Immunoglobulins in systemic sclerosis management. A large multicenter experience

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effectiveness and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) given in routine care to patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

A retrospective multicenter observational study was conducted in SSc patients treated with IVIG. We collected data on epidemiological parameters and clinical outcomes. Firstly, we assessed changes in organ manifestations during IVIG treatment. Secondly, we analyzed the frequency of adverse effects. The following parameters were collected from baseline to the last follow-up: the patient's weight, modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS), modified manual muscle strength scale (MRC), laboratory test(creatine kinase(CK), hemoglobin and protein levels), The University of California Los Angeles Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium gastrointestinal tract 2.0 (UCLA GIT 2.0) questionnaire, pulmonary function tests, and echocardiography.

RESULTS

Data were collected on 78 patients (82% females; 59% with diffuse SSc). Inflammatory idiopathic myopathy was the most frequent concomitant overlap disease (41%). The time since Raynaud's phenomenon and SSc onset were 8.8 ± 18 and 6.2 ± 6.7 years respectively. The most frequent IVIG indication was myositis (38/78), followed by gastrointestinal (27/78) and cutaneous (17/78) involvement. The median number of cycles given were 5. 54, 53 and 9 patients have been treated previously with glucocorticoids, synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic therapies respectively. After IVIG use we found significant improvements in muscular involvement (MRC ≥ 3/5 92% IVIG, p = 0.001 and CK levels from 1149 ± 2026 UI to 217 ± 224 UI, p = 0.02), mRSS (15 ± 12.4 to 13 ± 12.5, p = 0.015) and improvement in total score of UCLA GIT 2.0 (p = 0.05). None Anti-RNA polymerase III patients showed an adequate response in gastrointestinal involvement (0/7) in comparison with other antibodies (0 vs. 25, p = 0,039). Cardiorespiratory involvement remained stable. A total of 12 adverse events were reported with only one withdrawn due to serious adverse effect.

CONCLUSIONS

this study suggest that IVIG may improve myositis, gastrointestinal and skin involvement in SSc patients treated in routine care and seems to have a good safety profile.

POS0093 ASSESSMENT OF HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES OF CHRONICITY OF MINOR SALIVARY GLAND BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SJOGREN’S SYNDROME

Background

The origin of the histological chronic inflammation of the salivary gland in patients with primary Sjogren’s Syndrome (pSS) is questionable. It is probably a consequence of both, the evolution of the disease itself and ageing

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate histological data of chronicity of minor salivary gland biopsy with clinical characteristics and time of evolution in a series of patients with pSS.

Methods

A cross-sectional study including 98 subjects fulfilling the ACR-EULAR 2017 classification criteria for pSS. All patients underwent a minor salivary gland biopsy requested as per clinical practice. We collected the age at diagnosis and at biopsy, xeroftalmia and xerostomia evolution time, and stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow as a clinical data. We informed the following features in the minor salivary gland biopsy: the focus score (positive if ≥ 1), atrophy, fibrosis and adiposity all graded in negative, mild, moderate, and severe stages according to pathological criteria.

Results

This study included 98 patients with pSS. the median of all recruited parameters are shown in Table 1. Only 2 patients presented severe fibrosis and adiposity, so we did not consider them for the analysis. Both, the age at diagnosis and at biopsy are significantly higher between none, mild and moderate stages in the three biopsy parameters. The age at biopsy increased in negative, mild, and moderate stages, in median, 10, 9 and 6 years in atrophy, fibrosis and adiposity respectively. Although more evolution time is observed in atrophy and fibrosis regarding classification categories, it does not reach statistical signification. Focus score is associated with atrophy as a high percentage in severe stage shows negative biopsy (78% vs 22%, p = 0.046) while in negative, mild, and moderate atrophy display a positive biopsy (61%, 73% and 64%, respectively). Furthermore, we observe a significant OR of 8.75 [1.7-68] for negative, 6 [1.25-44] in mild and 9.92 [1.8-80] in moderate compared to severe atrophy. Fibrosis and adiposity are not related to focus score. A low unstimulated salivary flow is observed in the atrophy and fibrosis stages, although differences are explained when compared negative with mild and moderate (3.5 vs 2 and 1.4 for atrophy and 3 vs 2 and 1.75 for fibrosis). Regarding adiposity, a lineal statistically significant association is observed for every stage (3.5, 1.65 and 0.7, p< 0.001). No differences in the stimulated salivary flow are shown.

Table 1.

Description of variables included in the study.

CategoriesN(%)Median(IQR)Age at diagnosis(years)55.220 (51.097, 58.407)Age at biopsy (years)57.719 (53.851, 61.333)Xerostomia (months)19.614 (10.480, 35.121)Xeroftalmia (months)21.487 (8.148, 38.735)Focus score (positive)63 (64.3%)USF (ml/15 min)2.000 (1.400, 3.000)SSF (ml/ 5min)4.500 (3.000, 5.000)AtrophyNegative28 (28.7%)Mild37 (38.1%)Moderate23 (23.7%)Severe9 (9.3%)FibrosisNegative29 (30.5%)Mild40 (42.1%)Moderate26 (27.4%)AdiposityNegative39 (41.1%)Mild38 (40%)Moderate18 (18.9%)

USF: Unstimulated salivary flow, SSF: Stimulated salivary flow

Conclusion

An older age both, at diagnosis and at biopsy are associated with a severe stage of atrophy, fibrosis, and adiposity. Patient with severe atrophy shows less positive focus score, which might be noticed for biopsy interpretation

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0272 INTRAVENOUS VERSUS SUBCUTANEOUS TOCILIZUMAB IN A SERIES OF 471 PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis, including Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) (1-3). Clinical trials with TCZ in GCA was performed with intravenous (iv) TCZ in a phase 2 trial (3), and with subcutaneous (sc) TCZ in the phase 3 GiACTA (4). However, in GCA there are no studies comparing IV vs SC TCZ.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy of TCZ in GCA patients according to the route of administration IV-TCZ vs SC-TCZ.

Methods

Multicentre study of 471 patients diagnosed with GCA and treated with TCZ. They were divided into 2 groups according to the route of administration: a) IV, and b) SC. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques. Sustained remission was established according to EULAR definitions (5).

Results

We studied 471 patients (mean age, 74±9 years) treated with TCZ, 238 with IV-TCZ and 233 with SC-TCZ (Table 1). The time between diagnosis of GCA and TCZ onset was shorter in the SC TCZ group. Regarding acute phase reactants at the beginning of TCZ, no differences were found between both groups. There were no significant differences in sustained remission or in glucocorticoid-sparing effect of TCZ (Figure 1). Patients on IV TCZ treatment suffered more relevant adverse effects during follow-up.

Table 1.

Main characteristics of GCA patients treated with intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab

IV TCZ (n= 238)SC TCZ (n=233)PBaseline characteristics at TCZ onsetAge(years), mean±SD73.3±8.773.7±9.30.63Sex, female/male (% female)175/63 (73)167/66 (72)0.65Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]8 [3-23.5]5 [2-15]0.016ESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]30.5 [12.5-53]28 [10-56.5]0.66CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.4 [0.5-2.8]1.4 [0.4-4]0.92Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]20 [10-40]20 [10-36.2]0.69Safety after TCZ onsetFollow-up, (months), median [IQR]27 [16-44]14 [6-26.7]<0.001Relevant adverse events, n (%)80 (34)46 (19)<0.001Relevant adverse events per 100 patients-year12.715.2NSSerious infections, n (%)44 (18)21 (9)0.44Serious infections per 100 patients-year6.77.2NSMACEs, n (%)/1 (0.4)0 (0)-MACEs per 100 patients-year0.10NSMalignancies, n (%)4 (1.7)1 (0.4)0.20Malignancies per 100 patients-year0.60.3NS

Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; IV: intravenous; MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events; NS: non significant; SC: subcutaneous; SD: standard deviation

Conclusion

In GCA, TCZ seems equally effective and safe regardless of the route of administration IV or SC.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[3]Villiger PM, et al. Lancet. 2016; 387:1921-1927. PMID: 26952547

[4]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-328. PMID: 28745999

Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30. PMID: 31270110

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0806 OPTIMIZATION OF TOCILIZUMAB THERAPY IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. A MULTICENTER REAL-LIFE STUDY OF 471 PATIENTS

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be useful in the treatment of large-vessel vasculitis, including giant cell arteritis (GCA) (1-4). There is general agreement on the initial and the standard maintenance dose of TCZ. However, information on duration and optimization of TCZ in GCA is really scarce.

Objectives

Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of TCZ therapy optimization in an unselected wide series of GCA in real-world clinical practice.

Methods

Multicenter study on 471 patients with GCA who received TCZ therapy. Once complete remission was reached (n=231) TCZ was optimized in 125 patients. We compared patients in whom TCZ was optimized (TCZOPT group) or not (TCZNON-OPT group). Complete remission was defined as normalization of clinical and analytical (CRP and ESR) data. Optimization was done by decreasing the dose and/or prolonging the TCZ dosing interval progressively. We performed a comparison in effectiveness and safety parameters between optimized and non-optimized patients.

Results

We evaluated 231 GCA patients treated with TCZ with complete remission. No demographic or laboratory data differences was observed at TCZ onset between both groups (Table 1). The mean prednisone dose was higher in the TCZNON-OPT group at TCZ onset. The first TCZ optimization was performed after a median [25-75th] follow-up of 12 [6-17] months.

Table 1.

Main general features at TCZ onset of 231 GCA patients with prolonged remission.

OPTIMIZED-TCZ GROUP (n=125)NON-OPTIMIZED TCZ GROUP (n=106)pGENERAL FEATURES Age, years, mean± SD72.7±8.674±8.70.197 Sex, female/male n (% female)91/34 (72.8)74/32 (69.8)0.616 Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]8 [2-21.5]5 [2-21]0.384SYSTEMIC MANIFESTATIONS Fever, n (%)14 (11.2)15 (14.2)0.500 Constitutional syndrome, n (%)54 (43.2)39 (36.8)0.322 PMR, n (%)75 (60)69 (65.1)0.426ISCHEMIC MANIFESTATIONS Visual involvement, n (%)14 (11.2)16 (15.1)0.380 Headache, n (%)66 (52.8)62 (58.5)0.386 Jaw claudication, n (%)24 (19.2)25 (23.6)0.417AORTITIS (large-vessel involvement), n (%)65 (52)42 (39.6)0.060ANALYTICAL FINDINGS ESR, mm/1st hour, mean (SD)39.1±29.337.5±33.50.334 CRP, mg/dL mean (SD)2.6± 3.42.7± 40.305 Hemoglobin, g/dL, mean (SD)13.5±9.612.9±1.50.153GLUCOCORTICOIDS Prednisone dose, mg/d mean (SD)20.3±16.427±17.80.001

Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein; ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; IV: intravenous; PMR: polymyalgia rheumatica; SC: subcutaneous; SD: standard deviation; TCZ: tocilizumab.

The median prednisone dose at first TCZ optimization was 2.5 [0-5] mg/day. At the end of follow-up prolonged remission was observed in 78.2% of TCZOPT group compared with 66.7% in the TCZNON-OPT group (p= 0.001) (Figure 1). Seven (5.6%) of the 125 optimized cases relapsed. Serious adverse events were similar in both groups, while serious infections were more frequent in the TCZNON-OPT group (p=0.009).

Conclusion

Once complete remission is reached in GCA patients under TCZ treatment, optimization of biologic may be performed. Based on our experience it could be performed by reducing the dose or by prolonging dosing interval of TCZ. It seems to be an effective and safe practice.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34: S44-53. PMID: 27050507

[3]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[4]Loricera J, et al. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015; 27: 213-9. PMID: 25828585

Disclosure of Interests

Carmen Álvarez-Reguera: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, J. Loricera: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Jose Luis Hernández Hernández: None declared, Miguel Á. González-Gay Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and MSD., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche., Ricardo Blanco Consultant of: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, Lilly and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche.

POS0782 ULTRASONOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF MAJOR SALIVARY GLANDS IN PRIMARY SJOGREN’S SYNDROME: COMPARISON OF THREE SCORING SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATION WITH BIOPSY RESULTS

Background

Salivary glands ultrasound is an imaging technique useful for primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS) diagnosis. Nowadays, the use of ultrasound in diagnostic criteria is not clear. Different scoring systems have been published in recent years.

Objectives

This study aims to compare the reliability between three salivary glands ultrasound (SGUS) scores in a series of patients with pSS. Furthermore, we assessed the association of the three SGUS scores with minor salivary gland biopsy.

Methods

A cross-sectional study including 98 subjects fulfilling the ACR-EULAR 2017 classification criteria for pSS. All patients underwent an ultrasound of the salivary glands and a minor salivary gland biopsy requested as per clinical practice. An experienced Rheumatologist in SGUS evaluated systematically the previously acquired images. This Rheumatologist classified the images using three different scoring systems obtained from the grades of bilateral parotid and submandibular glands: De Vita (0-3), Salaffi (0-4) and Omeract (0-3). These three scores were performed in different days and blinded for the previous scores results. SGUS grade ≥ 2 was considered positive. Positive biopsy was deemed when focus score ≥1. We evaluated the agreement between the three scores and the individual scores with respect to the biopsy.

Results

This study included 98 patients with pSS. The distribution of the different grades according to the score system and the percentage of a positive SGUS are shown in Table 1. The reliability for a positive score for the three evaluated systems was almost perfect, with a Light’s kappa of 0.95 [0.9-1] for the De Vita-Salaffi, 0.87 [0.77-0.97] for De Vita- Omeract and 0.83 [0.71-0.94] for Salaffi-Omeract. We observed a same degree of concordance when the individual parotid and submandibular scores were evaluated. There was only a fair agreement for positivity of SGUS and a positivebiopsy in all scoring systems, specifically De Vita (kappa = 0.27 [0.09-0.45]), Salaffi (kappa = 0.26 [0.06-0.45]) and Omeract (kappa = 0.22 [0.03-0.42]). This associations with a positive biopsy did not change in magnitude when individually evaluated parotid and submandibular glands.

Table 1.

Distribution of the ultrasound grades and the percentage of positive biopsy in the different scoring systems evaluated.

01234Positive scoreVita23312618044(23.5%)(31.6%)(26.5%)(18.4%)(44.9%)Salaffi23291623746(23.5%)(29.6%)(16.3%)(23.5%)(7.1%)(46.69%)Omeract27292316039(28.4%)(30.5%)(24.2%)(16.8%)(41.1%)

Conclusion

The three SGUS scores are reliable for the evaluation of the main salivary glands in pSS. There was only weak agreement for SGUS and biopsy, so these two techniques provides complementary information and currently, SGUS cannot replace the biopsy for diagnosis purposes.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB1367 PET ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOCILIZUMAB IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. STUDY OF 101 PATIENTS FROM CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background

Positron emission tomography (PET) is one of the tools available for the diagnosis of extracranial large-vessel vasculitis (1-5). Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) including GCA. However, the improvement objectified by imaging techniques after TCZ therapy in extracranial GCA patients is controversial.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of TCZ improving the wall vessel inflammation by PET in GCA patients with large-vessel involvement.

Methods

Observational, multicenter study of 101 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed according to: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) biopsy of temporal artery, and/or c) presence of signs of vessel wall inflammation by PET, defined by the presence of vascular wall uptake of Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Patients were divided into two subgroups: a) with, and b) without signs of improvement (partial or total) in the follow-up PET.

Results

We studied 101 patients (74 women/27 men; mean age 69.7±9.3 years). Main clinical features of GCA with and without PET improvement are shown in Table 1. The group of patients which experienced PET improvement was older and was receiving higher doses of corticosteroids at TCZ onset.

Table 1.

Main features of 101 GCA patients treated with tocilizumab and with presence of signs of vessel wall inflammation by PET.

With PET improvement (n=88)Without PET improvement (n=13)pBaseline characteristics at TCZ onsetGeneral characteristicsAge(years), mean±SD70.6±9.163.8±9.20.014Sex, female/male (% female)67/21(76)7/6 (54)0.103Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]11 [4-24.2]4 [2-6]0.102Systemic manifestations, n (%)Fever, n (%)5 (6)2 (15)0.225Constitutional syndrome, n (%)36 (41)4 (31)0.466PmR, n (%)53 (60)9 (10)0.761Ischaemic manifestations, n (%)Visual involvement, n (%)2 (2)1 (1)0.342Headache, n (%)30 (34)3 (23)0.538Jaw claudication, n (%)8 (9)0 (0)0.592Laboratory dataESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]38.0 ± 26.213.54 ± 9.90.001CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.5 [0.7-2.4]1 [0.5-1.7]0.179Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]40.3 ± 19.421.9 ± 12.70.001Time from TCZ onset and follow-up PET (months)13.1±8.010.1±5.30.446

Conclusion

TCZ seems to be effective controlling GCA including vascular involvement detected by PET. However, the improvement observed by PET is most often partial, and rarely complete.

Figure 1.

Improvement by PET according to the time of the test.

References

[1]Loricera J, et al. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2015; 34: 372-7. PMID: 26272121

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015; 33: S19-31. PMID: 25437450

[3]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[4]Martínez-Rodríguez I, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 47: 530-537. PMID: 28967430

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48: 720-727. PMID: 29903537

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group: Juan C. González Nieto (H. Gregorio Marañón), Juan R. de Dios (H.U. Araba), Esther Fernández (H. Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca), Isabel de la Morena (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Patricia Moya (H. Sant Pau), Roser Solans i Laqué (H. Valle de Hebrón), Eva Pérez Pampín (H.U. de Santiago), José L. Andréu (H.U. Puerta de Hierro), Marcelino Revenga (H. Ramón y Cajal), Juan P. Baldivieso Achá (H. U. de La Princesa), Eztizen Labrador (H. San Pedro), Andrea García-Valle (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Adela Gallego (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz), Carlota Iñíguez (H.U. Lucus Augusti), Cristina Hidalgo (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca), Noemí Garrido-Puñal (H. Virgen del Rocío), Ruth López-González (Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora), José A. Román-Ivorra (H.U. y Politécnico La Fe), Sara Manrique (H. Regional de Málaga), Paz Collado (H.U. Severo Ochoa), Enrique Raya (H. San Cecilio), Valvanera Pinillos (H. San Pedro), Francisco Navarro (H. General Universitario de Elche), Alejandro Olivé-Marqués (H. Trías i Pujol), Francisco J. Toyos (H.U. Virgen Macarena), María L. Marena Rojas (H. La Mancha Centro), Antoni Juan Más (H.U. Son Llàtzer), Beatriz Arca (H.U. San Agustín), Carmen Ordás-Calvo (H. Cabueñes), María D. Boquet (H. Arnau de Vilanova), Noelia Álvarez-Rivas (H.U. Lucus Augusti), María L. Velloso-Feijoo (H.U. de Valme), Cristina Campos (H. General Universitario de Valencia), Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa (H. Doctor Negrín), Antonio García (H. Virgen de las Nieves), Carlos Vázquez (H. Miguel Servet), Pau Lluch (H. Mateu Orfila), Carmen Torres (Complejo Asistencial de Ávila), Cristina Luna (H.U. Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria), Elena Becerra (H.U. de Torrevieja), Nagore Fernández-Llanio (H. Arnáu de Vilanova), Arantxa Conesa (H.U. de Castellón), Eva Salgado (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense).

Disclosure of Interests

Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Jose Luis Hernández Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

POS0795 EPIDEMIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF GIANT CELL ARTERITIS IN PATIENTS INCLUDED IN THE ARTESER MULTICENTER STUDY

Background

Epidemiological information on Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) comes mainly from the Scandinavian countries of northern Europe, which show a higher incidence than the countries of southern Europe. GCA clinical manifestations can be divided into cranial, extracranial, and general syndrome.

Objectives

In a large series of GCA from Spain, we studied a) the incidence of GCA, b) clinical manifestations, and c) comorbidities at the time of disease diagnosis.

Methods

ARTESER is a retrospective epidemiological observational study of GCA promoted by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology in which 26 hospitals participate. The inclusion criteria were: all new patients diagnosed with GCA by a) ACR criteria, b) positive diagnostic test (temporal artery biopsy, temporal artery ultrasound or other relevant imaging techniques) and/or c) investigator’s clinical judgment. The patient recruitment period ranged from June 1, 2013 to March 29, 2019. The overall incidence of GCA per 100,000 people ≥50 years for the whole period and the mean annual incidence were evaluated. The clinical variables were collected by reviewing the patient’s medical history.

Results

1675 patients were included. The average annual incidence rate was 7.42 (95% CI: 6.57-8.27). All the cases were older than 50 years, and the age group with the highest annual incidence was that of 80 to 84 years, where it reached a value of 22.63 (95% CI: 22.04 -23.22). The mean annual incidence is higher in women than in men 10.07 (95% CI: 8.74-11.55) vs 4.81 (95% CI 3.84-5.93) (Table 1).

Table 1.

General characteristics, comorbidities and clinical manifestations

Epidemiologic, demographic and diagnosisMenWomenTotalGender, n (%)497 (29.7)1178 (70.3)1675Incidence annual rate (95% CI)4.81 (3.84-5.93)10.07 (8.74-11.55)7.42 (6.57-8.27)Age at diagnosis, years, mean (SD)76.9 (8.3)76.9 (8.0)76.9 (8.1)Diagnosis only by ACR Criteria89 (17.91)266 (22.58)355 (21.19)Diagnosis only with objective tests73 (14.69)140 (11.88)213 (12.72)Diagnosis ACR criteria + diagnosis objective tests311 (62.58)734 (62.31)1045 (62.39)Diagnosis by clinical judgment24 (4.8)38 (3.2)62 (3.7)Comorbidities at diagnosisArterial hypertension, n (%)330 (66.8)749 (63.7)1079 (64.6)Dyslipidemia, n (%)238 (48.3)563 (47.9)801 (48.0)Cranial clinical manifestationsNew-onset headache, n (%)382 (76.9)955 (81.1)1337 (79.9)Visual Clinic, n (%)194 (39.0)411 (34.9)605 (36.1)Extracranial manifestations and general syndromePolymyalgia rheumatica, n (%)178 (35.8)521 (44.3)699 (41.8)Asthenia, n (%)239 (48.1)634 (53.9)873 (52.2)Analysis at diagnosisErythrocyte sedimentation rate mm/h, mean (SD)72.3 (34.7)77.4 (33.0)75.9 (33.6)

The principal clinical characteristics of the population is shown in Table 1, the mean age at diagnosis was 76.9±8.1 years, 1178 (70.3%) were women. 1045 patients (62.39%) had ACR criteria and some positive objective test, 355 patients (21.9%) presented only ACR criteria and 213 (12.72%) only had a positive diagnostic test; 62 (3.7%) of the patients underwent diagnosis based on clinical judgment. The more frequent comorbidity was arterial hypertension (n=1079; 64.6%), followed by dyslipidemia (n=801, 48%). The predominant cranial manifestation was headache (n= 1337; 79.9%) and 605 patients experienced visual symptoms (36.1%). Polymyalgia rheumatica (n=699; 41.8%) and asthenia (n=837; 52.2%) were the most frequent extracranial and general syndrome manifestation, respectively. Regarding laboratory parameters, the most characteristic data was the increase of ESR (75.9±33.6 mm/1st h).

Conclusion

The mean annual incidence of GCA in Spain, 7.42 (95% CI: 6.57-8.27), is lower than that of the Scandinavian countries. It is higher in people older than 80 years. More than 60% of the patients met the ACR criteria and had a positive diagnostic test. Cranial manifestations constituted the most clinical features. The most frequent clinical manifestations are cranial. Up to a third of patients had visual manifestations.

Acknowledgements

This study has been funded by ROCHE Farma. The funder has not participated in the design, analysis, or interpretation of the results

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS1133 IRISIN LEVELS IN KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS ARE RELATED TO GENDER, OBESITY AND LOCAL INFLAMMATION

Background

Irisin is a myokine synthesized mainly in skeletal muscle with exercise, although its secretion has also been observed in other tissues such as adipose and has been related to obesity and other metabolic alterations. Although obesity and other metabolic factors are risk factors for knee osteoarthritis and patients with this condition often do less exercise and have poor muscular state, irisin has been poorly studied.

Objectives

To measure irisin levels in synovial fluid and plasma and evaluate their relationship with clinical severity and inflammation parameters in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic and radiographical osteoarthritis were studied. Demographic and anthropometric variables, Kellgren-Lawrence scale radiographic stage, the presence of synovial fluid and hypertrophy on ultrasound (at medial patellar line), clinical severity by Lequesne algofunctional index and physical exercise level were recorded. Levels of irisin, IL-6, TNF and hs-PCR were determined using ELISA.

Results

We included 168 women (age 69 ±1.5 y, symptoms duration 48 ±3 m) and 31 men (age 66.5 ±4 y, symptoms duration 36 ±12 m). Significantly higher levels of irisin in synovial fluid were observed in women who did not perform any physical exercise compared to those who did exercise sporadically or regularly (p.0.05), while in plasma a non-significant trend was observed. A weakly positive correlation between intraarticular levels (r= 0.17, p .0.05) and plasma levels (r= 0.16, p. 0.05) of irisin and Lequesne index in women was also evidenced. Regarding inflammatory parameters, in female patients the synovial levels of irisin presented a weak positive correlation with the synovial levels of IL-6 (r= 0.18, p< 0.05) but not in plasma; an association was also found in women between synovial levels of irisin and synovial fluid >8 mm and severe synovial hypertrophy (p<0.05) in women, but not with plasma levels. All significant associations disappeared when adjusting by IMC except in the case of synovial hypertrophy. No statistically significant results were obtained in men.

Conclusion

Levels of irisin are related to gender and obesity in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, the association with the intraarticular levels of IL-6 and the synovial hypertrophy could point to a possible local inflammatory effect at intraarticular level.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB1366 ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TOCILIZUMAB IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. STUDY OF 26 PATIENTS FROM CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background

Large-vessel vasculitis are characterized by the wall inflammation of the involved vessels, which can be detected by imaging tools (1-3). Ultrasound (US) is one of the most commonly used tools for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA), especially in patients with a cranial phenotype. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy in large-vessel vasculitis (LVV) including GCA (4,5). However, the improvement objectified by imaging techniques such as US after TCZ therapy is poorly documented.

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of TCZ improving the wall vessel inflammation by US.

Methods

Observational, multicenter study of 26 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed according to: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) biopsy of temporal artery, and/or c) presence of signs of vessel wall inflammation by US, defined by the presence of halo sign. In all the cases a baseline US and in the follow-up was mandatory.

Patients were divided into two subgroups: a) with, and b) without signs of improvement (partial or total) in the follow-up US.

Results

We studied 26 patients (19 women/7 men; mean age, 76.3±9.7 years). Main clinical features of GCA with and without US improvement are shown in Table 1. We found no significant differences in any of the variables studied between the two groups.

Table 1.

Main features of 27 GCA patients treated with tocilizumab followed by Ultrasound (US).

With US improvement (n=21)Without US improvement (n=5)pBaseline characteristics at TCZ onsetGeneral characteristicsAge(years), mean±SD77.3±8.972.2±12.90.270Sex, female/male (% female)17/4 (80,95)2/3 (40)0.101Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]6 [3-9]3 [1-6]0.452Systemic manifestations, n (%)Fever, n (%)1/21 (4.76)1/5 (20)0.354Constitutional syndrome, n (%)10/21 (47.62)2/5 (40)0.999PmR, n (%)11/21 (52.38)1/5 (20)0.330Ischaemic manifestations, n (%)Visual involvement, n (%)1/21 (4.76)1/5 (20)0.354Headache, n (%)15/21 (71.43)5/5 (100)0.298Jaw claudication, n (%)4/15 (26.67)¼ (25)0.999Laboratory dataESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]33 [22-49]55 [54-80]0.216CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.5 [0.7-6.7]3.8 [1-4.2]0.948Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]13.7 [10-30]30 [12.5-30]0.505Time from TCZ onset and follow-up US (months)3.9±3.63.1±2.10.456

After TCZ onset, 21 of 26 patients (80.7%) showed US signs of improvement (12 complete, 9 partial). In 4 out of 5 patients in whom there was no improvement in US findings, clinical improvement was observed at first month after starting TCZ.

Conclusion

TCZ seems to be effective controlling GCA including vascular involvement detected by US. This improvement can be seen by follow-up US, especially when performed at least 3 months after TCZ onset.

References

[1]Loricera J, et al. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2015; 34: 372-7. PMID: 26272121

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015; 33: S19-31. PMID: 25437450

[3]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[4]Martínez-Rodríguez I, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 47: 530-537. PMID: 28967430

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48: 720-727. PMID: 29903537

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group: Juan C. González Nieto (H. Gregorio Marañón), Juan R. de Dios (H.U. Araba), Esther Fernández (H. Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca), Isabel de la Morena (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Patricia Moya (H. Sant Pau), Roser Solans i Laqué (H. Valle de Hebrón), Eva Pérez Pampín (H.U. de Santiago), José L. Andréu (H.U. Puerta de Hierro), Marcelino Revenga (H. Ramón y Cajal), Juan P. Baldivieso Achá (H. U. de La Princesa), Eztizen Labrador (H. San Pedro), Andrea García-Valle (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Adela Gallego (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz), Carlota Iñíguez (H.U. Lucus Augusti), Cristina Hidalgo (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca), Noemí Garrido-Puñal (H. Virgen del Rocío), Ruth López-González (Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora), José A. Román-Ivorra (H.U. y Politécnico La Fe), Sara Manrique (H. Regional de Málaga), Paz Collado (H.U. Severo Ochoa), Enrique Raya (H. San Cecilio), Valvanera Pinillos (H. San Pedro), Francisco Navarro (H. General Universitario de Elche), Alejandro Olivé-Marqués (H. Trías i Pujol), Francisco J. Toyos (H.U. Virgen Macarena), María L. Marena Rojas (H. La Mancha Centro), Antoni Juan Más (H.U. Son Llàtzer), Beatriz Arca (H.U. San Agustín), Carmen Ordás-Calvo (H. Cabueñes), María D. Boquet (H. Arnau de Vilanova), Noelia Álvarez-Rivas (H.U. Lucus Augusti), María L. Velloso-Feijoo (H.U. de Valme), Cristina Campos (H. General Universitario de Valencia), Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa (H. Doctor Negrín), Antonio García (H. Virgen de las Nieves), Carlos Vázquez (H. Miguel Servet), Pau Lluch (H. Mateu Orfila), Carmen Torres (Complejo Asistencial de Ávila), Cristina Luna (H.U. Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria), Elena Becerra (H.U. de Torrevieja), Nagore Fernández-Llanio (H. Arnáu de Vilanova), Arantxa Conesa (H.U. de Castellón), Eva Salgado (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense).

Disclosure of Interests

Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto González: None declared, Patricia Moya: None declared, Eztizen Labrador-Sánchez: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

POS0802 INVOLVEMENT OF THE AORTA AND/OR ITS MAIN BRANCHES IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. TREATMENT WITH TOCILIZUMAB

Background

Large vessel involvement in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA), especially the aorta and/or its main branches, is frequent. Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown efficacy and safety in GCA and other large-vessel vasculitis (1-4).

Objectives

To assess the efficacy and safety of TCZ in GCA patients with involvement of the aorta and/or its main branches.

Methods

Multicenter observational study of 196 patients with GCA and involvement of the aorta and/or its major branches treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques. The presence of aortitis was performed by imaging techniques, mainly PET, and A-MRI.

Maintained remission was considered according to EULAR definitions (5).

Results

The main features of the 196 patients are showed in Table 1. Polymyalgia rheumatica, constitutional syndrome and headache were the most frequent clinical manifestations at TCZ onset. At 6 months after starting TCZ, 20% of the patients reached a sustained remission, that was progressively increasing. (Figure 1). A corticosteroid-sparing effect was observed from month 1 of TCZ onset (Figure 1). Relevant adverse events were observed in 12 per 100 patients-year, documenting serious infections in 4.8 per 100 patients-year (Table 1).

Table 1.

Main features of 196 GCA patients with involvement of the aorta and/or its main branches treated with TCZ.

GCA (n=196)Features at TCZ onsetAge(years), mean±SD71.3±9.5Sex, female/male (% female)148/48 (75)Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]7 [2-18.25]Systemic manifestations, n (%)Fever, n (%)24 (12)Constitutional syndrome, n (%)87 (44)PmR, n (%)131 (67)Ischaemic manifestations, n (%)Visual involvement, n (%)16 (8)Headache, n (%)74 (38)Jaw claudication, n (%)27 (14)Laboratory dataESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]32 [14-54]CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]1.5 [0.6-3.2]Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]15 [10-30]Safety after TCZ onsetRelevant adverse events, per 100 patients-year12Serious infections, per 100 patients-year4.8Figure 1.

A) Sustained remission, and B) median prednisone dose required in GCA patients with aortitis treated with tocilizumab

Conclusion

TCZ seems to be effective and relatively safe in GCA patients with involvement of the aorta and/or its main branches.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016; 34: S44-53. PMID: 27050507

[3]Loricera J, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2015; 33: S19-31. PMID: 25437450

[4]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021; 13: 1759720X211020917. PMID: 34211589

[5]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30. PMID: 31270110

Disclosure of Interests

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera Speakers bureau: from Roche, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Celgene, and Grünenthal., Rafael Melero: None declared, Santos Castañeda Speakers bureau: UAM-Roche, EPID- Future chair, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain., Clara Moriano: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene, and MSD., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Jansen, and Roche,, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Lilly, Janssen, and MSD., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, and Roche

POS0817 TOCILIZUMAB IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED GIANT CELL ARTERITIS VERSUS REFRACTORY/RECURRENT GIANT CELL ARTERITIS; MULTICENTER STUDY OF 471 PATIENTS OF CLINICAL PRACTICE

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only biologic drug approved in giant cell arteritis (GCA), based in two clinical trials (CT) (1,2). CT included selected patients who may differ from those of clinical practice (CP). A high proportion of GCA patients treated with TCZ in CT had a newly diagnosed GCA, whereas in CP, most of them are refractory/recurrent GCA (3,4). Although in CT the efficacy of TCZ seems to be similar in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA, in CP it is not documented.

Objectives

To compare in CP, the effectiveness and safety of TCZ in newly diagnosed vs refractory/recurrent GCA.

Methods

Multicentre observational study on 471 GCA patients treated with TCZ. GCA was diagnosed by: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques. A comparative study between patients with newly diagnosed GCA (<6 weeks) and those with refractory/recurrent GCA (>6 weeks) (according to GiACTA study definitions) (2). Sustained remission was based on EULAR definitions (5).

Results

The 471 GCA patients were divided into 2 subgroups: a) newly diagnosed GCA (n=91) and b) refractory/recurrent GCA (n=380) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Main features of patients with newly diagnosed GCA and refractory/recurrent GCA treated with tocilizumab.

Newly diagnosed GCA (n=91)Refractory/recurrent GCA (n=380)pBaseline characteristics at TCZ onset Age(years), mean±SD74.3±8.573.3±9.10.35 Sex, female/male (% female)60/31 (66)282/98 (74)0.11 Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]1 [0.5-1]10 [4-24]0.0001 ESR, mm 1st hour, median [IQR]46 [17.5-80.5]27 [10-50]0.02 CRP, mg/dL, median [IQR]2.1 [0.7-8.5]1.3 [0.4-2.8]0.13 Haemoglobin, g/dL, mean±SD12.3±1.512.7±1.50.03 Prednisone dose, mg/day, median [IQR]40 [21.2-50]15 [10-30]<0.001Effectiveness and Safety after TCZ onsetFollow-up, (months), median [IQR]15 [6-27.5]22 [11-37]0.004Relevant adverse events, n (%)23 (25)102 (27)0.54Relevant adverse events per 100 patients-year2015NSSerious infections, n (%)13 (14)53 (14)0.49Serious infections per 100 patients-year11.28NSMACES, n (%)0 (0)1 (0.3)-MACES per 100 patients-year00.2-Malignancies n (%)2 (2)3 (0.8)0.99Malignancies per 100 patients-year1.60.5NS

Abbreviations: CRP: C-reactive protein;ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate;GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; IV: intravenous; MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events; NS: non significant; SC: subcutaneous; SD: standard deviation

No significant differences were observed between both groups in sustained remission, although a greater tendency towards sustained remission is observed in newly diagnosed than in refractory/recurrent GCA patients (Figure 1). The decrease in glucocorticoids dose was faster in the first three months in the newly diagnosed GCA group, but thereafter, was similar in both groups, as well as the appearance of relevant adverse events and serious infections.

Figure 1.

A) Sustained remission, and B) median prednisone dose required in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA treated with tocilizumab.

Conclusion

The effectiveness and safety of TCZ seems to be similar in patients with newly diagnosed GCA and in patients with refractory/recurrent GCA.

References

[1]Villiger PM, et al. Lancet. 2016; 387:1921-1927. PMID: 26952547

[2]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-328. PMID: 28745999

[3]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[4]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2020; 124: S112-119. PMID: 32441643

[5]Hellmich B, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 79: 19-30. PMID: 31270110

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group: Juan C. González Nieto (H. Gregorio Marañón), Juan R. de Dios (H.U. Araba), Esther Fernández (H. Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca), Isabel de la Morena (H. Clínico Universitario de Valencia), Patricia Moya (H. Sant Pau), Roser Solans i Laqué (H. Valle de Hebrón), Eva Pérez Pampín (H.U. de Santiago), José L. Andréu (H.U. Puerta de Hierro), Marcelino Revenga (H. Ramón y Cajal), Juan P. Baldivieso Achá (H. U. de La Princesa), Eztizen Labrador (H. San Pedro), Andrea García-Valle (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Palencia), Adela Gallego (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Badajoz), Carlota Iñíguez (H.U. Lucus Augusti), Cristina Hidalgo (Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca), Noemí Garrido-Puñal (H. Virgen del Rocío), Ruth López-González (Complejo Hospitalario de Zamora), José A. Román-Ivorra (H.U. y Politécnico La Fe), Sara Manrique (H. Regional de Málaga), Paz Collado (H.U. Severo Ochoa), Enrique Raya (H. San Cecilio), Valvanera Pinillos (H. San Pedro), Francisco Navarro (H. General Universitario de Elche), Alejandro Olivé-Marqués (H. Trías i Pujol), Francisco J. Toyos (H.U. Virgen Macarena), María L. Marena Rojas (H. La Mancha Centro), Antoni Juan Más (H.U. Son Llàtzer), Beatriz Arca (H.U. San Agustín), Carmen Ordás-Calvo (H. Cabueñes), María D. Boquet (H. Arnau de Vilanova), Noelia Álvarez-Rivas (H.U. Lucus Augusti), María L. Velloso-Feijoo (H.U. de Valme), Cristina Campos (H. General Universitario de Valencia), Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa (H. Doctor Negrín), Antonio García (H. Virgen de las Nieves), Carlos Vázquez (H. Miguel Servet), Pau Lluch (H. Mateu Orfila), Carmen Torres (Complejo Asistencial de Ávila), Cristina Luna (H.U. Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria), Elena Becerra (H.U. de Torrevieja), Nagore Fernández-Llanio (H. Arnáu de Vilanova), Arantxa Conesa (H.U. de Castellón), Eva Salgado (Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense).

Disclosure of Interests

Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Javier Loricera: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, Jose Luis Hernández Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, Jansen and Roche, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, UCB Pharma and MSD, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD and Roche

POS1398 ASSOCIATION OF FUNCTIONAL SALIVARY TESTS WITH SALIVARY GLAND ULTRASOUND AND BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY SJOGREN’S SYNDROME

Background

Salivary gland ultrasonography is useful to assess salivary gland involvement in primary Sjögren Syndrome. Different publications have describes the association between decreases salivary flow and the degree of involvement with ultrasound.

Objectives

This study aims to assess the association of functional salivary tests evaluated by stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow (SSF and USF) with salivary major gland ultrasound scores (SGUS) and a positive focus score in a minor salivary gland biopsy.

Methods

A cross-sectional study including 98 subjects fulfilling the ACR-EULAR 2017 classification criteria for pSS. All patients underwent salivary functional tests, an ultrasound of salivary glands and a minor salivary gland biopsy requested as per clinical practice. The ultrasound images were graded using three different scoring systems: De Vita (0-3), Salaffi (0-4) and Omeract (0-3), obtained as the highest score achieved in the four evaluated glands, left and right parotid and submandibular. Positive biopsy was considered if focus score ≥1

Results

This study included 98 patients with pSS. We evaluated the different ultrasound scoring systems and each score individually assessed in parotid and submandibular gland with the salivary functional tests. USF is associated with all SGUS independently of the measurement, with a 2.5 ml/15min higher in negative compared to positive SGUS. Similar results were shown for SSF, with a 3 ml/5 min higher in negative compared to positive SGUS (Table 1). We observed no association between USF or SSF and a positive focus score in the minor salivary gland biopsy.

Table 1.

Association between salivary flows and ultrasound scoring systems.

Unstimulated Salivary FlowStimulated Salivary FlowUltrasound scoreGroupN(%)Means[95%CI]p-valN(%)Means[95%CI]p-valVitaN54 (55.1%)4.076[3.056, 5.096]0.00454 (55.1%)6.745[5.042, 8.447]0.011P44 (44.9%)1.839 [0.709, 2.969]44 (44.9%)3.436[1.550, 5.322]Vita ParotidN60 (61.2%)3.886[2.912, 4.861]0.00860 (61.2%)6.575 [4.961, 8.190]0.011P38 (38.8%)1.784[0.560, 3.008]38 (38.8%)3.182 [1.153, 5.210]Vita SubmandibularN55 (56.1%)4.002[2.986, 5.017]0.00755 (56.1%)6.668[4.977, 8.358]0.014P43 (43.9%)1.881[0.733, 3.030]43 (43.9%)3.458[1.546, 5.370]SalaffiN52 (53.1%)4.050 [3.005, 5.095]0.00752 (53.1%)6.754[5.015, 8.493]0.014P46 (46.9%)1.965 [0.854, 3.076]46 (46.9%)3.570[1.721, 5.419]Salaffi ParotidN58 (59.2%)3.857[2.861, 4.853]0.01658 (59.2%)6.578[4.931, 8.225]0.014P40 (40.8%)1.932 [0.733, 3.132]40 (40.8%)3.347[1.365, 5.330]Salaffi SubmandibularN54 (55.1%)4.011[2.985, 5.037]0.00754 (55.1%)6.689[4.982, 8.396]0.014P44 (44.9%)1.918[0.782, 3.054]44 (44.9%)3.505[1.614, 5.395]OmeractN56 (58.9%)3.727[2.727, 4.726]0.0156 (58.9%)6.313 [4.612, 8.014]0.043P39 (41.1%)1.854[0.656, 3.051]39 (41.1%)3.574[1.536, 5.613]Omeract ParotidN61(64.2%)3.562 [2.598, 4.526]0.04061 (64.2%)6.227[4.599, 7.854]0.036P34 (35.8%)1.874 [0.582, 3.165]34 (35.8%)3.326[1.147, 5.506]Omeract SubmandibularN57 (60.0%)3.661[2.667, 4.656]0.02857 (60.0%)6.246[4.557, 7.935]0.052P38 (40.0%)1.903[0.685, 3.120]38 (40.0%)3.603[1.534, 5.671]

N: Negative, P: Positive

Conclusion

USF and SSF are associated with SGUS system independently of the salivary gland evaluated but not with positivity in the biopsy, pointing to salivary ultrasound as a good technique to evaluate functionality. Neither USF nor SSF are associated with positivity in the biopsy indicating no link between histology and functionality.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

POS0801 VISUAL INVOLVEMENT AND PERMANENT VISUAL LOSS IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS: PREDICTIVE FACTORS

Background

Visual involvement is the most feared complication of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA) (1-5). Permanent visual loss (PVL) may be preceded by transient visual loss. Once blindness is established, the prognosis is poor. Most of the series of predictive factors of visual involvement in GCA are old and with a small number of patients.

Objectives

To assess the predictive factors of visual involvement and PVL in GCA.

Methods

Multicenter observational study of 471 patients with GCA. The diagnosis of GCA was performed between 2016 and 2021 according to: a) ACR criteria, and/or b) temporal artery biopsy, and/or c) imaging techniques.

From the 471 patients, we selected patients who developed a) visual involvement at any time during GCA and b) PVL. PVL was defined as partial or complete visual loss of >24 hours. Predictive factors were identified by multivariate analysis.

Results

Visual involvement was observed in 122 cases and PVL in 60 (Table 1). The ischemic and systemic manifestations set of variables associated with visual involvement were headache, and jaw claudication, whereas large-vessel involvement was a protective variable (Figure 1). The area under the curve (AUC) for the model was 0.72 (95%CI 0.67-0.77; p<0.0001).

Figure 1.

Forest plot of multivariate analysis.

Table 1.

Main features of the patients

Overall (n= 471)GCA without visual involvement (n=349)GCA with visual involvement (n= 122)GCA with PVL (n=60)P visual vs non visual involvementP PVL vs non visual involvementAge at diagnosis of GCA (mean±SD)72±971±975±875±90.0010.001Female/Male (% of female)342/129 (73)265/84 (76)77/45 (63)41/19 (68)0.0060.21Positive TAB, n (%)201 (43)146 (42)55 (45)33 (55)0.530.34Cardiovascular risk factorsHigh blood pressure, n (%)272 (58)189 (54)83 (68)40 (67)0.0130.058Dyslipidemia, n (%)241 (51)175 (50)66 (54)32 (53)0.610.63Diabetes, n (%)81 (17)50 (14)31 (25)16 (27)0.0070.016Previous or current smoking history, n (%)47 (10)31 (9)16 (13)8 (13)0.210.27CHADS2 score, median [IQR]1 [1-2]1 [0-2]2 [1-2]2 [1-2]0.0010.004Ischemic manifestationsHeadache, n (%)259 (55)167 (48)92 (75)42 (70)0.0000.002Jaw claudication, n (%)112 (24)63 (18)49 (40)26 (43)0.0000.000Systemic manifestationsFever, n (%)57 (12)47 (13)10 (8)4 (7)0.120.20Constitutional syndrome, n (%)175 (37)132 (38)43 (35)20 (33)0.550.47PmR, n (%)284 (60)218 (62)66 (54)29 (48)0.0940.022Large-vessel involvement, n (%)254 (54)211 (60)43 (35)20 (33)0.0000.000ESR, mm/1st hour, median [IQR]32 [12-57]30 [11-54]34 [15-67]42 [12-67]0.220.28CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.5 [0.5-3.4]1.4 [0.5-3.0]1.5 [0.4-4.7]1.5 [0.4-3.6]0.0420.30

In the same line, the set of variables associated with PVL were headache, and jaw claudication. By contrast, polymyalgia rheumatica (PmR), and large-vessel involvement were protective factors (Figure 1). The AUC for this model was 0.77 (95%CI 0.71-0.83; p<0.0001).

Conclusion

Headache, and jaw claudication seem to be associated with visual involvement in GCA, while large vessel involvement seems to be a protective factor. PmR also appears to be a protective factor for the development of PVL.

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 49: 126-135. PMID: 30655091

[2]Baalbaki H, et al. Clin Rheumatol. 2021; 40: 3207-3217. PMID: 33580374

[3]González-Gay MA, et al. Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41: 1497-1504. PMID: 9704651

[4]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019; 48: 720-727. PMID: 29903537

[5]Martínez-Rodríguez I, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018; 47: 530-537. PMID: 28967430

Acknowledgements

Tocilizumab in Giant Cell Arteritis Spanish Collaborative Group.

Disclosure of Interests

Lara Sanchez-Bilbao: None declared, Javier Loricera Speakers bureau: Roche, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Celgene, and Grünenthal, Clara Moriano: None declared, Santos Castañeda Speakers bureau: UAM-Roche, EPID- Future chair, Department of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain., Iván Ferraz-Amaro: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro: None declared, Olga Maiz: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Ignacio Villa-Blanco: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, Jose Luis Callejas-Rubio: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel: None declared, E. Galíndez-Agirregoikoa: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Julio Sanchez-Martin: None declared, Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Lilly, Celgene, and MSD., Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Jansen, and Roche,, Ricardo Blanco Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Lilly, Janssen, and MSD., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, MSD, and Roche

POS0804 TOCILIZUMAB IN LARGE-VESSEL GIANT CELL ARTERITIS AND TAKAYASU ARTERITIS: MULTICENTRIC OBSERVATIONAL COMPARATIVE STUDY

Background

Tocilizumab (TCZ) has shown to be effective for large vessel vasculitis including giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK) (1-5). However, LVV-GCA and TAK show different demographic and clinical features that may influence on TCZ therapeutic response.

Objectives

To compare the effectiveness of TCZ in patients with LVV-GCA and patients with TAK.

Methods

Observational multicenter study of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK who received TCZ. Outcome variables were: a) proportion of patients who achieved complete clinical improvement along with normalization of laboratory markers (CRP ≤0.5mg/dL and/or ESR ≤ 20 mm/1st hour) at 12 months b) complete improvement in imaging techniques. A comparative study between patients with LVV-GCA and TAK was performed.

Results

We evaluated 70 LVV-GCA and 57 TAK patients who received TCZ. Main clinical and demographic characteristic are described in Table 1. Patients with TAK were younger, had longer disease duration, had received more commonly previous biologic therapy and were receiving higher doses of prednisone at baseline. TCZ intravenous administration was more common in TAK patients (80.7% vs 48.6%; p<0.01). Follow-up time after TCZ onset was similar in both groups. At 12 months, about 75% of patients achieved complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization in both groups. A follow-up imaging technique was performed in 37 LVV-GCA patients after a mean time of 12.9±6.0 months and 38 TAK patients after 9.5±5.0 months. Complete improvement in imaging techniques was only observed in 18.9% and 21.1% of patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, respectively (Figure 1).

Table 1.LVV-GCA (n=70)TAK (n=57)pGeneral featuresAge (years), mean ± SD67.2 ± 10.540.5 ± 16.3< 0.01Sex (female), n (%)51 (72.9)49 (86)0.07Disease evolution before TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]5 [2-15]12 [3-37]<0.01Baseline laboratory parametersESR (mm/1st hour), median [IQR]32 [12.5-54.7]31 [10-52]0.82CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]1.4 [0.5-2.4]1.4 [0.5-3.5]0.41Baseline prednisone dose (mg/day), median [IQR]15 [10-20]30 [15-50]< 0.01Previous therapyConventional DMARDs, n(%)45 (64.3)44(77.2)0.51Biologic therapy, n (%)0(0)12 (21.1)<0.01TCZ therapyIntravenous, n (%)34 (48.6)46 (80.7)< 0.01Combined with MTX, n(%)24 (34.3)24 (42.1)0.37Follow-up time after TCZ onset, median [IQR]20 [10-36]18 [7-41]0.73Complete clinical improvement and ESR/CRP normalization at 12 months, n/N (%)35/47 (74.4)30/39 (76.9)0.79Complete improvement in imaging techniques, n/N(%)7/37 (18.9)8/38 (21.1)0.85

CRP: C-reactive protein; DMARDs: Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; GCA: giant cell arteritis; IQR: interquartile range; LVV: large vessel; MTX: methotrexate; n: Number of patients; N: total number of patients: TCZ: tocilizumab; TAK:takayasu

Figure 1.

Conclusion

The effectiveness of TCZ was similar in patients with LVV-GCA and TAK, despite a more refractory disease in TAK patients. A discordance between clinical and imaging activity improvement was observed in both LVV-GCA and TAK, as reported in previous studies (3).

References

[1]Calderón-Goercke M, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 49:126-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003

[2]Prieto-Peña D et al. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;13:175. PMID: 34211589.

[3]Prieto Peña D et al. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2021;39 Suppl 129:69-75. PMID: 33253103.

[4]González-Gay MA, et al. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2019;19:65-72. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2019.1556256.

[5]Prieto-Peña D, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019;48(4):720-727. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.05.007

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB1119 GLUCOCORTICOIDS’ TREATMENT IMPAIRS THE MEDIUM-TERM IMMUNOGENIC RESPONSE TO SARS-CoV-2 mRNA VACCINES IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS

Background

Patients with rheumatic diseases are at an increased risk for community infections (1,2). There still exists lack of data regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccines’ efficacy in vulnerable collectives with a compromised immune system, either due to a chronic pathology or to therapies targeting an autoimmune disease (3).

Objectives

To evaluate neutralizing antibodies (nAB) to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine after 3 to 5 months from administration in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients, as a surrogate of sustained-immunological response.

Methods

This cross-sectional study compared nAB titre of 39 SLE patients and 37 Healthy individuals with no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, who had all received two doses of a mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine within the last 3 to 6 months. SLE patients included 10 Not-treated subjects, 10 patients with Hydroxychloroquine (First-Line), 10 subjects with immunosuppressive drugs (Second-Line) and 9 patients under biological treatment (Third-Line). Glucocorticoids were permitted in all patient groups. Neutralization assay were used to determine nAB titre according previously validated protocol (4).

Results

Neutralizing antibody titres were assessed for a total of 76 serum samples from 39 (51%) Lupus patients and 37 (49%) healthy Controls. Healthy individuals showed the highest levels of nAB (1638.0 titre median), which were like not treated SLE subjects (1361.5 titre median). Treated patients presented substantially lower nAB titres compared to Healthy subjects: a 73% decrease for First-Line patients (p-value = 0.0135), 56% for patients received a Second-Line treatment (p-value = 0.2218) and 72% for Third-Line treated patients (p-value = 0.0104). A multivariate analysis pointed to Glucocorticoids as the most associated factor with declining nAB levels (75% decrease, p-value = 0.0037), and the one explaining, to a large extent, the lower acquired response in treated SLE patients. Furthermore, a significant reduction in nAB titres was observed for patients treated with Rituximab compared to Healthy subjects (89% decrease, p-value= 0.0008) (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Neutralizing antibody (nAB) titre after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Healthy individuals (Controls) and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients under different therapy regimes. Estimations are derived from a linear model in which sex, age, time from vaccination, vaccine type and corticoids therapy were included as covariates for statistical control.

Conclusion

Medium-term response of SLE patients to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, as measured by the titre of nABs, may be compromised by Glucocorticoids and Rituximab users. This reduced response likely translates into a higher probability of COVID-19 infection These findings might help to inform recommendations in vaccination protocols for SLE patients.

References

[1]Strangfeld A, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021; 80(7):930-42.

[2]Kroon FPB, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021.

[3]Ostrov BE, et al. Immunol Invest. 2021;50(7):833-56.

[4]Trinité B, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2608.

Disclosure of Interests

None declared

AB0055 AUTOIMMUNE RESPONSE AGAINST THE SHARED EPITOPE SEQUENCE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Background:

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease, associated with hiperproduction of autoantibodies (AAb), in which the most specific are the AAb against citrullinated peptides (ACPA). RA is influenced by genetic factors, specifically, there is a strong genetic association with the shared epitope (SE), a five amino acid sequence motif in positions 70–74 of HLA-DRβ1 chains encoded by HLA-DRB1 alleles: QKRAA, QRRAA and RRRAA.

The present study aims to analyze whether SE-peptides (SE-p) can be a target of the autoimmune response in RA.

Objectives:

To analyze the presence of AAb against the unmodified (Un) SE-p, citrullinated (Cit) SE-p and carbamylated (Car) SE-p.

Methods:

Sera from consecutive 117 RA patients and 21 psoriasic arthritis (PsA) from our outpatient clinic were collected by venopunture. Also 138 sera from blood donors were obtained as healthy controls (HC). All participants signed the informed consent.

We perfomed a homemade ELISA test using a sequence of 15 aminoacid peptides from positions 65-79 of HLA-DRB1 containing the 3 different SE sequences, in the Un, Cit and Car SE-p, synthesized in a linear and cycled form. We established a 90% of specificity using a ROC curve obtained from HC and PsA for each ELISA test.

HLA-DRB1 polymorphism was performed using a HLA-DRB1 sequence specific oligonucleotide typing kit (Lifecodes) in 95 RA and in 15 PsA.

ACPA and RF were determined with commercial assays (Inova Diagnostics and Binding Site, respectively).

Results:

The overall sensitivity of the different SE-p AAb tests ranged from 5.1-21.4%.

RRRAA SE polymorphism was associated with AAb against cycled CitCitCitAA SE-p (p=0.025), QKRAA polymorphism was almost significantly associated with AAb against cycled QKCitAA SE-p (p=0.067), whereas there was no association between QRRAA polymorphism and AAb against cycled QCitCitAA SE-p (p=0.690). On the other hand, there was no association between SE polymorphisms and AAb to any other peptide used in the ELISA test.

Significant differences were observed in the presence of AAb against lineal RRRAA, lineal CitCitCitAA and cycled CitCitCitAA SE-p when comparing RA vs. HC patients (p=0.022, 0.044, 0.022, respectively). Moreover, there also were significant differences in the presence of AAb against cycled CitCitCitAA SE-p between RA and PsA patients (sensitivity 21.4%, specificity 100%; p=0.014).

It must be highlighted that cycled CitCitCitAA SE-p AAb were detected in 20.0% of RA patient sera that were negative for RF and ACPA.

There was no association between RF or ACPA with the presence of any SE-p AAb.

Conclusion:

RA patients have autoantibodies against the Shared Epitope (SE). The cycled CitCitCitAA SE peptide (SE-p) shows the best performance among all the peptides tested and could identify patients seronegative for ACPA and RF, both analyzed by commercial assays.

Additional studies must be performed to verify the diagnostic and utility of these new autoantibodies against SE-p in RA.

Acknowledgements:

This work was granted by the 2018 call of the “Fundación Española de Reumatologia” and the 2017 call grant “Fundació Parc Taulí”.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared

THU0297 SERIOUS INFECTIONS IN 134 PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS WITH TOCILIZUMAB IN CLINICAL PRACTICE. FREQUENCY, TYPE AND CLINICAL ASSOCIATIONS

Background:

Infections are the most common adverse event of Tocilizumab (TCZ) in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). In GiACTA study(1),serious infections were observed in 7% (9.6/100 patient-years) of patients who received TCZ weekly. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are conducted under highly standardized design excluding some real-world patients. Therefore, adverse events may be underestimated in RCTs. In our series of real-life, serious infections occurred in 11.9% (10.6/100 patient-years)(2).

Objectives:

In a wide series of GCA of clinical practice treated with TCZ, we assess the frequency, type and predisposing factors of serious infections.

Methods:

Multicenter study of 134 patients diagnosed with GCA, all of them refractory to conventional therapy, treated with TCZ. Serious infection was considered when a life-threatening infection, fatal, or requiring hospitalization occurred, intravenous antibiotics were required, or the infectious process led to persistent or significant disability.

Results:

16 of 134 (11.9%, 10.6/100 patient-years) patients developed serious infections during follow-up. The most frequent infections were pneumonia (n=4), urinary tract infection (n=4), and facial herpes zoster (n=2). At TCZ onset, serious infections were more frequent in older patients (74.3±9.6 vs 72.9±8.7 years), with a longer GCA evolution (20 [4.3-45.6] vs 13 [5-29.3] months), with visual manifestations (43.75% vs 17.8%) and a higher dose of prednisone at TCZ onset (30.4±15.5 vs 21.1±16.1 mg/day) (TABLE). Presence of comorbidities were similar in both groups. 13 of the 16 patients who had infections received a dose of prednisone greater than 15 mg/day (16.3/100 patient-years) compared to 3 patients under treatment with less than 15 mg/day of prednisone (4.2/100 patient-years).

Conclusion:

The age, GCA duration, ocular involvement and the dose of glucocorticoids, at TCZ onset, seem to be predisposing factors related to an increased risk of developing serious infections in GCA patients.

References:

[1]Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:317-28.

[2]Calderón-Goercke M et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019 Aug;49(1): 126-135.

TABLESERIOUS INFECTIONS(n=16)WITHOUT SERIOUS INFECTIONS(n=118)pBASAL FEATURES AT TCZ ONSETGENERAL FEATURES Age, years, mean± SD74.3±9.672.9±8.70.552 Sex, female/male n(%)13/388/300.760 Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]20[4.3-45.6]13[5-29.3]0.604COMORBIDITIES Hypertension, n(%)9(56)86(73)0.551 Diabetes, n(%)3(19)39(33)0.677 Chronic kidney disease, n(%)3(19)27(23)0.512CLINICAL FEATURES OF GCA PMR, n(%)9(56.25)64(54.2)0.879 Aortitis, n(%)5(31.25)53(45)0.301 Visual manifestations, n(%)7(43.75)21(17.8)0.017CORTICOSTEROIDS AT TCZ ONSET Prednisone dose mg/d, mean (SD)30.4±15.521.1±16.10.031

Disclosure of Interests:

Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elena Becerra-Fernández: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, E. Galindez: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, MSD, UCB, Pfizer, Menarini, Grunenthal, Gebro, Novartis, Janssen, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Catalina Gomez-Arango: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Carlos Fernández-Díaz Speakers bureau: Brystol Meyers Squibb, Alejandro Olive: None declared, María Álvarez del Buergo: None declared, Luisa Marena Rojas: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Francisco Navarro: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Arantxa Conesa: None declared, Carlos Vázquez: None declared, Jose Andrés Román-Ivorra: None declared, Pau Lluch: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Carmen Torres-Martín: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi, Carmen Ordas-Calvo: None declared, Cristina Luna-Gomez: None declared, Francisco J. Toyos Sáenz de Miera: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, Carmen González-Vela: None declared, Javier García-Fernández: None declared, Patricia Vicente-Gómez: None declared, Ángel García-Manzanares: None declared, Norberto Ortego: None declared, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán: None declared, Montserrat Corteguera: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

OP0033 OPTIMIZATION OF TOCILIZUMAB THERAPY IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS. A MULTICENTER REAL-LIFE STUDY OF 134 PATIENTS

Background:

Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only biological agent approved in Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). There is general agreement on the initial and the standard maintenance dose of TCZ. However, information on duration and optimization of TCZ in GCA is scarce.

Objectives:

Our aim was to assess efficacy and safety of TCZ therapy optimization in an unselected wide series of GCA in clinical practice.

Methods:

Multicenter study, 134 patients with GCA who received TCZ due to inefficacy/adverse events of previous therapy. Once complete remission was reached and based on a shared decision between patient and physician TCZ was optimized in some cases. Optimization was done by decreasing the dose and/or prolonging the TCZ dosing interval progressively.

Results:

134 GCA patients treated with TCZ (101w/33m); mean age 73.0±8.8 years. TCZ was administered IV to 106 (79.1%) patients and SC to 28 (20.9%). TCZ was optimized in 43 (32.1%) patients. No demographic, clinical manifestations or laboratory data differences had been found at TCZ onset (TABLE). After a follow up of 12 [6-15.5] months, and a complete remission for 6 [3-12] months; the first TCZ optimization was performed. Median prednisone dose at first TCZ optimization was 2.5 [0-5] mg/day. TCZ IV was optimized from 8 to 4 mg/kg/4weeks in 12 of 106 (11.3%) and from 162 mg/SC/week to 162 mg/SC/2weeks in 9 of 28 (32.1%) cases. Five (11.6%) of the 43 optimized cases relapsed. In 4 cases, the relapses were treated increasing TCZ up to the pre-optimization dose, in 1 case the route of administration was change (4 mg/kg/4week to 162 mg/SC/week). In 8 of 43 optimized patients (18.6%), it was possible to withdraw TCZ after complete remission for 30 [16.25-45.75] months. Regarding adverse events and severe infections were similar in both groups. The mean TCZ treatment costs were lower in the optimized group.

Conclusion:

Once remission is reached in GCA patients under TCZ treatment, optimization of TCZ may be performed. Based on our experience it could be performed by reducing the dose with IV TCZ or by prolonging dosing interval with SC TCZ.

References:

[1]Calderón-Goercke M et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019 Aug;49(1): 126-135.

TABLE.OPTIMIZED-TCZ GROUP (n=43)NON-OPTIMIZED TCZ GROUP (n=91)pBASAL FEATURES AT TCZ ONSETGENERAL FEATURESAge, years, mean± SD68.9±8.771.4±8.50.125Sex, female/male n(%)32/1068/240.779Time from GCA diagnosis to TCZ onset (months), median [IQR]19.5[7.75-45]10.5[4 – 25]0.047SYSTEMIC MANIFESTATIONSFever, n(%)1(2.4)8(8.7)0.176Constitutional syndrome, n(%)11(26.2)19(20.7)0.476PMR, n(%)18(42.9)56(60.9)0.052ISCHEMIC MANIFESTATIONSVisual involvement, n(%)5(11.9)23(25)0.084Headache, n(%)26(61.9)42(45.7)0.081Jaw claudication, n(%)1(2.4)11(12)0.072CORTICOSTEROIDS AT TCZ ONSETPrednisone dose, mg/d mean (SD)15.1±11.125±17.40.001FOLLOW-UP ON TCZ THERAPY (MONTHS), MEDIAN [IQR]24[18-27]6 [3-18]0.000Relapses, n(%)5(11.6)5(5.5)0.207End follow-up remission, n(%)40(93)84(92)0.99Severe side efects, n(%)14(32.6)22(24.2)0.307Seriuos infections, n(%)6(14)10(11)0.878Cost, (mean) euros per yearIVSC7 538.47 329.011 726.411 726.4--

Disclosure of Interests:

Monica Calderón-Goercke: None declared, D. Prieto-Peña: None declared, Santos Castañeda: None declared, Clara Moriano: None declared, Elena Becerra-Fernández: None declared, Marcelino Revenga: None declared, Noelia Alvarez-Rivas: None declared, Carles Galisteo: None declared, Águeda Prior-Español: None declared, E. Galindez: None declared, Cristina Hidalgo: None declared, Sara Manrique Arija: None declared, Eugenio de Miguel Grant/research support from: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Consultant of: Yes (Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer), Paid instructor for: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Speakers bureau: yes (AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Roche, Grunental, Janssen, Sanofi), Eva Salgado-Pérez: None declared, Vicente Aldasoro Speakers bureau: Roche, Abbvie, MSD, UCB, Pfizer, Menarini, Grunenthal, Gebro, Novartis, Janssen, Ignacio Villa-Blanco Consultant of: UCB, Speakers bureau: Novartis, MSD, Lilly, Susana Romero-Yuste: None declared, J. Narváez: None declared, Catalina Gomez-Arango: None declared, Eva Perez-Pampín: None declared, Rafael Melero: None declared, Francisca Sivera: None declared, Alejandro Olive: None declared, María Álvarez del Buergo: None declared, Luisa Marena Rojas: None declared, Carlos Fernández-López: None declared, Francisco Navarro: None declared, Enrique Raya: None declared, Beatriz Arca: None declared, Roser Solans-Laqué: None declared, Arantxa Conesa: None declared, Carlos Vázquez: None declared, Jose Andrés Román-Ivorra: None declared, Pau Lluch: None declared, Paloma Vela-Casasempere: None declared, Carmen Torres-Martín: None declared, Juan Carlos Nieto Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Nordic Pharma, BMS, Gebro, FAES Farma, Roche, Sanofi, Carmen Ordas-Calvo: None declared, Cristina Luna-Gomez: None declared, Francisco J. Toyos Sáenz de Miera: None declared, Nagore Fernández-Llanio: None declared, Antonio García: None declared, J. Luis Hernández: None declared, Miguel A González-Gay Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, MSD, Ricardo Blanco Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, and Roche, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Pfizer, Roche, Bristol-Myers, Janssen, and MSD

Sexual dysfunction in fibromyalgia patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of sexual dysfunction in female patients with fibromyalgia (FM), the impact of FM on sexual activity and the factors associated with sexual dysfunction in these patients.

METHODS

Thirty-one consecutive women with FM were enrolled; two groups of 20 aged-matched healthy women and 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were used as controls. Demographic features were recorded in all patients. A cross-sectional analysis of pain (100-mm VAS scale), anxiety and depression (as determined by the STAI and Beck Depression Inventory scales, respectively) was performed. Sexual function was assessed by the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ).

RESULTS

FM and RA patients showed a significantly higher rate of sexual dysfunction compared to healthy controls. Sexual dysfunction was more frequent among FM patients (97%) than in RA patients (84%) but without statistical differences. A univariate analysis showed that age (p=0.0002), marital (p=0.036) and work status (p=0.048), pain intensity (p=0.007), level of anxiety (p=0.002), level of depression (p=0.0005), were significantly associated with sexual dysfunction in FM. However, only the intensity of depression was associated with the sexual dysfunction in patients with FM in the multivariate analysis (p=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Sexual function was very frequently and severely affected in patients with FM and this impairment appeared to be particularly associated with the degree of depression. The recognition of this dysfunction and its inclusion for the multidisciplinary management of FM may contribute to improve quality of life of these patients.