1
|
Ural Z, Helvacı Ö, Özbaş B, Güz G, Derici Ü. Unexpected Late Response to Ofatumumab in Adult Post-Transplantation Recurrent Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, Case Report. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:1632-1635. [PMID: 35853766 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Idiopathic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is an important cause of kidney failure in adults, which is associated with a high risk of disease recurrence after transplantation. Plasmapheresis, rituximab, immunoadsorption, and high-dose cyclosporine are used to treat post-transplant recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (rFSGS). However, the response rate is variable, and few options remain for unresponsive patients. CASE REPORT We present a 44-year-old man with an early post-transplant rFSGS. After peritransplant plasmapheresis, rituximab, and abatacept treatments failed, we employed ofatumumab. After 9 months without apparent benefit, we observed an unexpected partial remission thereafter, without severe side effects. Furthermore, remission has been sustained in 30-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS We believe ofatumumab can be considered an alternative for patients with plasmapheresis and rituximab-resistant post-transplant rFSGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep Ural
- Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Özant Helvacı
- Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Özbaş
- Erciyes University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Galip Güz
- Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ülver Derici
- Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Özbaş B, Keskin O, Hecker H, Karahan I, Özbaş C, Kalkan Ç, Kartal A, Önder FO, Öncü BK, Gençdal G, Akyildiz M, Günşar F, Idilman R, Weissenborn K, Özütemiz Ö, Yurdaydin C. Determination of Turkish norms of psychometric tests for diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy and proposal of a high sensitive screening test battery. Hepatol Int 2021; 15:1442-1455. [PMID: 34085147 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-021-10207-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score (PHES) needs local standardization. AIMS This study aimed at standardizing PHES for Turkish patients and compare them with German norms; to determine minimal hepatic encephalopathy (mHE) prevalence with two different methods [PHES battery and Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF)] and to assess whether sub-tests of the battery can be used for screening for mHE. METHODS Healthy volunteers (n = 816; 400 male) and cirrhotics (n = 124; 58 male) were included. For mHE diagnosis PHES score threshold was set at ≤ - 5 points and that of CFF at < 39 Hz. For comparing German and Turkish norms, datasets were combined. Multiple backward procedure was applied to assess effects of age, sex and education on single tests of the battery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for assessing diagnostic capabilities of subtests of the battery. RESULTS PHES norms for Turks were developed. MHE prevalence in compensated cirrhotics was 29.8% and 27.4% with PHES and CFF tests, respectively, with low compatibility (kappa coefficient 0.389); mHE prevalence decreased to 16% when both tests were combined. Turks performed worse vs Germans in the digit symbol (DS) and serial dotting (SD) subtests but performed better in other subtests. In ROC analyzes of subtests, the combination of DS + SD tests achieved an AUROC of 0.974 versus PHES. CONCLUSIONS Use of two methods for diagnosing mHE is important for research purposes. From a clinical perspective, sensitivity with acceptable specificity may suffice for screening instruments for mHE. Combined use of DS and SD subtests of the PHES battery appears suitable for this purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burak Özbaş
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Onur Keskin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hartmut Hecker
- Department of Biometrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Irfan Karahan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cansu Özbaş
- Department of Public Health, Gazi University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Çağdaş Kalkan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aysun Kartal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatih Oğuz Önder
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcu Kahveci Öncü
- Department of Psychiatry, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Genco Gençdal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Koç University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Akyildiz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Koç University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Fulya Günşar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ramazan Idilman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Ömer Özütemiz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Cihan Yurdaydin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Koç University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tek NA, Yurtdaş G, Cemali Ö, Bayazıt AD, Çelik ÖM, Uyar GÖ, Güneş BD, Özbaş B, Erten Y. A Comparison of the Indirect Calorimetry and Different Energy Equations for the Determination of Resting Energy Expenditure of Patients With Renal Transplantation. J Ren Nutr 2020; 31:296-305. [PMID: 32682604 DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2020.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the agreement between the resting energy expenditure (REE) obtained by indirect calorimetry and eight prediction equations in adult patients with renal transplantation and a newly developed REE prediction equation for use in patients with renal transplantation in the clinic. METHODS A total of 51 patients (30 males and 21 females) were involved in the study. The REE was measured by indirect calorimetry and compared with the previous prediction equations. The agreement was assessed by the interclass correlation coefficient and by Bland-Altman plot analysis. RESULTS No significant difference was found in terms of age and body mass index between the genders. Differences between the predicted and measured REEs were maximum in the Bernstein equation (-478 kcal) and minimum in the Cunningham equation (-69 kcal). It was found that underprediction values varied from 27.5% (chronic kidney disease equation) to 98.0% (Bernstein equation). The highest overprediction value was found in the Schofield equation (17.7%). The Cunningham equation and the new equation had the lowest root mean square error (265 kcal/day). In this study, fat-free mass (FFM) was found to be the most significant variable in multiple regression analysis (r2: 0.55). The new specific equation based on FFM was generated as 424.2 + 24.7∗FFM (kg). Besides that, it was found that the new equation and Cunningham equation were distributed randomly according to Bland-Altman analysis. A supplementary new equation based on available anthropometric measurements was developed as -1996.8 + 19.1∗height (cm) + 7.2∗body weight (kg). CONCLUSION This study showed that most of the predictive equations significantly underestimated REE. In patients with renal transplantation, if the REE is not measurable by indirect calorimetry, the use of the proposed equations will be more accurate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilüfer Acar Tek
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gamze Yurtdaş
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey; Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - Özge Cemali
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Derya Bayazıt
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Özge Mengi Çelik
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gizem Özata Uyar
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burcu Deniz Güneş
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University, Besevler, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Burak Özbaş
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, School of Medicine, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkiye
| | - Yasemin Erten
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nephrology, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Örmeci N, Özbaş B, Güner R, Özkan H, Yalçı A, Çoban Ş, Dökmeci A, Kalkan Ç, Akıncı H, Yüksel O, Başar Ö, Yüksel İ, Balık İ. Tenofovir-best hope for treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection? Turk J Gastroenterol 2015; 26:322-7. [PMID: 26038999 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2015.0164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS To evaluate the effectiveness of tenofovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in a real life setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 164 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were treated with Tenofovir. Eighty-six patients (52.4%) were naïve. Seventy-seven (46.9%) patients were previously treated with anti-viral drugs, including standard interferon (n=4), pegylated (PEG) interferon (n=14), standard interferon together with lamivudine (n=13), lamivudine alone (n=41), adefovir (n=2), lamivudine together with adefovir (n=1), and entecavir (n=2). Six patients (3.7%) had liver cirrhosis before treatment of tenofovir. RESULTS The patients who have hepatitis B viral DNA>104 copy/mL with chronic hepatitis B infection were included in the treatment of Tenofovir. Average follow up time was 30.31±14.33 months. HBV DNA negativity and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization were 86.5% and 71.3%, respectively, at the last visit. Hepatitis B e-Antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion occurred in 11 (19.6%) out of 164 patients. During the follow-up period, 4 (2.4%) patients developed liver cirrhosis and in 5 (3%) patients hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurred out of 164 patients. HBsAg seroconversion occurred in one patient (0.6%). CONCLUSION Tenofovir can be used safely and successfully in those patients that were naive, experienced with immune modulators and/or antivirals, HBeAg-positive, and HBeAg-negative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Necati Örmeci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Örmeci N, Özbaş B, Güner R, Özkan H, Yalçı A, Çoban Ş, Dökmeci A, Kalkan Ç, Akıncı H, Yüksel O, Başar Ö, Yüksel İ, Balık İ. Tenofovir-best hope for treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection? Turk J Gastroenterol 2015. [PMID: 26038999 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2015.0164.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS To evaluate the effectiveness of tenofovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection in a real life setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 164 patients with chronic hepatitis B who were treated with Tenofovir. Eighty-six patients (52.4%) were naïve. Seventy-seven (46.9%) patients were previously treated with anti-viral drugs, including standard interferon (n=4), pegylated (PEG) interferon (n=14), standard interferon together with lamivudine (n=13), lamivudine alone (n=41), adefovir (n=2), lamivudine together with adefovir (n=1), and entecavir (n=2). Six patients (3.7%) had liver cirrhosis before treatment of tenofovir. RESULTS The patients who have hepatitis B viral DNA>104 copy/mL with chronic hepatitis B infection were included in the treatment of Tenofovir. Average follow up time was 30.31±14.33 months. HBV DNA negativity and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization were 86.5% and 71.3%, respectively, at the last visit. Hepatitis B e-Antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion occurred in 11 (19.6%) out of 164 patients. During the follow-up period, 4 (2.4%) patients developed liver cirrhosis and in 5 (3%) patients hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurred out of 164 patients. HBsAg seroconversion occurred in one patient (0.6%). CONCLUSION Tenofovir can be used safely and successfully in those patients that were naive, experienced with immune modulators and/or antivirals, HBeAg-positive, and HBeAg-negative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Necati Örmeci
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|