Clinical Outcomes of Image-Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Total Body Irradiation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based total body irradiation (TBI) with image guidance is a novel technique that is increasing in implementation. Compared to conventional TBI, VMAT-TBI offers favorable dose homogeneity, better organ-at-risk sparing, and enhanced patient comfort. However, whether these dosimetric advantages translate to improved clinical outcomes that justify the increased planning and delivery burden is not well understood. Only a single study of clinical outcomes of VMAT-TBI exists in the literature. We present the largest study to date of clinical outcomes of VMAT-TBI.

MATERIALS/METHODS

In this IRB-approved retrospective single-institution study, all patients treated with VMAT-TBI conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplant, per the institution's published protocol, were identified. Dosimetric data were abstracted from the radiation oncology treatment planning system. Clinical data were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was six-month overall survival (6M OS) from the last day of TBI by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (47 adult and 8 pediatric) were treated with VMAT-TBI between June 2020 and December 2022. All patients received conditioning chemotherapy with standard-dose TBI of 12 or 13.2 Gy in 8 twice-daily fractions. The PTV coverage (V95%) mean was 95.3% ± 1.2%. Mean lung dose was 9.5 Gy ± 0.6 for adult patients and 8.4 Gy ± 0.9 for pediatric patients. Mean lung dose rate was 18.0 cGy/min ± 4.4. Mean kidney dose was 5.9 Gy ± 0.6. Mean skin dose measured by MOSFET was 12.7 Gy ± 1.2. Median treatment time was 63 minutes (range: 53-104). Median follow-up was 7.7 months. At most recent follow-up, 78% of patients were alive. 6M OS was 82%. Common acute toxicities were fatigue (90.9% of patients, all grade 1-2), diarrhea (70.9%, all grade 1-2), nausea (76.4%, all grade 1-2), mucositis (60% grade 1-2, 12.7% grade 3, 1.8% grade 4, no grade 5), and xerostomia (54.5%, all grade 1). Mean pretreatment FEV1 was 98.3 percent of predicted (%p) ± 11.9%p and mean posttreatment FEV1 was 94.7%p ± 13.8%p. Mean pretreatment GFR was 101.4mL/min/1.73m² ± 17.4, mean 3-month posttreatment GFR was 92.4 ± 20.0, and mean 6-month posttreatment GFR was 97.5 ± 26.48. One patient experienced grade 2 pneumonitis; there were no other cases of pneumonitis. There were no acute grade 3+ toxicities aside from mucositis. Observed late toxicities were cataracts (7.3%, all grades 1-3) and hypothyroidism (12.7%, all grades 1-2). There were no grade 3+ late toxicities. Mild acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was noted in 27.2% of patients and mild chronic GVHD was noted in 14.5% of patients, with no other cases of GVHD.

CONCLUSION

In the largest series to date, VMAT-TBI had excellent oncologic and toxicity outcomes. A randomized trial of VMAT-TBI versus standard TBI is warranted.

Impact of omitting post-transplant minidose-methotrexate doses in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Given prophylactic methotrexate (MTX) is often held in the setting of toxicity we investigated the impact of omitting minidose-MTX dose(s). Outcomes were compared between patients who had 1-3 doses omitted and those who received all four planned doses of minidose-MTX. Of 370 consecutive patients, 50 had MTX dose(s) omitted. When MTX was omitted, initial management was mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 36/50 patients) with or without corticosteroids (14/50 patients). Rates of grade 3-4 acute GVHD were similar between groups. Omission of minidose-MTX resulted in an increased risk of chronic GVHD (cGVHD; HR 2.27; p = .024) and decreased overall survival (HR 1.61; p = .024). However, other transplant-related outcomes were comparable. In summary, omission of minidose-MTX doses was not associated with an increased risk of acute GVHD when an alternative was added (e.g. MMF ± corticosteroids). This did not abrogate the increased risk of cGVHD or decreased overall survival.