Increased risk of eosinophilic esophagitis with poor environmental quality as measured by the Environmental Quality Index

Geographic differences in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) prevalence suggest the possibility that environmental exposures contribute to EoE pathogenesis. We aimed to examine the association between environmental quality and risk of EoE, using the Environmental Quality Index (EQI), which provides quantification of environmental quality in five domains: air, land, water, built, and sociodemographic for all counties in the United States. To do this, we performed a case-control study in a large pathology database. EoE cases were defined by ≥15 eosinophils per high-power field with other pathologic diagnoses excluded; controls did not have EoE. The pathology data were geocoded and linked with the EQI by county of residence. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratio (OR and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of EoE with overall EQI and for each domain, after adjusting for sex, age, and proportion minority race or ethnicity at the county level (higher EQI score indicates worse environmental quality). Of 29,802 EoE cases and 593,329 controls analyzed, odds of EoE were highest in the worst quintile of EQI (OR 1.25; 95% CI: 1.04-1.50), which was largely explained by poor scores in the water domain (OR: 1.33; 1.17-1.50). Conversely, odds of EoE were reduced with higher scores in the air domain (OR: 0.87, 0.74-1.03) and land domain (OR 0.87; 0.76-0.99). Poor EQI, mostly reflected by poor water quality, was associated with increased odds of EoE, while poor air and land quality were inversely associated with EoE. Additional work to identify specific water pollutants that may have an etiologic role in EoE may be warranted.

A visual analogue scale and a Likert scale are simple and responsive tools for assessing dysphagia in eosinophilic oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

While symptom scores have been developed to evaluate dysphagia in eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), their complexity may limit clinical use.

AIM

To evaluate a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 10-point Likert scale (LS) for assessment of dysphagia severity before and after EoE treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study enrolling consecutive adults undergoing out-patient endoscopy. Incident cases of EoE were diagnosed per consensus guidelines. At diagnosis and after 8 weeks of treatment, symptoms were measured using the VAS, LS and the Mayo Dysphagia Questionnaire (MDQ). The percentage change in scores before and after treatment were compared overall, in treatment responders (<15 eos/hpf) and non-responders, and in patients without baseline dilation.

RESULTS

In 51 EoE cases, the median VAS decreased from 3.6 at baseline to 1.4 post-treatment (71% decrease), the LS decreased from 6 to 2 (67%) and the MDQ decreased from 20 to 10 (49%). The VAS correlated with both the LS (R = 0.77; P < 0.0001) and MDQ (R = 0.46, P = 0.001). After stratification by histological response, the LS decreased 70% in responders vs. 13% in non-responders (P = 0.02). In patients who did not receive baseline dilation, both the VAS and LS decreased significantly more in the histological responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the VAS and LS were responsive to successful treatment as measured by histologic improvement. Because the VAS and LS are simple to administer and are responsive to treatment, they can provide an efficient and objective method for assessing dysphagia severity in EoE in clinical practice.