Randomized prospective evaluation of a novel technique for biopsy or lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast lesions: radioactive seed versus wire localization

BACKGROUND

Standard wire localization (WL) and excision of nonpalpable breast lesions has several shortcomings.

METHODS

Ninety-seven women with nonpalpable breast lesions were prospectively randomized to radioactive seed localization (RSL) or WL. For RSL, a titanium seed containing 125I was placed at the site of the lesion by using radiographical guidance. The surgeon used a handheld gamma detector to locate and excise the seed and lesion.

RESULTS

Both techniques resulted in 100% retrieval of the lesions. Fewer RSL patients required resection of additional margins than WL patients (26% vs. 57%, respectively, P = .02). There were no significant differences in mean times for operative excision (5.4 vs. 6.1 minutes) or radiographical localization (13.9 vs. 13.2 minutes). There were also no significant differences in the subjective ease of the procedures as rated by surgeons, radiologists, and patients. All WLs were carried out on the same day as the excision, whereas RSL was performed up to 5 days before the operative procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

RSL is as effective as WL for the excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and reduces the incidence of pathologically involved margins of excision. RSL also reduces scheduling conflicts and may allow elimination of intraoperative specimen mammography. RSL is an attractive alternative to WL.

Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): why map DCIS?

The appropriateness of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of patients with biopsy diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) has not been established. Three hundred forty-one patients presented with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS or DCISM. Two hundred forty (70%) underwent sentinel node biopsy at their definitive procedure. All clinical and pathologic data were collected prospectively. Of 224 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCIS 23 (10%) were upstaged to infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) at their definitive therapy and of 16 patients with a biopsy diagnosis of DCISM seven (44%) were upstaged to IDC. Excisional biopsies were no more sensitive for detecting IDC than was core biopsy. Lymph node metastases were detected in 26 of 195 (13%) patients with a definitive diagnosis of DCIS, in three of 15 (20%) with a definitive diagnosis of DCISM, and in eight of 30 (27%) with a definitive diagnosis of IDC. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a valuable tool in the treatment of patients with DCIS and DCISM and is particularly needed in those undergoing mastectomy. No "high-risk" group of patients can be identified for selective sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Learning curves and breast cancer lymphatic mapping: institutional volume index

INTRODUCTION

To date, studies of breast cancer lymphatic mapping (LM) have analyzed success with respect to individual surgeons. However, LM and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) are procedures that require institutional multidisciplinary cooperation between the departments of radiology, pathology, and surgery. Thus, it is important to evaluate these procedures with respect to the institution. This study examines 30 institutions to clarify the value of the institutional volume index (IVI) (cases/month) to the outcome of LM and SLNBx in breast cancer.

METHODS

From July 1997 to July 1999, 30 institutions participated in the Department of Defense national breast LM trial. All participants underwent a 2-day training course for surgeons, nuclear medicine physicians, and pathologists. The records for each institution were prospectively accrued and submitted to a database. The false negatives, failure rates, and IVI were calculated for each institution. A logistic regression model plots the relationship between IVI and institutional failure rate. Using a multivariate analysis, mapping failure was analyzed as a function of case number with respect to the individual surgeon and the institution as a whole.

RESULTS

False negative results were demonstrated in only 5 (4%) cases among all institutions and were excluded from further analysis due to small numbers. Mapping failures were found in all but 7 of the 30 institutions whose data were complete. There were 71 mapping failures among 74 surgeons over 555 cases, which yielded an overall failure rate of 12.79% (71 555). The logistic regression model revealed an inverse relationship between IVI and institutional failure rate. However, the multivariate analysis revealed that the individual surgeon performance was the most significant factor in determining institutional mapping success.

CONCLUSION

Failure to map can be a function of multiple factors including surgical skill, surgical volume index, and injection method of the SLN patient, all under the quality control of an institution. The surgical failure rate on the other hand is a function of surgical skill, surgical volume, and injection methods. While differences in mapping success exist across institutions, this disparity is not due to factors associated with the institution as a whole, but lie with the individual surgeon.

The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in women undergoing prophylactic mastectomy

BACKGROUND

Indications for prophylactic mastectomy (PM) range from LCIS to BRCA 1-2 positive, cosmesis, and cancer phobia. Occult cancers have been found in up to 5% of PM cases. Consequently, consideration must be given to the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy as a diagnostic procedure in these patients as PM excludes the subsequent option of SLN biopsy.

METHODS

From April 1994 to November 1999, all patients undergoing PM had SLN biopsy after four quadrant periareolar injections of radiocolloid (450 mci) and blue dye (5 cc). All patients were prospectively accrued to the computerized database of breast patients. The SLN were all evaluated with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as well as CAM5.2 cytokeratin immunohistochemical (CK-IHC) stains.

RESULTS

Over a 67-month period, 1,356 patients were mapped; 57 patients underwent PM in which 148 nodes (2.6 nodes per patient) were evaluated. Nodes were examined by routine H&E and CK-IHC staining. Two patients, neither of whom was found to have a cancer in the prophylactic mastectomy breast, were found to have a positive SLN by CK-IHC staining. Infiltrating carcinoma was discovered within the PM breasts of 2 additional patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was negative for malignancy by H&E as well as CK-IHC stains. No lymphedema has been detected in PM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Sentinel node biopsy has been shown to be an accurate and minimally invasive method of evaluating the lymphatic basin. This study shows that the absence of known disease within the breast does not preclude the presence of occult cancer or metastatic nodal disease. Four patients (7%) had a significant change in their surgical management as a direct result of sentinel lymph node biopsy. Two patients were spared the complications of a complete axillary node dissection. This minimally invasive procedure accurately evaluated the known disease status and provided new diagnostic information. Most important, once a mastectomy is performed, the opportunity for SLN biopsy is lost should a cancer be found within the breast specimen.

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer

The standard of care for the evaluation of axillary nodal involvement remains complete lymph node dissection. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy are changing this long-held paradigm; indeed, several leading institutions already reserve complete axillary dissection for patients with metastasis to the SLN. In addition to reviewing the literature, this chapter describes our lymphatic mapping experience at the H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute with 1147 breast cancer patients. Our results, in addition to a meta-analysis of data from 12 institutions comprising an additional 1842 patients undergoing complete axillary dissection, demonstrate that SLN biopsy is an accurate method of axillary staging. Although the results from small series may exaggerate the probability of false negative results, the risk of nodal disease based on tumor size and other risk factors should be evaluated when considering the results of SLN sampling.

Lymphatic mapping in gynecologic malignancies

Gynecologic malignancies account for 15% of all cancer diagnosis in women. Primary lymphatic spread is well recognized in vulvar, cervical, uterine, and ovarian carcinomas. Vulvar carcinoma spreads locally to the inguinofemoral lymph nodes in a relatively predictable fashion similar to the local spread of breast carcinoma. Lymphatic mapping using radioactive colloid should provide adequate means to sample these nodal basins while attempting to reduce postoperative morbidity. Methods of vulvar lymphoscintigraphy are described.