Language and verbal fluency outcome after bilateral subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Language disorders in Parkinson's Disease (PD) following bilateral subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS) are common.

OBJECTIVE

To assess STN-DBS impact on language and observe clinical and anatomical predictors of poor outcome.

METHODS

We prospectively included PD patients undergoing STN-DBS. We performed a neuropsychological evaluation focusing on language before (V0), 3 days after (V1), and 3 months after (V2) surgery. Patients performed all assessments in ON drug condition, V1 with the stimulation turned OFF to evaluate the lesion effect, and V2 with the stimulation turned ON to evaluate the stimulation effect. Electrodes and active contact locations were determined with MRI-Atlas fusion. The stimulation parameters and the total electrical energy delivered (TEED) were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

18 PD patients consecutively operated were included. We identified a decline in phonemic verbal fluency (VFP) at V1 and V2 (p = 0.023 and 0.032 respectively), as well as in semantic verbal fluency (VFS) (p = 0.025 and 0.019, respectively). There was a significant slowdown in the verbs naming test (p = 0.048). No other language alteration was recorded. There was no correlation between demographic or clinical factors and verbal fluency (VF) evolution. Active contact location within substantia nigra was associated with VFP worsening (p = 0.047), while elevated TEED on the left-sided electrode was associated with VFS decline (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

VF was significantly altered following STN-DBS. Location outside the dorsolateral sensorimotor STN, and high stimulation power appeared to promote this decline. Other language domains remained stable.

Serological determination of hepatitis C virus genotype: comparison with a standardized genotyping assay

In patients with chronic hepatitis C, determination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype could be routinely run in the future to tailor treatment schedules. The suitabilities of two versions of a serological, so-called serotyping assay (Murex HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-3 [SA1-3] and Murex HCV Serotyping Assay version 1-6 [SA1-6]; Murex Diagnostics Ltd.), based on the detection of genotype-specific antibodies directed to epitopes encoded by the NS4 region of the genome, for the routine determination of HCV genotypes were studied. The results were compared with those of a molecular biology-based genotyping method (HCV Line Probe Assay [INNO-LiPA HCV]; Innogenetics S.A.), based on hybridization of PCR products onto genotype-specific probes designed in the 5' noncoding region of the genome, obtained with pretreatment serum samples from 88 patients with chronic hepatitis C eligible for interferon therapy. Definitive genotyping was performed by sequence analysis of three regions of the viral genome in all samples with discrepant typing results found among at least two of the three assays studied. In all instances, sequence analysis confirmed the result of the INNO-LiPA HCV test. The sensitivity of SA1-3 was 75% relative to the results obtained by the genotyping assay. The results were concordant with those of genotyping for 92% of the samples typeable by SA1-3. The sensitivity of SA1-6 was 89% relative to the results obtained by the genotyping assay. The results were concordant with those of genotyping for 94% of the samples typeable by SA1-6. Overall, SA1-6 had increased sensitivity relative to SA1-3 but remained less sensitive than the genotyping assay on the basis of PCR amplification of HCV RNA. Cross-reactivities between different HCV genotypes could be responsible for the mistyping of 8 (SA1-3) and 6% (SA1-6) of the samples. Subtyping of 1a and 1b is still not possible with the existing peptides, but discriminating between subtypes may not be necessary for routine use.