Spinal anesthesia does not cause left ventricular dysfunction in patients older than 60 years without cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are undergoing surgery more frequently than ever. In this population, spinal anesthesia, which is known to cause sympathetic blockade associated with arterial vasodilation, is proposed as an excellent option. However, its effects on left ventricular systolic function have not been studied.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate left ventricular systolic function by transthoracic echocardiography in patients older than 60 years, without prior cardiovascular disease, under spinal anesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective observational study with a total of 54 patients older than 60 years without prior cardiovascular disease, in whom, after the completion of subarachnoid anesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine with sensory block equal to or greater than T10, left ventricular systolic function was measured using MAPSE. In addition, CI-IVC, LVOT-VTI and CO were measured. Values at 5 min after the blockade were compared with those obtained previously.

RESULTS

A 3.3% decrease in MAPSE and a slight decrease in LVOT-VTI and CO were found, with no statistical or clinical significance. 14.8% of the patients presented MAP equal to or less than 60 mmHg. Comparison of echocardiographic changes between hypotensive and non-hypotensive patients was not statistically significant or clinically relevant.

DISCUSSION

Our study shows that spinal anesthesia with anesthetic level T10 or higher in patients older than 60 years without cardiovascular disease is a safe technique since it does not significantly alter echocardiographic parameters measuring left ventricular systolic function.

[Factors involved in the development of vasoplegia after cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation. A prospective observational study]

OBJECTIVE

The incidence and risk factors for vasoplegia in the early postoperative period and at 24h are investigated in patients subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Vasoplegia following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with a high morbimortality. The risk factors described emerged from retrospective, non-controlled studies.

METHODS

Observational prospective study of 188 consecutive patients subjected to cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in a single hospital between November 2011 and May 2012. Emergency surgery or complex procedures were excluded. Vasoplegia was assessed during the immediate postoperative period, and at 24h after surgery, and was defined as a mean arterial pressure below 50mmHg, and the need for a noradrenaline perfusion of more than 0.08μg/kg/min, monitored by cardiac output and systemic vascular resistances. The anaesthetic and cardiopulmonary bypass protocols, as well as haemodynamic management, were the same in all patients.

RESULTS

Almost half (48%) of patients had vasoplegia in the immediate postoperative period, and 34% at 24h. Risk factors for immediate vasoplegia development were preoperative use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor drugs, a mean arterial pressure<50mmHg immediately after beginning cardiopulmonary bypass, duration of aortic clamping as well as the cardiopulmonary bypass, and minimum temperature in cardiopulmonary bypass. Vasoplegia at 24h after surgery was correlated to preoperative angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor drug treatment and cardiopulmonary bypass duration.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of vasoplegia after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is high during the first 24 postoperative hours. Preoperative treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor and the mean arterial pressure at the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass are the more easily controllable risk factors. In patients arriving to surgery with those drugs, treatment or prevention of vasoplejia should be planned.

[First-year medical residents' self-assessment of skill in basic life support and automatic external defibrillation]

OBJECTIVE

To determine first-year medical residents' perception of their competence in basic life support (BLS) and the use of automatic external defibrillation (AED).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Course in BLS and AED accredited by the European Resuscitation Council with pre- and post-course self-assessment. The post-training questionnaire was administered immediately after the course and 8 months later. The data recorded covered (a) prior training and experience, (b) self-assessment of BLS and AED skills (9 items, scored 1-5), (c) the skill considered most difficult, and (d) satisfaction (13 items, scored 0-10).

RESULTS

The questionnaire was initially completed by 71 residents; 31 also responded 8 months later. Self-assessment scores improved immediately after the course (P = .0001). Scores had fallen 8 months later (P = .0001) but were still significantly higher than pre-course perception of skill (P = .017). More than 95% of the residents considered themselves to be competent after the course and more than 80% felt competent 8 months later, with the exception of skills in bag-mask ventilation (74.2%) and removal of a foreign body (61.3%). The skill considered most difficult was bag-mask ventilation. Mean (SD) BLS and AED scores for real-life situations were 8.48 (1.33) and 9.19 (0.94), respectively, after the course and 7.32 (1.4) and 7.29 (1.32) at 8 months (P = .0001). Overall satisfaction was high.

CONCLUSIONS

The residents perceived themselves as competent to give BLS and AED immediately after the course and 8 months after training, although fewer felt as competent at the second assessment. Bag-mask ventilation was considered the most difficult skill.

[Hemostasis-altering drugs and regional anesthetic techniques: safety guidelines]

New developments--in the form of emerging clinical settings for regional anesthesia as well as problems arising with the concomitant use of regional techniques and hemostasis-altering drugs--require the ongoing revision of safety guidelines. The annual meeting of ESRA held in Spain in 2003 saw the discussion and clarification of a variety of issues of current concern, including conclusions reached on the estimated risk of spinal hematoma when published safety guidelines are followed or not, precautions to take in epidural anesthesia during cardiac surgery, guidelines for using fondaparinux for thromboprophylaxis, the circumstances under which neuroaxial techniques can be used safely in patients under the effects of platelet aggregation inhibitors such as thienopyridine, and the application of epidural anesthesia in parturients with eclampsia who have received platelet aggregation inhibitors. Conclusions drawn at the meeting enrich and clarify certain important safety issues related to local and regional anesthesia in patients receiving antiplatelet drugs and/or anticoagulants.

[Comparative study of radial and cubital arterial catheterization]

In this prospective study we evaluated catheterization of the cubital artery as an alternative to cannulation of the radial artery. Seventy six surgical patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 38 patients according to the intention to catheterize the cubital or the radial artery. The incidence of failure and the technical difficulties were significantly higher in cubital than in radial arterial catheterization (p less than 0.001 and p less than 0.05, respectively) and they were related to the cubital pulse palpation. There were no significant differences in the time elapsed to achieve the catheterization, time of stability of the catheter, nor in the incidence of complications. The qualification of the technician, the arterial blood pressure and the anatomic characteristics of the forearm did not influence the results. We conclude that whenever the cubital arterial pulse is appropriately perceived, catheterization of this artery is a good alternative to radial catheterization.