530. Bamlanivimab (BAM) for SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Rates and Risk Factors for Hospitalization after Monoclonal Antibody Administration in a High-Risk Population

Background

In response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, an emergency use authorization (EUA) was issued for neutralizing antibody therapies including BAM. Licensing trials suggest that use of BAM reduces hospitalizations when compared with placebo (1.6% vs 6.3%). However, the real world impact of BAM is not well-described. In this study, risk factors, outcomes, and hospitalization rates among high-risk outpatients presenting with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 who received BAM were examined.

Methods

This is a single center retrospective analysis of all patients who received BAM monotherapy between 11/11/2020 and 3/16/2021. Electronic health records were reviewed for baseline demographics, EUA indications, comorbidities, and outcomes to include infusion reactions, hospitalizations, and deaths occurring within 29 days of BAM administration. Moderate COVID-19 was defined as having any infiltrate on chest imaging prior to BAM administration. Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare categorical values as appropriate, and Mann-Whitney U for continuous variables.

Results

Of the 101 patients who received BAM (median age 64 years; 21% black; 4% Hispanic; 55% male), 13 were subsequently admitted. 22 patients (22%) had moderately severe disease as evidenced by abnormal imaging. Severity on presentation, number of indications for therapy, hypertension, stroke, diabetes, and number of co-morbidities were significantly associated with subsequent admission (table 1). No patients had adverse infusion reactions. Of those hospitalized, 8 (61.5%) were for COVID-19, the median duration of hospitalization was 2 days, and 4 received guideline-directed treatment for COVID-19 (table 2).

Table 1. Factors Associated with Hospitalization Following Bamlanivimab (BAM) Administration

Conclusion

In a high-risk population, hospitalization rates were higher than those observed in clinical trials, with 8% of subjects being admitted for COVID-19. Disease severity on presentation, multiple indications for therapy, and the presence of multiple co-morbidities were all associated with subsequent admission. Reassuringly, BAM was well tolerated, and in those requiring admission, hospitalizations were short, resource utilization was low, and there were no deaths.

Disclosures

Benjamin L. Custer, M.D., Alexion Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Armata Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder)Biomarin Pharmaceutical (Shareholder)Crispr Therapeutics (Shareholder)CVS Health Corp (Shareholder)Editas Medicine (Shareholder)Gilead (Shareholder)Glaxo Smith Kline (Shareholder)Hologic Inc (Shareholder)Merck (Shareholder)Mesoblast LTD (Shareholder)Pfizer (Shareholder)Sanofi (Shareholder)Unitedhealth Group (Shareholder)Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Shareholder) Dana M. Blyth, MD, Nothing to disclose

1364. Microbiology of Sepsis in a Combat-Trauma Military Population

Background

There are limited data on sepsis in combat casualties. We examined characteristics of sepsis, specific infections, and associated microbiology in a complex combat trauma population.

Methods

The Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study collected infection-related data from military personnel wounded during deployment (2009-2014). Medevac patients transferred to participating US military hospitals with sepsis or septic shock based on the Sepsis-1 SIRS criteria were analyzed for associated potential sources and infection-associated clinical microbiology.

Results

Prevalence of sepsis was 24.7% (667 of 2699 patients) with 93 (14%) patients meeting septic shock criteria. There were 1013 sepsis/shock episodes (SSE) among 667 subjects. Infections attributed to SSE were identified in 996 (98.3%) of 1013 episodes, primarily being bloodstream infections (BSI) +/- other infections (29.5%), skin and soft tissue (SSTI)/osteomyelitis (35.3%), pneumonia (12.1%), and multiple concurrent infections (14.2%). At least 1 organism was identified in 96% of SSE and 53% were polymicrobial. Gram-positive organisms (GP) were identified in 54% of SSE: 16% with multiple GP, of monomicrobial infections 4.1% were S. aureus, 15.8% other staphylococci, and 13% Enterococcus spp. Gram-negative bacilli (GN) were identified from 74.5% of SSE: 34% with multiple GN, of monomicrobial infections 11% were Pseudomonas spp., 8% E. coli, 6% Enterobacter spp., and 6% Acinetobacter spp. Mycobacterial species were uncommon (0.9%). Yeast, mold, and anaerobes were identified from 19%, 22%, and 12.5% of SSE, respectively. Compared to sepsis, septic shock infections were more often polymicrobial (p< 0.001), and had more infections with ESKAPEE pathogens, only Mucor spp., and only Bacteroides (p< 0.05). More infections with only Pseudomonas spp. and only non-lugdunensis coagulase-negative Staphylococci were identified among sepsis patients (p< 0.05).

Conclusion

Sepsis rates, using the Sepsis-1 criteria are sensitive but lack specificity supporting reclassification using updated Sepsis-3 criteria. In a complex trauma population, sepsis is common with most frequent infections related to SSTI/osteomyelitis, as well as BSI and multiple concurrent infections with a diverse spectrum of microbiology.

Disclosures

Dana M. Blyth, MD, Nothing to disclose

Pneumocystis jirovecii Disease: Basis for the Revised EORTC/MSGERC Invasive Fungal Disease Definitions in Individuals Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus

BACKGROUND

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) causes substantive morbidity in immunocompromised patients. The EORTC/MSGERC convened an expert group to elaborate consensus definitions for Pneumocystis disease for the purpose of interventional clinical trials and epidemiological studies and evaluation of diagnostic tests.

METHODS

Definitions were based on the triad of host factors, clinical-radiologic features, and mycologic tests with categorization into probable and proven Pneumocystis disease, and to be applicable to immunocompromised adults and children without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Definitions were formulated and their criteria debated and adjusted after public consultation. The definitions were published within the 2019 update of the EORTC/MSGERC Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease. Here we detail the scientific rationale behind the disease definitions.

RESULTS

The diagnosis of proven PCP is based on clinical and radiologic criteria plus demonstration of P. jirovecii by microscopy using conventional or immunofluorescence staining in tissue or respiratory tract specimens. Probable PCP is defined by the presence of appropriate host factors and clinical-radiologic criteria, plus amplification of P. jirovecii DNA by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in respiratory specimens and/or detection of β-d-glucan in serum provided that another invasive fungal disease and a false-positive result can be ruled out. Extrapulmonary Pneumocystis disease requires demonstration of the organism in affected tissue by microscopy and, preferably, PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated definitions of Pneumocystis diseases should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research in a broad range of immunocompromised patients without HIV.

Revision and Update of the Consensus Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease From the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential.

METHODS

To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved.

RESULTS

There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.

Difficult to Treat Infections in the Burn Patient

Background: Unusual infections can lead to complications in more severely burned patients and pose major challenges in treatment. Methods: The published literature of retrospective reviews and case series of the uncommon infections of osteomyelitis, polymicrobial bacteremia, recurrent bacteremia, endocarditis, central nervous system (CNS), and rare fungal infections in burned patients have been summarized and presented. Results: When compared with infections occurring in the non-burn population, these infections in burn patients are more likely to be because of gram-negative bacteria or fungi. Because of hyperdynamic physiology and changes in immunomodulatory response secondary to burns, the clinical presentation of these infections in a patient with major burns differs from that of the non-burn patient and may not be identified until the post-mortem examination. Some of these infections (osteomyelitis, endocarditis, CNS, rare fungal infections) may necessitate surgical intervention in addition to antimicrobial therapy to achieve cure. The presence of the burn and allograft can also present unique challenges for surgical management. Conclusions: These difficult and unusual infections in the severely burned patient necessitate an index of suspicion, appropriate diagnosis, identification and sensitivities of the putative pathogen, effective systemic antimicrobial therapy, and appropriate surgical intervention if recovery is to be achieved.

HIV PrEP in the Military: Experience at a Tertiary Care Military Medical Center

Objectives

We evaluated human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) administration at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC), which serves a geographic area at high risk of HIV infection.

Methods

Medical records were reviewed for all patients initiating PrEP at WRNMMC from November 1, 2013, to March 30, 2016. Demographic, laboratory, clinical, and risk exposure characteristics and outcomes were described.

Results

One hundred fifty-nine patients received PrEP; 133 (84%) patients were active duty, 95 (60%) patients were over 28 yr old. The majority were non-Hispanic Whites (n = 87, 55%). The median men who have sex with men (MSM) risk index score was 18.0 (IQR 12.0-22.0); 20 patients scored less than 10. One hundred and thirty-one (82%) patients remained on PrEP through the evaluation period. Patients mainly discontinued PrEP for service-related or toxicity reasons. Incident STIs occurred in 31 (19%) patients. No cases of HIV seroconversion were observed.

Conclusions

In this first description of PrEP utilization in a U.S. military health care system, a significant number of patients were non-Hispanic Whites, well-educated, were older, or were otherwise at low risk for HIV acquisition. Further effort is needed to enhance PrEP use among the higher risk young African-American MSM population, and further studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of PrEP in individuals who are not categorized as high risk.

Longitudinal assessment of cardiac diastolic function in HIV-infected patients

Asymptomatic isolated diastolic dysfunction (DD), with normal left ventricular systolic function, may be the first indication of underlying cardiac disease in HIV-negative populations. We previously reported a high prevalence (37%) of DD among asymptomatic HIV-infected patients at low risk for AIDS and cardiovascular disease (CVD). We performed a longitudinal assessment of interval echocardiographic changes in this cohort over a four-year period. Repeat transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) utilized standard techniques. Sixty (of the original 91) HIV-infected patients, predominately men, underwent repeat TTE (median follow-up 3.7 years, interquartile range [IQR] 3.5, 4.0). Cohort characteristics (median; IQR) include age 42.0 (36.5, 46.0) years, HIV duration 16.4 years (8.1, 18.9), current CD4 count 572.0 cells/mm(3) (436.5, 839.0), antiretroviral therapy (ART) duration 8.1 years (4.8, 13.4) and Framingham risk score 1.0 (0.0, 2.0). DD was observed in 28/60 patients on re-evaluation (47%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 34%, 60%); 31% (11/36) of patients had new onset DD for an overall incidence of 8.2/100 person-years. On follow-up, subjects with DD were older, had a trend towards higher body mass index, hypertension and longer duration of HIV infection compared with subjects without DD. We confirmed a high prevalence of DD (47%) in asymptomatic HIV-infected patients at low risk for AIDS and CVD.

High dose atorvastatin decreases cellular markers of immune activation without affecting HIV-1 RNA levels: results of a double-blind randomized placebo controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) exhibit antiviral activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and may modulate the immune response to HIV infection. Studies evaluating the antiviral activity of statins have yielded conflicting results.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial to investigate the effect of atorvastatin on HIV-1 RNA (primary objective) and cellular markers of immune activation (secondary objective). HIV-infected individuals not receiving antiretroviral therapy were randomized to receive either 8 weeks of atorvastatin (80 mg) or placebo daily. After a 4-6 week washout phase, participants switched treatment assignments. The study had 80% power to detect a 0.3 log(10) decrease in HIV-1 RNA level. Expression of CD38 and HLA-DR on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells was used to measure immune activation.

RESULTS

Of 24 randomized participants, 22 completed the study. Although HIV-1 RNA level was unaffected by the intervention (-0.13 log(10) copies/mL; P = .85), atorvastatin use resulted in reductions in circulating proportions of CD4(+) HLA-DR(+) (-2.5%; P = .02), CD8(+) HLA-DR(+) (-5%; P = .006), and CD8(+) HLA-DR(+) CD38(+) T cells (-3%; P = .03). Reductions in immune activation did not correlate with declines in serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term use of atorvastatin was associated with modest but statistically significant reductions in the proportion of activated T lymphocytes.

Cardiac diastolic dysfunction is prevalent in HIV-infected patients

Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has markedly improved survival in HIV-infected patients, but not without significant adverse effects including ART-associated dyslipdemia and insulin resistance, which may in part contribute to an increased risk of cardiovascular events. Other contributing factors to cardiovascular risk may include uncontrolled HIV replication, the effects of HIV and ART on vascular endothelium and inflammatory cytokines. Diastolic dysfunction may be an early sign of cardiovascular disease. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction in HIV-infected patients without cardiovascular symptoms. We enrolled 91 subjects in a cross-sectional study of HIV-infected patients without cardiovascular symptoms between September 2004 and August 2005, to assess whether demographics, HIV-related factors, cardiac risk factors, and ART were associated with diastolic dysfunction. All subjects underwent two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging. Subjects were predominately male with a median age of 38 (interquartile range [IQR]: 33, 42) years and median ART duration 6.15 (IQR: 2.1, 8.4) years. Subjects had low Framingham risk scores. Diastolic dysfunction was observed in 34 patients (37%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.4, 48.1). Cardiac risk factors or poor prognostic indicators of AIDS progression were uncommon with no difference between subjects with or without diastolic dysfunction. A nonstatistically significant trend in increased rate of diastolic dysfunction was observed in patients receiving protease inhibitors 1 year or more, 44% versus 28%, respectively (univariate odds ratio 2.02, 95% CI 0.83 to 4.90). This was not observed with prolonged use of either non-nucleoside or nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. A high prevalence of diastolic dysfunction (37%) in a cohort of HIV-infected patients on ART at low risk for AIDS and cardiovascular disease was demonstrated.

Unusual case of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia during primary HIV infection

Symptomatic primary HIV infection occurs in an estimated 50% to 90% of patients. A constellation of symptoms that most closely resembles those of acute infectious mononucleosis characterizes the syndrome. On rare occasions, opportunistic infections present simultaneously with primary HIV infection. We describe a patient who presented with an episode of severe Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia during what appeared to be a prolonged primary HIV infection. Serological testing demonstrated the progressive development of reactive bands on serial Western blot determinations. This case highlights how primary HIV infection can produce profound immunosuppression through CD4 lymphocytopenia predisposing patients to opportunistic infection.

Osteonecrosis in HIV-infected persons: radiographic findings delay clinical diagnosis

Patients with HIV infection demonstrate an unexpectedly high incidence of bone-related disorders, most notably osteonecrosis. We describe 4 HIV-infected patients with osteonecrosis for whom reliance on plain radiographs for establishing the diagnosis was misleading and resulted in a delay in diagnosis. NOne o four patients had significant previously reported risk factors that are associated with osteonecrosis in HIV-infected patients. Osteonecrosis appears to be yet another complication of HIV disease or tis related therapies that has potential for significant morbidity. This disease typically requires surgical intervention for optimal management. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for osteonecrosis in this patient population in cases of unexplained bone pain or persistent groin pain. Given the high incidence of osteonecrosis in patients with HIV infection, unexplained osteonecrosis should prompt HIV screening, particularly in the absence of identifiable risk factors.

Symptomatic hyperlactataemia precipitated by the addition of tetracycline to combination antiretroviral therapy

Hyperlactataemia in the setting of combination antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection occurs on a spectrum ranging from common, asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities to rare, potentially life-threatening lactic acidosis. Some other medications, including the biguanides, tetracycline, and even linezolid, have rarely been reported to cause lactic acidosis. Recently, cases of lactic acidosis or hyperlactataemia have been reported in patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy that have been precipitated by the addition of other medications-eg, metformin or ribavirin. We report a case of symptomatic hyperlactataemia in a patient on combination antiretroviral therapy that was likely precipitated by the addition of tetracycline and discuss the broader implications of other medications with the potential to cause hyperlactataemia in the setting of combination antiretroviral therapy.

Plague

In the United States, plague poses a threat to humans from the infected animals in the endemic areas of the Western states. Plague may also be used in the near future as an agent of warfare or terrorism. Although the presentation of bubonic plague may be less of a problem, the septicemic and pneumonic forms present challenges to early diagnosis and prompt treatment. The major threat of plague as an agent of terrorism will probably be through the inhalational route. which could result in many cases of the pneumonic form, requiring early recognition and initiation of appropriate therapy. In a mass-casualty scenario, the clinician should be aware of the potential agents of biowarfare and be familiar with the treatment and prophylaxis recommendations outlined by the CDC. It is also prudent to employ universal precautions and respiratory isolation when treating patients with any unknown exposure. In endemic areas, personal protective measures such as use of insecticides, insect repellants, and prompt prophylaxis in cases of exposure to plague are recommended for reducing the incidence of infection. The author also recommends review of CDC website on bioterrorism (http://www.bt.cdc.gov) to keep informed of plague updates.

Defending against viruses in biowarfare. How to respond to smallpox, encephalitides, hemorrhagic fevers

The threat of bioterrorism with use of viruses is increasing. Smallpox, encephalitis, and hemorrhagic fevers are the most likely diseases to result from viral deployment. It is critical that all healthcare professionals become familiar with the clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention of these diseases. Awareness and preparedness are instrumental in reducing viral transmission and improving survival of the victims.

Tuberculosis and HIV infection. How to safely treat both disorders concurrently

Progress has been made in screening, early recognition, prevention, and treatment of TB, but its coexistence with HIV infection continues to present a challenge. Healthcare professionals should be familiar with guidelines for treating HIV-infected patients with TB while concurrently administering highly active antiretroviral therapy. Primary care physicians are encouraged to consult specialists who are familiar with treatment of patients with such coexisting disease. Whenever feasible, directly observed therapy should be instituted in all cases of TB to promote compliance and reduce the incidence of drug resistance and treatment failure.