Wraparound programmes for pregnant and parenting women with substance use concerns in Canada: Partnerships are essential

Wraparound programmes, wherein multiple services are offered at one location, are effective in engaging pregnant or parenting women experiencing substance use and other complex challenges while also addressing gaps in services between the health, child welfare and addictions fields. Evaluations of these programmes have demonstrated positive outcomes; nevertheless, few studies have focused on how programmes' cross-sectoral partnerships are structured and the difference these partnerships make. Drawing on the Co-Creating Evidence study, a three-year Canadian evaluation of eight multi-service programmes in six provinces, this article examines the partnerships that make wraparound service delivery possible. The study used a mixed-methods design involving interviews, questionnaires, output and de-identified client data; this article reports on qualitative findings only. Sixty service partners and 108 programme staff were interviewed in 2018 and 2019. Qualitative data analysis techniques were applied; NVivo12 software (QRS International, Melbourne, Australia) was utilised to facilitate the analyses. In terms of the programmes' partnership characteristics, overall, programmes more commonly formed partnerships with child welfare, health services (e.g. primary care, public health and perinatal care) and specialised health services such as mental health services, maternal addictions and Opioid Agonist Therapy. The programmes had fewer partnerships with housing, income assistance, Indigenous cultural programming, infant development and legal services. Key benefits of partnerships included: clients' improved access to health and social care, addressing social determinants of health; partners' increased knowledge about the significance of trauma in relation to women's substance use; improved child welfare outcomes and strengthened cultural safety and (re)connection. Key challenges included: tensions between partners regarding differing perceptions, mandates and responsibilities; personal differences and systemic barriers. Lastly, by means of steady dialogue and collaboration, partners increased their appreciation and use of the trauma-informed, harm reduction approaches that are central to wraparound programmes.

Multi-service prevention programs for pregnant and parenting women with substance use and multiple vulnerabilities: Program structure and clients' perspectives on wraparound programming

BACKGROUND

In Canada, several community-based, multi-service programs aimed at reaching vulnerable pregnant or parenting women with substance use and complex issues have emerged. These programs offer basic needs and social supports along with perinatal, primary, and mental health care, as well as substance use services. Evaluations of these 'one-stop' programs have demonstrated positive outcomes; nevertheless, few published studies have focused on how these programs are structured, on their cross-sectoral partnerships, and on clients' perceptions of their services.

METHODS

The Co-Creating Evidence (CCE) project was a three-year evaluation of eight multi-service programs located in six Canadian jurisdictions. The study used a mixed-methods design involving semi-structured interviews, questionnaires, output data, and de-identified client data. This article focuses on qualitative interviews undertaken with 125 clients during the first round of site visits, supplemented by interview data with program staff and service partners.

RESULTS

Each of the programs in the CCE study employs a multi-service model that both reflects a wrap-around approach to care and is intentionally geared to removing barriers to accessing services. The programs are either operated by a health authority (n = 4) or by a community-based agency (n = 4). The programs' focus on the social determinants of health, and their provision of primary, prenatal, perinatal and mental health care services is essential; similarly, on-site substance use and trauma/violence related services is pivotal. Further, programs' support in relation to women's child welfare issues promotes collaboration, common understanding of expectations, and helps to prevent child/infant removals.

CONCLUSIONS

The programs involved in the Co-Creating Evidence study have impressively blended social and primary care and prenatal care. Their success in respectfully and flexibly responding to women's diverse needs, interests and readiness, within a community-based, wraparound service delivery model paves the way for others offering pre- and postnatal programming.