Urodynamic profile of lower urinary tract symptoms in young men: A testimony of the truth?

AIM

To evaluate the impact of urodynamic study (UDS) in the management of young men presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective, observational study of urodynamic findings of 128 patients presented with LUTS at the Department of Urology, Institute of Nephrourology, Bangalore, over a period of 5 years (August 2014 to July 2019). Pre- and post-UDS diagnoses as well as treatment modalities were compared to evaluate the usefulness of UDS.

RESULTS

A total of 110 patients (86%) had abnormal UDS findings. Before UDS, 55 (43%) patients were clinically diagnosed for overactive bladder; after UDS, bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) was seen in 32 (25%) patients and detrusor overactivity in 18 (14.1%). Clinically, BOO was diagnosed in 36 (28.1%) patients; however, urodynamic findings of BOO were seen only in 23 (18%) patients. Pre-UDS, bladder underactivity was suspected in 23 (18%); however, underactive detrusor was noted in 20 (15.6%) patients, and 3 (2.4%) patients were normal on UDS. Post-UDS, antibiotics were not prescribed to anyone. 18 (14%) patients underwent surgery after UDS confirmation of BOO. 67 patients (52.3%) had their clinical diagnosis changed following UDS. Concomitant changes in the management were required for 59 patients (46%).

CONCLUSION

Etiologies of LUTSs in young men are more varied. Clinical diagnosis and treatment are often empirical and inaccurate. UDS is useful to achieve accurate diagnosis and to guide appropriate treatment. Video urodyanamics should be used to evaluate LUTS in young men.

A comparative study of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for solitary renal stone of 1-2 cm

Background:

PCNL is the treatment of choice for renal stones. But wide array of complications due to larger tract size(>20 Fr) has lead to development of improved techniques like miniPCNL(<20 Fr) and RIRS(Retrograde intrarenal surgery).

Aim and Objective:

To perform a study comparing miniPCNL with RIRS for renal stones 1-2 cm with respect to stone free rate , complications and quality of life.

Materials and Methods:

A prospective, randomised study was carried out our tertiary care centre, recruiting 40 patients in each group from Dec 2016 to Oct 2018. Patients demographic characteristics, operative findings, surgical outcomes and quality of life( SF-36 questionnaire) were recorded with 3 months of follow-up.

Results:

RIRS has longer operative time (69.75 min > 51.58 min; p=0.003), lesser radiation exposure (p=0.012), shorter hospital stay (p =0.15), lesser blood loss and lesser post operative pain on POD1 and POD2 (p =0.005, p=0.001 respectively). RIRS group patients sufferred more post op complications (p=0.03 )of which urosepsis was most common. Stone free rate is significantly better(p =0.003) in miniPCNL group on POD1 , while SFR's at 1 month (miniPCNL-90% and RIRS -85%) and 3 month (miniPCNL- 92.5% and RIRS -87.5%) was better in miniPCNL group, but statistically insignificant.On subgroup analysis SFR in lower pole calculus was better in miniPCNL group at 1month and 3 month (p=0.008). Second intervention for stone clearance was required in 3 patients of miniPCNL and 5 patients of RIRS, out of which 4 had lower pole stone.No significant differnce was found in quality of life in both groups at 1 month.

Conclusion:

MiniPCNL is a better treatment modality for higher single step stone free rate, shorter operative time and fewer postop complication. RIRS has SFR slightly less than miniPCNL but has less radiation exposure and much less post operative pain. There is no significant difference in quality of life in both groups.

A Retrospective Observational Study for Prediction of Stone-Free Status after Single-session of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Stones

Introduction: Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) is a preferred minimal invasive treatment modality for renal stones with advantages of being effective and having lower morbidity rates. Aim: To predict the Stone Free Rate (SFR) after RIRS with lower pole and non-lower pole stones. Materials and Methods: The records of 85 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral RIRS from September 2016 to July 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The studied parameters included patient demographics, stone characteristics (size, volume, and attenuation, Lower Pole Infundibulopelvic Angle (LP IPA) and operative time, presence of preoperative Double-J Stent (DJS) and Stone Free Status (SFS). Standard statistical tests were applied with level of significance as p<0.05. Results: Overall success rate was 83.5% (71 cases) while 14 cases had Residual Stones (RS) at 1 month. The mean age of the patients was 41.07±12.25 years. The mean operative time was 68.85±22.3 minutes. Mean stone size and stone volume were higher in the RS group compared to SF (Stone free) group, 15.07±1.5 mm vs. 12.28±1.6 mm, 1187±145 mm3 vs.680.67±289 mm3 respectively (p<0.001; p<0.001). In RS group, 90% (13) cases had IPA<45°, while 80% cases with IPA>45° were stone free. Patients with non-lower pole stones has SFR 2.8 times compared to LP stones (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, only LP IPA and LP stone location predicts SFS after RIRS. Conclusion: RIRS is effective procedure for renal stones. Stone size, stone volume, LP stone location and LP IPA effectively predict SFR. However, LP IPA and LP stone location are the most significant predictor of SFS, after single session RIRS for solitary renal stone.

Evaluation of Testicular Workup for Ischemia and Suspected Torsion score in patients presenting with acute scrotum

Background

Testicular torsion is one of the causes of acute scrotum and it requires timely evaluation and surgical treatment. Color Doppler is considered investigation of choice, but it may delay treatment, as, many times, it may not be available for emergency situations. Barbosa et al. created Testicular Workup for Ischemia and Suspected Torsion (TWIST) score based on clinical parameters for clinical diagnosis of testicular torsion. We have evaluated this score in our population.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively calculated TWIST score in patients of acute scrotum admitted to tertiary teaching institute. Patients without complete TWIST score were excluded from the study. The scoring system consisted of testicular swelling (2 points), hard testicle (2), absent cremasteric reflex (1), nausea/vomiting (1), and high-riding testis (1). Statistical analysis was done to evaluate the validity of scores.

Results

A total of 118 patients were included in the study, out of which 45 (38%) patients had testicular torsion. The mean age of patients was 16.6 years in testicular torsion patients and 15.2 years in other patients. Cutoff for low-risk and high-risk patients was two and five, respectively. Fifty percent, 26.2%, and 23.8% of patients were present in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Negative predictive value of TWIST score for low-risk patients was 96.61% while positive predictive value for high-risk patients was 92.86%.

Conclusions

TWIST score has high predictive value and can be used for clinical diagnosis of testicular torsion. It can decrease the need of color Doppler in about 50% of cases and can prevent delay in treatment.