1
|
Orellana-Noia VM, Reed DR, McCook AA, Sen JM, Barlow CM, Malecek MK, Watkins M, Kahl BS, Spinner MA, Advani R, Voorhees TJ, Snow A, Grover NS, Ayers A, Romancik J, Liu Y, Huntington SF, Chavez JC, Saeed H, Lazaryan A, Raghunathan V, Spurgeon SE, Ollila TA, Del Prete C, Olszewski A, Ayers EC, Landsburg DJ, Echalier B, Lee J, Kamdar M, Caimi PF, Fu T, Liu J, David KA, Alharthy H, Law J, Karmali R, Shah H, Stephens DM, Major A, Rojek AE, Smith SM, Yellala A, Kallam A, Nakhoda S, Khan N, Sohail MA, Hill BT, Barrett-Campbell O, Lansigan F, Switchenko J, Cohen J, Portell CA. Single-route CNS prophylaxis for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas: real-world outcomes from 21 US academic institutions. Blood 2022; 139:413-423. [PMID: 34570876 PMCID: PMC8777199 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021012888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Prophylaxis is commonly used to prevent central nervous sy stem (CNS) relapse in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), with no clear standard of care. We retrospectively evaluated 1162 adult patients across 21 US academic centers with DLBCL or similar histologies who received single-route CNS prophylaxis as part of frontline therapy between 2013 and 2019. Prophylaxis was administered intrathecally(IT) in 894 (77%) and using systemic high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) in 236 (20%); 32 patients (3%) switched route due to toxicity and were assessed separately. By CNS-International Prognostic Index (IPI), 18% were considered low-risk, 51% moderate, and 30% high. Double-hit lymphoma (DHL) was confirmed in 243 of 866 evaluable patients (21%). Sixty-four patients (5.7%) had CNS relapse after median 7.1 months from diagnosis, including 15 of 64 (23%) within the first 6 months. There was no significant difference in CNS relapse between IT and HD-MTX recipients (5.4% vs 6.8%, P = .4), including after propensity score matching to account for differences between respective recipient groups. Weighting by CNS-IPI, expected vs observed CNS relapse rates were nearly identical (5.8% vs 5.7%). Testicular involvement was associated with high risk of CNS relapse (11.3%) despite most having lower CNS-IPI scores. DHL did not significantly predict for CNS relapse after single-route prophylaxis, including with adjustment for treatment regimen and other factors. This large study of CNS prophylaxis recipients with DLBCL found no significant difference in CNS relapse rates between routes of administration. Relapse rates among high-risk subgroups remain elevated, and reconsideration of prophylaxis strategies in DLBCL is of critical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Manuel Orellana-Noia
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Daniel R Reed
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center of Wake Forest University, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Ashley Alesia McCook
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | - Christian M Barlow
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Mary-Kate Malecek
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Marcus Watkins
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Brad S Kahl
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Michael A Spinner
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Ranjana Advani
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Timothy J Voorhees
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
- Division of Hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Anson Snow
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Natalie Sophia Grover
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Amy Ayers
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jason Romancik
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Yuxin Liu
- Division of Hematology, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Julio C Chavez
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Hayder Saeed
- Department of Malignant Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | | | - Vikram Raghunathan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Stephen E Spurgeon
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR
| | - Thomas A Ollila
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | | | - Adam Olszewski
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Emily C Ayers
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
- Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel J Landsburg
- Lymphoma Program, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Jun Lee
- Division of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO
| | - Manali Kamdar
- Division of Hematology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO
| | - Paolo F Caimi
- Adult Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Transplant Section, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Timothy Fu
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Jieqi Liu
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Kevin A David
- Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Hanan Alharthy
- Department of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jennie Law
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Maryland Greenbaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD
| | - Reem Karmali
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Harsh Shah
- University of Utah/Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT
| | | | - Ajay Major
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Sonali M Smith
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Amulya Yellala
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Avyakta Kallam
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Nadia Khan
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; and
| | - Mohammad Ahsan Sohail
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Brian T Hill
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Frederick Lansigan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH
| | - Jeffrey Switchenko
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jonathon Cohen
- Winship Cancer Institute, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Craig A Portell
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Del Prete C, Muthiah A, Almhanna K. Does tumor profile in gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) junction cancer justify off-label use of targeted therapy?—a narrative review. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8:1110. [PMID: 33145329 PMCID: PMC7575969 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-3510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Despite significant therapeutic progress, gastric cancer remains among the most deadly forms of cancer encountered in clinical practice, and this remains true even in the context of declining incidence. Outcomes in advanced disease remain poor and therapy is rarely curative in this setting. As our understanding of tumor profile gains sophistication, a growing interest in targeted therapies and moreover the use of tumor profile to inform these therapies has developed in the hopes of altering nearly uniformly poor outcomes. A wide and growing array of molecular targets have been identified in the recent past. Targets of potential clinical interest include human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), c-MET, and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR). This advanced molecular understanding has been increasingly used to justify the off-label usage of targeted therapies, though the efficacy of this approach warrants careful consideration. While targeted agents have demonstrated efficacy across a wide range of malignancies, even with molecular profiling data, efficacy is not assured. It will also be demonstrated that even within the same malignancy, what holds true in the metastatic setting does not necessarily apply to the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting. This review will assess the current evidence for the use of targeted therapies utilizing these biomarkers in the context of gastric and gastroesophageal (GE) junction cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Del Prete
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Warren-Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University/Lifespan Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Arun Muthiah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Warren-Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University/Lifespan Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Khaldoun Almhanna
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Warren-Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University/Lifespan Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wasp GT, Del Prete C, Farrell JAD, Dragnev KH, Russo G, Atkins GT, Phillips JD, Brooks GA. Impact of neuroimaging in the pretreatment evaluation of early stage non-small cell lung cancer. Heliyon 2020; 6:e04319. [PMID: 32637704 PMCID: PMC7330068 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There are limited data and conflicting guideline recommendations regarding the role of neuroimaging in the pretreatment evaluation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We performed a retrospective, pragmatic cohort study of patients with NSCLC diagnosed between January 1 and December 31, 2015. Eligible patients were identified from an institutional tumor registry. We collected all records of pretreatment neuroimaging within 12 weeks of diagnosis, including CT head (CT) and MRI brain (MRI). We abstracted the indication for neuroimaging, presence of central neurologic symptoms and cancer stage (with and without neuroimaging findings) from the tumor registry and the electronic health record. Results We identified 216 evaluable patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC. 157 of 216 patients (72.7%) underwent neuroimaging as part of initial staging, and 41 (26%) were found to have brain metastases. Of 43 patients with central neurologic symptoms at the time of neuroimaging, 28 (67%) had brain metastasis. In patients without central neurologic symptoms, brain metastases were discovered in 0 of 33 patients with clinical stage I or II, 4 of 36 (11%) with clinical stage III and 9 of 45 (20%) with clinical stage IV disease. Conclusions In patients with early stage NSCLC (i.e. clinical stage I and II) without central neurologic symptoms, brain metastases are unlikely. The continued use of neuroimaging in the pretreatment evaluation of clinical stage I patients without central neurologic symptoms is not needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garrett T Wasp
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH, 03765, USA
| | - Christopher Del Prete
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | | | - Konstantin H Dragnev
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH, 03765, USA
| | - Gregory Russo
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, USA
| | - Graham T Atkins
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Pulmonology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, USA
| | - Joseph D Phillips
- Department of Surgery, Section of Thoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, USA
| | - Gabriel A Brooks
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Dr, Lebanon, NH, 03765, USA
| |
Collapse
|