Clinical and technical insights of tumour mutational burden in non-small cell lung cancer

Despite the durable responses provided by the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors in advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) without actionable targets in a subset of patients, a large proportion of them will progress after immunotherapy. Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) was the first biomarker approved for immunotherapy, although it has multiple limitations, thus the development of novel biomarkers is an urgent need. Tumour Mutational Burden (TMB) is an emerging biomarker defined as the total number of mutations per coding area of tumour genome. Targeted gene panels have emerged as a cost-effective approach to estimate TMB. However, there is still an unmet need to fully standardize sample requirements, panel size, and bioinformatic pipelines to ensure that TMB is calculated appropriately. In addition, researchers are also evaluating TMB calculation in liquid biopsy. In this work, we summarize the relevant advances and the clinical utility of TMB in NSCLC.

Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) as Immunotherapy Biomarker in Breast Cancer

Breast cancer constitutes the most common malignant neoplasm in women around the world. Approximately 12% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic stage, and between 5 and 30% of early or locally advanced BC patients will relapse, making it an incurable disease. PD-L1 ligation is an immune inhibitory molecule of the activation of T cells, playing a relevant role in numerous types of malignant tumors, including BC. The objective of the present review is to analyze the role of PD-L1 as a biomarker in the different BC subtypes, adding clinical trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors and their applicable results. Diverse trials using immunotherapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 in BC, as well as prospective or retrospective cohort studies about PD-L1 in BC, were included. Despite divergent results in the reviewed studies, PD-L1 seems to be correlated with worse prognosis in the hormone receptor positive subtype. Immune checkpoints inhibitors targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis have achieved great response rates in TNBC patients, especially in combination with chemotherapy, making immunotherapy a new treatment option in this scenario. However, the utility of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker in the rest of BC subtypes remains unclear. In addition, predictive differences have been found in response to immunotherapy depending on the stage of the tumor disease. Therefore, a better understanding of tumor microenvironment, as well as identifying new potential biomarkers or combined index scores, is necessary in order to make a better selection of the subgroups of BC patients who will derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Update on systemic treatment in early triple negative breast cancer

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease representing about 15% of all breast cancers. TNBC are usually high-grade histological tumors, and are generally more aggressive and difficult to treat due to the lack of targeted therapies available, and chemotherapy remains the standard treatment. There is a close relationship between pathological complete response after chemotherapy treatment and higher rates of disease-free survival and overall survival. In this review of systemic treatment in early triple negative breast cancer, our purpose is to analyze and compare different therapies, as well as to highlight the novelties of treatment in this breast cancer subtype.

Long term control stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic colorectal cancer: a single center study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate survival after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as radical treatment for metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) and to identify prognostic factors after treatment.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic CRC treated with SBRT on metastatic lesions were retrospectively analyzed between February 2012 and August 2016 at the General University Hospital of Valencia. The follow-up was carried out until July 15, 2018. The data have been collected in a database. Patients may have received prior systemic therapy and/or resection of metastatic disease. Endpoints were timed from end of SBRT and included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were identified. Before SBRT, 77.5% of the patients have received systemic therapy and 65.2% surgery for metastatic disease. Of metastatic lesions treated with SBRT 53.1% were located in the lung, 30.6% in the liver and 16.3% in other locations. Median survival were: PFS after treatment with SBRT was 9.9 months (95% CI: 4.64-15.1) and the median OS was 28.9 months (95% CI: 19.0-38.7). No relapses were observed in 20% of the patients after SBRT. The treatment was well tolerated and no patient had grade 3 or 4 adverse effects. Right colon [HR 16.53 (95% CI: 3.11-87.87), P value 0.001] and higher tumor stage (III-IV) [HR 12.30 (95% CI: 2.10-71.92), P value 0.005] showed a lower OS in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT for oligometastatic disease is an effective option for patients with advanced CRC, with encorauging survival outcomes. However, a definitive validation in large randomized studies is required.

Working towards a consensus on the oncological approach of breakthrough pain: a Delphi survey of Spanish experts

Purpose

There is a lack of standards for the diagnosis, assessment and management of breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). La Fundación ECO (the Foundation for Excellence and Quality in Oncology) commissioned a study to establish a consensus and lay the foundations for the appropriate management of BTcP in oncology patients.

Patients and methods

A modified Delphi survey comprising two rounds was used to gather and analyze data, which was conducted over the Internet. Each statement that reached a consensus with the respondents was defined as a median consensus score (MED) of ≥7, and agreement among panelists as an interquartile range (IQR) of ≤3.

Results

In total, 69 medical oncologists responded, with a broad consensus that BTcP implied exacerbations of high-intensity pain, as opposed to moderate pain. Furthermore, they concurred that appropriate diagnostic equipment is needed, and that rapid-onset fentanyl formulations should be the preferred treatment for BTcP management. The panelists agreed that a lack of appropriate information and training to attend to patients, as well as limited patient visitation rights, were barriers to effective BTcP management. Regarding gaps in detected knowledge, the panelists were unsure of the measures necessary to assess the burden of the disease on the patient’s quality of life and associated medication costs. Alongside this, there was a lack of awareness of the technical specifics of the different formulations of rapid-onset fentanyl.

Conclusion

These results represent the current status of BTcP management. They may inform recommendations and provide a framework for future research.

Role of RAS mutation status as a prognostic factor for patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin, with or without bevavizumab: A retrospective analysis

The role of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations as negative predictors for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has been firmly established. However, whether the RAS mutation status plays a role as a biomarker for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment remains controversial. Data from 93 CRC patients who received first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidines and oxaliplatin, with or without bevacizumab, were analyzed. We investigated the association between the RAS mutation status and clinical outcomes in terms of response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Mutations in RAS genes were observed in 47 (52.6%) patients (45 KRAS and 2 NRAS mutations). Patients with tumours harbouring RAS mutations were less suitable for primary tumour resection, were more likely to develop lung metastases, and received bevacizumab treatment for a shorter time period compared with those with wild-type tumours. The response rate to chemotherapy did not differ according to the RAS mutation status, and there were no significant differences in PFS [RAS mutation: 12 months, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.7-15.2 vs. RAS wild-type: 12 months, 95% CI: 9.67-14.32; P=0.857] or OS (RAS mutation: 20 months, 95% CI: 14.3-25.6 vs. RAS wild-type: 24 months, 95% CI: 18.7-29.2; P=0.631). Patients with RAS mutation vs. those with RAS wild-type exhibited a favourable trend in PFS when treated with bevacizumab (13 months, 95% CI: 6.5-19.4 vs. 10 months, 95% CI: 4.2-15.7, respectively; P=0.07) and OS (27 months, 95% CI: 18.5-35.4 vs. 15 months, 95% CI: 12.4-17.5, respectively; P=0.22). In conclusion, RAS mutations are not a prognostic marker for PFS and OS in CRC patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatine treatment, with or without bevacizumab. RAS mutations are not predictive of the lack of efficacy of bevacizumab, and these patients appear to benefit from anti-angiogenic treatment.

SIADH-related hyponatremia in hospital day care units: clinical experience and management with tolvaptan

Hyponatremia (Na ˂135 mmol/l) is the most frequent electrolyte disorder in clinical practice, and the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) is the commonest cause of hyponatremia in cancer patients. Correcting hyponatremia in these patients can reduce morbidity and mortality, increase the response to anti-cancer agents, and help reduce hospital length of stay and costs. Tolvaptan is an oral medication used to treat SIADH-related hyponatremia patients that needs to be initiated at hospital so patients can have their serum sodium monitored. If tolvaptan could be initiated in hospital day care units (DCUs), performing the same tests, hospitalization could be avoided, quality of life improved, and costs reduced. This is the first publication where a panel of oncologists are sharing their experience and making some recommendations with the use of tolvaptan to treat SIADH-related hyponatremia in DCU after collecting and examining 35 clinical cases with these type of patients. The conclusion from this retrospective observational analysis is that the use of tolvaptan in DCU is safe and effective in the therapeutic management of SIADH-related hyponatremia.

Oncologists’ perceptions of cancer pain management in Spain: The real and the ideal

AIM

Studies in some countries suggest that cancer pain is often not adequately controlled, but little is known about the situation in Spain. The objective of this study was to identify medical oncologists' perceptions about pain management in their patients.

METHODS

Two-round Delphi survey of 24 medical oncologists from 22 large, geographically diverse hospitals in Spain. Physicians rated each of 150 statements on a Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5=strongly agree). The mean, standard deviation and frequency of replies in three agreement categories were calculated for each item. Statements allowing comparison of oncologists' perceptions of how pain is managed in routine clinical practice with how it should be managed were grouped together and analyzed.

RESULTS

The most notable discrepancies between the real and the ideal occurred in the failure to provide written information or to confirm that patients understand what they are told, the lack of comprehensive and systematic evaluation of pain, and the lack of use of non-pharmacological treatments (NPTs) for cancer pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical oncologists need to improve their communication skills, providing patients with both written and verbal information about their disease and the plan for pain management. Pain should be evaluated at each patient visit using validated scales, and greater attention should be paid to the possible use of NPTs.

[Euthanasia in patients with cancer and the continuous-care providers]

During the clinical evolution of patients with cancer there are many occasions, or phases of the disease, when there are no specific treatments and, as such, we need to provide maximum comfort following appropriate symptom control; in this stage it is fundamental to respect personal autonomy together with the option to reject futile treatment. With appropriate control of symptoms it is possible to reach the stage where the majority of the patients do not continue to suffer. Continuous-care providers for cancer patients are those who are responsible for providing help to resolve these situations. In palliative medicine there are highly-efficacious procedures to the help in these last hours. Sedation is applied when it is impossible to control symptoms by other means. With appropriate Carer cover, it is not necessary to introduce laws on assisted suicide and/or active voluntary euthanasia, neither because of the magnitude of demand, nor because of the difficulties in achieving appropriate control of symptoms.

[Safety and efficacy of oral trans-mucosal fentanyl citrate in the long-term treatment of breakthrough pain in oncology patients: the ECODIR study]

INTRODUCTION

Oral trans-mucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is the one drug specifically developed for the management of breakthrough pain. This study assesses the long-term safety and efficacy of OTFC standard clinical conditions. Patients and methods. Six-month observational study performed on cancer patients with episodes of breakthrough pain. Safety was assessed by recording the advent of adverse events and efficacy by the evaluating the intensity of breakthrough pain.

RESULTS

174 cancer patients were recruited into the study. All adverse reactions reported were mild or moderate. OTFC was significantly faster (time to the commencement of pain relief: 12.7 +/- 11.4 vs 32.7 +/- 18.4 minutes; p < 0.001) and potent (post-treatment pain intensity: 3.4 +/- 1.5 vs 4.3 +/- 1.5; p < 0.001) than the previously-used drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study confirms the good safety profile of OTFC as well as its effectiveness over long-term period treatment of breakthrough pain.

Análisis de la concentración sérica del ADN tumoral en el cáncer de pulmón no microcítico y avanzado: ¿es útil como factor pronóstico?

INTRODUCTION

Presence of circulating DNA in the serum of patients with cancer makes detection of tumour-specific genetic alterations feasible.

OBJECTIVE

To study serum DNA concentration in patients diagnosed as having advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and to evaluate its relationship with age, histology, stage, response, time-to-progression (TTP), and survival.

METHODS

Serum DNA from 78 patients was purified and spectrophotometrically quantified.

RESULTS

No significant correlations were found between serum DNA concentration and age, histology, response and survival. There was a significant correlation with respect to stage (IIIB = 408.75 ng/ml; IV = 478.74 ng/ml; p = 0.02). When patients were grouped according to DNA concentration, significant correlation with TTP was found; establishing a cut-off point at 500 ng/ml ([DNA] < 500 ng/ml TTP = 7.25 months, 95%CI: 3.5-5.25; [DNA ] > or = 500 ng/ml TTP = 4.25 months, 95%CI: 2-6.5; p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Using the present method, DNA concentration quantification appears to be simple, but with certain deficiencies due to inter-sample variability and low specificity. This is because total DNA concentration is measured without distinguishing as to whether it is tumour-related. We suggest that there is a correlation between DNA concentration and prognosis which enables an analysis of the natural history of the disease.

Second-line treatment with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cisplatin failures: a pilot study

PURPOSE

This pilot study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who had failed cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had refractory or resistant NSCLC, WHO performance status 0-2, adequate hematologic parameters and normal hepatic, renal and cardiac function. Gemcitabine (1200 mg/m2) was administered on days 1, 8 and 15; vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 8, every 4 weeks until patients experienced disease progression.

RESULTS

From September 1997 to March 1998, 16 patients were enrolled (six: stage IIIB: ten: stage IV). All 16 patients were assessable for toxicity and evaluated for response. One complete (6.25%) response and no partial responses were observed. Median survival was 25 weeks (95% CI 19-30). A median of 3.31 courses per patient was administered, and the median interval between courses was 28 days. The median delivered dose was 664.85 mg/m2 per week of gemcitabine and 10.71 mg/m2 per week of vinorelbine, corresponding to a relative dose intensity of 0.73 and 0.85, respectively. Grade 2/3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 13 (24.52%) of 53 courses administered. Neutropenia Grade 2/3 occurred in 14 courses (26.41%). There were seven (13.20%) episodes of fever related to the drug administration. Mild asthenia was observed in six (37.5%) patients. Other toxicities were mild to moderate.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that this gemcitabine/vinorelbine combination is not an active salvage regimen in patients with refractory NSCLC. The combination merits further evaluation with modified regimens.