PC treatments where normal T may be preferred. SM-88 might not worsen QOL parameters related to T level. An effect on PSA DT and CTCs were demonstrated even in an aggressive doubling time subgroup. Prospective trials are planned to confirm its utility.[Table: see text]

Randomized phase II trial of intravenous ascorbic acid (AA) as an adjunct to pazopanib for metastatic and unresectable clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): A study of Academic and Community Cancer Research United (ACCRU) GU1703

TPS679

Background: AA has re-emerged as a promising anti-cancer agent based on recent knowledge of pharmacokinetics, discovery of unexpected mechanisms of action, and early phase trials with IV AA.(Shenoy et al, Cancer Cell 34: 2018, in press) We hypothesized that ccRCC would be particularly susceptible to anti-cancer effects of IV AA due to: a. TET dependent demethylation of the hypermethylated genome of ccRCC causing re-expression of tumor suppressors (Shenoy et al, AACR 2018 Targeting DNA methylation conf. A11; Hu et al, Clin Cancer Res 20:4349-60, 2014) b. H2O2 production causing intra-tumoral oxidative damage, hypothesized to be enhanced by high iron content in RCC microenvironment c. Intracellular accumulation of dehydroascorbic acid secondary to high HIF activity in ccRCC. Animal data and case reports support the hypothesis. Methods: Trial design: Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed metastatic/ unresectable ccRCC are randomized 1:1 to arm A (pazopanib 800 mg/d plus IV AA 1g/kg 3 times/week) or arm B (pazopanib 800 mg/d). Protocol treatment is for 10 cycles (unless PD, unacceptable AE, alternative therapy, or pt refusal), each cycle being 28 days. Primary endpoint is Treatment Failure-Free rate at 40 weeks (TFF40). Treatment Failure is defined as: Radiographic disease progression, off-protocol treatment due to AE, alternative therapy initiation (except metastasectomy post clinical benefit), or death. Secondary endpoints include OS, PFS, ORR and AE. Statistical methods: 82 eligible pts (41 in each in arm) will provide 81% power to detect a 19% increase of TFF40 from 45% in arm B to 64% in arm A assuming a one-sided type I error rate of 0.19 (EAST 6.4). Correlatives: Epigenetic mechanism: 5mC, 5hmC and H3K27me3 IHC, MeDIP/ hMeDIP seq, RNA seq. H2O2 mechanism: tumor microenvironment iron, tumor catalase IHC. Dehydroascorbic acid mechanism: HIF-1 alpha, HIF-2 alpha, GLUT-1 IHC. Key exclusion criteria: G6PD deficiency, renal disease (Cockcroft Gault CrCl < 55 ml/min). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03334409 Status: Open for accrual in 9/10 planned sites. Funding Source: Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT03334409.

Typical hormone deprivation side effects compared to SM-88 therapy for rising PSA

79

Background: Treatment for rising PSA non-metastatic prostate cancer (nmPC) includes multifaceted hormone therapies (HT) associated with increasing related toxicity; in aggregate the risk benefit ratio is not ideal. We report on the use before HT, of SM-88, a novel combination therapy (amino acid analogue, CYP3A4 inducer, mTOR inhibitor and catalyst) based on the Warburg effect without known hormone related toxicity. Methods: Prospective ongoing Phase II of SM-88 (230 mg po bid) in recurrent nmPC with rising PSA (PCWG3 definition), no radiographically identified metastases at baseline and detectable CTCs. Results: From Sept 2016 to Dec 2017, there have been 31 consented (34 planned) with 23 evaluable (completed > 1 cycle). Mean age 68.9; BMI 28.7; 38% black and 62% post RT. Mean testosterone (T) rose from 319 to 382 ng/dl (p=.19). Typical HT related side-effects were not observed: 96% of subjects reported no hot flashes, 91% no gynecomastia, 83% interest and 61% activity in sex, 78% excellent or nearly so overall health and 74% excellent QOL on at least 50% of their EORTC questionnaires; weight (-0.2 kg), hct (0%), glu (+2 mg/dl), urinary N telopeptide (-4.2 nmol), MAP (normotensives -2 mmHg, hypertensives -3 mmHg), heart rate (-2.4 beats/min), QTc (-3 ms) with no newly emergent >480 ms, serum Ca++ (-0.006 mg/dL), LDH (+6.4 u/L), bsAlkPhos (+6.2 u/L), triglycerides (-5.2 mg/dL), total protein (0.05 g/dL) and albumin (0.02 g/dL). Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio decreased at the end of cycle 1 in 100% (n=5, median 2.4) of those who progressed to subsequent therapy vs 47% of those who did not (p=.05). AEs occurred in 16 subjects: 1 unrelated Grade (G) 3; 0 G 4; 14/26 G 1-2 possibly related to drug. No AEs were related to T levels. From initial diagnosis of PSA rise (median 9, 3-18 months), 96% (22/23) have remained metastases free and 78% (18/23) remained free of additional HT (p<.05). There were no skeletal or cardiovascular events. Conclusions: SM-88 may be useful in delaying the start of HT. While on SM88 subjects did not report any T or therapy related AEs >G2. SM88 may be useful in prostate cancer patients who are more sensitive or vulnerable to HT related toxicity while maintaining stable PSA values. Prospective trials are planned to confirm its utility. Clinical trial information: NCT02796898.

Racial diversity among histology of renal cell carcinoma at an urban medical center

622

Background: Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are more likely to have papillary RCC (pRCC) than Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW). Little is known about the histology of RCC in Hispanics (H). The Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center (MECC) serves a diverse population in the Bronx, NY. We sought to investigate histological subtype-specific associations with established RCC risk factors in an ethnically diverse patient population to elucidate prospective relationships between those factors and racial differences in RCC histology. Methods: : The MECC tumor registry was used to identify patients ≥18 years of age treated with partial or radical nephrectomy between January 2000 and December 2015. An institutional software program and individual chart review were used to obtain demographic data (including self-reported race, age, and sex), pathology data, and RCC risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, renal function, weight). Data were modeled by multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. Results: 1010 RCC cases were identified (232 NHW, 383 NHB, 181 H, and 214 other). Histology was 530 clear cell (ccRCC), 257 papillary (pRCC), 100 chromophobe (cRCC), and 123 other. Individuals with pRCC compared to ccRCC were more likely to be NHB than NHW (OR 4.41; 95%CI 2.81,6.93) and more likely to have a higher Fuhrman grade (OR 1.5; 95%CI 1.03,2.07), but were less likely to be female (OR 0.50; 95%CI 0.35,0.72) or H than NHW (OR 0.518, 95%CI 0.271,0.991). Individuals with cRCC compared to ccRCC were also more likely to be NHB than NHW (OR 2.23, 95%CI 1.06,4.67) and to have higher Fuhrman grade (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.06,3.14). Conclusions: In the MECC dataset, histology of RCC varies by race, confirming earlier reports that non-ccRCC is more common in NHB than NHW. We also report for the first time that pRCC is less common in H than NHW. These associations will be evaluated in additional larger national data sets and may help elucidate reasons for disparate RCC outcomes among various races and ethnicities.

Predict: Evaluation of baseline characteristics predictive of distant metastases in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer—Updated data

253

Background: Metrics predicting a positive imaging test for men presumed M0 castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are not universally accepted/implemented. PREDICT (NCT01981109) evaluates characteristics predictive of a baseline (BL) imaging study positive for distant mets (M1) in men with presumed M0 CRPC, and follows those with confirmed M0 disease to M1 development. Methods: Men with no imaging in the previous 3 months (mos) were enrolled in the registry. Imaging modality to detect mets was at investigator’s discretion. Based on BL imaging, patients were classified as M0 or M1. Results: PREDICT enrolled 224 men, of whom 208 had BL scan/image data; 55 (25%) men presented with undetected M1. Visceral disease was noted in 11% of men presenting with M1 disease; 60% had bone only disease, 18% had nodal only disease and 11% had bone + nodal disease. Bone mets were found in 16% (25/160) of Tc99 scans vs 40% (19/48) of NaF PET (p = 0.0004). Of men with M0 at BL, 37/153 (24%) became M1 at a mean time from study entry of 11.9 mos. Mean follow-up was 28 mos. In these men, the only notable change in laboratory values from BL was PSA (mean: 16 vs 69 ng/mL; p = 0.020) and PSADT (7.7 vs 6.3 mos; p < 0.001). Baseline PSADT was 10.9 (M0) and 5.7 (M1) mos. BL mean laboratory values were significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the M1 vs M0 group for PSA (47 vs 10 ng/mL), alkaline phosphatase (111 vs 77 U/L), and prostatic acid phosphatase (8.2 vs 2.5 ng/mL). Conclusions: A high proportion (25%) of men presented with asymptomatic, occult mets, and 11% of the occult mets involved visceral disease. In men with documented M0 CRPC, approximately a quarter will develop mets in the next 12 mos. Early detection of occult mets will allow patients to initiate therapies shown to improve overall survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01981109.

Analysis of racial differences in histologic subtype and survival in renal cell carcinoma at an urban academic cancer center

e16571

Background: Black patientswithrenal cell carcinoma (RCC) have a unique distribution of histological subtypes and historic worse survival compared to white patients. Little is known about RCC in Hispanics. We investigated histologic and survival differences between racial groups treated for RCC at the Montefiore-Einstein Cancer Center (MECC) in Bronx, NY. Methods: We included via the Cancer Registry 1010 patients who underwent RCC resection at MECC between 2000 and 2015. Demographics, clinical characteristics and pathology reports were collected. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were built to evaluate the association of histology and survival with clinically and statistically significant risk factors in Non-Hispanic White (NHW), Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic (H) patients. Results: 233 patients were NHW (23.1%), 383 NHB (37.9%), 174 H (17.2%), and 220 other race (21.8%). Median age was 61 (range 22, 91). 58% were male. Histology was 529 (52%) clear cell (CC), 255 (25%) papillary (P), 100 (10%) chromophobe, and 126 (12.5%) other. P was more common in NHB (60.5%) compared to NHW (17%) and less common in H (6.3%) patients (P < 0.0001). On multivariate logistic analysis, patients with P vs. CC were more likely to be NHB (OR 5.06; 95% CI 2.92, 8.76; P < 0.0001) and less likely to have a body mass index > 30 (BMI, OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.32, 0.76, P = 0.001) adjusting for age, race, gender, hypertension (HTN), and end stage renal disease (ESRD). Adjusting for above covariates there were no significant differences for C vs. CC. There was no difference in disease free survival (DFS) for NHB vs. NHW (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.44, 1.94; P = 0.841) or H vs. NHW (HR 1.29; 95% CI 0.62, 2.71; P = 0.495) patients adjusting for age, gender, histology, ESRD, and BMI. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) for NHB vs. NHW (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.57, 1.65; P = 0.908) or H vs. NHW (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.79, 2.38; P = 0.256) patients adjusting for the same covariates. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients with RCC, P histology and lower BMI were significantly associated with NHB race. Unlike historic cohorts there was no significant difference in DFS or OS in NHB compared to NHW patients.

Risks and benefits of phase I trials: Eighteen-year experience from a single institution

e18146

Background: Phase I trials are a critical component of drug development; yet are considered non-therapeutic. This leads to recruitment barriers due to provider and patient discomfort. The largest meta-analysis of phase I studies has previously shown a response rate (RR) of 10.6%. Herein we report the results from our institution. Methods: Records of patients enrolled on phase I trials at our institution from January 1999 to December 2016 were reviewed. Recorded data included adverse events (AE); treatment related responses and deaths. Kaplan-Meier analysis and t-test were performed on the reviewed data. Results: During this period 774 patients were accrued on 64 phase I trials [43.8% cytotoxic, 45.3% biological, 6.2% both and 4.7% viral agents]. Primary cancer diagnoses included colorectal (25.2%), ovarian (17.6%), lung (7.8%), uterine (6.6%) and breast (6.1%). In total, 609 patients were evaluable for response, 41.1% had stable disease (SD) and overall RR was 7.7% (complete RR = 1.0%). Patients with overall clinical benefit (SD+response) had lower mean baseline WBC (4.83 vs 5.94 k/uL, p = 0.0008), ANC (2.92 vs 4.12 k/uL, p = 0.00007), platelets (209 vs 246 k/uL, p = 0.00007), LDH (280 vs 346 U/L, p = 0.0055) and higher serum albumin (3.97 vs 3.86 g/dL, p = 0.011) as compared to patients with progressive disease. Grade 3/4 non-hematological and hematological AE were seen in 28.5% and 19.9% patients, respectively. Treatment-related mortality was 0.8%. Patients with baseline LDH below the median (247 U/L) for the cohort had a higher median survival (312 days vs 201 days, p < 0.001, HR 0.61 95% CI 0.51-0.73). The median and mean duration on study were 56 and 87 days, respectively. Conclusions: This is one of the largest single-institution series of phase I oncology trials. Our RR of 7.7% [95% CI 5.9-10.1%] falls within the 95% CI of the RR of a majority of third line (and greater) chemotherapy regimens for solid tumors. Thus, the concept of 'non-therapeutic' nature of phase I studies needs reconsideration.

Quality of life (QOL) analysis from E3805, chemohormonal androgen ablation randomized trial (CHAARTED) in prostate cancer (PrCa)

286

Background: Docetaxel concurrent with androgen deprivation (ADT) for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) improves overall survival over ADT alone. However, docetaxel as a cytotoxic has an adverse event profile that can diminish QOL. Methods: Patients were randomized to ADT plus 6 cycles of docetaxel every 3 weeks (Arm A, N = 397) or ADT alone (Arm B, N = 393). Validated QOL instruments for PrCa and docetaxel including Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)–Prostate were administered at baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months (mos.) after randomization. Paired t-tests were used to examine QOL changes over time. A mixed effect model compared QOL between arms at each time point (Table). Results: 790 patients were randomized and QOL completed for Arm A and B (91% and 88%, baseline; 87% and 80%, 3 mos.; and 70% and 67%, 12 mos.). Patients in Arm A (ADT + docetaxel) reported -2.7 [Standard Error (SE) 0.9] decline in FACT-P at 3 mos. (p = 0.003), but did not differ significantly from baseline at 12 mos. (-0.7, SE 1.1). In contrast, patients in Arm B (ADT alone), did not differ significantly at 3 mos. [-1.1 (SE: 1.0)], but reported a significant decline [-4.2 (SE: 1.1); p = 0.0001] from baseline to 12 mos. FACT-P scores differed significantly between Arm A and B at 3 mos. (p = 0.02) and 12 mos. (0.04), with Arm A lower at 3 mos. and higher at 12 mos. Conclusions: Docetaxel is associated with decreased QOL on treatment (at 3 mos.) not seen with ADT alone. However, 12 mos. QOL was better for the patients who had docetaxel versus ADT alone, returning to baseline. This suggests that docetaxel + ADT does not confer long-term negative impact on QOL for mHSPC. Clinical trial information: NCT00309985. [Table: see text]

Patient characteristics at time of prostate cancer diagnosis in different races at an academic center serving a diverse population

158

Background: In the United States, prostate cancer (PCa) incidence and death rate differ among racial groups. Non-Hispanic Blacks (NHB) have a higher incidence and death rate than non-Hispanic Whites (NHW), whereas incidence and death rate are slightly lower in Hispanics (H) than in NHW. We sought to compare the socioeconomic, demographic and baseline prognostic factors at PCa diagnosis among different races at a large, urban academic center serving a diverse population. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, the Montefiore Medical Center Cancer Registry was used to generate a comprehensive list of patients diagnosed with PCa 2004 to 2013. Clinical Looking Glass (a searchable database of patient information) and individual patient chart review were used to obtain data including age at diagnosis, socioeconomic score (SES), Gleason score, stage at diagnosis and PSA at diagnosis. Patients were classified by self-identified race as H, NHB or NHW. For categorical variables the chi-square test was used, whereas the ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis tests were employed for continuous variables. Results: During the specified period 2352 patients were diagnosed with PCa among which 778 were self-classified as H, 1046 as NHB, 486 as NHW and 42 as other (O). The mean age at diagnosis differed between these groups (H 63.2, NHB 63.4, NHW 67, O 63.0, p < 0.0001). The proportion of men below the mean SES also differed between races (H 92.8%, NHB 91.3%, NHW 56.6%, O 75%, p < 0.0001). Median PSA (ng/ml) at diagnosis was similar (H 8.0, NHB 8.4 NHW 7.2, O 6.4, p = 0.0768) whereas Gleason score differed between racial groups (Gleason ≤ 6: H 42.8%, NHB 39.1%, NHW 52.2%, O 50%; Gleason 8-10: H 15.8%, NHB 17.6%, NHW 14.3%, O 16.7%, p = 0.0005). The proportion of men with metastatic disease at diagnosis also differed significantly in these groups (H 7.5%, NHB 9.0%, NHW 4.3%, O 9.5%, p = 0.0139). Conclusions: At our center, in patients with newly diagnosed PCa, there are significant differences among racial groups. These include age at diagnosis, SES, Gleason score and proportion with metastatic disease. Such differences at diagnosis suggest that minority patients are at risk for inferior PCa outcomes.

Metabolic complications with the use of mTOR inhibitors for cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

398

Background: mTOR inhibitors are approved in several malignancies including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The risk of metabolic complications with these agents is not well characterized. Methods: PubMed was searched for articles published from 2001 until 2011. Eligible studies included prospective randomized trials evaluating temsirolimus, everolimus, and ridaforolimus in patients with all solid tumor malignancies. 16 eligible phase II clinical trials and 8 randomized controlled clinical trials were included in a systematic review and meta-analysis and the number of metabolic related AEs including hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia were extracted. Incidence rates and incident rate ratios were calculated. Results: In total, 24 trials (including 4,261 patients) were included. The average incidence rate of any grade metabolic adverse events and grade 3-4 metabolic adverse events was 0.70 per patient and 0.11 (95% CI, 0.08, 0.15) per patient respectively. Analysis of the 3,317 patients across 8 RCT’s revealed that the log incidence rate ratio (IRR) of any grade metabolic adverse events with mTOR inhibitor therapy compared with control was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.84, 1.31) using a random-effects model. The risk of grade 3-4 adverse events was also increased with an IRR of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.05, 1.99). The IRR of all grade hyperglycemia was 1.08 (95% CI, 0.76, 1.40) and of grade 3-4 hyperglycemia was 1.66 (95% CI, 1.12, 2.20). The IRR of all grade hypertriglyceridemia was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.56, 1.26) and of grade 3-4 hypertriglyceridemia was 0.70 (95% CI,- 0.43, 1.83). The IRR of all grade hypercholesterolemia was 1.21 (95% CI, 0.77, 1.65) and of grade 3-4 hypercholesterolemia was 1.21 (95% CI, 0.77, 1.65). These findings suggest a statistically significant increase in the risk of hyperglycemia, hypercholesterolemia (all grades and grade 3 and 4), and all grade hypertriglyceridemia associated with mTOR therapy when compared with control. Conclusions: The risk of all grade and grade 3-4 metabolic adverse events are increased in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors compared with control. However, grade 3-4 metabolic adverse events remain relatively uncommon.

Pulmonary complications with the use of mTOR inhibitors in targeted cancer therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

362

Background: mTOR inhibitors are approved in several malignancies including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). While pulmonary toxicities are a recognized adverse effect associated with this drug class, the frequency and risk of these side effects have not been well characterized. Methods: Clinical trials of mTOR inhibitors in solid tumors were identified through a search of PubMed and ASCO abstracts. Prospective studies of temsirolimus, everolimus, and ridaforolimus in solid tumors were evaluated for inclusion. 22 eligible phase II and phase III trials that included 4,242 patients were identified and included in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adverse event data was extracted for pulmonary complications including pneumonitis, dyspnea, and cough. The incidence rate and the incidence rate ratios were determined for these pulmonary adverse events. Results: Based on our analysis of the 20 trials that reported pneumonitis, the incidence rate of any grade pneumonitis in patients with solid tumors treated with mTOR inhibitors is 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06-0.17). The incidence rate of grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis is 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.04). The incidence rate ratio of any grade pneumonitis with mTOR inhibitors relative to controls is 18.9 (95% CI, 6.5-55.1), and the incidence rate ratio for the development of grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis is 7.9 (95% CI, 2.6-24.0). The incidence rates of any grade cough and dyspnea were found to be 0.23 (95% CI, 0.20-0.27) and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10-0.21), respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 or 4 cough and dyspnea are found to be 0.01 (95% CI, 0.00-0.01) and 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02-0.04), respectively. There was a statistically significant, but modest increase in risk of developing any grade cough (incidence rate ratio of 1.9 [95% CI, 1.6-2.4]) and grade 3 or 4 dyspnea (incidence rate ratio of 2.0 [95% CI, 1.2-3.3]) with mTOR inhibitors relative to controls. Conclusions: This study confirms that mTOR inhibitors are associated with pulmonary adverse events and provides a quantitative estimation of the risk of these adverse events in solid tumor patients treated with these drugs. The majority of pulmonary adverse events are low grade.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin plus ipilimumab as first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma

TPS4676

Background: While metastatic urothelial carcinoma is a chemosensitive neoplasm, current therapeutic approaches are inadequate. Preclinical and clinical data suggests that bladder cancer is immunogenic. For example, CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes correlate with survival in patients with muscle-invasive disease (Sharma, PNAS, 2007). However, immunotherapeutic approaches have been rarely investigated for advanced urothelial cancer. CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab is a novel approach to immunotherapy that interrupts T-cell pathways responsible for immune down-regulation or tolerance. In a proof of concept study, ipilimumab was administered to 12 patients with muscle-invasive disease preoperatively (Carthon, Clin Can Res, 2010). Treatment resulted in perivascular infiltration of cells positive for CD3, CD8, CD4, and granzyme and intriguing evidence of antitumor activity. In the current trial, we will explore a “phased” schedule of chemotherapy and ipilimumab with the goal of “autovaccinating” patients to tumor antigen with chemotherapy prior to introduction of immune checkpoint blockade. Methods: We have initiated a phase II clinical trial of gemcitabine (G), cisplatin (C), plus ipilimumab in chemonaive patients with unresectable and/or metastatic urothelial cancer within the Hoosier Oncology Group network. During cycles 1 and 2, G (1000 mg/m2 D day 1 + 8) and C (70 mg/m2 D 1) will be administered every 21 days without ipilimumab. During cycles 3-6, GC plus ipilimumab (10 mg/kg day 1) will be administered every 21 days. Patients without evidence of disease progression after completion cycle 6 will continue single-agent ipilimumab “maintenance” every 3 months. The primary objective is to determine the 1-year overall survival. The trial will enroll 36 patients and is powered to detect an improvement in 1-year survival from 60% to 80%. Secondary objectives include progression-free survival, disease control rate, safety, and immunologic outcomes. Correlative studies will include serial measurements of the global composition of immune cells in the blood by polychromatic flow cytometry, whole blood transcriptional profiling, and tumor-antigen specific CD8+ T cells assays.

Prevalence and characteristics of patients with stage IV solid tumors who receive no anticancer therapy

6065

Background: Clinicians caring for patients with cancer are well aware that a subset of patients who present with metastatic solid tumors never receive anticancer therapy for reasons including poor functional status, comorbidities, and patient preference. The prevalence and characteristics of this population have not previously been described. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients diagnosed with metastatic (stage IV) solid tumors including breast, cervix, colon, kidney, small-cell and non-small cell lung [NSCLC and SCLC], prostate, rectum and uterus. Patients who received neither radiation therapy nor systemic therapy were identified. Other factors such as age, race, income, insurance status, and diagnosis year were assessed. In an exploratory analysis, log-binomial regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios (PR) for the proportion of untreated stage IV to treated stage IV cancer cases according to these factors. Results: From 2000-2008, 773,233 patients with stage IV cancer were identified of whom 159,284 (21%) received no anticancer therapy (Table). Patients with NSCLC accounted for 55% of untreated patients. Across all cancer types, older age (PR range 1.37-1.49, all p<0.001), black race (PR range 1.05-1.32, all p<0.001), lack of medical insurance (PR range 1.47-2.46, all p<0.001), and lower income (except uterus) (PR range 0.91-0.98 for every $10,000 income, all p<0.001) were associated with increased prevalence of not receiving treatment. Conclusions: Approximately 20% of patients who present with stage IV solid tumors never receive anticancer therapy. These findings have potential implications with regards to healthcare policy and access to care. [Table: see text]

Trends in the use of cytoreductive nephrectomy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor era

4623

Background: Two large randomized trials (SWOG, EORTC) published in 2001 established the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CyNx) for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the cytokine era. A paradigm shift occurred in 2005 with the approval of VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We hypothesized that uncertainty regarding the role of CyNx in the VEGFR TKI era has resulted in a change in practice patterns. Methods: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) registry, we identified 2780 patients with histologically-confirmed mRCC between 2000 and 2008 who underwent CyNx or no surgery. Patients were separated into pre- or VEGFR TKI-eras (2000-2005 vs. 2006-2008). Differences in baseline characteristics between these patient groups were assessed and controlled for in a logistic regression analysis to determine the likelihood of undergoing CyNx. Results: Overall, 1202 of 2780 patients (43%) underwent CyNx. CyNx increased from 41% in 2000 to 49% in 2005, and decreased to 35% in 2008, with a 20% decreased likelihood of undergoing CyNx in the VEGFR TKI era compared to the pre-VEGFR TKI era. Logistic regression analysis showed that tumor size, age, race, marital status and pre- versus post-2005 periods were independent predictors of CyNx (Table). Patients who were non-Caucasian, single, with primary tumor <3cm, or older were less likely to undergo CyNx. Conclusions: Use of CyNx increased after supporting level I evidence was published in 2001, and decreased after regulatory approval of VEGFR TKIs in 2005. Racial and demographic differences exist in the utilization of CyNx. The results of pending randomized trials evaluating the role of CyNx in the TKI-era are awaited to optimize use of this modality and address potential disparities. [Table: see text]