Accuracy of Leg Length and Hip Offset Measurements Using a Fluoroscopic Grid During Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Minimizing leg length (LLD) and hip offset (OD) discrepancies is critical for tissue tension and implant longevity in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The direct anterior approach (DAA) helps surgeons recreate these values under fluoroscopy. Several methods to accomplish this have been described, with no consensus on which is superior. This study evaluated the ability to minimize LLD and OD using a surgeon-controlled, adjustable fluoroscopic grid. We hypothesized that this tool would recreate parameters to within 10 mm of the contralateral side.

Methods

One hundred eleven primary THAs performed with an adjustable radiopaque grid to equalize leg length and hip offset were retrospectively reviewed. These values were measured on postoperative radiographs and compared to the contralateral hip. Patients were excluded if they had inadequate imaging, revision arthroplasty, preexisting deformities, or underwent approaches other than DAA.

Results

Mean age was 59.1 ± 11.1 years, 63.1% of patients were female, and average body mass index was 27.8 ± 7.0. Mean LLD was 3.7 ± 3.0 mm, while mean OD was 4.6 ± 3.6 mm. 95.5% of hips showed LLD < 10 mm, while 93.7% of hips had OD < 10 mm. Furthermore, 76.6% of hips had LLD < 5 mm, while 62.2% of hips had OD < 5 mm.

Conclusions

The described technique restored limb length and hip offset during DAA THA. This technique yields consistent results and offers an inexpensive alternative to costly digital software and more cumbersome fixed grid systems.

Acellular dermal matrix augmentation significantly increases ultimate load to failure of pectoralis major tendon repair: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that standard pectoralis major tendon (PMT) repairs have inferior strength compared with native tendon.

HYPOTHESIS

Augmentation of PMT repair with an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) will increase the ultimate load to failure.

METHODS

Eighteen cadaveric specimens were allocated to 3 repair groups: standard repair (SR); augmented repair (AR) with ADM; and intact, native tendon (NT). Specimens were tested for cyclic elongation, linear stiffness, load to 5 mm displacement, maximum load to failure, and method of failure.

RESULTS

Maximum load to failure in AR (1450 ± 295 N) was significantly higher than SR (921 ± 159 N; P = .0042) and equivalent to NT (1289 ± 240 N; P = .49). NT required the highest load to displace 5 mm (709 ± 202 N), which was higher than AR (346 ± 95 N; P < .001) and SR (375 ± 55; P = .0015). NT stiffness (125 ± 42 N/mm) was greater than the AR (69 ± 19 N/mm; P = .0073) or SR (75 ± 11 N/mm; P = .015). The mode of failure for SR was suture pullout from the PMT as opposed to button pullout from the humerus (fracture) for AR.

CONCLUSION

ADM augmentation of PMT repair significantly increases ultimate load to failure.

Slope-reducing tibial osteotomy decreases ACL-graft forces and anterior tibial translation under axial load

PURPOSE

Posterior tibial slope (PTS) represents an important risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure, as seen in clinical studies. An anterior closing wedge osteotomy for slope reduction was performed to investigate the effect on ACL-graft forces and femoro-tibial kinematics in an ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee in a biomechanical setup.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric knees with a relatively high native slope (mean ± SD): (slope 10° ± 1.4°, age 48.2 years ± 5.8) were selected based on prior CT measurements. A 10° anterior closing-wedge osteotomy was fixed with an external fixator in the ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee (quadruple Semi-T/Gracilis-allograft). Each condition was randomly tested with both the native tibial slope and the post-osteotomy reduced slope. Axial loads (200 N, 400 N), anterior tibial draw (134 N), and combined loads were applied to the tibia while mounted on a free moving and rotating X-Y table. Throughout testing, 3D motion tracking captured anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation (ITR). Change of forces on the reconstructed ACL-graft (via an attached load-cell) were recorded, as well.

RESULTS

ATT was significantly decreased after slope reduction in the ACL-deficient knee by 4.3 mm ± 3.6 (p < 0.001) at 200 N and 6.2 mm ± 4.3 (p < 0.001) at 400N of axial load. An increase of ITR of 2.3° ±2.8 (p < 0.001) at 200 N and by 4.0° ±4.1 (p < 0.001) at 400 N was observed after the osteotomy. In the ACL-reconstructed knee, ACL-graft forces decreased after slope reduction osteotomy by a mean of 14.7 N ± 9.8 (p < 0.001) at 200 N and 33.8 N ± 16.3 (p < 0.001) at 400N axial load, which equaled a relative decrease by a mean of 17.0% (SD ± 9.8%), and 33.1% (SD ± 18.1%), respectively. ATT and ITR were not significantly changed in the ACL-reconstructed knee. Testing of a tibial anterior drawing force in the ACL-deficient knee led to a significantly increased ATT by 2.7 mm ± 3.6 (p < 0.001) after the osteotomy. The ACL-reconstructed knee did not show a significant change (n.s.) in ATT after the osteotomy. However, ACL-graft forces detected a significant increase by 13.0 N ± 8.3 (p < 0.001) after the osteotomy with a tibial anterior drawer force, whereas the additional axial loading reduced this difference due to the osteotomy (5.3 N ± 12.6 (n.s.)).

CONCLUSIONS

Slope-reducing osteotomy decreased anterior tibial translation in the ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knee under axial load, while internal rotation of the tibia increased in the ACL-deficient status after osteotomy. Especially in ACL revision surgery, the osteotomy protects the reconstructed ACL with significantly lower forces on the graft under axial load.