Serum antioxidant capacity, biochemical profile and body composition of breast cancer survivors in a randomized Mediterranean dietary intervention study

PURPOSE

Increasing evidence suggests that Mediterranean Diet (MD) is correlated with reduced risk of breast cancer (BC) and cancer mortality, since it modifies patients' serum antioxidant capacity, body composition and biochemical parameters. The aim of the study was to investigate whether a dietary intervention based on MD has a beneficial effect on these factors.

METHODS

In this intervention study, seventy female BC survivors were randomly assigned to (1) the intervention group (personalized dietary intervention based on MD) and (2) the control group (received the updated American Cancer Society Guidelines on Nutrition and Physical Activity for Cancer Prevention and ad libitum diet). Both groups were assessed twice [beginning, end of study (after 6 months)] regarding their anthropometric and biochemical parameters, serum vitamin C, vitamin A, a-tocopherol and CoQ10 levels, dietary intake and adherence to MD. An additional intermediate analysis was conducted on participants' body composition and biochemical profile.

RESULTS

Concerning the intervention group, body weight, body fat mass, waist circumference, body mass index as well as HDL-cholesterol were significantly decreased (P < 0.2%). An increase was observed in the vitamin C levels in blood (P < 0.2%). In the control group, body weight, body fat mass and serum total cholesterol rose (P < 0.2%). At the end of the study the two groups were significantly different considering blood glucose, vitamin C, polyunsaturated fatty acids, vitamin A and a-tocopherol levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This randomized dietary intervention based on MD managed to ameliorate serum antioxidant capacity, body composition, adherence to MD and glycemic profile of postmenopausal BC survivors.

Effect of rosuvastatin monotherapy or in combination with fenofibrate or ω-3 fatty acids on lipoprotein subfraction profile in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and metabolic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Raised triglycerides (TG), decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels and a predominance of small dense low density lipoproteins (sdLDL) are characteristics of the metabolic syndrome (MetS).

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of high-dose rosuvastatin monotherapy with moderate dosing combined with fenofibrate or ω-3 fatty acids on the lipoprotein subfraction profile in patients with mixed dyslipidaemia and MetS.

METHODS

We previously randomised patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) > 160 and TG > 200 mg/dl to rosuvastatin monotherapy 40 mg/day (R group, n = 30) or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day combined with fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF group, n = 30) or ω-3 fatty acids 2 g/day (Rω group, n = 30). In the present study, only patients with MetS were included (24, 23 and 24 in the R, RF and Rω groups respectively). At baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment, the lipoprotein subfraction profile was determined by polyacrylamide 3% gel electrophoresis.

RESULTS

The mean LDL size was significantly increased in all groups. This change was more prominent with RF than with other treatments in parallel with its greater hypotriglyceridemic capacity (p < 0.05 compared with R and Rω). A decrease in insulin resistance by RF was also noted. Only RF significantly raised HDL-C levels (by 7.7%, p < 0.05) by increasing the cholesterol of small HDL particles. The cholesterol of larger HDL subclasses was significantly increased by R and Rω.

CONCLUSIONS

All regimens increased mean LDL size; RF was the most effective. A differential effect of treatments was noted on the HDL subfraction profile.

Effect of rimonabant, micronised fenofibrate and their combination on cardiometabolic risk factors in overweight/obese patients: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of rimonabant, micronised fenofibrate and their combination on anthropometric and metabolic parameters in overweight/obese patients with dyslipidaemia.

METHODS

All patients (n = 30) received a hypocaloric diet ( approximately 600 kcal/day deficit) and were randomly allocated to receive open-label rimonabant (R) 20 mg/day (n = 10), micronised fenofibrate (F) 200 mg/day (n = 10) or rimonabant 20 mg/day plus fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF) (n = 10). Anthropometric and metabolic parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 months after treatment initiation.

RESULTS

Compared with baseline similar significant reductions in body weight, body mass index and waist circumference were observed in the R (-6, -5 and -5%, respectively; p < 0.01) and RF group (-5% for all, p < 0.05), while improvements in these parameters were smaller in the F group (-2, -2.5 and -2%, respectively; p < 0.05). Triglycerides were reduced by 18% in the R group (p = NS), by 39% in the F group (p < 0.001) and by 46% in the RF group (p < 0.05). Importantly, combination treatment resulted in a 42% increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (p < 0.05), while HDL-C was not significantly altered in the two monotherapy groups. Subsequently, a more pronounced increase in apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I) levels (+25%) was observed in the RF group compared with changes in both monotherapy groups (p < 0.0001 vs R and p < 0.005 vs F group). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels were not significantly altered in any group. Apolipoprotein B (apoB) levels were reduced in all groups and this reduction was significantly more pronounced in the RF group (p < 0.05 vs baseline as well as p < 0.005 and p < 0.01 for RF vs R and F groups, respectively). ApoB/apoA-I ratio decreased by 3% with R (p = NS), by 18% with F (p < 0.05) and by 40% with RF treatment (p < 0.01). Total cholesterol to HDL-C ratio decreased by 20% with F (p < 0.0001) and by 33% with RF therapy (p < 0.005), while it was not significantly altered in R group.

CONCLUSION

The combination of rimonabant and fenofibrate may further improve metabolic parameters in overweight/obese patients with dyslipidaemia compared with each monotherapy. This improvement is particularly pronounced for HDL-C levels.