1
|
Cohn A, Li CYL, Hoffman SE, Abreu-Metzger AP, Castlen J, Laws ER, Carroll RS, Bi WL, Meredith DM, Kaiser UB. Characterization of Gonadotroph Pituitary Adenomas Based on the Recent 2017 WHO Pituitary Tumor Classification. J Endocr Soc 2021. [DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvab048.1305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: More than 20% of pituitary adenomas are nonfunctional, the majority of which are of gonadotroph origin. Whereas previously, immunohistochemistry of pituitary hormones was used to classify adenoma subtypes, in 2017 the World Health Organization (WHO) reclassified pituitary adenomas using transcription factor expression in addition to immunohistochemistry. With this change, clinically nonfunctional gonadotroph adenomas can be distinguished among: (1) those staining for the transcription factor SF-1 and gonadotropins FSH and/or LH (FSH/LH+), (2) those that stain for SF-1 but not for FSH or LH (FSH/LH- SF1+), and (3) true null cell adenomas. It is unclear whether these three subgroups behave similarly clinically, or if they have distinct manifestations or outcomes. Our aim was to characterize these subgroups in regard to tumor size, recurrence and pituitary insufficiency.
Methods: In a retrospective chart review, 71 patients from 2017-2020 who presented to the hospital for transsphenoidal resection of clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas were reviewed. All patients with pituitary adenomas that stained positive for SF-1 and negative for T-PIT and PIT-1, and tumors that were negative for all three transcription factors were evaluated. Those lacking clinical data were excluded. Clinical characteristics examined include: demographics, tumor size, invasion of cavernous sinus, and hormone deficiencies.
Results: Of the 71 pituitary tumors, 45% (n=32) stained positive for the beta subunit FSH and/or LH (FSH/LH+) and SF-1, 44% (n=31) stained for SF-1 with negative pituitary hormone stains (FSH/LH- SF1+), and 11% (n=8) were negative for all transcription factors and hormones (true null). All tumors were macroadenomas (>1 cm). While there were >50% males in the FSH/LH+ and FSH/LH- SF1+ groups, in the true null group only 25% of patients were male. Most patients were >50 years old in all 3 groups (81% FSH/LH+, 75% FSH/LH- SF1+, 88% true null). The prevalence of cavernous sinus involvement was 36% in both groups that stained for SF-1, but was 62% in the true null group. Both SF-1+ groups had similar tumor sizes and prevalence of panhypopituitarism (15-21%), but there were more episodes of recurrence since last known follow up in the FSH/LH- SF1+ group (20%), compared to FSH/LH+ tumors (7%). The true null group had ≥50% rates for both panhypopituitarism and recurrence.
Conclusions: In this study, we highlighted the category of FSH/LH- SF1+ gonadotroph adenomas and compared these to FSH/LH+ and true null cell tumors. Based on clinical features, FSH/LH- SF1+ gonadotroph adenomas are similar to FSH/LH+ staining pituitary adenomas in regard to age, sex, size, and degree of cavernous sinus invasion, although there were more recurrences in the FSH/LH- SF1+ group. Though less common, our cohort suggests more aggressive tendencies in the true null group compared to SF-1 staining tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aviva Cohn
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David M Meredith
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ursula B Kaiser
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Purpose To investigate characteristics of Open Globe Injuries (OGI) that presented with Intra-Ocular Foreign Body (IOFB), along with their long-term visual outcomes, complications and need for subsequent surgeries. Methods Retrospective interventional consecutive case series of OGIs with IOFBs that presented to the Eye Trauma service at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear from 2010 to 2015. Data collected included time from injury to OGI repair, location of injury and IOFB, retinal detachment (RD) rate, presenting and final visual acuity (VA) and subsequent surgeries. Results Fifty-seven consecutive cases of OGIs with IOFBs were included. The majority of patients were male (93%), mean age was 37 years and mean follow-up was 28 +/- 22 months. The median time from injury to OGI repair was 0 days (range: 0-16 days). Overall, 38/57 (66.7%) eyes achieved final vision of 20/40 or better and 43/57 (75.4%) vision of 20/150 or better. Zone I injuries were the most common (86%), followed by Zone II (16%), and Zone III (10%). 33 cases had IOFBs in the anterior segment only and 24 cases had posterior segment involvement. In total, 30% of cases (17/57) were complicated by an RD, 58.3% (14/24) in the posterior versus 9.1% (3/33) in the anterior IOFB group.( p<0.01). There were no cases of endophthalmitis. Posterior IOFB and higher zone of injury were found to be risk factors for RD both at presentation (all p<0.05) and post-primary repair.(all p<0.05) Posterior IOFB was associated with higher vitrectomy rates both at presentation (p<0.0001) and post-primary repair (p=0.002) and worse long-term visual outcome (p = 0.014). Conclusion OGIs with IOFB involving the posterior segment are associated with higher complication and re-operation rates and worse visual prognosis compared to those involving the anterior segment only.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yvonne Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Seanna Grob
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Orbit and Oculofacial Plastic Surgery, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Dean Eliott
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA
| | - Leo A Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA
| | - Demetrios G Vavvas
- Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA
| | - John B Miller
- Harvard Retinal Imaging Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston MA.,Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Retina Service, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|