TAVI versus SAVR in intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and chronic kidney disease: a matched comparison in a subcohort from the GARY registry

Background

According to American and recent European guidelines, both transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) may be used to treat severe aortic stenosis in a subgroup of patients with intermediate surgical risk, in spite of slight differences in recommended age limits (ACC/AHA: 65–80 years and ESC/EACTS: <75 years). A shared therapeutic decision is made with the patient, based on a heart team assessment. For this, individual factors should be taken into account. Concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a prognostic factor in such patients, and CKD stage ≥3a and ≥3b has been shown to be a significant independent risk factor for SAVR and TAVI, respectively.

Purpose

To compare TAVI vs. SAVR outcomes in a subgroup of patients for whom both therapies could possibly be considered according to current guidelines.

Methods

The large nation-wide German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) includes data from patients treated with TAVI or SAVR. A subcohort of patients from GARY with intermediate surgical risk (age ≤80 years, STS-score 4–8) and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (CKD stages 3a, 3b, and 4) was selected. A matched analysis of 704 patients undergoing TAVI and 374 undergoing SAVR was carried out using a propensity score method. Primary endpoint was 1-year survival. Clinical complications and specifically the need for postprocedural new-onset dialysis were secondary endpoints.

Results

TAVI and SAVR showed similar survival results at 1 year in a Kaplan-Meier analysis (HR [95% CI] for TAVI: 1.271 [0.795,2.031], p=0.316). Despite a numerically higher post-procedural short-term survival in TAVI patients and a numerically higher 1-year survival in SAVR patients, such differences did not reach statistical significance (96.4% vs. 94.2%, p=0.199, and 86.2% vs. 81.2%, p=0.316, respectively). In weighted analyses, need for permanent pacemaker, vascular complications, and moderate-to-severe valvular regurgitation were significantly more common with TAVI, whereas patients undergoing SAVR had significantly higher rates of myocardial infarction, and transient ischaemic attack, needed more transfusions for bleeding, and had a significantly longer intensive care unit stay and overall hospital stay. The need for new-onset dialysis for a limited time was more common after SAVR (p<0.0001); however, very few patients required chronic dialysis either after TAVI or after SAVR.

Conclusion

In a matched analysis of intermediate-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and a concomitant moderate-to-severe CKD, for whom both TAVI and SAVR could possibly be considered, both approaches showed excellent and comparable results.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): The registry receives financial support in the form of unrestricted grants by medical device companies (Edwards Lifesciences, JenaValve Technology, Medtronic, Sorin, St. Jude Medical, Symetis S.A.).In addition, there is unrestricted support by funding statisticians by the DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung).

Refined prediction and validation of individual risk using machine learning in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: TAVI Risk Machine (TRIM) scores

Background

Given the recent option for treatment using TAVI irrespective of surgical risk, general surgical risk scores have become less relevant, while TAVI-specific scores require refinement. Additionally, post-TAVI risk models are lacking; however, such risk models can support decision between post-TAVI treatment approaches, such as early discharge or close surveillance.

Purpose

This study aimed to predict 30-day mortality following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) based on machine learning (ML) using data from the German Aortic Valve Registry.

Methods

Mortality risk was determined using a random forest ML model that was condensed in the newly developed TAVI Risk Machine (TRIM) scores, designed to represent clinically meaningful risk modelling before (TRIMpre) and after (TRIMpost) TAVI. Algorithm was trained and cross-validated on data of 24,452 patients and generalisation was examined on data of 5,889 patients.

Results

TRIMpost demonstrated significantly better performance than traditional scores (C-statistics value, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.74; 0.83]). An abridged TRIMpost score comprising 25 features (calculated using a web interface) exhibited significantly higher performance than traditional scores (C-statistics value, 0.74; 95% CI [0.70; 0.78]).

Conclusion

TRIM scores have high performance for risk estimation before and after TAVI. Together with clinical judgement, they may support standardised and objective decision-making before and after TAVI.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Low-gradient aortic stenosis in patients with concomitant mitral regurgitation - a subgroup analysis from the German aortic valve registry (GARY)

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by German Cardiac Society, German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, and German Heart Foundation. Statistical funding support by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research/Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf Forschung (DZHK).

Background

Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) frequently present concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR), which may interfere with echocardiographic measurement of mean pressure gradient (MPG), maximal flow velocity and aortic valve area (AVA).

Purpose

We therefore, aimed to investigate the impact of different grades of MR on parameters of AS severity in a large cohort of all-comer patients with severe AS, prospectively included in the national German Aortic Registry (GARY).

Methods

 All patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement for severe AS enrolled in GARY between 2011 and 2017 were considered for this analysis. After excluding cases with mitral stenosis and unknown causes of MR, 119,641 patients were considered for the present study. Based on LVEF, the study population was divided into the following subgroups: group 1 (LVEF < 30%, n = 7545), group 2 (LVEF 30-50%, n = 30,116), and group 3 (LVEF > 50%, n = 81,980). Differences in the values of the mPG were explored in each group and in relation to the decremental values of aortic valve area (AVA).

Results

Overall, 37,489 (31.3%) patients had no MR, 77,890 (65.1%) had MR grade I-II, and 4262 (3.6%) had MR grade III-IV. 

In group 1, 2 and 3, no MR was reported in 1339 (17.7%), 7612 (25.3%) and 28,538 (34.8%) patients respectively. MR grade I-II was more frequently observed (group 1 5621 [74.5%] vs. group 2 20,972 [69.6%] vs. group 3 51,297 [62.6%]), whereas MR grade III-IV was observed less frequently and present only in 585 (7.7%), 1532 (5.1%) and 2145 (2.6%) patients in subgroups 1, 2 and 3, respectively.

The aortic mPG was significantly lower in subgroup 1 compared to 2 and 3 (33.74 ± 14.93 versus 41.4 ± 16.47 and 46 ± 16.19mmHg respectively, p < 0.001). With increasing severity of MR, there was a significant reduction of the aortic mPG in each LVEF subgroup (Figure 1). This pattern was maintained irrespective of the AVA value.

Conclusions

 In patients with severe AS, concomitant MR may potentially affect diagnostic accuracy of echocardiographic AS evaluation. In this first GARY analysis of patients with severe AS and concomitant MR, we observed that increasing MR severity affects transvalvular aortic mPG and results in a low-gradient AS pattern. In contrast, AVA is a robust diagnostic parameter for the diagnosis of true severe AS that maintains its validity independently of LVEF and severity of concomitant MR.

Abstract Figure 1

Clinical outcomes after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with chronic kidney disease: an analysis in 29 893 patients from the German Aortic Valve Registry

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a key risk factor in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

Purpose

We analyzed the impact of eGFR and different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD), on short- and mid-term survival in patients undergoing TAVI or SAVR.

Methods

Data from 29893 patients enrolled in the German Aortic Valve registry (GARY) from January 2011 to December 2015 receiving TAVI (n=12834) or SAVR (n=17059) at 88 sites were included. The impact of renal impairment, as measured by eGFR and CKD stages, was investigated. The primary endpoint was 1-year cumulative all-cause mortality. A propensity score method was used to compare TAVI vs. SAVR in patients with intermediate risk and mild-to-moderate renal disease being eligible for both therapies.

Results

Higher CKD stages were significantly associated to lower in-hospital, 30-day- and 1-year survival rates. Both TAVI- and SAVR-treated patients in CKD 3a, 3b, 4, and 5 stages showed significant and gradually increasing HR values for 1-year all-cause mortality. The same trend persisted in multivariable analysis, although HR values for CKD 3a and 5 did not reach significance in TAVI patients, whereas CKD 4+5 did not reach statistical significance in SAVR. Likewise, eGFR as a continuous variable was a significant predictor for 1-year mortality, with the best cut-off points being 47.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 for TAVI and 59.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 for SAVR. Significant 8.6% and 9.0% increases in 1-year mortality were observed for every 5-mL reduction in eGFR for TAVI and SAVR, respectively. No significant differences in survival were found between TAVI and SAVR in a matched group of intermediate-risk patients potentially eligible for both therapies (HR [(95% CI] for TAVI vs SAVR 1.24 [0.76, 2.02], p=0.240).

Conclusions

CKD≥3b and CKD≥3a is an independent major risk factor for mortality in patients undergoing TAVI and SAVR, respectively. In the overall population of patients with severe aortic stenosis, an appropriate stratification based on CKD substage may contribute to a better selection of patients suitable for such therapies. TAVI and SAVR appear to achieve similar survival rates in intermediate-risk patients with moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Unrestricted grants by medical device companies (Edwards Lifesciences, JenaValve Technology, Medtronic, Sorin, St. Jude Medical, Symetis S.A.). Unrestricted support by funding statisticians by the DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislaufforschung).

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the LOTUS Edge system: early European experience

Aims

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the recently commercialised LOTUS EdgeTM system.

Methods and results

We performed a multicentre, single-arm, retrospective registry to generate early information on patients undergoing TAVI with the LOTUS EdgeTM system following its commercial release in July 2019. Novel features of this second-generation device include increased flexibility of the delivery catheter, enhanced visualisation of the locking mechanism and the depth guard technology to reduce left ventricular outflow tract interaction and, potentially, reduce the risk of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. All endpoints were defined according to the VARC-2 definitions and were reported by the treating site.

A total of 286 consecutive patients from 18 participating centres were included. The mean age and STS score were 81.2±6.9 years and 5.2±5.4%, respectively. Most procedures were performed under local anaesthesia (97.2%) via transfemoral access (98.6%).

Successful vascular access, valve delivery and deployment and system retrieval were achieved in 97.6% of cases. 30-day rates of all-cause mortality (2.1%, N=6) and stroke (3.5%, N=10) were acceptable. Disabling, life-threatening or major bleeding occurred in 3.8% and major vascular complications in 2.1%. The incidence of new PPM implantation was 27.1% among all patients and 32.2% among pacemaker-naive patients. After TAVI, the mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 11.9±5.6 mmHg and the mean aortic valve area was 1.9±0.9 cm2. The rate of moderate paravalvular leak was 2.1% with no cases of severe paravalvular leak.

Conclusions

Early experience with the LOTUS EdgeTM system demonstrated acceptable 30-day clinical outcomes with impressively low rates of paravalvular leak. The requirement for new PPM remained high in this early experience. Further study is required to understand if improving operator experience with the device can reduce PPM rates.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Stroke and mortality rates after valve-in-valve TAVR and comparison with data from redo SAVR

Background and purpose

Early registry data described a potentially increased risk for cerebrovascular events and mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as valve-in-valve (viv) procedures. Further data of small patient cohorts described divergent results for cerebrovascular events and mortality in patients undergoing TAVR as viv procedures for failed surgical bioprotheses in comparison with patients on redo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We performed a meta-analysis of stroke rates and mortality for viv TAVR procedures basing on the current literature.

Methods

We included all case series (≥10 patients), case-control studies and randomized controlled trials comparing viv TAVR and redo SAVR procedures with respect to cerebrovascular events and mortality rates. Additionally, we included all case series and registries with patients undergoing viv TAVR. After a structured literature research, 17 studies were eligible. For statistical analysis risk ratios and confidence intervals using Mantel-Haenszel test and the I-statistic to quantify possible heterogeneity were calculated. A P-value <0.05 was defined as statistical significant difference.

Results

Eleven case series and registries reporting on stroke and mortality in 8,509 patients undergoing viv TAVR were eligible for analysis. The quantitative analysis of non-comparative studies showed a calculated 30-day stroke rate of 2.2% and 30-day mortality rate of 4.2% after viv TAVR. Data on the 1-year rates were sporadically reported, therefore meta analysis was not appropriately feasible.

Six studies reporting on 498 participants undergoing viv TAVR (N=254) and redo SAVR (N=244) were eligible. The median age ranged from 72.3 to 80.2 years for viv TAVR and from 66.2 to 78.8 years for redo SAVR patients. The STS score was 7.2–7.4% (viv TAVR) and 5.8–7.7% (redo SAVR), respectively. A total of 3/226 participants treated with viv TAVR and 4/214 patients undergoing redo SAVR experienced a stroke during the first 30 postoperative days (N=4 trials, RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.59, p=0.83, I2 = 0%). None of the studies reported sufficient data on the 1-year stroke incidence. The 30-day mortality was 4.3% for viv TAVR and 4.5% for redo SAVR patients. This difference was not significantly different (N=6 trials, RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.40 to 2.05, p=0.80, I2 = 0%). The 1-year mortality rates were 13.3% and 13.6%, respectively (N=2 trials, RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.94, p=0.94, I2 = 0%).

Conclusion

In the current literature favorable stroke and mortality rates at 30 days for patients undergoing viv TAVR are documented. Similar stroke and mortality rates comparing viv TAVR and redo SAVR patients at 30 days were found as well as similar 1-year mortality. A selection bias for the viv TAVR and redo SAVR patients may exist, but cannot be dissolved with this registry analysis, only showing a trend of younger and lower risk patients receiving a redo SAVR procedure.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding source: None

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in nonagenarians: insights from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY)

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of nonagenarians (≥ 90 years) with that of younger (< 90 years) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in current practice.

METHODS

Data are collected from the German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY), which was designed to evaluate current practice in the invasive treatment of patients with aortic valve diseases in Germany. Data were analyzed regarding procedural outcome, 30-day, and 1-year outcomes of nonagenarians in comparison to that of younger patients.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2015, 2436/33,051 (7.3%) nonagenarians underwent TAVI and were included in GARY. Nonagenarians were significantly more often male (45.2% vs. 40.0%, p < 0.001), frail (38.7% vs. 34.7%, p < 0.001), and had higher EuroSCORE scores than younger patient group (23.2% vs. 17.0%). Nonagenarians were significantly less often treated via transapical access (16.3% vs. 22.3%, p < 0.001). Procedure was performed significantly less often in general anesthesia (58.2% vs. 60.7%, p = 0.02) in nonagenarians, while necessity of pacemaker implantation was significantly higher in nonagenarians (27.2% vs. 24.8%, p > 0.001). The incidence of other typical postprocedural complications such as severe bleeding events and vascular complications were comparable between groups. However, 30-day (5.2% vs. 3.9%) and 1-year (22.7% vs. 17.7%) mortality rates were significantly higher among nonagenarians and age ≥ 90 years could be identified as an isolated risk factor for mortality.

CONCLUSION

TAVI is a highly standardized procedure that can be performed safely with high procedural success even in very old patients. Although mortality is significantly higher in these patients-most probably due to the intrinsic higher risk profile of the very old patients-the results are still acceptable. To optimize outcome, especially elderly patients seem to profit from a procedure under local anesthesia or conscious sedation, to minimize the rate of postoperative delirium and the length of stay and to facilitate early mobilization.

Pulmonary hypertension and valvular heart disease

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality in patients with left-sided heart disease, including valvular heart disease. In this context, elevated left atrial pressure primarily leads to the development of post-capillary PH. Despite the fact that repair of left-sided valvular heart disease by surgical or interventional approaches will improve PH, recent studies have highlighted that PH (pre- or post-interventional) remains an important predictor of long-term outcome. Here, we review the current knowledge on PH in valvular heart disease taking into account new hemodynamic PH definitions, and the distinction between post- and pre-capillary components of PH. A specific focus is on the precise characterization of hemodynamics and cardiopulmonary interaction, and on potential strategies for the management of residual PH after mitral or aortic valve interventions. In addition, we highlight the clinical significance of tricuspid regurgitation, which may occur as a primary condition or as a consequence of PH and right heart dilatation (functional). In this context, proper patient selection for potential tricuspid valve interventions is crucial. Finally, the article highlights gaps in evidence, and points toward future perspectives.

P6491Predictive effect of mitral annular size on persistent mitral valve dysfunction after transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair for functional mitral regurgitation

Background

In patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR), deformation of the mitral valve (MV) apparatus leads to deteriorating coaptation of both leaflets. The MV geometry is essential to predict procedural success of using the MitraClip™ for FMR patients. Persistent such mitral regurgitation (MR) and post-procedural mitral stenosis (MS) are parameters for an increasing mortality rate after MitraClip implantation. The anterior-to-posterior mitral annulus diameter (MAD) is simple to evaluate with a high reproducibility rate. However, the predictive effect has not been determined to date.

Purpose

We evaluated the predictive effect of baseline anterior-to-posterior MAD on persistent MV dysfunctions after MitraClip™ implantation.

Methods

We investigated the prevalence of procedural failure (MR at discharge > grade 2+) and post-procedural MS (mean transmitral gradient (mTMG) at discharge ≥6 mmHg) in a patient cohort with FMR (n=190), who underwent MitraClip™ implantation. We measured the MV apparatus geometry on mid-systole using transoesophageal echocardiography before the index procedure. The MAD was stratified by interquartile ranges (IQR) in the comparison. (≤34 mm, 35 to 37 mm, 38 to 40 mm, and ≥41 mm, respectively)

Results

The mean age was 75±9 years, and 63 patients (33%) were female. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34±14%. Moderate-to-severe (3+) or severe MR (4+) were documented in all patients before the procedure. Transthoracic echocardiography at discharge revealed residual MR (>2+) in 10 patients (5%) and post-procedural MS in 13 patients (7%), in which one patient presented with both residual MR and MS.

After stratification by the IQRs of MAD, there were significant differences in body weight (p<0.001), height (p<0.001), and body surface area (p<0.001), but no significant differences in the other baseline characteristics. Notably, significant differences in the prevalence of procedural failure (p=0.004) and post-procedural MS (p=0.022) were observed among the groups. (Figure) Specifically, in the cohort with the 4th IQR (MAD ≥41 mm, n=44), procedural failure was observed in 7 patients (16%), although the prevalence was only 2% in the other IQR groups. Moreover, the cohorts with the 1st and 2nd IQR presented with higher prevalence of post-procedural MS (6 of 46 patients (13%) in the 1st IQR group, and 6 of 51 (12%) in the 2nd IQR group) than those with the 3rd and 4th IQRs. (1 of 49 patients (2%) in the 3rd IQR, and none of 44 patients in the 4th IQR)

Figure 1

Conclusion

In this analysis we showed that the mitral annulus size affected MV dysfunction after MitraClip™. Anterior-to-posterior MAD was useful to predict the procedural result. For FMR candidates with dilated mitral annulus larger than 40 mm, new-generation MitraClip-XTR™ system or other therapeutic concept such as annuloplasty may be reasonable to obtain satisfactory MV function.

[Cardioband®: Where do we stand, who are suitable patients?]

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is characterized by a dilatation of the mitral valve annulus resulting in an insufficient adaptation of the anterior and posterior mitral valve leaflets and/or severe tethering of the leaflets due to dilatation of the left ventricle. The Cardioband® system was introduced in 2015 and is a catheter-based direct mitral valve annuloplasty procedure for treatment of FMR. In the European CE approval study 60 patients with moderate or severe FMR were analyzed per protocol. There were no device or procedure-related deaths. The technical success rate of the procedure, defined as successful implantation and tightening was 97%. At 1 year, the overall survival and survival free of hospital readmission for heart failure were 87% and 66%, respectively. Currently, various interventional treatment procedures are available, such as the edge-to-edge technique as well as direct and indirect annuloplasty. In summary, patients with FMR as a result of a dilatation of the mitral valve annulus appear to be suitable for direct annuloplasty with the Cardioband® system.

[Interventional catheter treatment of tricuspid valve regurgitation]

BACKGROUND

The tricuspid valve can be considered the "forgotten" valve because in the past hardly any research has been conducted in this field and as a result only few therapeutic options existed. The prognosis of untreated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is poor and mortality is high for patients with severe TR. Patients frequently return to medical practices and hospitals because of cardiac decompensation, with shortness of breath and leg edema.

OBJECTIVE

Recent years have seen more development in catheter-based treatment options. Currently, several devices are in clinical evaluation, which are presented in this article.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A web-based literature search was carried out and information was gathered at international cardiology meetings (TCT 2016 in Washington, DGK 2017 in Mannheim, EuroPCR 2017 in Paris).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

There are various options for interventional catheter procedures for TR, which are being investigated within the scope of clinical studies. Most aim at reducing the tricuspid annular diameter and optimizing leaflet coaptation. Because of these new therapy options patients can now be treated who were considered untreatable in the past because of the high perioperative mortality.

[Future interventional procedures for valve diseases]

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous valve therapies represent one of the most innovative areas within interventional cardiology in the past 10 years.

AIM

The aim of this work is to give an overview of current and upcoming therapeutic options.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this manuscript, the results of a retro- and prospective literature research are summarized.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

With the introduction of percutaneous therapies for valvular heart disease, patients who were previously considered too ill for surgery can now be treated. The percutaneous treatment of aortic or mitral valve disease has become standard therapy. Likewise, promising results have been obtained for percutaneous treatment options for pathologies of the tricuspid valve, which are still under intense investigation.