The influence of a probiotic/prebiotic supplement on microbial and metabolic parameters of equine cecal fluid or fecal slurry in vitro

The microbes that reside within the equine hindgut create a complex and dynamic ecosystem. The equine hindgut microbiota is intimately associated with health and, as such, represents an area which can be beneficially modified. Synbiotics, supplements that combine probiotic micro-organisms with prebiotic ingredients, are a potential means of influencing the hindgut microbiota to promote health and prevent disease. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the influence of an equine probiotic/prebiotic supplement on characteristics of the microbiota and metabolite production in vitro. Equine cecal fluid and fecal material were collected from an abattoir in QC, CAN. Five hundred milliliters of cecal fluid was used to inoculate chemostat vessels maintained as batch fermenters (chemostat cecal, N = 11) with either 0 g (control) or 0.44 g of supplement added at 12 h intervals. One hundred milliliters of cecal fluid (anaerobic cecal, N = 15) or 5% fecal slurry (anaerobic fecal, N = 6) were maintained in an anaerobic chamber with either 0 g (control) or 0.356 g of supplement added at the time of vessel establishment. Samples were taken from vessels at vessel establishment (0), 24, or 48 h of incubation. Illumina sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and bioinformatics were performed for microbiome analysis. Metabolite data was obtained via NMR spectroscopy. All statistical analyses were run in SAS 9.4. There was no effect of treatment at 24 or 48h on alpha or beta diversity indices and limited taxonomic differences were noted. Acetate, propionate, and butyrate were higher in treated compared to untreated vessels in all methods. A consistent effect of supplementation on the metabolic profile with no discernable impact on the microbiota of these in vitro systems indicates inoculum microbe viability and a utilization of the provided fermentable substrate within the systems. Although no changes within the microbiome were apparent, the consistent changes in metabolites indicates a potential prebiotic effect of the added supplement and merits further exploration.

A Comparison of Methods to Maintain the Equine Cecal Microbial Environment In Vitro Utilizing Cecal and Fecal Material

Simple Summary

In vitro systems for the fermentation of equine gastrointestinal (GI) content provide researchers with the ability to evaluate changes which may occur due to external influences but which cannot be accessed in vivo. The objective of this study was to evaluate three fermentation systems to replicate the equine cecal environment with regard to the microbiome and metabolite profile. The microbiome and metabolome of the fecal slurry used as inocula in this study were not representative of the cecal systems and care should be taken if feces are to be used to mimic proximal hindgut regions such as the cecum. However, the microbiome of the cecal inoculum maintained in either a chemostat batch fermenter or anaerobic chamber was fairly comparable. The metabolite concentrations, but not rate of production, were significantly different between the two cecal systems. These results provide a context to determine the most appropriate methods by which to create a fermentation system to reflect the equine cecal environment. They also highlight that caution must be exercised as many factors may influence the microbial and metabolic profiles within these systems; as such, they can best be used to demonstrate trends and gross reactions to environmental stimuli.

Abstract

The equine gastrointestinal (GI) microbiota is intimately related to the horse. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the microbiome and metabolome of cecal inoculum maintained in an anaerobic chamber or chemostat batch fermenter, as well as the fecal slurry maintained in an anaerobic chamber over 48 h. Cecal and fecal content were collected from healthy adult horses immediately upon death. Cecal fluid was used to inoculate chemostat vessels (chemostat cecal, n = 11) and vessels containing cecal fluid (anaerobic cecal, n = 15) or 5% fecal slurry (anaerobic fecal, n = 6) were maintained in an anaerobic chamber. Sampling for microbiome and metabolome analysis was performed at vessel establishment (0 h), and after 24 h and 48 h of fermentation. Illumina sequencing was performed, and metabolites were identified via nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Alpha and beta diversity indices, as well as individual metabolite concentrations and metabolite regression equations, were analyzed and compared between groups and over time. No differences were evident between alpha or beta diversity in cecal fluid maintained in either an anaerobic chamber or chemostat. The microbiome of the fecal inoculum maintained anaerobically shifted over 48 h and was not comparable to that of the cecal inoculum. Metabolite concentrations were consistently highest in chemostat vessels and lowest in anaerobic fecal vessels. Interestingly, the rate of metabolite change in anaerobic cecal and chemostat cecal vessels was comparable. In conclusion, maintaining an equine cecal inoculum in either an anaerobic chamber or chemostat vessel for 48 h is comparable in terms of the microbiome. However, the microbiome and metabolome of fecal material is not comparable with a cecal inoculum. Future research is required to better understand the factors that influence the level of microbial activity in vitro, particularly when microbiome data identify analogous communities.

Culturing Human Gut Microbiomes in the Laboratory

The human gut microbiota is a complex community of prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbes and viral particles that is increasingly associated with many aspects of host physiology and health. However, the classical microbiology approach of axenic culture cannot provide a complete picture of the complex interactions between microbes and their hosts in vivo. As such, recently there has been much interest in the culture of gut microbial ecosystems in the laboratory as a strategy to better understand their compositions and functions. In this review, we discuss the model platforms and methods available in the contemporary microbiology laboratory to study human gut microbiomes, as well as current knowledge surrounding the isolation of human gut microbes for the potential construction of defined communities for use in model systems. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology, Volume 75 is October 2021. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Defined gut microbial communities: promising tools to understand and combat disease

Defined gut microbial communities are emerging tools that allow detailed studies of microbial ecosystems and their interactions with the host. In this article, we review strategies underlying the design of defined consortia and summarize the efforts to introduce simplified communities into in vitro and in vivo models. We conclude by highlighting the potential of defined microbial ecosystems as effective modulation strategies for health benefits.

1D 1 H NMR as a Tool for Fecal Metabolomics

Metabolomic studies allow a deeper understanding of the processes of a given ecological community than nucleic acid-based surveys alone. In the case of the gut microbiota, a metabolic profile of, for example, a fecal sample provides details about the function and interactions within the distal region of the gastrointestinal tract, and such a profile can be generated in a number of different ways. This unit elaborates on the use of 1D ¹ H NMR spectroscopy as a commonly used method to characterize small-molecule metabolites of the fecal metabonome (meta-metabolome). We describe a set of protocols for the preparation of fecal water extraction, storage, scanning, measurement of pH, and spectral processing and analysis. We also compare the effects of various sample storage conditions for processed and unprocessed samples to provide a framework for comprehensive analysis of small molecules from stool-derived samples. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC Basic Protocol 1: Extracting fecal water from crude fecal samples Alternate Protocol 1: Extracting fecal water from small crude fecal samples Basic Protocol 2: Acquiring NMR spectra of metabolite samples Alternate Protocol 2: Acquiring NMR spectra of metabolite samples using Bruker spectrometer running TopSpin 3.x Alternate Protocol 3: Acquiring NMR spectra of metabolite samples by semiautomated process Basic Protocol 3: Measuring sample pH Support Protocol 1: Cleaning NMR tubes Basic Protocol 4: Processing raw spectra data Basic Protocol 5: Profiling spectra Support Protocol 2: Spectral profiling of sugars and other complex metabolites.