miR-129-5p inhibits anchorage-independent growth through silencing of ACTN1 and the ELK4/c-FOS axis in HPV-transformed keratinocytes

A persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) can induce precancerous lesions of the cervix that may ultimately develop into cancer. Cervical cancer development has been linked to altered microRNA (miRNA) expression, with miRNAs regulating anchorage-independent growth being particularly important for the progression of precancerous lesions to cancer. In this study, we set out to identify and validate targets of miR-129-5p, a previously identified tumor suppressive miRNA involved in anchorage-independent growth and HPV-induced carcinogenesis. We predicted 26 potential miR-129-5p targets using online databases, followed by KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. RT-qPCR and luciferase assays confirmed that 3'UTR regions of six genes (ACTN1, BMPR2, CAMK4, ELK4, EP300, and GNAQ) were targeted by miR-129-5p. Expressions of ACTN1, CAMK4, and ELK4 were inversely correlated to miR-129-5p expression in HPV-transformed keratinocytes, and their silencing reduced anchorage-independent growth. Concordantly, miR-129-5p overexpression decreased protein levels of ACTN1, BMPR2, CAMK4 and ELK4 in anchorage-independent conditions. Additionally, c-FOS, a downstream target of ELK4, was downregulated upon miR-129-5p overexpression, suggesting regulation through the ELK4/c-FOS axis. ACTN1 and ELK4 expression was also upregulated in high-grade precancerous lesions and cervical cancers, supporting their clinical relevance. In conclusion, we identified six targets of miR-129-5p involved in the regulation of anchorage-independent growth, with ACTN1, BMPR2, ELK4, EP300, and GNAQ representing novel targets for miR-129-5p. For both ACTN1 and ELK4 functional and clinical relevance was confirmed, indicating that miR-129-5p-regulated ACTN1 and ELK4 expression contributes to HPV-induced carcinogenesis.

Current preconception care practice in the Netherlands - An evaluation study among birth care professionals

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current practice of preconception care in the Netherlands and the perceptions of birth care professionals concerning preconception care.

METHODS

We have developed a digital questionnaire and conducted a cross-sectional study by distributing the questionnaire among 102 organisations: 90 primary care midwifery practices and obstetric departments of 12 hospitals in the Southwest region of the Netherlands between December 2020 and March 2021. One birth care professional per organization was asked to complete the questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to present the results.

FINDINGS

Respondents of eighty-three organisations (81.4 %) filled in the questionnaire, of whom 74 respondents were independent primary care midwives and 9 respondents were obstetricians. Preconception care mostly consisted of an individual consultation in which personalized health and lifestyle advice was given. Among the respondents, 44.4 % reported that the organization had a preconception care protocol. The way in which the consultation was carried out, as well as the health and lifestyle related questions asked, differed between respondents. More than 85 % of the respondents inquire about the following possible risk factors for complications: maternal illnesses, obstetric history, folic acid supplement intake, alcohol intake, smoking, substance abuse, hereditary disease, prescription medication, dietary habits, overweight, and birth defects in the family. The respondents acknowledged that preconception care should be offered to all couples who wish to become pregnant, as opposed to offering preconception care only to those with an increased risk of complications. Still, respondents do not receive many questions regarding the preconception period or requests for preconception care consultations.

KEY CONCLUSION

Birth care professionals acknowledge the need for preconception care for all couples. In the Netherlands, preconception care consists mostly of an individual consultation with recommendations for health and lifestyle advice. However, the identification of risk factors varies between birth care professionals and less than half of the respondents indicate that they have a protocol available in their practice. Furthermore, the demand of parents-to-be for preconception care is low. More research, that includes more obstetricians, is necessary to investigate if there is a difference between the care provided by primary care midwives and obstetricians.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

To increase the awareness and uptake of preconception care, it would be prudent to emphasize its importance to parents-to-be and professionals, and actively promote the use of widespread, standardized protocols for birth care professionals.