1
|
Sugarbaker D, Richards WG, Alsup CA, Jaklitsch MT, Corson JM, Godleski JJ, Chirieac LR, Bueno R, Zellos L. Impact of pathological staging on survival in patients with epithelial mesothelioma treated with extrapleural pneumonectomy. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.7706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
7706 Objective: There is no universally accepted staging system in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). A seventeen-year single institution experience of surgically treating a large epithelial MPM cohort with extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) gives insight to the applications and limitations of BWH/ DFCI and AJCC staging systems. Methods: We retrospectivly reviewed 526 consecutive patients with epithelial MPM who were surgically explored at our institution since 1988 with intent to perform EPP. Pathologic diagnoses of mesothelioma were confirmed and clinicopathologic data were recorded. Kaplan-Meyer survival from diagnosis was calculated. Those who underwent EPP were staged using BWH / DFCI (J Thorac Cardiov Surg 117:5463;1999) and AJCC (6th Edition) criteria. Operative deaths were included in the analysis and patients received varied adjuvant regimens. Results: Of 526 patients explored for potential EPP, 53 (10%) underwent alternative pleurectomy and 55 (11%) were unresectable. The remaining 418 (79%) underwent EPP. Of these, 307 (73%) were male. Median age at diagnosis was 57.9 years (17–78). Operative mortality was 5%. Median follow-up was 16 months and 23% of observations were censored. Overall median, 1-yr, 3-yr and 5-yr survival was: 18.9 mo., 68.8%, 26.3%, and 13.9%. The table below presents Kaplan-Meyer survival by stage. Conclusions: 1) Both pathological staging systems stratify survival in this cohort, although each system is limited in that a majority of patients are classified as stage 3. 2) BWH / DFCI criteria identify more stage 1–2 patients with favorable prognosis, 164 (39%) vs 46 (11%). 3) AJCC criteria classify more patients to stage 4, 76 (18%) vs 4 (1%), but appear to identify some patients with relatively favorable prognosis. 4) Selected criteria from both systems might be combined to optimally stratify patients with epithelial MPM undergoing EPP. No significant financial relationships to disclose. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - R. Bueno
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - L. Zellos
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shelley JJ, Alsup CA. Mixing irreversible hydrocolloid with no bubbles or hassles. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:558-60. [PMID: 1432784 DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(92)90434-c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|