Service Use Patterns by Children With Down Syndrome in a Canadian Region

Children with Down syndrome require services from different sectors over time to optimize health and development, however, there is little information on longitudinal, cross-sector service use. Parents of children with Down syndrome attending a Canadian children's hospital participated in semistructured interviews covering life-time multiple sector service use. Five key service patterns were identified: (1) primary care physicians playing a circumscribed role; (2) a marked shift in public habilitative service receipt from development agencies in the preschool years to exclusive school delivery after school entry; (3) families obtaining private services to address gaps from public sector services; (4) a prominent role for parents to identify additional services; and (5) service variability as a function of timing and severity of medical comorbidity.

Cross-sector service use patterns among children with developmental disabilities in a district in Canada

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of information about cross-sector service use by children with developmental disabilities despite their need for services from multiple sectors.

METHODS

Responses to service use questions from a parent-completed survey on school-aged children who attended clinics specific for those with developmental disabilities at a Canadian children's hospital were examined.

RESULTS

School meetings were the most common of three professional meeting types attended in the last 12 months (64.9%) for the sample of 205 children. Recreational services were the most common of five service types received in the same time period (79.0%). Using ordinal logistic regression models, a higher number of behavioural difficulties was the only variable consistently related to indices of more meeting types (school, physician, other) attended and more service types received (recreation, respite, etc.).

CONCLUSIONS

The service relationship with behavioural problems, and not socio-demographic variables, is consistent with a needs-based oriented delivery system.

What adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities say they need to access annual health examinations: System navigation support and person-centred care

OBJECTIVE

To gain an understanding of the support needs of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) when scheduling, traveling to, and attending annual health examinations (AHEs).

DESIGN

Qualitative study that is part of a large population-level intervention aiming to increase uptake of AHEs among adults with IDD.

SETTING

Ontario.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 8 men and 5 women with IDD took part in semistructured interviews about their personal experiences related to AHEs.

METHODS

Thematic analysis was used to examine experiences relating to scheduling, traveling to, and attending AHEs.

MAIN FINDINGS

Support emerged as the overarching theme. Support included assistance navigating the health care system (assistance scheduling AHEs, reminders to book AHEs, financial assistance, transportation) and person-centred care (respect of privacy and autonomy, communication style, kindness, compassion, rapport with physician, health advocacy, and collaboration). Barriers to this support were also identified (lack of rapport, perception of unfriendliness, perception that the physician is too busy to tend to needs, and perception that the physician did not want to perform AHEs).

CONCLUSION

For adults with IDD, system navigation support and person-centred care were central to accessing AHEs. In collaboration with informal caregivers, physicians have an important role in reducing barriers to patients accessing this valuable preventive care opportunity. Physicians can fulfil some of the needs disclosed by adults with IDD related to attending AHEs by offering support for scheduling appointments, by linking patients with IDD to resources that facilitate appointment attendance, and by increasing consultation duration.

Are we making a difference in primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities?

OBJECTIVES

To examine the impact of the dissemination of guidelines to physicians and of a population-level health communication intervention on the percentage of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) receiving preventive care through primary care.

METHODS

Noninstitutionalized adults with IDD in the province of Ontario, Canada, aged 40 to 64 years were matched to Ontarians without such disabilities each fiscal year (FY) from 2003 to 2016. Health administrative data were used to create a composite measure of receipt of recommended preventive primary care. Age-adjusted rates were used to assess trends, and average two-year rate ratios (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions.

RESULTS

The number of adults with IDD identified ranged from 20 030 in FY 2003 to 28 080 in FY 2016. The percentage of adults with IDD receiving recommended preventive primary care ranged from 43.4% in 2003 to 55.7% in 2015. Men with IDD had a 53.7% increase across the 13 years, while women with IDD only had a 30.9% increase. When evaluating the impact of the interventions, men with IDD were 4% more likely (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05) to receive recommended primary care in FY 2015 and FY 2016 as compared to FY 2009 and FY 2010; in contrast, women with IDD were 5% less likely (RR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93-0.98). A comparable drop was observed among women without IDD.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 45% of adults with IDD in Ontario still do not receive recommended preventive care through primary care. Long-term impacts of the interventions introduced in the province may still occur over time, so ongoing monitoring is warranted. Special attention should be given to the preventive care needs of women with IDD.

[Not Available]

Objectif

Proposer aux médecins de soins primaires une approche novatrice pour la détermination des risques et la prise de décisions cliniques connexes dans la prise en charge de troubles mentaux indifférenciés.

Sources de l’information

Nous avons procédé à une recherche documentaire dans PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO et Google Scholar à l’aide des expressions de recherche suivantes, en anglais : diagnostic uncertainty, diagnosis, risk identification, risk assessment/methods, risk, risk factors, risk management/methods, cognitive biases and psychiatry, decision making, mental disorders/diagnosis, clinical competence, evidence-based medicine, interviews as topic, psychiatry/education, psychiatry/methods, documentation/methods, forensic psychiatry/education, forensic psychiatry/methods, mental disorders/classification, mental disorders/psychology, violence/prevention and control et violence/psychology.

Message principal

Les troubles mentaux constituent une grande part de la pratique en soins primaires; ils se présentent souvent de manière indifférenciée et ce, pendant de longues périodes. La difficile quête d’un diagnostic peut détourner l’attention de la détermination des risques, parce que nous présumons souvent qu’il faut un diagnostic avant d’amorcer un traitement. Cette situation peut avoir contribué par inadvertance à des événements indésirables. Il faudrait en priorité se concentrer sur les points saillants relatifs aux risques que présente le patient. Cet article propose une approche novatrice pour organiser les renseignements sur le patient afin d’aider à la détermination des risques et à la prise de décisions relativement à la prise en charge des patients souffrant de troubles mentaux indifférenciés.

Conclusion

Une approche structurée peut aider les médecins à gérer l’incertitude clinique fréquente dans la détermination des risques chez des patients souffrant de troubles mentaux, et à composer avec l’anxiété et les biais cognitifs courants qui influencent la prise de décisions en matière de risques. En se concentrant sur les risques, les déficiences fonctionnelles et les symptômes connexes à l’aide d’un cadre novateur, les médecins peuvent répondre aux besoins immédiats de leurs patients tout en continuant à rechercher un diagnostic précis et à établir un traitement à long terme.

Approach to risk identification in undifferentiated mental disorders

OBJECTIVE

To provide primary care physicians with a novel approach to risk identification and related clinical decision making in the management of undifferentiated mental disorders.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

We conducted a review of the literature in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar using the search terms diagnostic uncertainty, diagnosis, risk identification, risk assessment/methods, risk, risk factors, risk management/methods, cognitive biases and psychiatry, decision making, mental disorders/diagnosis, clinical competence, evidence-based medicine, interviews as topic, psychiatry/education, psychiatry/methods, documentation/methods, forensic psychiatry/education, forensic psychiatry/methods, mental disorders/classification, mental disorders/psychology, violence/prevention and control, and violence/psychology.

MAIN MESSAGE

Mental disorders are a large component of practice in primary care and often present in an undifferentiated manner, remaining so for prolonged periods. The challenging search for a diagnosis can divert attention from risk identification, as diagnosis is commonly presumed to be necessary before treatment can begin. This might inadvertently contribute to preventable adverse events. Focusing on salient aspects of the patient presentation related to risk should be prioritized. This article presents a novel approach to organizing patient information to assist risk identification and decision making in the management of patients with undifferentiated mental disorders.

CONCLUSION

A structured approach can help physicians to manage the clinical uncertainty common to risk identification in patients with mental disorders and cope with the common anxiety and cognitive biases that affect priorities in risk-related decision making. By focusing on risk, functional impairments, and related symptoms using a novel framework, physicians can meet their patients' immediate needs while continuing the search for diagnostic clarity and long-term treatment.