1
|
Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, Avall-Lundqvist E, Fischerova D, Haie Meder C, Köhler C, Landoni F, Lax S, Lindegaard JC, Mahantshetty U, Mathevet P, McCluggage WG, McCormack M, Naik R, Nout R, Pignata S, Ponce J, Querleu D, Raspagliesi F, Rodolakis A, Tamussino K, Wimberger P, Raspollini MR. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2018; 127:404-416. [PMID: 29728273 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/12/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite significant advances in the screening, detection, and treatment of preinvasive cervical lesions, invasive cervical cancer is the fifth most common cancer in European women. There are large disparities in Europe and worldwide in the incidence, management, and mortality of cervical cancer. OBJECTIVE The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) jointly develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines in order to improve the quality of care for women with cervical cancer across Europe and worldwide. METHODS The ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of cervical cancer (23 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence based, the current literature identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 159 international reviewers, selected through ESGO/ESTRO/ESP and including patient representatives. RESULTS The guidelines cover comprehensively staging, management, and follow-up for patients with cervical cancer. Management includes fertility sparing treatment; stage T1a, T1b1/T2a1, clinically occult cervical cancer diagnosed after simple hysterectomy; early and locally advanced cervical cancer; primary distant metastatic disease; cervical cancer in pregnancy; and recurrent disease. Principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | - Daniela Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Christhardt Köhler
- Asklepios Hambourg Altona and University of Cologne, Medical Faculty, Department of Gynecology, Germany
| | | | - Sigurd Lax
- General Hospital Graz Sued-West, Austria
| | | | | | | | - W Glenn McCluggage
- Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, United Kingdom
| | | | - Raj Naik
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead, United Kingdom
| | - Remi Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University, The Netherlands
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "FondazioneG Pascale," IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Jordi Ponce
- University Hospital of Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Minard-Colin V, Anderson JR, Bisogno G, Schwob D, Rodeberg DA, Stevens M, Ferrari A, Martelli H, Walterhouse D, De Salvo GL, Arndt CAS, Rey A, Oberlin O, Haie Meder C, Hawkins DS. Localized vagina/uterus rhabdomyosarcoma (VU RMS): Results of a pooled analysis from four international cooperative groups. J Clin Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.10063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gianni Bisogno
- Department of Pediatrics, Hematology/Oncology Division, Padova, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Andrea Ferrari
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hadoux J, Rey A, Duvillard P, Lhomme C, Balleyguier C, Haie Meder C, Morice P, Gouy S, Uzan C, Mazeron R, Larue C, Pautier P. Doxorubicin, cisplatin, and ifosfamide (API) as first-line therapy for relapsed or metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2012. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.10098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
10098 Background: Uterine leiomyosarcomas (ULMS) are rare gynecologic malignancies characterized by a poor prognosis due to a high rate of local and metastatic recurrences. Chemotherapy (CT) with doxorubicin or ifosfamide or both is associated with a 10 to 30% objective response rate (ORR) and a cisplatin-based multiCT approach achieved a good response rate (DECAV therapy: API + dacarbazine + vindesine, 54% ORR in uterine sarcomas), though toxic. We aimed to determine efficacy and toxicity of doxorubicin, cisplatin and ifosfamide (API) combination as first line treatment of metastatic or relapsed ULMS (MRULMS). Methods: This monocentric study included MRULMS pts with a physiological age < 65 y. CT consisted in doxorubicin 50 mg/m² d1, ifosfamide 3 g/m²/d d1d2 + mesna, cisplatin 75 mg/m² d3, + G-CSF; q 3 weeks. Results: Results in 38 pts with MRULMS were analyzed; median age was 51 (40-64), median cycles of CT was 5; 8 (21%) pts were treated for local relapse, 21 (55.3%) for metastatic disease and 9 (23.7%) for both. Metastatic sites were: lungs in 16 pts (42.1%), pelvis in 7 pts (18.4%), liver in 7 pts (18.4%), peritoneum in 6 pts (15.8%) and bone in 5 pts (13.2%); 14 pts (36.8%) had a multisite metastatic disease. Main grade 3-4 toxicities in 38 pts were neutropenia (74%), thrombopenia (60%), anemia (55%), fatigue (18%) and vomiting (13%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in 35% of pts and 1 patient died of septic shock after cycle 1. Thirty four pts were evaluable for response (4 pts had complete surgery at relapse) and 16 pts responded (4 CR + 12 PR) (ORR: 47%); 23.5% and 29.4% of the pts had respectively stable and progressive disease. For all pts (38) and evaluable pts (34), median PFS were 9.8 and 9.5 months and OS 27 and 25.3 months respectively. Conclusions: Despite toxicity observed, API is an effective treatment which compares favorably with other first line therapies for MRULMS pts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annie Rey
- Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Pierre Duvillard
- Department of Pathology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|