Decision making by health professionals during COVID-19: an integrative review

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the scientific production on the decision making of health workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

Integrative review in the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, WoS, and BVS. Inclusion criteria: original articles available in full, in any language, related to the object investigated.

RESULTS

During this pandemic, health workers have been making decisions based on ethical/bioethical principles (utility, beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, proportionality, flexibility, clinical prognosis, duration of the need, and fair health attention), values (solidarity, equality, equity, utilitarianism, relational autonomy, reliability, reciprocity, maximization of the benefits and resources, and prioritization of those in worse conditions), beliefs and personal motivation, protocols, directives, tools, algorithms, recommendations, and criteria.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

Decision making has never been so necessary as in this pandemic. This article is not a recipe for the professionals, since decision making is based on numerous factors. However, it provides them with a foundation that can be helpful in this difficult process.

Construction and validation of an instrument for the structural assessment of wards for urinary continence in older adults

OBJECTIVE

to build and validate an instrument for structural assessment of wards for the preservation of urinary continence in hospitalized older adults.

METHOD

this is a methodological study divided into two stages. The first corresponded to an integrative literature review that guided the construction of the instrument. The second consisted of the content validation stage of the instrument, by means of expert consensus, using the Delphi technique. The selected experts were recognized in the field and authors of the articles included in the integrative review.

RESULTS

six experts participated in the content validation, which resulted in the "Instrument for Structural Assessment of Wards for the Preservation of Urinary Continence in Older Adults", composed of 27 items, distributed in three dimensions: "physical structure", "human resources", and "material resources". Two Delphi rounds were carried out for validation, resulting in a final version with 83% agreement among the experts.

CONCLUSION

the instrument reached content validity, requiring application for clinical validation. However, it can be used by researchers and health staff in hospital settings, in order to identify structural weaknesses and guide the priority of interventions for the quality and safety of this care.