The Impact of NUTRItional Status at First Medical Oncology Visit on Clinical Outcomes: The NUTRIONCO Study

Malnutrition affects up to 75% of cancer patients and results from a combination of anorexia and metabolic dysregulation. Metabolic and nutritional abnormalities in cancer patients can lead to cachexia, a multifactorial syndrome characterized by involuntary loss of skeletal muscle mass, systemic inflammation and increased protein catabolism. Cancer cachexia negatively affects patients' outcomes, response to anticancer treatments, quality of life, and survival. However, risk of malnutrition, and cachexia are still under-recognized in cancer patients. The Prevalence of Malnutrition in Oncology (PreMiO) study revealed that 51% of patients already had nutritional deficiencies at their first medical oncology visit. Here, we report the results of the subsequent retrospective, observational NUTRItional status at first medical oncology visit ON Clinical Outcomes (NUTRIONCO) study, aimed at assessing the impact of baseline nutritional and non-nutritional variables collected in the PreMiO study on the clinical outcomes of the same patients followed up from August 2019 to October 2021. We have highlighted a statistically significant association between baseline variables and patient death, rehospitalization, treatment toxicity, and disease progression at follow-up. We found a higher overall survival probability in the well-nourished general study population vs. malnourished patients (p < 0.001). Of major interest is the fact that patient stratification revealed that malnutrition decreased survival probability in non-metastatic patients but not in metastatic patients (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that baseline malnutrition (p = 0.004) and VAS score for appetite loss (p = 0.0104), in addition to albumin < 35 g/L (p < 0.0001) and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio > 3 (p = 0.0007), were independently associated with the death of non-metastatic patients at follow-up. These findings highlight the importance of proactive, early management of malnutrition and cachexia in cancer patients, and in particular, in non-metastatic patients, from the perspective of a substantial improvement of their clinical outcomes.

Folinic acid in colorectal cancer: esquire or fellow knight? Real-world results from a mono institutional, retrospective study

The stock of therapeutic weapons available in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been progressively grown over the years, with improving both survival and patients' clinical outcome: notwithstanding advances in the knowledge of mCRC biology, as well as advances in treatment, fluoropyrimidine antimetabolite drugs have been for 30 years the mainstay of chemotherapy protocols for this malignancy. 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) seems to act differently depending on administration method: elastomer-mediated continuous infusion better inhibits Thymidylate Synthase (TS), an enzyme playing a pivotal role in DNA synthetic pathway. TS overexpression is an acknowledged poor prognosis predicting factor. The simultaneous combination of 5FU and folinate salt synergistically strengthens fluorouracil cytotoxic effect. In our experience, levofolinate and 5FU together in continuous infusion prolong progression free survival of patients suffering from mCRC, moreover decreasing death risk and showing a clear clinical benefit for patients, irrespective of RAS mutational status, primitive tumor side and metastases surgery.

Breakthrough Cancer Pain Clinical Features and Differential Opioids Response: A Machine Learning Approach in Patients With Cancer From the IOPS-MS Study

PURPOSE

A large proportion of patients with cancer suffer from breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). Several unmet clinical needs concerning BTcP treatment, such as optimal opioid dosages, are being investigated. In this analysis the hypothesis, we explore with an unsupervised learning algorithm whether distinct subtypes of BTcP exist and whether they can provide new insights into clinical practice.

METHODS

Partitioning around a k-medoids algorithm on a large data set of patients with BTcP, previously collected by the Italian Oncologic Pain Survey group, was used to identify possible subgroups of BTcP. Resulting clusters were analyzed in terms of BTcP therapy satisfaction, clinical features, and use of basal pain and rapid-onset opioids. Opioid dosages were converted to a unique scale and the BTcP opioids-to-basal pain opioids ratio was calculated for each patient. We used polynomial logistic regression to catch nonlinear relationships between therapy satisfaction and opioid use.

RESULTS

Our algorithm identified 12 distinct BTcP clusters. Optimal BTcP opioids-to-basal pain opioids ratios differed across the clusters, ranging from 15% to 50%. The majority of clusters were linked to a peculiar association of certain drugs with therapy satisfaction or dissatisfaction. A free online tool was created for new patients’ cluster computation to validate these clusters in future studies and provide handy indications for personalized BTcP therapy.

CONCLUSION

This work proposes a classification for BTcP and identifies subgroups of patients with unique efficacy of different pain medications. This work supports the theory that the optimal dose of BTcP opioids depends on the dose of basal opioids and identifies novel values that are possibly useful for future trials. These results will allow us to target BTcP therapy on the basis of patient characteristics and to define a precision medicine strategy also for supportive care.

Prevalence of malnutrition in patients at first medical oncology visit: the PreMiO study

BACKGROUND

In cancer patients, malnutrition is associated with treatment toxicity, complications, reduced physical functioning, and decreased survival. The Prevalence of Malnutrition in Oncology (PreMiO) study identified malnutrition or its risk among cancer patients making their first medical oncology visit. Innovatively, oncologists, not nutritionists, evaluated the nutritional status of the patients in this study.

METHODS

PreMiO was a prospective, observational study conducted at 22 medical oncology centers across Italy. For inclusion, adult patients (>18 years) had a solid tumor diagnosis, were treatment-naive, and had a life expectancy >3 months. Malnutrition was identified by the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), appetite status with a visual analog scale (VAS), and appetite loss with a modified version of Anorexia-Cachexia Subscale (AC/S-12) of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia-Cachexia Therapy (FAACT).

FINDINGS

Of patients enrolled (N=1,952), 51% had nutritional impairment; 9% were overtly malnourished, and 43% were at risk for malnutrition. Severity of malnutrition was positively correlated with the stage of cancer. Over 40% of patients were experiencing anorexia, as reported in the VAS and FAACT questionnaire. During the prior six months, 64% of patients lost weight (1-10 kg).

INTERPRETATION

Malnutrition, anorexia, and weight loss are common in cancer patients, even at their first visit to a medical oncology center.

Breakthrough Cancer Pain: Preliminary Data of The Italian Oncologic Pain Multisetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS)

Introduction

An ongoing national multicenter survey [Italian Oncologic Pain multiSetting Multicentric Survey (IOPS-MS)] is evaluating the characteristics of breakthrough cancer pain (BTP) in different clinical settings. Preliminary data from the first 1500 cancer patients with BTP enrolled in this study are presented here.

Methods

Thirty-two clinical centers are involved in the survey. A diagnosis of BTP was performed by a standard algorithm. Epidemiological data, Karnofsky index, stage of disease, presence and sites of metastases, ongoing oncologic treatment, and characteristics of background pain and BTP and their treatments were recorded. Background pain and BTP intensity were measured. Patients were also questioned about BTP predictability, BTP onset (≤10 or >10 min), BTP duration, background and BTP medications and their doses, time to meaningful pain relief after BTP medication, and satisfaction with BTP medication. The occurrence of adverse reactions was also assessed, as well as mucosal toxicity.

Results

Background pain was well controlled with opioid treatment (numerical rating scale 3.0 ± 1.1). Patients reported 2.5 ± 1.6 BTP episodes/day with a mean intensity of 7.5 ± 1.4 and duration of 43 ± 40 min; 977 patients (65.1%) reported non-predictable BTP, and 1076 patients (71.7%) reported a rapid onset of BTP (≤10 min). Higher patient satisfaction was reported by patients treated with fast onset opioids.

Conclusions

These preliminary data underline that the standard algorithm used is a valid tool for a proper diagnosis of BTP in cancer patients. Moreover, rapid relief of pain is crucial for patients’ satisfaction. The final IOPS-MS data are necessary to understand relationships between BTP characteristics and other clinical variables in oncologic patients.

Funding

Molteni Farmaceutici, Italy.

Gefitinib in non-small cell lung carcinoma: a case report of an unusual side effect and complete response in advanced disease

Gefitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, indicated in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in all lines of treatment for patients harboring EGFR mutations. It has a favorable toxicity profile but may induce unexpected adverse effects, such as an infiammatory reaction in the bladder. We report a rare case of hemorrhagic cystitis, an unusual side effect, in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib, which did not compromise the clinical response.

Gefitinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Case Report of an Unusual Side Effect and Complete Response in Advanced Disease

Gefitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, indicated in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in all lines of treatment for patients harboring EGFR mutations. It has a favorable toxicity profile but may induce unexpected adverse effects, such as an infiammatory reaction in the bladder. We report a rare case of hemorrhagic cystitis, an unusual side effect, in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer treated with gefitinib, which did not compromise the clinical response.

The therapy of kidney cancer with biomolecular drugs

PURPOSE

Over the last few years, targeted agents have assumed a predominant role in treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Our aim is to discuss recent developments on this rapidly evolving topic.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Sunitinib represents front-line standard treatment for the good- and intermediate prognosis groups of patients with clear cell renal carcinoma. Bevacizumab/interferon and pazopanib have also been FDA-approved as first-line agents, while sorafenib has moved toward second-line and later therapy. Temsirolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, is recommended as front line therapy for patients in the poor-risk group and is the best front-line choice for patients with non-clear cell histology. Another mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, has shown clinical benefit post-tyrosine kinasis inhibitors failure in a phase III study and is considered the standard of care in this setting. Novel prognostic and efficacy markers might help to define most appropriate therapeutic strategy. Best sequence of use of these effective agents in mRCC patients remains up to the discretion of treating physician.

CONCLUSIONS

In light of the considerable advances in understanding the biology of mRCC, several new drugs have been recently developed, with an increasing number of treatment options. Several markers are under evaluation for diagnostic, prognostic and efficacy purposes. A treatment algorithm, based on the best scientific evidence produce so far, is presented and it will evolve as data from ongoing trials will be available.

Panitumumab a novel drug in cancer treatment

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a member of the erbB family overexpressed in most of the solid tumors. In cancer cells, the overexpression of EGFR correlates with the development and the progression of tumor. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that blocks the extracellular domain of the EGFR and has not been associated with the formation of any antibodies directed against it. This review summarizes on the preclinical and clinical development of panitumumab in human solid tumors. As bevacizumab and cetuximab have been approved for colorectal cancer because of their improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival when associated with chemotherapy, panitumumab represents an interesting molecule which needs more phase III studies to validate its efficacy.

Intermediate and high grade malignant non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: preliminary results using a new combination regimen (EVE-COPEM)

Between 1988 and 1992, 60 patients with intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) were treated with a new multidrug combination chemotherapy including 4'epidoxorubicin (25 mg/m2), etoposide (60 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m2), administered intravenously (i.v.) on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day every 4 weeks, prednisone (40 mg/m2) orally for 6 days every 4 weeks, vincristine (1 mg/m2) i.v. and methotrexate (400 mg/m2) i.v. on the 8th day every 4 weeks, vindesine (2.5 mg/m2) and cytarabine (200 mg/m2) on the 15th day every 4 weeks. Patients achieving apparent complete remission (CR) or good partial response (PR) after the 1st cycle of therapy were submitted to three other cycles of the same therapy. Patients failing to respond to the 1st cycle or whose disease progressed despite therapy, were treated with an alternative 2nd line therapy. Seventeen patients (28%) had stage II-II E, 15 (25%) stage III and 28 (47%) stage IV disease. Tumoral mass > 10 cm was found in 28 cases, the presence of extranodal sites (ES) in 32 cases, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 240 IU/l in 34 cases, performance status (PS) > or = 2 in 12 cases. CR was obtained in 46 (76.4%) out of the 60 patients. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was 82, 64 and 61% with a median follow-up of 12, 24 and 36 months respectively. No relapse occurred later than 26 months after achievement with CR thus far. Overall survival (OS) was 77% at 12 months and calculated to be 62% and 59% at 24 and 36 months, respectively. Two patients died as a result of the treatment. Reversible myelosuppression was the main toxic effect. One hundred and ten out of the 221 cycles of chemotherapy were delayed because of therapy toxicity. Negative prognostic factors on the RFS and OS were the presence of an advanced stage of disease, a mass larger than 10 cm, the presence of ES, the elevated LDH, the PS > or = 2, the delay of therapy. In conclusion, results obtained using our protocol overlap those from other third generation regimens. Toxicity was also similar. The influence of clinical conditions such as stage of disease, the presence of ES, high LDH level and tumoral mass > 10 cm on the RFS and OS were significant. Principal variables influencing prognosis must be unified to compare results of similar treatments from different institutions.