Abdominal wall mass resections: single-center closure practices and outcomes following oncologic resections of abdominal wall fascia

PURPOSE

Radical resections for abdominal wall tumors are rare, thus yielding limited data on reconstruction of defects. We describe surgical management and long-term outcomes following radical tumor resection.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review of patients between January 2010 and December 2022. Variables included operative characteristics, wound complications, hernia development, tumor recurrence, and reoperation. A multivariable analysis compared wound morbidity for suture and mesh repairs while adjusting for defect width, fascial closure, and CDC wound class.

RESULTS

120 patients were identified. Mean follow-up was 3.9 ± 3.4 years. Seventy-five (62.5%) of the masses were primary; most commonly desmoid (n = 25) and endometrioma (n = 27). Forty-five masses were metastases. Mean tumor width was 6.2 ± 3.4 cm; mean defect width was 8.1 ± 4.1 cm. Sixty-one patients (50.8%) had mesh placed, with variation in technique. Postoperative CT scans were available for 88 (73.3%) patients. Forty SSOs (33.3%), 11 SSIs (9.2%), and 18 (15%) SSOPIs occurred within 30 days. On multivariable analysis, increased defect width was associated with SSOPI (OR 1.17, p = 0.041) and CDC wound class II-III was associated with SSI (OR 8.38 and 49.1, p < 0.05) and SSOPI (OR 5.77 and 17.4, p < 0.05); mesh was not associated with these outcomes. Seven patients (5.8%) underwent 30-day reoperations and 35 (20.8%) required additional operations after 30 days. Thirteen percent developed abdominal wall (n = 8) or intra-abdominal tumor recurrence (n = 8) requiring reoperation. Twenty-seven (22.5%) patients developed hernias with a mean fascial defect width of 9.8 ± 7.2 cm.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal wall mass resections are morbid, often contaminated cases with high postoperative complication rates. Risks and benefits of mesh implantation should be tailored on an individual basis.

Tanaka score predicts surgical intensive care admission following abdominal wall reconstruction

PURPOSE

With the advancement of abdominal wall reconstruction, more complex hernia patients are undergoing repairs that may require a postoperative surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission. The volume ratio (VR) of the hernia sac to the abdominal cavity is an easily applied method to quantify disease severity and the ensuing physiologic insult. This study aimed to predict postoperative SICU admission using VR and other preoperative variables.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review was conducted for patients undergoing large abdominal hernias (width ≥ 18 cm) repaired from September 2014 to October 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, abdominal surgical history, and VR were analyzed through univariate and multivariable methods to identify predictors of SICU admission within the first two postoperative days. A predictive model was generated and validated.

RESULTS

Of 434 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 127(29%) required a SICU admission within the first two postoperative days. VR was significantly higher in SICU patients (Median 30.6% [IQR 14.4-59.0] vs. 10.6% [IQR 4.35-23.6], P < 0.001). Male sex, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, prior component separation, recurrent incisional hernia, hernia grade 3, and VR showed higher odds of SICU admission. When validated on a testing dataset, these variables showed strong SICU admission predictions, with an area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.82, 81.7% and 68.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The volume ratio in combination with preoperatively available variables can reliably predict postoperative SICU admission following abdominal wall reconstruction. Anticipating such events preoperatively allows for bed space allocation as well as optimizing postoperative care.

Is there an advantage to laparoscopy over open repair of primary umbilical hernias in obese patients? An analysis of the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC)

PURPOSE

The most common techniques used to repair umbilical hernias are open and laparoscopic. As the obesity epidemic in the United States is growing, it is essential to understand how this morbidity affects umbilical hernia repairs. This study compares laparoscopic versus open umbilical hernia repairs in obese patients.

METHODS

All patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² who underwent elective, open or laparoscopic repair of a primary umbilical hernia with mesh were identified from the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC). A retrospective review of the prospectively collected data was conducted. Outcomes of interest included surgical site infections (SSI), surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), hernia-related quality-of-life survey (HerQles), and long-term recurrence. A logistic regression model was used to generate propensity scores.

RESULTS

Of 1507 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 322 were laparoscopic, and 1185 were open cases. The laparoscopic group had higher mean BMI (37 ± 6 vs. 35 ± 5 kg/m² , P < 0.001 ) and mean hernia width (3 cm ± 1 vs. 2 cm ± 2, P < 0.001). Using a propensity score model, we controlled for several clinically relevant covariates. Propensity score adjustment showed no differences in the 30-day HerQles score (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58-1.49), SSI (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.52-4.77), SSOPI (OR 2.85, 95% CI 0.84-9.62) or hernia recurrence (hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.50-1.49).

CONCLUSION

In obese patients with primary umbilical hernias, there is likely no benefit to laparoscopy over open umbilical hernia repair with mesh with regard to wound morbidity. Although, the long-term recurrence also showed no difference between these two approaches, overall follow up was lacking.

Is concomitant cholecystectomy safe during abdominal wall reconstruction? An AHSQC analysis

PURPOSE

Unlike routine ventral hernia repair, abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) can results in large pieces of mesh and extensive manipulation of the intra-abdominal contents, rendering subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy challenging. This study addresses the additional wound morbidity of concomitant cholecystectomy.

METHODS

The Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative (AHSQC) was retrospectively reviewed and logistic regression modeling was used to control for multiple covariates. Patients that underwent open AWR with cholecystectomy were compared to a similar group of patients undergoing uncomplicated, open, clean, AWR alone.

RESULTS

130 patients undergoing concomitant cholecystectomy were compared to a control group of 6440 patients. The addition of a cholecystectomy did not cause a significant change in wound morbidity (SSI: p = 0.16; SSOPI: p = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

This study noted that a concomitant cholecystectomy does not increase the wound morbidity as compared to an uncomplicated, clean, AWR. This provides support for consideration of routine cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis undergoing AWR.

The use of Vicryl mesh in a porcine model to assess its safety as an adjunct to posterior fascial closure during retromuscular mesh placement

BACKGROUND

Posterior component separation has become a common approach to complex abdominal wall reconstructions. This technique includes creation of an extraperitoneal retromuscular space for subsequent large synthetic mesh reinforcement. In certain cases, when complete restoration of "posterior" layer is precluded by significant tissue loss/damage, one proposed strategy is to replace the posterior fascia with an absorbable synthetic polyglactin (Vicryl) mesh. However, the safety of this strategy to prevent mesh-related visceral complication is unknown. Herein, we aimed to characterize mesh-viscera adhesion profiles and host tissue response of synthetic mesh either exposed directly to the viscera, or protected with Vicryl mesh.

METHODS

Using adult Yorkshire pigs, 5 × 5 cm pieces of mesh were secured to the intact peritoneum in each of the four quadrants (n = 6 pigs, 24 mesh samples). The study groups were Vicryl (V), Marlex (M), Softmesh (S), Marlex + Vicryl construct (MV), Softmesh + Vicryl construct (SV). The self-made composite meshes were then implanted with the Vicryl side facing the exposed viscera. The pigs were survived for 60 days. At necropsy, grossly, the extent and tenacity of visceral adhesions were evaluated using established scales. Histologically, all specimens for fibrous encapsulation on the visceral surface of the mesh were reviewed by an experienced pathologist blind to meshes used.

RESULTS

At necropsy, all Vicryl meshes were completely resorbed. The mean adhesion and tenacity scores for M and MV were 1.8 and 1.1 (P > 0.05), 2.0 and 1.5 (P > 0.05), respectively; while the mean adhesion extent scores and tenacity scores for S and SV were 2.0 and 1.2 (P > 0.05), 2.0 and 1.7 (P > 0.05). No significant difference in adhesion extent and tenacity was observed between Synthetic and Vicryl composite mesh groups. Histologically, Marlex + Vicryl mesh and Softmesh + Vicryl mesh constructs had thicker fibrous capsules than the corresponding unprotected Marlex and Soft mesh implants. Furthermore, visceral adhesions in the composite groups were noted to be to the fibrous capsule and not synthetic mesh itself.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of the absorbable polyglactin (Vicryl) mesh as a separating layer between a synthetic mesh and intestines, did not reduce adhesions across various mesh types and composites. Histologically, however, a thick fibrous capsule replaced the Vicryl mesh and may be an important layer to prevent intestinal erosion into retromuscular synthetic meshes.