Early neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduces the loss of muscle mass in critically ill patients - A within subject randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (NMES) on muscle thickness, strength and morphological and molecular markers of the quadriceps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult critically ill patients with an expected prolonged stay received unilateral quadriceps NMES sessions for 7 consecutive days. Before and after the intervention period, quadriceps thickness was measured with ultrasound. After the intervention period, strength was assessed in cooperative patients and muscle biopsies were taken. Multivariable regression was performed to identify factors affecting muscle thickness loss.

RESULTS

Muscle thickness decreased less in the stimulated leg (-6 ± 16% versus -12 ± 15%, p = 0.014, n = 47). Strength was comparable. Opioid administration, minimal muscle contraction and more muscle thickness loss in the non-stimulated muscle were independently associated with better muscle thickness preservation. Stimulated muscles showed a shift towards larger myofibers and higher MyHC-I gene expression. NMES did not affect gene expression of other myofibrillary proteins, MuRF-1 or atrogin-1. Signs of myofiber necrosis and inflammation were comparable for both muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

NMES attenuated the loss of muscle mass, but not of strength, in critically ill patients. Preservation of muscle mass was more likely in patients receiving opioids, patients with a minimal muscle contraction during NMES and patients more prone to lose muscle mass.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.govNCT02133300.

Early mobilization in clinical practice: the reliability and feasibility of the 'Start To Move' Protocol

PURPOSE

The properties of a local Intensive Care Unit early mobilization protocol ('Start To Move As Soon As Possible') in critically ill patients, consisting of an objective diagnostic assessment linked to six treatment levels were evaluated. This study aimed to investigate whether the protocol can be reliably applied by different health-care providers (reliability), to examine the associations between prescribed and delivered treatments (feasibility) and to explore safety and patient satisfaction with the protocol.

METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study evaluating the reliability of the protocol between physiotherapist was evaluated with Cohen's kappa, percentage of agreement, and intraclass correlation coefficients in 61 patients. Feasibility was analyzed as agreement between prescribed and delivered treatments with Spearman's rank correlation coefficients in 60 patients. A satisfaction survey was used to evaluate patient satisfaction with the protocol.

RESULTS

Excellent agreement was observed between physiotherapists for diagnostic level assignment (Kappa = 0.92), while the majority of the treatment proposals per level showed moderate to substantial agreement between the physiotherapists (Kappa range: 0.40-0.89). Three hundred and thirteen treatments were prescribed. Perfect agreement was observed between prescribed and delivered treatments in level 0 (Spearman's rho 1.00) and excellent associations for levels 1-5 (0.941, 0.995, 0.951, 0.998, and 0.999), respectively. Unwanted safety events rate was 3%. Most patients (92%) were very satisfied with physiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Excellent inter-rater agreement for diagnostic level assignment and moderate to substantial agreement for proposed treatments support the reliability of the protocol. Perfect to excellent associations between prescribed and delivered treatments supports its feasibility. Complications were rare, and most patients were very positive regarding the care provided by physiotherapists during their stay in the ICU.