1
|
Szlosarek PW, Creelan BC, Sarkodie T, Nolan L, Taylor P, Olevsky O, Grosso F, Cortinovis D, Chitnis M, Roy A, Gilligan D, Kindler H, Papadatos-Pastos D, Ceresoli GL, Mansfield AS, Tsao A, O’Byrne KJ, Nowak AK, Steele J, Sheaff M, Shiu CF, Kuo CL, Johnston A, Bomalaski J, Zauderer MG, Fennell DA. Pegargiminase Plus First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Nonepithelioid Pleural Mesothelioma: The ATOMIC-Meso Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:475-483. [PMID: 38358753 PMCID: PMC10870227 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Importance Arginine deprivation using ADI-PEG20 (pegargiminase) combined with chemotherapy is untested in a randomized study among patients with cancer. ATOMIC-Meso (ADI-PEG20 Targeting of Malignancies Induces Cytotoxicity-Mesothelioma) is a pivotal trial comparing standard first-line chemotherapy plus pegargiminase or placebo in patients with nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma. Objective To determine the effect of pegargiminase-based chemotherapy on survival in nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma, an arginine-auxotrophic tumor. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a phase 2-3, double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted at 43 centers in 5 countries that included patients with chemotherapy-naive nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma from August 1, 2017, to August 15, 2021, with at least 12 months' follow-up. Final follow-up was on August 15, 2022. Data analysis was performed from March 2018 to June 2023. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly intramuscular pegargiminase (36.8 mg/m2) or placebo. All patients received intravenous pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and platinum (75-mg/m2 cisplatin or carboplatin area under the curve 5) chemotherapy every 3 weeks up to 6 cycles. Pegargiminase or placebo was continued until progression, toxicity, or 24 months. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was overall survival, and secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety. Response rate by blinded independent central review was assessed in the phase 2 portion only. Results Among 249 randomized patients (mean [SD] age, 69.5 [7.9] years; 43 female individuals [17.3%] and 206 male individuals [82.7%]), all were included in the analysis. The median overall survival was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-11.8 months) with pegargiminase-chemotherapy as compared with 7.7 months (95% CI, 6.1-9.5 months) with placebo-chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93; P = .02). The median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.8-7.4 months) with pegargiminase-chemotherapy as compared with 5.6 months (95% CI, 4.1-5.9 months) with placebo-chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46-0.90; P = .02). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events with pegargiminase occurred in 36 patients (28.8%) and with placebo in 21 patients (16.9%); drug hypersensitivity and skin reactions occurred in the experimental arm in 3 patients (2.4%) and 2 patients (1.6%), respectively, and none in the placebo arm. Rates of poststudy treatments were comparable in both arms (57 patients [45.6%] with pegargiminase vs 58 patients [46.8%] with placebo). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of arginine depletion with pegargiminase plus chemotherapy, survival was extended beyond standard chemotherapy with a favorable safety profile in patients with nonepithelioid pleural mesothelioma. Pegargiminase-based chemotherapy as a novel antimetabolite strategy for mesothelioma validates wider clinical testing in oncology. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02709512.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter W. Szlosarek
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- The Mid and South Essex University Hospitals Group, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
- Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Thomas Sarkodie
- The Mid and South Essex University Hospitals Group, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
| | - Luke Nolan
- Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Taylor
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Olga Olevsky
- David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Federica Grosso
- Mesothelioma Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Meenali Chitnis
- Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Roy
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - David Gilligan
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hedy Kindler
- University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | | | | - Anne Tsao
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Kenneth J. O’Byrne
- Princess Alexandra Hospital and Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Anna K. Nowak
- Medical School, The University of Western Australia and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia
| | - Jeremy Steele
- Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Sheaff
- Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | - Marjorie G. Zauderer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Dean A. Fennell
- University of Leicester & University Hospitals of Leicester NHS, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bomalaski JS, Chen KT, Chuang MJ, Liau CT, Peng MT, Chen PY, Lee CC, Johnston A, Liu HF, Huang YLS, Kuo CL, Shiu CF, Hsu PW, Chuan CC, Lai DM, Wei KC. Phase IB trial of pegylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) plus radiotherapy and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.2057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2057 Background: ADI-PEG 20 exploits the different metabolic ability for synthesizing arginine (Arg) between normal and neoplastic cells to reduce tumor cell growth. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that cancers which are either Arg auxotrophic, with silencing of argininosuccinate synthetase ( ASS1), or Arg non-auxotrophic, respond to ADI-PEG 20 monotherapy or ADI-PEG 20 combined with various chemotherapies, respectively. ADI-PEG 20 has shown efficacy as monotherapy in ASS1 negative mouse glioblastoma (GBM) models and the combination of ADI-PEG 20 with temozolomide (TMZ) and with radiation (RT) in both ASS1 negative and ASS1 positive mouse GBM models. Based on these rationales, ADI-PEG 20 was added to standard RT + TMZ in patients with newly diagnosed GBM. This is the first clinical trial combining ADI-PEG 20 with RT. Methods: This phase IB, open-label, single-arm, standard 3+3 dose escalation with a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) expansion study (NCT04587830) was initiated in June 2020. Weekly ADI-PEG 20 is added to concurrent RT + TMZ and to 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ (Stupp protocol). ADI-PEG 20 could be continued for up to 2 years. RANO criteria are used to determine response by evaluating MRI at 1, 3 and 6 months after RT, and every 3 months thereafter. Major eligibility criteria are age 20-75 years with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed GBM with Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60. Endpoints include safety, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Cohorts 1 (18 mg/m2) and 2 (36 mg/m2) were completed without dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Enrollment to cohort 3 (RP2D phase, 36 mg/m2) is ongoing with 23/26 patients. The major adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (52%), constipation (39%) and neutrophil decrease (39%). Dermatologic or allergic reactions occurred in 12/23 (52%), and all were grade 1-2 except for anaphylactic shock in 1 and vasculitis/rash in 1. 22/23 are alive, with median PFS = 9.5 months. The first 6 study patients are all alive for at least 11 months, with the longest at 1.5 years. 10 are off treatment due to progressive disease in 6, severe AE in 2, consent withdrawal in 1, and medical decision in 1. Mean peripheral blood Arg levels were suppressed ( < 10uM) for 4-6 weeks in most subjects, with a reciprocal elevation of citrulline levels. Anti-ADI-PEG 20 antibodies tended to increase as peripheral Arg levels increased. Conclusions: The addition of ADI-PEG 20 to RT + TMX was safe, and no DLT was observed. The RP2D of ADI-PEG 20 was determined to be 36mg/m2. AEs were those typically seen with RT + TMZ, with perhaps an increase in rash reported with the addition of ADI-PEG 20. Anaphylaxis and vasculitis were seen (1 subject with each), and have been observed previously with ADI-PEG 20. The preliminary OS data are encouraging. A registration phase 2/3 trial of this triplet is being considered. Clinical trial information: NCT04587830.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ko-Ting Chen
- Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Chi-Ting Liau
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | | - Pin-Yuan Chen
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Chi Lee
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou,, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | | - Hui-Fen Liu
- Polaris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | - Peng-Wei Hsu
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | | - Dar-Ming Lai
- National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Chen Wei
- New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Szlosarek PW, Wimalasingham AG, Phillips MM, Hall PE, Chan PY, Conibear J, Lim L, Rashid S, Steele J, Wells P, Shiu CF, Kuo CL, Feng X, Johnston A, Bomalaski J, Ellis S, Grantham M, Sheaff M. Phase 1, pharmacogenomic, dose-expansion study of pegargiminase plus pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with ASS1-deficient non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med 2021; 10:6642-6652. [PMID: 34382365 PMCID: PMC8495293 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We evaluated the arginine‐depleting enzyme pegargiminase (ADI‐PEG20; ADI) with pemetrexed (Pem) and cisplatin (Cis) (ADIPemCis) in ASS1‐deficient non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) via a phase 1 dose‐expansion trial with exploratory biomarker analysis. Methods Sixty‐seven chemonaïve patients with advanced non‐squamous NSCLC were screened, enrolling 21 ASS1‐deficient subjects from March 2015 to July 2017 onto weekly pegargiminase (36 mg/m2) with Pem (500 mg/m2) and Cis (75 mg/m2), every 3 weeks (four cycles maximum), with maintenance Pem or pegargiminase. Safety, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy were determined; molecular biomarkers were annotated by next‐generation sequencing and PD‐L1 immunohistochemistry. Results ADIPemCis was well‐tolerated. Plasma arginine and citrulline were differentially modulated; pegargiminase antibodies plateaued by week 10. The disease control rate was 85.7% (n = 18/21; 95% CI 63.7%–97%), with a partial response rate of 47.6% (n = 10/21; 95% CI 25.7%–70.2%). The median progression‐free and overall survivals were 4.2 (95% CI 2.9–4.8) and 7.2 (95% CI 5.1–18.4) months, respectively. Two PD‐L1‐expressing (≥1%) patients are alive following subsequent pembrolizumab immunotherapy (9.5%). Tumoral ASS1 deficiency enriched for p53 (64.7%) mutations, and numerically worse median overall survival as compared to ASS1‐proficient disease (10.2 months; n = 29). There was no apparent increase in KRAS mutations (35.3%) and PD‐L1 (<1%) expression (55.6%). Re‐expression of tumoral ASS1 was detected in one patient at progression (n = 1/3). Conclusions ADIPemCis was safe and highly active in patients with ASS1‐deficient non‐squamous NSCLC, however, survival was poor overall. ASS1 loss was co‐associated with p53 mutations. Therapies incorporating pegargiminase merit further evaluation in ASS1‐deficient and treatment‐refractory NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter W Szlosarek
- Center for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute (BCI) - A Cancer Research UK Center of Excellence, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Center, London, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Akhila G Wimalasingham
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Melissa M Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Peter E Hall
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Pui Ying Chan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - John Conibear
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Louise Lim
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Sukaina Rashid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jeremy Steele
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Paula Wells
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Chih-Ling Kuo
- Polaris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Xiaoxing Feng
- Polaris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - John Bomalaski
- Polaris Pharmaceuticals, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Stephen Ellis
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Barts Health NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Marianne Grantham
- Cytogenetics and Molecular Haematology, Pathology and Pharmacy Building, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Michael Sheaff
- Department of Histopathology, Pathology and Pharmacy Building, Barts Health NHS Trust, Royal London Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Tine BA, Hirbe AC, Luo J, Oppelt PJ, Weiss MC, Eulo VA, Toeniskoetter J, Haarberg S, Abaricia S, Ruff T, Bomalaski JS, Johnston A, Kuo CL, Shiu CF, Ingham M, Bui N, Chawla SP, Schwartz GK, Ganjoo KN. Phase II trial of pegylated arginine deiminase in combination with gemcitabine and docetaxel for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.11508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
11508 Background: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is dependent on extracellular arginine as it often lacks expression of argininosuccinate synthase 1 (ASS1), the urea cycle enzyme needed to produce intracellular arginine. PEGylated arginine deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) is an extracellular arginine-degrading enzyme that causes ASS1 deficient tumors to enter the starvation state. Preclinical data demonstrated that addition of docetaxel (D) with ADI-PEG20 upregulates expression of the transporter for gemcitabine (G), overcoming transporter level resistance, and causing increased cell death. In vivo modeling demonstrated that the combination of ADI-PEG20 with G+D was superior to G+D alone. Therefore, we performed a phase 2 trial testing the addition of ADI-PEG20 to G+D. Methods: We performed an investigator-initiated, phase 2, multicenter, multi-arm clinical trial of ADI-PEG20 with G (90minute infusion)+D in STS, Ewing’s, osteosarcoma and small cell lung cancer. We are reporting Arm A, the STS arm. Eligible patients had STS that would be standardly treated with G+D that had progressed on at least one prior line of therapy with measurable disease by RECIST1.1 and had adequate organ function Based on a historic median PFS of 6.2 months for G+D, we targeted to enroll N = 75 patients in cohort A to detect a 2.8 month improvement with 80% power at a 5% alpha level. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), safety, tolerability, cancer related mortality, and correlation with ASS1 expression by IHC. We evaluated PFS by Kaplan-Meier method and estimated overall response rate (ORR). Results: 75 patients were treated and deemed evaluable. The trial underwent two dose reductions by the data safety monitoring board due to prolonged neutropenia and thrombocytopenia preventing the use of day 8 G+D, consistent with preclinical mechanism of action data showing that ADI-PEG 20+D enhanced G uptake. Originally, the G dose was 900mg/m2 reduced first to 750mg/m2 then to 600mg/m2. D was dose reduced at the time of the second dose reduction from 75mg/m2 to 60mg/m2. ADI-PEG20 was given at a fixed intramuscular dose (36 mg/m2) weekly. The need for two dose reductions affected the PFS. The PFS/OS (months) were for the 600mg/m2 group (n = 31) was 6.0/N.D., leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (N = 33) 7.2/22.5, liposarcoma 5.1/17.4, and other (N = 36) 2.8/15.0. Responses were 8% complete (6/75) (3 LMS, 1 synovial and 2 angiosarcoma), 17% partial (13/75), and 43% stable disease (32/75), for an ORR of 25% (19/75) and CBR of 68% (51/75). There was a trend for ASS1 negative tumors to benefit more than ASS1 positive tumors. Conclusions: The combination of ADI-PEG20 with G+D can be safely and effectively given at a dose of 600mg/m2 G and 60mg/m2 D. Future randomized trials of ADI-PEG20 with G+D are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03449901.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jingqin Luo
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Mia C. Weiss
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | - Tyler Ruff
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Nam Bui
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsai FJ, Yang CF, Chen CC, Chuang LM, Lu CH, Chang CT, Wang TY, Chen RH, Shiu CF, Liu YM, Chang CC, Chen P, Chen CH, Fann CSJ, Chen YT, Wu JY. A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility variants for type 2 diabetes in Han Chinese. PLoS Genet 2010; 6:e1000847. [PMID: 20174558 PMCID: PMC2824763 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 257] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2009] [Accepted: 01/18/2010] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
To investigate the underlying mechanisms of T2D pathogenesis, we looked for diabetes susceptibility genes that increase the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a Han Chinese population. A two-stage genome-wide association (GWA) study was conducted, in which 995 patients and 894 controls were genotyped using the Illumina HumanHap550-Duo BeadChip for the first genome scan stage. This was further replicated in 1,803 patients and 1,473 controls in stage 2. We found two loci not previously associated with diabetes susceptibility in and around the genes protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type D (PTPRD) (P = 8.54×10−10; odds ratio [OR] = 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.36–1.82), and serine racemase (SRR) (P = 3.06×10−9; OR = 1.28; 95% CI = 1.18–1.39). We also confirmed that variants in KCNQ1 were associated with T2D risk, with the strongest signal at rs2237895 (P = 9.65×10−10; OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.19–1.40). By identifying two novel genetic susceptibility loci in a Han Chinese population and confirming the involvement of KCNQ1, which was previously reported to be associated with T2D in Japanese and European descent populations, our results may lead to a better understanding of differences in the molecular pathogenesis of T2D among various populations. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex disease that involves many genes and environmental factors. Genome-wide and candidate-gene association studies have thus far identified at least 19 regions containing genes that may confer a risk for T2D. However, most of these studies were conducted with patients of European descent. We studied Chinese patients with T2D and identified two genes, PTPRD and SRR, that were not previously known to be involved in diabetes and are involved in biological pathways different from those implicated in T2D by previous association reports. PTPRD is a protein tyrosine phosphatase and may affect insulin signaling on its target cells. SRR encodes a serine racemase that synthesizes D-serine from L-serine. Both D-serine (coagonist) and the neurotransmitter glutamate bind to NMDA receptors and trigger excitatory neurotransmission in the brain. Glutamate signaling also regulates insulin and glucagon secretion in pancreatic islets. Thus, SRR and D-serine, in addition to regulating insulin and glucagon secretion, may play a role in the etiology of T2D. Our study suggests that, in different patient populations, different genes may confer risks for diabetes. Our findings may lead to a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of T2D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuu-Jen Tsai
- School of Post-Baccalaureate Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Genetics, Pediatrics and Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Fan Yang
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- National Genotyping Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chu Chen
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Lee-Ming Chuang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chieh-Hsiang Lu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - Chwen-Tzuei Chang
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Yuan Wang
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Rong-Hsing Chen
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chiung-Fang Shiu
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Min Liu
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chun Chang
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei Chen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hsiun Chen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- National Genotyping Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Cathy S. J. Fann
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Tsong Chen
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- National Genotyping Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
- * E-mail: (Y-TC); (J-YW)
| | - Jer-Yuarn Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- National Genotyping Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Chinese Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (Y-TC); (J-YW)
| |
Collapse
|