Discordance between pain specialists and patients on the perception of dependence on pain medication: A multi-centre cross-sectional study

AIM

Patients with chronic non-cancer pain are referred to pain centres to improve their pain treatment. The discontinuation of pain medications in case of poor efficacy can be difficult to accept for patients, particularly opioid analgesics. Previous research has described that from the patients' perspective, the psychological relief of a negative effect of chronic pain and withdrawal symptoms of prescription opioids represent drivers of persistent use and first stage of opioid use disorder, despite insufficient pain relief. There is no validated tool to investigate this psychological dependence. This study aimed to assess discordance between patients and pain specialists in their perception of dependence on pain medication and investigate associations with characteristics of patients, type of pain and iatrogenic pharmacodependence.

METHODS

Self-administered questionnaires (patients and physicians) were administered in six pain centres in France. A question on perceived dependence on pain medications was addressed to the patient and the physician in a matched pair. Discordance between them was evaluated by the Cohen kappa coefficient. Demographics, pain, anxiety and depression, pain medication withdrawal symptoms, diverted use, and craving represented variables studied in a multivariate model as potentially associated with patient-physician discordance.

RESULTS

According to the 212 pairs of completed questionnaires, a perceived dependence was reported by the majority of patients (65.6%) and physicians (68.4%). However, the concordance was fair (kappa=0.38; CI [95%]: 0.25-0.51). Almost all patients (89.3%) were treated with an opioid analgesic. A higher likelihood of discordance was observed when patients suffered from nociplastic pain (odds ratio [OR]: 2.72, 95% [CI]: 1.29-5.84).

CONCLUSION

Medical shared-decision for changing pain treatment could be improved by taking into account the perception of patient dependence on medications for pain relief and or psychoactive effects, particularly in nociplastic pain for which the treatment is challenging.

Low-dose ketamine infusion to facilitate opioid tapering in chronic non-cancer pain with opioid-use disorder: a historical cohort study

BACKGROUND

Long-term opioid use is associated with pharmacological tolerance, a risk of misuse and hyperalgesia in patients with chronic pain (CP). Tapering is challenging in this context, particularly with comorbid opioid-use disorder (OUD). The antihyperalgesic effect of ketamine, through N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonism, could be useful. We aimed to describe the changes in the dose of opioids consumed over 1 year after a 5-day hospitalisation with ketamine infusion for CP patients with OUD.

METHODS

We performed a historical cohort study using a medical chart from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019. Patients were long-term opioid users with OUD and CP, followed by the Pain Center of the University Hospital of Toulouse, for which outpatient progressive tapering failed. Ketamine was administered at a low dose to initiate tapering during a 5-day hospitalisation.

RESULTS

59 patients were included, with 64% of them female and a mean age of 48±10 years old. The most frequent CP aetiologies were back pain (53%) and fibromyalgia (17%). The baseline opioid daily dose was 207 mg (±128) morphine milligram equivalent (MME). It was lowered to 92±72 mg MME at discharge (p<0.001), 99±77 mg at 3 months (p<0.001) and 103±106 mg at 12 months. More than 50% tapering was achieved immediately for 40 patients (68%), with immediate cessation for seven patients (12%). 17 patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

A 5-day hospitalisation with a low-dose ketamine infusion appeared useful to facilitate opioid tapering in long-term opioid users with CP and OUD. Ketamine was well tolerated, and patients did not present significant withdrawal symptoms. Prospective and comparative studies are needed to confirm our findings.

eDOL mHealth App and Web Platform for Self-monitoring and Medical Follow-up of Patients With Chronic Pain: Observational Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain affects approximately 30% of the general population, severely degrades quality of life (especially in older adults) and professional life (inability or reduction in the ability to work and loss of employment), and leads to billions in additional health care costs. Moreover, available painkillers are old, with limited efficacy and can cause significant adverse effects. Thus, there is a need for innovation in the management of chronic pain. Better characterization of patients could help to identify the predictors of successful treatments, and thus, guide physicians in the initial choice of treatment and in the follow-up of their patients. Nevertheless, current assessments of patients with chronic pain provide only fragmentary data on painful daily experiences. Real-life monitoring of subjective and objective markers of chronic pain using mobile health (mHealth) programs can address this issue.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that regular patient self-monitoring using an mHealth app would lead physicians to obtain deeper understanding and new insight into patients with chronic pain and that, for patients, regular self-monitoring using an mHealth app would play a positive therapeutic role and improve adherence to treatment. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a new mHealth app called eDOL.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the eDOL tool. Patients completed several questionnaires using the tool over a period of 2 weeks and repeated assessments weekly over a period of 3 months. Physicians saw their patients at a follow-up visit that took place at least 3 months after the inclusion visit. A composite criterion of the acceptability and feasibility of the eDOL tool was calculated after the completion of study using satisfaction surveys from both patients and physicians.

RESULTS

Data from 105 patients (of 133 who were included) were analyzed. The rate of adherence was 61.9% (65/105) after 3 months. The median acceptability score was 7 (out of 10) for both patients and physicians. There was a high rate of completion of the baseline questionnaires and assessments (mean 89.3%), and a low rate of completion of the follow-up questionnaires and assessments (63.8% (67/105) and 61.9% (65/105) respectively). We were also able to characterize subgroups of patients and determine a profile of those who adhered to eDOL. We obtained 4 clusters that differ from each other in their biopsychosocial characteristics. Cluster 4 corresponds to patients with more disabling chronic pain (daily impact and comorbidities) and vice versa for cluster 1.

CONCLUSIONS

This work demonstrates that eDOL is highly feasible and acceptable for both patients with chronic pain and their physicians. It also shows that such a tool can integrate many parameters to ensure the detailed characterization of patients for future research works and pain management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT03931694; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03931694.

Surveillance ophtalmologique des patients sous APS au long cours : analyse d’une population de 925 patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this 4-Year study was to analyze the population referred to our laboratory for the visual follow-up of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We received 925 patients: 78% female, 22% male. For each patient, a 13-item criteria was filled out and regular exams were performed. The pathologies were divided in to 4 groups: rheumatoid polyarthritis (P), lupus (L), sarcoidosis (S), others (O).

RESULTS

The pathologies were distributed as follows: 48% "P", 29% "L", 3% "S", 1% "P + L", 19% "O". Of these patients, 19% had less than 1 Year of treatment, 73% 1-10 Years and 8% more than 10 Years. The screening exposed no retinal intoxications but 3% presented pre-clinical intoxication (PCI) and 80% were allowed to continue their treatment. The most important statistical results were: 1) a significant relation between the PCI and the duration of the treatment (p<0.001); 2) a non-significant relation between the PCI and the daily dose (p=0.417); and 3) a significant relation between PCI and the cumulative dose (p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

The results shows the advantage of the ERG in screening to prevent anti-malarial retinal toxicity. This study confirms that the cumulative dose seems to be more important than the daily dose, but we agree with the international consensus to respect a daily dose under 6.5 mg/kg/d. The results also demonstrated that, with this large and diversified population, there is a need for prospective and multi-centric studies. With the above results, international standards should be established in order to obtain the most efficient screening for each category of patient.

[Children also die]

Palliative care has recently been developed in adults. However, children die as well and quite a few articles have been published on this special issue. The object of this article is to summarize the available literature in order to call for the development of clinical policies and minimum standards adapted to French pediatrics.

[Functional visual explorations of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. A study of three cases]

Laurence-Moon syndrome, which is very rare, and Bardet-Biedl syndrome, which is more frequent are now well-recognized as two distinct entities in pediatric neurology. Bardet-Biedl syndrome includes a number of common clinical signs it shares with Laurence-Moon syndrome but also with other syndromes, particularly Alströme syndrome. These signs are retinitis pigmentosa, mental retardation, obesity, and hypogonadism. Ophthalmological and electrophysiological examinations are essential for confirmation and correct diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome. We present three case histories. Our third case illustrates the possibility of below normal yet discernable electroretinogram amplitudes which do not infirm the diagnosis of Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

[The war of the gasses: observations at witness of Dr. Voivenel during the conflict, 1914-1918]

Dr Voivenel was an exceptional witness of the First World War in fact of his regular attendance on the battle front close to soldiers. Through his duty, he brought great contributions to psychiatry and fighting gas pathology. We are proposing to pick that second subject out of his book: La Guerre des Gaz", published in 1919, a true and present-day chemical war study.