Persistence and Adherence to PCSK9 Inhibitor Monoclonal Antibodies Versus Ezetimibe in Real-World Settings

INTRODUCTION

The cardiovascular disease risk reduction benefits of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9i mAb) and ezetimibe are dependent on remaining on treatment and being persistent and adherent. We estimated the percentage of patients on therapy, persistent and adherent at 182 and 365 days among US adults with health insurance who initiated a PCSK9i mAb (n = 16,588) or ezetimibe (n = 83,086) between July 2015 and December 2019.

METHODS

Using pharmacy fill claims, being on therapy was defined as having a day of medication supply in the last 60 of 182 and 365 days following treatment initiation, being persistent was defined as not having a gap of 60 days or more between the last day of supply from one prescription fill and the next fill, and being adherent was defined by having medication available to take on ≥ 80% of the 182 and 365 days following treatment initiation. We estimated multivariable-adjusted risk ratios for being persistent and adherent comparing patients initiating PCSK9i mAb versus ezetimibe using Poisson regression.

RESULTS

At 182 days following initiation, 80% and 68% were on therapy and 76% and 64% were persistent among patients who initiated a PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe, respectively. Among patients who were on therapy and persistent at 182 days following initiation, 88% and 81% of those who initiated a PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe, respectively, were on therapy at 365 days. Among those on therapy and persistent at 182 days following initiation, being persistent and being adherent at 365 days were each more common among PCSK9i mAb versus ezetimibe initiators (persistent: 82% versus 76%, multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.08; adherent: 74% versus 71%, multivariable-adjusted risk ratio 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest approaches to increase persistence and adherence to PCSK9i mAb and ezetimibe should be implemented prior to or within 182 days following treatment initiation.

Practical solutions for implementation of blood cholesterol guidelines in clinical practice

Underutilization of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and failure to attain guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals are important quality gaps in cardiovascular risk optimization, especially among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Large database analyses demonstrate an unmet need for improved LDL-C measurement, and that nearly 75% of patients with ASCVD have an LDL-C level above guideline-recommended levels, and greater than 50% are not treated with statins or ezetimibe. Proposed solutions for overcoming these obstacles to optimal lipid management include provider- and patient-facing educational interventions, health information technology strategies, implementation of incentive-based care, advocacy efforts, and systems-based process innovations. While individual interventions may not be enough to overcome the totality of barriers to optimal LLT, comprehensive multifaceted approaches that address barriers at the provider, patient, and healthcare delivery level are likely to offer the greatest likelihood of success and improved patient outcomes.

Recurrent Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Events Potentially Prevented with Guideline-Recommended Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy following Myocardial Infarction

PURPOSE

Many adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) who are recommended to take a statin, ezetimibe and/or a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) by the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology cholesterol guideline do not receive these medications. We estimated the percentage of recurrent ASCVD events potentially prevented with guideline-recommended cholesterol-lowering therapy following a myocardial infarction (MI) hospitalization.

METHODS

We conducted simulations using data from US adults with government health insurance through Medicare or commercial health insurance in the MarketScan database. We used data from patients with an MI hospitalization in 2018-2019 to estimate the percentage receiving guideline-recommended therapy. We used data from patients with an MI hospitalization in 2013-2016 to estimate the 3-year cumulative incidence of recurrent ASCVD events (i.e., MI, coronary revascularization or ischemic stroke). The low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction with guideline-recommended therapy was derived from trials of statins, ezetimibe and PCSK9i, and the associated ASCVD risk reduction was estimated from a meta-analysis by the Cholesterol-Lowering Treatment Trialists Collaboration.

RESULTS

Among 279,395 patients with an MI hospitalization in 2018-2019 (mean age 75 years, mean LDL-C 92 mg/dL), 27.3% were receiving guideline-recommended cholesterol-lowering therapy. With current cholesterol-lowering therapy use, 25.3% (95%CI: 25.2%-25.4%) of patients had an ASCVD event over 3 years. If all patients were to receive guideline-recommended therapy, 19.8% (95%CI: 19.5%-19.9%) were estimated to have an ASCVD event over 3 years, representing a 21.6% (95%CI: 20.5%-23.6%) relative risk reduction.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of guideline-recommended cholesterol-lowering therapy could prevent a substantial percentage of recurrent ASCVD events.

Estimated number and percentage of US adults with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease recommended add-on lipid-lowering therapy by the 2018 AHA/ACC multi-society cholesterol guideline

Study objective

The 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) cholesterol guideline recommends a maximally-tolerated statin with add-on lipid-lowering therapy, ezetimibe and/or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) for adults with very-high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk to achieve a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) <70 mg/dL. We estimated the percentage of US adults with ASCVD recommended, by the 2018 AHA/ACC cholesterol guideline, and receiving add-on lipid-lowering therapy.

Design setting and participants

Cross-sectional study including 805 participants from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2020 data. NHANES sampling weights were used to obtain estimates for the US adult population.

Main measures

Very-high ASCVD risk was defined as either: ≥2 ASCVD events, or one ASCVD event with ≥2 high-risk conditions. Being recommended add-on lipid-lowering therapy was defined as having very-high ASCVD risk and LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL, or LDL-C < 70 mg/dL while taking ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor.

Results

An estimated 18.7 (95%CI, 16.0-21.4) million US adults had ASCVD, of whom 81.6 % (95%CI, 76.7 %-86.4 %) had very-high ASCVD risk, and 60.1 % (95%CI, 54.5 %-65.7 %) had very-high ASCVD risk and LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. Overall, 61.4 % (95%CI, 55.8 %-66.9 %) were recommended add-on lipid-lowering therapy and 3.2 % (95 % CI, 1.2 %-5.3 %) were taking it. Smokers, adults with diabetes, hypertension and chronic kidney disease were more likely, while those taking atorvastatin or rosuvastatin were less likely, to be recommended add-on lipid-lowering therapy.

Conclusion

The majority of US adults with ASCVD are recommended add-on lipid-lowering therapy by the 2018 AHA/ACC cholesterol guideline but few are receiving it.

Hot topics in interventional cardiology: Proceedings from the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions (SCAI) 2021 think tank

The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) Think Tank is a collaborative venture that brings together interventional cardiologists, administrative partners, and select members of the cardiovascular industry community annually for high-level field-wide discussions. The 2021 Think Tank was organized into four parallel sessions reflective of the field of interventional cardiology: (a) coronary intervention, (b) endovascular medicine, (c) structural heart disease, and (d) congenital heart disease. Each session was moderated by a senior content expert and co-moderated by a member of SCAI's Emerging Leader Mentorship program. This document presents the proceedings to the wider cardiovascular community in order to enhance participation in this discussion, create additional dialog from a broader base, and thereby aid SCAI, the industry community and external stakeholders in developing specific action items to move these areas forward.

[Homogenization of the specimens for culturing mycobacteria by means of the detergents Präwozell N-BX and ditalan E (author's transl)]

In cooperation of four laboratories the efficiency of the two detergents Präwozell N-BX (Nekal BX) and Ditalan E used for homogenization of diagnostic specimens for cultural investigations on tuberculosis was compared. The pretreatment of sputum specimens was done according to the directions given in "DAB 7 (D.L.) - DDR" [German Pharmacopocia 7(Diagnostic laboratory methods) GDR]. Percentage of positive cultures, time of growth and rate of contamination were evaluated. Comparative investigations with both methods using the same sputum specimens were performed with 2117 samples. 245 cultures were positive in all, 223 (91,0%) of them after homogenization by means of Präwozell N-BX and 205 (83,7%) pretreated with Ditalan E. Out of 161 cultures positive with both methods, the time of growth was shorter at least one week in 19 samples (12%) after using Präwozell N-BX and in 55 specimens (34%) homogenized by means of Ditalan E than in the parallel culture. The number of contaminations was 18 (0,85%) after Ditalan E pretreatment and 10 (0,47%) after Präwozell N-BX homogenization. Taking as a basis the directives concerning the cultural investigations for mycobacteria Ditalan E did not show better results than those found with Präwozell N-BX.