1
|
Sharma A, Feuer V, Stuart BK, Folk JB, Doan BT, Kulkarni CA, Ramtekkar U, Fortuna L, Myers K. Home-Based Telemental Health: A Proposed Privacy and Safety Protocol and Tool. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol 2021; 31:464-474. [PMID: 34543079 DOI: 10.1089/cap.2021.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the development of a protocol and practical tool for the safe delivery of telemental health (TMH) services to the home. The COVID-19 pandemic forced providers to rapidly transition their outpatient practices to home-based TMH (HB-TMH) without existing protocols or tools to guide them. This experience underscored the need for a standardized privacy and safety tool as HB-TMH is expected to continue as a resource during future crises as well as to become a component of the routine mental health care landscape. Methods: The authors represent a subset of the Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Telemental Health Consortium. They met weekly through videoconferencing to review published safety standards of care, existing TMH guidelines for clinic-based and home-based services, and their own institutional protocols. They agreed on three domains foundational to the delivery of HB-TMH: environmental safety, clinical safety, and disposition planning. Through multiple iterations, they agreed upon a final Privacy and Safety Protocol for HB-TMH. The protocol was then operationalized into the Privacy and Safety Assessment Tool (PSA Tool) based on two keystone medical safety constructs: the World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist/Time-Out and the Checklist Manifesto.Results: The PSA Tool comprised four modules: (1) Screening for Safety for HB-TMH; (2) Assessment for Safety During the HB-TMH Initial Visit; (3) End of the Initial Visit and Disposition Planning; and (4) the TMH Time-Out and Reassessment during subsequent visits. A sample workflow guides implementation. Conclusions: The Privacy and Safety Protocol and PSA Tool aim to prepare providers for the private and safe delivery of HB-TMH. Its modular format can be adapted to each site's resources. Going forward, the PSA Tool should help to facilitate the integration of HB-TMH into the routine mental health care landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Sharma
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Vera Feuer
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Barbara Krishna Stuart
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Johanna B Folk
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Bridget T Doan
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada
| | - Chetana A Kulkarni
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, Canada
| | - Ujjwal Ramtekkar
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University School of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.,Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Lisa Fortuna
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kathleen Myers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kulkarni CA, Rasasingham R, Woods NN, Gorman DA, Szatmari P, Hanson MD. Case Report: Defining Applicant Attributes to Be Prioritized in the Selection of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Subspecialty Residents at the University of Toronto. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:650317. [PMID: 33959054 PMCID: PMC8093509 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) subspecialty training program at the University of Toronto was among the first fully accredited CAP programs in Canada. As one of Canada's largest CAP subspecialty programs, we attract many excellent applicants annually. While objectivity and transparency in the selection of candidates have been valued, it was unclear which applicant attributes should be prioritized. This quality improvement project was undertaken to identify the key applicant attributes that should be prioritized for admission to the program. Materials/Methods: An initial list of attributes was compiled by project team members and feedback solicited. Through iterative design, this list was categorized into "end products," "branding attributes" and "generic attributes." The "end products" were removed as these represented outputs of training rather than attributes on which applicant selection should be based. Subsequent steps involved only the "branding" and "generic" attributes. A consensus-building exercise led to the creation of two short-lists of five attributes within each category. Finally, a paired-comparison forced choice methodology was used to determine the ranking of these attributes in order of importance when assessing applicants. Results: The final lists of "generic" and "branding" attributes developed through a consensus-building exercise are presented in rank order based on the paired-comparison methodology. The overall response rate for the forced choice electronic survey was 49% of faculty and learners. Conclusions/Discussion: This project used an iterative process of consensus building & pairwise comparison to prioritize key attributes for assessing trainee selection to the program. Going forward, these attributes will be incorporated into the file review and interview portions of our admissions process. In addition to emphasizing these priority attributes in admissions, there are implications for other aspects of the program including curriculum and faculty development, as well as guiding the overall mission and vision for the Division. A similar process could be undertaken by other training programs seeking to identify priority attributes for admission to their programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chetana A Kulkarni
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raj Rasasingham
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Humber River Regional Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicole N Woods
- The Wilson Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel A Gorman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Szatmari
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark D Hanson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|