First-in-Human Study of the Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) Inhibitor Tuvusertib (M1774) as Monotherapy in Patients with Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Tuvusertib (M1774) is a potent, selective, orally administered ATR protein kinase inhibitor. This first-in-human study (NCT04170153) evaluated safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose for expansion (RDE), pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and preliminary efficacy of tuvusertib monotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Ascending tuvusertib doses were evaluated in 55 patients with metastatic or locally advanced unresectable solid tumors. A safety monitoring committee determined dose escalation based on PK, PD, and safety data guided by a Bayesian 2‑parameter logistic regression model. Molecular responses (MRs) were assessed in circulating tumor DNA samples.

RESULTS

Most common Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (36%), neutropenia and lymphopenia (both 7%). Eleven patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities, most commonly Grade 2 (n=2) or Grade 3 (n=8) anemia. No persistent effects on blood immune cell populations were observed. The RDE was 180mg tuvusertib QD, 2 weeks on/1 week off, which was better tolerated than the MTD (180mg QD continuously). Tuvusertib median time to peak plasma concentration ranged from 0.5-3.5h and mean elimination half-life from 1.2-5.6h. Exposure-related PD analysis suggested maximum target engagement at ≥130mg tuvusertib QD. Tuvusertib induced frequent MRs in the predicted efficacious dose range, MRs were enriched in patients with radiological disease stabilization and complete MRs were detected for mutations in ARID1A, ATRX and DAXX. One patient with platinum- and PARP inhibitor‑resistant BRCA wild-type ovarian cancer achieved an unconfirmed RECIST v1.1 partial response.

CONCLUSIONS

Tuvusertib demonstrated manageable safety and exposure-related target engagement. Further clinical evaluation of tuvusertib is ongoing.

Identification of HMGA2 as a predictive biomarker of response to bintrafusp alfa in a phase 1 trial in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer

Background

We report the clinical activity, safety, and identification of a predictive biomarker for bintrafusp alfa, a first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGFβRII (a TGF-β "trap") fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1, in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

Methods

In this expansion cohort of a global phase 1 study, patients with pretreated, advanced TNBC received bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg every 2 weeks intravenously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. The primary objective was confirmed best overall response by RECIST 1.1 assessed per independent review committee (IRC).

Results

As of May 15, 2020, a total of 33 patients had received bintrafusp alfa, for a median of 6.0 (range, 2.0-48.1) weeks. The objective response rate was 9.1% (95% CI, 1.9%-24.3%) by IRC and investigator assessment. The median progression-free survival per IRC was 1.3 (95% CI, 1.2-1.4) months, and median overall survival was 7.7 (95% CI, 2.1-10.9) months. Twenty-five patients (75.8%) experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 5 patients (15.2%); no patients had a grade 4 TRAE. There was 1 treatment-related death (dyspnea, hemolysis, and thrombocytopenia in a patient with extensive disease at trial entry). Responses occurred independently of PD-L1 expression, and tumor RNAseq data identified HMGA2 as a potential biomarker of response.

Conclusions

Bintrafusp alfa showed clinical activity and manageable safety in patients with heavily pretreated advanced TNBC. HMGA2 was identified as a potential predictive biomarker of response.

ClinicalTrialsgov identifier

NCT02517398.

Integrative molecular analysis of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma to identify predictive biomarkers of response to avelumab

9569

Background: Avelumab, an FDA-approved human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody for patients (pts) with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma, showed an objective response rate (ORR; by RECIST v1.1) of 31.8% in a second-line phase 2 trial (NCT02155647). We assessed the association of tumor mutational burden (TMB; nonsynonymous somatic variants/megabase), PD-L1 expression, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status, and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T-cell density with ORR and survival. Molecular profiles (RNAseq and WEX) also were analyzed. Methods: Baseline tumors (n = 36) were profiled using RNAseq and WEX sequencing. PD-L1 expression (≥1% cutoff), MCPyV status, and CD8+ T-cell density at the tumor invasive margin were evaluated by IHC. MHC locus expression was measured with OptiType and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) with LOHHLA. Results: Of 36 pts profiled, 12 had a response, 27 were PD-L1+, and 23 were MCPyV+. The TMB upper tertile and quartile values were 1.34 and 3.16, respectively. Consistent with literature, MCPyV− pts had a higher median TMB (2.72) than MCPyV+ pts (0.49). PD-L1+ tumors trended toward a higher TMB. An empirical cohort-specific TMB cutoff of ≥2 was chosen to include sufficient pts per subgroup. Pts with TMB ≥2 vs TMB < 2 had higher ORR (5 of 11 [45.5%] vs 7 of 25 [28.0%]) and 6-mo PFS rates (60% vs 38%). Among pts with TMB ≥2, the highest ORRs were reported in MCPyV− (4 of 7 pts), PD-L1+ (5 of 9 pts), and CD8+ T-cell density higher than median (5 of 6 pts) subgroups. MHC expression trended with ORR and survival. Higher mean MHC expression was found in pts with CD8+ T-cell density higher than median (p < 0.05). Mutations in antigen presentation genes were detected: LOH at the HLA locus in 9 of 30 pts (28%), including 4 with a response; an NK cell activation signature was also associated with response. These data may suggest that ADCC contributes to response. Factorial analysis of gene signature scores identified signatures (eg, IFNγ, TP53 pathway) associated with MCPyV status and response. Conclusions: Responses in this data set were not attributed to any specific biomarker alone. Future analysis is focused on validating these results and identifying rational drug combinations with avelumab. Clinical trial information: NCT02155647.

Effect of cladribine tablets on lymphocyte reduction and repopulation dynamics in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Immune reconstitution therapies (IRT) for patients with multiple sclerosis are used for short, intermittent treatment periods to induce immune resetting and allow subsequent treatment-free periods. Cladribine tablets are postulated to be an IRT that causes selective and transient reductions in CD19⁺ B cells and T cells, followed by reconstitution of adaptive immune function.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize long-term lymphocyte count changes in pooled data from the 2-year CLARITY and subsequent 2-year CLARITY Extension studies, and the PREMIERE registry (Long-term CLARITY cohort).

METHODS

Data from patients randomized to placebo (n = 435) or cladribine tablets 10 mg (MAVENCLAD^®; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years, referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg; n = 685) in CLARITY or CLARITY Extension, including time spent in the PREMIERE registry were pooled to provide long-term follow-up data. The study investigated absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) up to 312 weeks and B and T cell subsets up to 240 weeks after the first dose, in patients receiving placebo or cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg administered as two short (4 or 5 days) weekly treatments at the start of months 1 and 2 in each treatment year, followed by no further active treatment.

RESULTS

Treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg resulted in selective reductions in B and T lymphocytes. Lymphocyte recovery began soon after treatment in each of years 1 and 2. Median ALC recovered to the normal range and CD19⁺ B cells recovered to threshold values by week 84, approximately 30 weeks after the last dose of cladribine tablets in year 2. Median CD4⁺ T cell counts recovered to threshold values by week 96 (approximately 43 weeks after the last dose of cladribine tablets in year 2). Median CD8⁺ cell counts never dropped below the threshold value.

CONCLUSION

These results show the dynamics of lymphocyte count changes following treatment with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg. The immune cell repopulation results provide further evidence that cladribine tablets may represent a form of IRT.

Safety of cladribine tablets in the treatment of patients with multiple sclerosis: An integrated analysis

BACKGROUND

Treating patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) with cladribine tablets (two times 4 or 5 days of treatment each year for 2 years) results in long-lasting efficacy, with continued stability in many patients for 4 or more years. Safety and tolerability outcomes from individual clinical studies with cladribine tablets have been reported previously.

OBJECTIVE

Report safety data from an integrated analysis of clinical trials and follow-up in patients with MS to further characterize the safety profile of cladribine tablets.

METHODS

Data for patients treated with cladribine tablets 10 mg (MAVENCLAD^®; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years, referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg) as monotherapy (n = 923) or placebo (n = 641) in Phase III clinical trials (CLARITY, CLARITY Extension and ORACLE-MS) and followed up in the PREMIERE registry were aggregated (Monotherapy Oral cohort). To better characterize rare events, additional data from earlier studies which involved the use of parenteral cladribine in patients with MS, and the ONWARD study, in which patients were given cladribine tablets in addition to interferon (IFN)-β or placebo plus IFN-β were included in an All Exposed cohort (cladribine, n = 1926; placebo, n = 802). Adjusted adverse events incidences per 100 patient-years (Adj-AE per 100 PY) were calculated for the integrated analyses.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the Monotherapy Oral cohort was 103.29 vs. 94.26 Adj-AEs per 100 PY for placebo. TEAEs that occurred more frequently with cladribine tablets were mainly driven by the TEAEs of lymphopenia (Adj-AE per 100 PY 7.94 vs. 1.06 for placebo) and lymphocyte count decreased (Adj-AE per 100 PY 0.78 vs. 0.10 for placebo) as anticipated due to the mode of action of cladribine. An increase in TEAE incidence rate was also observed in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group vs. placebo for herpes zoster (Adj-AE per 100 PY 0.83 vs. 0.20, respectively). There were no cases of systemic, serious disseminated herpes zoster attributed to treatment with cladribine tablets. In general there was no increase in the risk of infections including opportunistic infections with cladribine tablets versus placebo, except for herpes zoster. Periods of severe lymphopenia (< 0.5 × 10⁹ cells/L) were associated with an increased frequency of infections, but the nature of these was not different to that observed in the overall patient group treated with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg. Within the constraints of a limited sample size, malignancy rates in the overall clinical program for cladribine in MS did not show evidence of an increase compared to placebo-treated patients and there was no increase in the incidence of malignancies over time in cladribine-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

The AE profile for cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg as a monotherapy has been well-characterized in a pooled population of patients from early to more advanced relapsing MS. There was no increased risk for infections in general except for a higher incidence of herpes zoster. Lymphopenia was amongst the most frequently observed TEAEs that occurred at a higher incidence with cladribine relative to placebo. There was also no increase in malignancy rates for cladribine relative to placebo.

WED 184 Cladribine tablets in clarity patients with high disease activity ms

Background

Patients with high disease activity (HDA) relapsing-remitting MS are less likely to attain no evidence of disease activity (NEDA; no relapses, MRI activity or progression).

Objective

Post-hoc analysis to compare the proportion of patients with NEDA with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (CT3.5) vs placebo.

Methods

Patients from CLARITY were retrospectively stratified using 2 definitions of HDA based on relapse history, prior treatment, and MRI characteristics: HRA (n=261) and HRA plus disease activity on treatment (HRA+DAT) [n=289]). Data for patients treated with CT3.5 or placebo who fulfilled these criteria and achieved NEDA status were compared over the 2 years using odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI.

Results

HRA subgroup: 76% of CT3.5-treated patients were relapse-free and 84% were T1 Gd+ lesion free vs 49% and 31%, respectively, for placebo. HRA+DAT subgroup: 77% of CT3.5-treated were relapse-free and 85% were T1 Gd+ lesion free vs 50% and 32%, respectively, for placebo. In the HRA and HRA+DAT subgroups, 43.2% and 43.7%, respectively, of CT3.5-treated patients were disease activity free compared with 8.7%, (OR: 8.02; 95% CI: 3.93 to 16.35; p<0.0001) and 9.0% (OR: 7.82; 95% CI: 4.03 to 15.19; p<0.0001) respectively, for placebo. In the overall population, composite NEDA score favored CT over placebo (OR: 4.46; 95% CI: 3.18 to 6.26; p<0.0001).

Conclusions

Treatment with CT3.5 significantly increased the proportion of HDA patients with NEDA vs placebo.

Disclaimer

http://medpub-poster.merckgroup.com/ABN2018DISC_NEDA.pdf

WED 182 Cladribine tablets effects on lymphocytes in ms patients

Background

Lymphopenia is expected from the mechanism of action of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (CT3.5)

Objective

Investigate absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC; 312 weeks) and subsets (240 weeks) in RRMS patients receiving 2 annual courses of CT3.5.

Methods

Pooled data from patients randomised to CT3.5 over 2 years in CLARITY/CLARITY-Extension inclusive of the PREMIERE registry (n=685).

Results

Baseline: median ALC=1.86 × 109/L. Year-1: ALC reached nadir at 9 weeks post-treatment with CT3.5 (1.00 × 109/L). Year-2: ALC reached nadir at Week-55 (0.81 × 109/L), then recovered to the normal range (≥1.00 × 109/L; Week-96). ALC was in normal range in 75% of patients by Week-144. Baseline median CD4+ were 851 cells/µL. Nadirs occurred at Week-16 (385 cells/µL) in Year-1 and at Week-60 (292 cells/µL) in Year-2; values increased after nadirs and regained threshold (350 cells/µL, ~Week-120). Baseline median CD8+ were 378 cells/µL. Nadirs occurred at Week-16 (239 cells/µL; Year 1) and Week-72 (232 cells/µL; Year 2). CD8+ recovered quickly after treatment and remained above 200 cells/µL at all times. Baseline median CD19+ were 205 cells/µL. Nadirs occurred at Week-9 (18 cells/µL; Year-1) and Week-52 (31 cells/µL; Year-2). CD19+ then reached threshold of 100 cells/µL by the end of Year-2.

Conclusion

Lymphocyte recovery begins soon after CT3.5. ALC, CD19+ B and CD4+ T cells; reached threshold by 7.5, 12 and 18 months. CD8+ cells remained above threshold.

Disclaimer

http://medpub-poster.merckgroup.com/ABN2018DISC_LongLymph.pdf

THUR 192 Yearly lymphopenia rates in cladribine tablets-treated rms patients

Background

Cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (CT3.5) demonstrated efficacy in RMS patients in CLARITY/CLARITY-Extension. Lymphopenia was common (CT3.5: mechanism of action).

Objective

Evaluate whether lymphopenia persists following treatment/re-treatment with CT3.5 in CLARITY/CLARITY- Extension.

Methods

Lymphopenia by grade for patients randomised to CT3.5 throughout CLARITY/CLARITY-Extension (7 mg/kg cumulative 4 year dose; n=186) are reported. Patients with Grade 0 (G0) lymphopenia (≥1.0 × 109 cells/L) before the first course of CT and G0/1 (≥0.8 × 109 cells/L) before subsequent treatment in Years 2 (Y2), 3 and 4 were analysed.

Results

176 patients were G0 at the start of CLARITY (167 were G0/1; CLARITY-Extension). G3 lymphopenia was observed in 1% patients (Week-13, Y1), and in 7%, 11% and 12% patients at Week-12 in Y2, 3 and 4. In each year, G3 lymphopenia was observed in 1%, 4%, 4% and 4% patients (Week-24), in 1%, 2%, 2% and 2% patients (Week-36), and in 1% patients (Week-48) in Y2 only. G3 lymphopenia was reported in <18% patients at any time-point. No patients had G4 lymphopenia at the end of each treatment year.

Conclusions

In patients meeting treatment/re-treatment guidelines, no G4 lymphopenia occurred at the end of any treatment year; G3 lymphopenia was uncommon. Lymphocyte-based re-treatment criteria minimised the incidence of severe, sustained lymphopenia during 4 years’ treatment with CT.

Disclaimer

http://medpub-poster.merckgroup.com/ABN2018DISC_Year1-4.pdf

WED 185 Clarity: mri outcomes in high disease activity relapsing ms

Background

The CLARITY study demonstrated the benefit of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (CT3.5) for patients with relapsing MS (RMS). Patients with high disease activity (HDA) RMS are at risk of clinical activity and disability progression.

Objective

Post-hoc analysis of MRI outcomes in CLARITY for CT3.5 vs placebo.

Methods

Retrospective analysis using HDA definitions based on relapse history, prior treatment, and MRI characteristics: high relapse activity (HRA) and HRA plus disease activity on treatment (HRA+DAT).

Results

For cumulative new T1 Gd+ lesions, relative risk ratios (RRR) for both subgroups (HRA: 0.087; 95% CI: 0.052 to 0.144; p<0.0001) (HRA+DAT: 0.077; 95% CI: 0.046 to 0.128; p<0.0001) were lower for CT3.5 vs placebo. Risk reductions (RR) (91% and 92%, respectively) were similar to the 90% reduction in the overall CLARITY population (0.097; 95% CI: 0.070 to 0.134; p<0.0001). Cumulative active T2 lesions RRR favoured CT3.5 vs placebo for both subgroups (HRA: 0.263; 95% CI: 0.180 to 0.383, p<0.0001) (HRA+DAT: 0.254; 95% CI: 0.178 to 0.363; p<0.0001): RRs of 74% and 75%, reflecting the 73% overall population reduction (0.272; 95% CI: 0.221 to 0.335; p<0.0001). Cumulative combined unique lesions RRR favoured CT3.5 vs placebo for HRA (0.212; 95% CI: 0.145 to 0.311; p<0.0001) and HRA+DAT (0.203; 95% CI: 0.141 to 0.291; p<0.0001): RRs were 79% and 80%, reflecting the 77% overall population reduction (0.234; 95% CI: 0.190 to 0.290; p<0.0001). There were no significant interactions between HDA and non-HDA subgroups.

Conclusions

The treatment benefit of CT3.5 on MRI outcomes was similar in HDA RMS subgroups and the overall CLARITY study population.

Disclaimer

http://medpub-poster.merckgroup.com/ABN2018DISC_HDAMRI.pdf

THUR 178 Infections during grade 3/4 lymphopenia with cladribine tablets

Background

In CLARITY, cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (CT3.5) demonstrated efficacy in relapsing MS patients. The most common AE was lymphopenia, reflecting cladribine’s mode of action. Integrated safety analysis showed infection incidence was not higher in patients receiving CT3.5 vs placebo, bar a small increase of herpes zoster (HZV).

Objective

Post-hoc analysis examined infectious AEs occurring concurrently with Grade 3/4 lymphopenia (G3/4) in CT3.5 treated patients.

Methods

The AE profile for CT3.5 during the periods of G3/4 was analysed. Adjusted-AE incidences per 100 patient years (Adj-AE/100PY) were calculated in a cohort of patients receiving CT3.5 monotherapy in clinical trials.

Results

Data are presented as Adj-AE/100PY: G3/4 vs without G3/4. Adj-AE/100PY for any infections/infestations was 57.53 vs 24.50. Infections were similar between periods. ≥50% cases with G3/4 were easily-treatable upper- respiratory-tract infections (nasopharyngitis: 13.48 vs 5.24; upper-respiratory-tract infection: 9.67 vs 3.41; pharyngitis: 4.51 vs 0.73). HZV occurred in 4 patients with G3/4 (4.50 vs 0.73); cases were dermatomal and mild-to- moderate in severity. Single occurrences were reported for most infectious AEs. Opportunistic infections were single occurrences, not severe, serious or difficult-to-treat.

Conclusions

G3/4 increased frequency of infections but did not affect the type of infectious AEs in CT3.5 treated patients. HZV profile was uncomplicated, consistent with findings of previous analyses.

Disclaimer

http://medpub-poster.merckgroup.com/ABN2018DISC_Grade34.pdf

Effects of Postponing Treatment in the Second Year of Cladribine Administration: Clinical Trial Simulation Analysis of Absolute Lymphocyte Counts and Relapse Rate in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Cladribine Tablets (MAVENCLAD^®) selectively reduce absolute lymphocyte counts (ALCs) in patients with multiple sclerosis. The recommended cumulative dose of Cladribine Tablets is 3.5 mg/kg over 4-5 days in months 1 and 2 of treatment years 1 and 2, followed by prolonged efficacy with no additional treatment. After the cladribine-induced reduction, ALCs recover to normal within each treatment year in most patients. Those patients with slow ALC recovery can develop Grade 3-4 lymphopenia, especially those patients with Grade ≥  2 lymphopenia at the start of year 2. Guidelines allowing treatment postponements during year 2 have been proposed for patients with a low ALC, subsequent to CLARITY, the pivotal clinical trial.

METHODS

A virtual population was generated using characteristics from CLARITY patients. A clinical trial simulation was performed to determine the impact of alternative treatment scenarios on ALC and relapse rate, by postponing treatment in year 2 to allow for longer ALC recovery time in patients who required it. Should a patient not recover to normal ALC (Grade 0) or Grade 1 lymphopenia within the period defined in the treatment algorithm, treatment in year 2 was suspended.

RESULTS

Results were similar across considered scenarios, which implemented different postponement durations. Specifically, ~  92% of virtual subjects did not require treatment postponement and <  1% discontinued due to Grade 2-4 lymphopenia at the end of the maximally permitted postponement. Less severe lymphopenia was observed during year 2 when a treatment algorithm was applied. The effect on relapse rate over 2 years was negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Results support treatment guidelines to decrease the risk of severe lymphopenia following treatment with Cladribine Tablets, while preserving efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CLARITY; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00213135.

Cladribine tablets added to IFN-β in active relapsing MS: The ONWARD study

Objective

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cladribine tablets in patients still experiencing active relapsing MS despite interferon (IFN)-β treatment.

Methods

A 96-week phase II study, randomizing patients treated with IFN-β to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg/IFN-β or placebo/IFN-β. Patients were to receive cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg/IFN-β or placebo/IFN-β in a 2:1 ratio (n = 172) with safety and exploratory efficacy outcomes being assessed.

Results

Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were similar across treatment groups, except lymphopenia. Fifty of 124 (40.3%) cladribine/IFN-β recipients vs 0% of placebo/IFN-β recipients reported lymphopenia as an AE, with grade 3/4 lymphopenia (laboratory lymphocyte count < 500 cells/mm³) experienced by 79/124 (63.7%) vs 1 (2.1%), respectively. Patients treated with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg/IFN-β were 63% less likely to have a qualifying relapse than placebo/IFN-β recipients, and cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg/IFN-β reduced most MRI measures of disease activity.

Conclusions

In patients with active relapsing MS despite IFN-β treatment, cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg/IFN-β reduced relapses and MRI lesion activity over 96 weeks compared with placebo/IFN-β but led to an increased incidence of lymphopenia.

Classification of evidence

This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with active relapsing MS despite IFN-β treatment, cladribine tablets added to IFN-β reduced relapses and MRI lesion activity over 96 weeks and increased the incidence of lymphopenia.

Clinical trial registration

NCT00436826.

040 An analysis of malignancy risk in the clinical development programme of cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis

Introduction

An independent meta-analysis; Pakpoor et al. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2015;2:e158) in Phase III trials (with a 2 year duration) of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis found no increased rate of malignancy with cladribine tablets (CT) versus other DMD treatments. Data from additional trials involving CT 3.5 mg/kg (CT3.5) and a safety registry (up to 8 years’ follow-up) allow further insights into malignancy risk. Objective is to assess malignancy risk with CT3.5 monotherapy and placebo (PBO) in data from 3 Phase III trials and a registry, and compare the incidence rate with a global database.

Methods

The CT 3.5 population comprised 923 patients (3433 patient-years’ [PY] total exposure time) and the PBO group comprised 641 patients (2026 PY). Individual case reports of malignancies were reviewed by independent, blinded adjudication committee. Standardised incidence ratios (SIR) were calculated using the GLOBOCAN reference population (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers [NMSCs]) and a Danish reference population for NMSC rates.

Results

The incidence per 100 PY of confirmed malignancy was CT3.5 0.293 (95%CI 0.158–0.544) and PBO 0.148 (95%CI 0.048–0.460); the risk difference 95% CI included 0 (−0.166–0.414). The CT 3.5 malignancy SIR was almost identical (0.97, 95% CI 0.44–1.85) to the GLOBOCAN matched reference population. The PBO group SIR was numerically lower (0.48, 95% CI 0.14–1.53). There were no cases of haematological, lymphoproliferative or virus-induced cancers. There was no clustering of specific tumour types, and the incidence of skin cancer was not increased after treatment with CT3.5 versus PBO. The incidence of malignancies with CT3.5 was constant and did not increase over time.

Conclusion

Analysis of malignancy rates in a cohort that includes patients with up to 8 years’ follow-up confirms the Conclusion of the earlier meta-analysis; the incidence of malignancies with CT3.5 is similar to a matched reference population.

039 Rates of lymphopenia in years 1–4 in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis treated annually with cladribine tablets

Introduction

The CLARITY and CLARITY Extension studies demonstrated the efficacy of cladribine tablets in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. The most common adverse event was lymphopenia, consistent with the mechanism of action of cladribine tablets. Objective was to evaluate whether lymphopenia persists following annual treatment with cladribine tablets.

Methods

Lymphopenia by grade (NCI CTCAE v3.0) for patients randomised to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in CLARITY and re-randomised to cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in CLARITY Extension (7 mg/kg cumulative dose over 4 years; n=186) are reported. Patients with Grade 0 lymphopenia (≥1.0×109 cells/L) before the first course of cladribine tablets and Grade 0/1 (≥0.8×109 cells/L) prior to administration in Years 2, 3 and 4 were included in the analysis.

Results

176 patients were Grade 0 at CLARITY baseline and 167 were Grade 0/1 at CLARITY Extension baseline. Grade 3 lymphopenia was observed in 1% of patients at Week 13 in Year 1, and in 7%, 11% and 12% at Week 12 in Years 2, 3 and 4, respectively. By Week 24 in Years 1, 2, 3 and 4, Grade 3 lymphopenia was observed in 1%, 4%, 4% and 4% of patients, respectively. By Week 36 in Years 1, 2, 3 and 4, Grade 3 lymphopenia was observed in 1%, 2%, 2% and 2% of patients, respectively. Grade 3 lymphopenia was only observed in Week 48 of Year 2 (1% of patients). Grade 3 lymphopenia was reported in <18% of patients at any time point. No patients had Grade 4 lymphopenia at the end of any years.

Conclusion

No patients included in this analysis experienced Grade 4 lymphopenia at the end of any treatment year. Grade 3 lymphopenia was uncommon. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of lymphocyte-based treatment criteria in minimising the incidence of severe, sustained lymphopenia during treatment with cladribine tablets.

Efficacy of Cladribine Tablets in high disease activity subgroups of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: A post hoc analysis of the CLARITY study

Background:

In the CLARITY (CLAdRIbine Tablets treating multiple sclerosis orallY) study, Cladribine Tablets significantly improved clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes (vs placebo) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Objective:

Describe two clinically relevant definitions for patients with high disease activity (HDA) at baseline of the CLARITY study (utility verified in patients receiving placebo) and assess the treatment effects of Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg compared with the overall study population.

Methods:

Outcomes of patients randomised to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg or placebo were analysed for subgroups using HDA definitions based on high relapse activity (HRA; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not) or HRA plus disease activity on treatment (HRA + DAT; patients with ⩾2 relapses during the year prior to study entry, whether on DMD treatment or not, PLUS patients with ⩾1 relapse during the year prior to study entry while on therapy with other DMDs and ⩾1 T1 Gd+ or ⩾9 T2 lesions).

Results:

In the overall population, Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg reduced the risk of 6-month-confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) worsening by 47% vs placebo. A risk reduction of 82% vs placebo was seen in both the HRA and HRA + DAT subgroups (vs 19% for non-HRA and 18% for non-HRA + DAT), indicating greater responsiveness to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg in patients with HDA. There were consistent results for other efficacy endpoints. The safety profile in HDA patients was consistent with the overall CLARITY population.

Conclusion:

Patients with HDA showed clinical and MRI responses to Cladribine Tablets 3.5 mg/kg that were generally better than, or at least comparable with, the outcomes seen in the overall CLARITY population.

Cilengitide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: biomarker expression and outcome

Integrins αvβ3 and αvβ5 regulate angiogenesis and invasiveness in cancer, potentially by modulating activation of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β pathway. The randomized phase III CENTRIC and phase II CORE trials explored the integrin inhibitor cilengitide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with versus without O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation. These trials failed to meet their primary endpoints.

Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the levels of the target integrins of cilengitide, αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins, of αvβ8 and of their putative target, phosphorylation of SMAD2, in tumor tissues from CENTRIC (n=274) and CORE (n=224).

αvβ3 and αvβ5 expression correlated well in tumor and endothelial cells, but showed little association with αvβ8 or pSMAD2 levels. In CENTRIC, there was no interaction between the biomarkers and treatment for prediction of outcome. In CORE, higher αvβ3 levels in tumor cells were associated with improved progression-free survival by central review and with improved overall survival in patients treated with cilengitide.

Integrins αvβ3, αvβ5 and αvβ8 are differentially expressed in glioblastoma. Integrin levels do not correlate with the activation level of the canonical TGF-β pathway. αvβ3 integrin expression may predict benefit from integrin inhibition in patients with glioblastoma lacking MGMT promoter methylation.

Reduced brain atrophy rates are associated with lower risk of disability progression in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis treated with cladribine tablets

BACKGROUND

Neuroimaging studies have used magnetic resonance imaging-derived methods to assess brain volume loss in multiple sclerosis (MS) as a reliable measure of diffuse tissue damage.

METHODS

In the CLARITY study ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00213135), the effect of 2 years' treatment with cladribine tablets on annualized percentage brain volume change (PBVC/y) was evaluated in patients with relapsing MS (RMS).

RESULTS

Compared with placebo (-0.70% ± 0.79), PBVC/y was reduced in patients treated with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg (-0.56% ± 0.68, p = 0.010) and 5.25 mg/kg (-0.57% ± 0.72, p = 0.019). After adjusting for treatment group, PBVC/y showed a significant correlation with the cumulative probability of disability progression (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.571, 0.787; p < 0.001), with patients with lower PBVC/y showing the highest probability of remaining free from disability progression at 2 years and vice versa.

CONCLUSIONS

Cladribine tablets given annually for 2 years in short-duration courses in patients with RMS in the CLARITY study significantly reduced brain atrophy in comparison with placebo treatment, with residual rates in treated patients being close to the physiological rates.

Cilengitide combined with cetuximab and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: results of an open-label, randomized, controlled phase II study (CERTO)

BACKGROUND

This multicentre, open-label, randomized, controlled phase II study evaluated cilengitide in combination with cetuximab and platinum-based chemotherapy, compared with cetuximab and chemotherapy alone, as first-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive cetuximab plus platinum-based chemotherapy alone (control), or combined with cilengitide 2000 mg 1×/week i.v. (CIL-once) or 2×/week i.v. (CIL-twice). A protocol amendment limited enrolment to patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) histoscore ≥200 and closed the CIL-twice arm for practical feasibility issues. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS; independent read); secondary end points included overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analyses. A comparison between the CIL-once and control arms is reported, both for the total cohorts, as well as for patients with EGFR histoscore ≥200.

RESULTS

There were 85 patients in the CIL-once group and 84 in the control group. The PFS (independent read) was 6.2 versus 5.0 months for CIL-once versus control [hazard ratio (HR) 0.72; P = 0.085]; for patients with EGFR histoscore ≥200, PFS was 6.8 versus 5.6 months, respectively (HR 0.57; P = 0.0446). Median OS was 13.6 for CIL-once versus 9.7 months for control (HR 0.81; P = 0.265). In patients with EGFR ≥200, OS was 13.2 versus 11.8 months, respectively (HR 0.95; P = 0.855). No major differences in adverse events between CIL-once and control were reported; nausea (59% versus 56%, respectively) and neutropenia (54% versus 46%, respectively) were the most frequent. There was no increased incidence of thromboembolic events or haemorrhage in cilengitide-treated patients. αvβ3 and αvβ5 expression was neither a predictive nor a prognostic indicator.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of cilengitide to cetuximab/chemotherapy indicated potential clinical activity, with a trend for PFS difference in the independent-read analysis. However, the observed inconsistencies across end points suggest additional investigations are required to substantiate a potential role of other integrin inhibitors in NSCLC treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ID NUMBER

NCT00842712.

Two cilengitide regimens in combination with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter: results of the open-label, controlled, randomized phase II CORE study

BACKGROUND

Survival outcomes for patients with glioblastoma remain poor, particularly for patients with unmethylated O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter. This phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial investigated the efficacy and safety of 2 dose regimens of the selective integrin inhibitor cilengitide combined with standard chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and an unmethylated MGMT promoter.

METHODS

Overall, 265 patients were randomized (1:1:1) to standard cilengitide (2000 mg 2×/wk; n = 88), intensive cilengitide (2000 mg 5×/wk during wk 1-6, thereafter 2×/wk; n = 88), or a control arm (chemoradiotherapy alone; n = 89). Cilengitide was administered intravenously in combination with daily temozolomide (TMZ) and concomitant radiotherapy (RT; wk 1-6), followed by TMZ maintenance therapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, pharmacokinetics, and safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 16.3 months in the standard cilengitide arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.686; 95% CI: 0.484, 0.972; P = .032) and 14.5 months in the intensive cilengitide arm (HR, 0.858; 95% CI: 0.612, 1.204; P = .3771) versus 13.4 months in the control arm. Median progression-free survival assessed per independent review committee was 5.6 months (HR, 0.822; 95% CI: 0.595, 1.134) and 5.9 months (HR, 0.794; 95% CI: 0.575, 1.096) in the standard and intensive cilengitide arms, respectively, versus 4.1 months in the control arm. Cilengitide was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard and intensive cilengitide dose regimens were well tolerated in combination with TMZ/RT→TMZ. Inconsistent overall survival and progression-free survival outcomes and a limited sample size did not allow firm conclusions regarding clinical efficacy in this exploratory phase II study.

Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CENTRIC EORTC 26071-22072 study): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Cilengitide is a selective αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin inhibitor. Data from phase 2 trials suggest that it has antitumour activity as a single agent in recurrent glioblastoma and in combination with standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (particularly in tumours with methylated MGMT promoter). We aimed to assess cilengitide combined with temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study, we investigated the efficacy of cilengitide in patients from 146 study sites in 25 countries. Eligible patients (newly diagnosed, histologically proven supratentorial glioblastoma, methylated MGMT promoter, and age ≥18 years) were stratified for prognostic Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis class and geographic region and centrally randomised in a 1:1 ratio with interactive voice response system to receive temozolomide chemoradiotherapy with cilengitide 2000 mg intravenously twice weekly (cilengitide group) or temozolomide chemoradiotherapy alone (control group). Patients and investigators were unmasked to treatment allocation. Maintenance temozolomide was given for up to six cycles, and cilengitide was given for up to 18 months or until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. The primary endpoint was overall survival. We analysed survival outcomes by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00689221.

FINDINGS

Overall, 3471 patients were screened. Of these patients, 3060 had tumour MGMT status tested; 926 patients had a methylated MGMT promoter, and 545 were randomly assigned to the cilengitide (n=272) or control groups (n=273) between Oct 31, 2008, and May 12, 2011. Median overall survival was 26·3 months (95% CI 23·8-28·8) in the cilengitide group and 26·3 months (23·9-34·7) in the control group (hazard ratio 1·02, 95% CI 0·81-1·29, p=0·86). None of the predefined clinical subgroups showed a benefit from cilengitide. We noted no overall additional toxic effects with cilengitide treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events of grade 3 or worse in the safety population were lymphopenia (31 [12%] in the cilengitide group vs 26 [10%] in the control group), thrombocytopenia (28 [11%] vs 46 [18%]), neutropenia (19 [7%] vs 24 [9%]), leucopenia (18 [7%] vs 20 [8%]), and convulsion (14 [5%] vs 15 [6%]).

INTERPRETATION

The addition of cilengitide to temozolomide chemoradiotherapy did not improve outcomes; cilengitide will not be further developed as an anticancer drug. Nevertheless, integrins remain a potential treatment target for glioblastoma.

FUNDING

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) with or without cilengitide in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the randomized phase I/II ADVANTAGE trial (phase II part)

BACKGROUND

Recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN) overexpresses αvβ5 integrin. Cilengitide selectively inhibits αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins and is investigated as a treatment strategy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The phase I/II study ADVANTAGE evaluated cilengitide combined with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) in R/M-SCCHN. The phase II part reported here was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial investigating progression-free survival (PFS). Patients received up to six cycles of PFE alone or combined with cilengitide 2000 mg once (CIL1W) or twice (CIL2W) weekly. Thereafter, patients received maintenance therapy (cilengitide arms: cilengitide plus cetuximab; PFE-alone arm: cetuximab only) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-two patients were treated. Median PFS per investigator read was similar for CIL1W + PFE, CIL2W + PFE, and PFE alone (6.4, 5.6, and 5.7 months, respectively). Accordingly, median overall survival and objective response rates were not improved with cilengitide (12.4 months/47%, 10.6 months/27%, and 11.6 months/36%, respectively). No clinically meaningful safety differences were observed between groups. None of the tested biomarkers (expression of integrins, CD31, Ki-67, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, vascular endothelial-cadherin, type IV collagen, epidermal growth factor receptor, or p16 for human papillomavirus) were predictive of outcome.

CONCLUSION

Neither of the cilengitide-containing regimens demonstrated a PFS benefit over PFE alone in R/M-SCCHN patients.

Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and methylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) gene promoter: Key results of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled, phase III CENTRIC study

LBA2009

Background: Cilengitide (CIL) is a selective αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrin inhibitor. In a phase II study in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, CIL added to standard temozolomide (TMZ) and radiotherapy (RT) was well tolerated and appeared to confer improved survival in patients with glioblastoma and methylated MGMT gene promoter (Stupp et al. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2712-8). Methods: This multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, phase III study randomized (1:1) patients (≥ 18 years) with newly diagnosed, histologically proven supratentorial glioblastoma (WHO Grade IV) and centrally determined MGMT gene promoter methylation. Treatment consisted of CIL 2000 mg twice weekly i.v. plus standard TMZ/RT→TMZ (concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide and radiotherapy; Stupp et al. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987-96) or standard TMZ/RT→TMZ alone. CIL was to be administered for ≥ 18 months, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator read and safety. Results: 272 patients received CIL plus TMZ/RT→TMZ, and 273 were treated with TMZ/RT→TMZ alone (intention-to-treat population). 54% and 52% of patients were male, and 42% and 44% had ECOG-PS ≥ 1, respectively. 75% of patients of both arms were ≥ 50 years old. Overall, baseline characteristics were well balanced across treatment arms. Median OS was 26.3 months in both arms (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.02 [95%CI: 0.81-1.29], p = 0.86). Median PFS per investigator read was 13.5 months in the CIL arm and 10.7 months in the control arm (HR = 0.93 [95%CI: 0.76-1.14], p = 0.48). Treatment was generally well tolerated and the known safety profile of CIL was confirmed. Conclusions: CIL failed to prolong PFS or OS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and methylated MGMT gene promoter. The previously reported safety profile of CIL in addition to standard therapy was confirmed. Clinical trial information: NCT00689221.

Cilengitide combined with standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation: Final results of the multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled, phase III CENTRIC study

LBA2009

The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June, 2, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Sunday edition of ASCO Daily News.

Phase I/IIa Study of Cilengitide and Temozolomide With Concomitant Radiotherapy Followed by Cilengitide and Temozolomide Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Purpose

Invasion and migration are key processes of glioblastoma and are tightly linked to tumor recurrence. Integrin inhibition using cilengitide has shown synergy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in vitro and promising activity in recurrent glioblastoma. This multicenter, phase I/IIa study investigated the efficacy and safety of cilengitide in combination with standard chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Patients and Methods

Patients (age ≥ 18 to ≤ 70 years) were treated with cilengitide (500 mg) administered twice weekly intravenously in addition to standard radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide. Treatment was continued until disease progression or for up to 35 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months.

Results

Fifty-two patients (median age, 57 years; 62% male) were included. Six- and 12-month PFS rates were 69% (95% CI, 54% to 80%) and 33% (95% CI, 21% to 46%). Median PFS was 8 months (95% CI, 6.0 to 10.7 months). Twelve- and 24-month overall survival (OS) rates were 68% (95% CI, 53% to 79%) and 35% (95% CI, 22% to 48%). Median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 23.2 months). PFS and OS were longer in patients with tumors with O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation (13.4 and 23.2 months) versus those without MGMT promoter methylation (3.4 and 13.1 months). The combination of cilengitide with temozolomide and radiotherapy was well tolerated, with no additional toxicity. No pharmacokinetic interactions between temozolomide and cilengitide were identified.

Conclusion

Compared with historical controls, the addition of concomitant and adjuvant cilengitide to standard chemoradiotherapy demonstrated promising activity in patients with glioblastoma with MGMT promoter methylation.

Placebo influences on dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

Clinical features that are prognostic indicators of placebo response among dyskinetic Parkinson's disease patients were determined. Placebo-associated improvements occur in Parkinsonism, but responses in dyskinesia have not been studied. Placebo data from two multicenter studies with identical design comparing sarizotan to placebo for treating dyskinesia were accessed. Sarizotan (2 mg/day) failed to improve dyskinesia compared with placebo, but both treatments improved dyskinesia compared with baseline. Stepwise regression identified baseline characteristics that influenced dyskinesia response to placebo, and these factors were entered into a logistic regression model to quantify their influence on placebo-related dyskinesia improvements and worsening. Because placebo-associated improvements in Parkinsonism have been attributed to heightened dopaminergic activity, we also examined the association between changes in Parkinsonism and dyskinesia. Four hundred eighty-four subjects received placebo treatment; 178 met criteria for placebo-associated dyskinesia improvement and 37 for dyskinesia worsening. Older age, lower baseline Parkinsonism score, and lower total daily levodopa doses were associated with placebo-associated improvement, whereas lower baseline dyskinesia score was associated with placebo-associated worsening. Placebo-associated dyskinesia changes were not correlated with Parkinsonism changes, and all effects in the sarizotan group were statistically explained by the placebo-effect regression model. Dyskinesias are affected by placebo treatment. The absence of correlation between placebo-induced changes in dyskinesia and Parkinsonism argues against a dopaminergic activation mechanism to explain placebo-associated improvements in dyskinesia. The magnitude and variance of placebo-related changes and the factors that influence them can be helpful in the design of future clinical trials of antidyskinetic agents.

Sarizotan as a treatment for dyskinesias in Parkinson's disease: A double-blind placebo-controlled trial

The objective of this study is to conduct a dose-finding study of sarizotan in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with dyskinesia to identify a safe dose and to identify a sensitive dyskinesia rating measure. Sarizotan is a novel compound with full 5-HT(1A) agonist properties and additional high affinity for D(3) and D(4) receptors. An open label study documented improvements in PD patients with levodopa-induced dyskinesia. There is no precedent for study designs or outcome measures in pivotal trials of antidyskinesia therapies. The approach used here was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel study. Included were PD patients optimized to levodopa and dopaminergic drugs with moderately disabling dyskinesias present greater than or equal to 25% of the waking day. Interventions included sarizotan 2, 4, or 10 mg/day or matching placebo, given in two doses. There were two outcome measures: the primary measure was change from baseline in diary-based on time without dyskinesia; the secondary measures were change from baseline in scores on the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), the composite score of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Items 32+33 (dyskinesia duration and disability) and total UPDRS. A total of 398 subjects were randomized, with 381 included in the intention-to-treat population. No significant changes occurred on sarizotan compared to placebo on any diary-based measure of dyskinesia or the AIMS score. The composite score of UPDRS Items 32+33 was significantly improved with 2 mg/day sarizotan, with a trend at 10 mg/day. Adverse events were not significantly different in sarizotan- and placebo-treated patients, but off time significantly increased with sarizotan 10 mg/day. Sarizotan 2 mg/day is a safe agent in PD patients with dyskinesia. To test its role in abating dyskinesia, future studies should focus on this dose and will use the composite score of UPDRS Items 32+33 as the primary outcome.