Rare cause of intestinal obstruction - submucous lipoma of the sigmoid colon

The lipoma of the colon is a benign and rare tumor. Most lipomas are asymptomatic, their discovery being fortuitous. The diagnosis is ussualy easy by colonoscopy associated with biopsies. The abdominal CT scan also has its role in the diagnostic process and in the assesment of the tumoral extension.The treatment depends essentially on the clinical picture, on the size and location of the lipoma and involves endoscopic or surgical excision. We present the case of a 56 years old woman in which a random colonoscopic and than tomographic diagnosis of a sigmoidian lipoma was made 2 years ago when the patient presented with different symptoms, the submucosal lipoma being small sized at the time; the surgical treatment(sigmoidectomy including the tumor) was currently indicated by the sub-occlusive syndrome and haematochezia, due to the intraluminal proliferation of the tumor.

[The vitreoretinal complications of cataract surgery]

The paper reports a retrospective study performed between January 1996 and January 1999 which comprised 423 patients who underwent eye cataract surgery. Vitreoretinal complications (retinal detachment, cystoid macular edema, choroidal detachment, endophthalmitis, luxation of the lens into the vitreous body) were related to age, sex, other general and local diseases and surgical complications, like disruption of the posterior capsule. The study presents also vitreoretinal complications after Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy. The outcomes of the study show that 18 cases (4.25%) had retinal detachment, 11 (2.60%) had cystoid macular edema, 2 cases had endophthalmitis, while choroidal detachment and luxation of the lens into the vitreous body were reported each in 1 case. Retinal detachment following Neodymium:YAG laser capsulotomy (performed in 109 cases) was found in 2 cases. All of those vitreoretinal complications were reported with a higher incidence in patients with vascular diseases (diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, angiosclerosis) and also in patients who had axial lengths of 25 mm or greater.

Circulating anticentromere CENP-A and CENP-B antibodies in patients with diffuse and limited systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the disease sensitivity and specificity of testing for autoantibodies against 2 of the 3 main human centromere antigenic components, CENP-A and CENP-B (recombinant, expressed in baculovirus).

METHODS

ELISA with CENP-A and CENP-B antigens were used to test 45 sera showing a centromere pattern by immunofluorescence (IFA) and sera from 96 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), subdivided into diffuse (dSSc) and limited (lSSc) forms. For controls, the same tests were performed on sera from 100 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 100 with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 50 random blood donors. Sera from all the patients with SSc were also tested for the presence of anti-Scl70 antibody by ELISA (bovine antigen), and for pattern and titer by IFA (HEp-2 cells).

RESULTS

Of the 45 IFA positive sera, 93% were positive for anti-CENP-A and 91% for anti-CENP-B. There was a very good quantitative correlation between the antibody levels against these 2 centromere components (r = 0.597; p<0.001). Anti-CENP-A and B were found in 48% of patients with lSSc, and in 11% and 9%, respectively, of those with dSSc. The difference in the frequency of anti-CENP-A between the 2 patient groups was significant (chi-squared, p<0.001). Similar levels of anticentromere staining pattern by IFA were observed for these 2 groups. Anti-Scl70 was elevated in 8% of lSSc and 25% of dSSc patients; this difference was also significant (chi-squared, p = 0.02). Neither CENP-A nor CENP-B reacted with IgG from SSc patients containing anti-Scl70. The frequency of abnormal levels in patients with SLE and RA was, respectively, 11% and 3% for anti-CENP-A and 4% and 3% for anti-CENP-B. The reaction of IgG from SLE and RA patients with CENP-A was not inhibited by histone H3, i.e., it was not due to recognition of the histone-like domain in CENP-A. Thus, when 96 SSc patients were compared to 200 patients with RA and SLE, the disease specificity of anti-CENP-A and B was 93% and 96.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In addition to IFA, ELISA tests for CENP-A and CENP-B yield results with similar sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of SSc. CENP-A and CENP-B are primarily associated with lSSc. In SSc the autoantibody response is directed simultaneously and with similar amplitude against these 2 components of the centromere structure, whereas in other autoimmune diseases the response is directed mainly against one of the 2 components.