1
|
Kleck CJ, Noshchenko A, Burger EL, Cain CMJ, Patel VV. Postoperative pelvic incidence (PI) change may impact sagittal spinopelvic alignment (SSA) after instrumented surgical correction of adult spine deformity (ASD). Spine Deform 2021; 9:1093-1104. [PMID: 33871832 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00283-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To study factors causing postoperative change of PI after surgical correction of ASD and to assess the effect of this variability on postoperative PI-LL mismatch. BACKGROUND PI is used as an individual constant to define lumbar lordosis (LL) correction goal (PI-LL < 10). Postoperative changes of PI were shown but with opposite vectors. The impact of the PI variability on the postoperative PI-LL has not been studied. METHODS The medical and radiographic data analyzed for patients who underwent long posterior instrumented spinal fusion. Inclusion criteria are age, ≥ 20 years old; ASD due to degenerative disk disease (DDD) or scoliosis (DS); ≥ 3 levels fused; and 2-year follow-up or revision. Studied parameters are LL (L1-S1), PI, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and PI-LL. Measurement error and postoperative changes were defined. Statistical analysis includes ANOVA, correlation, regression, and risk assessment by odds ratio; P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. RESULTS Eighty patients were included: mean age, 62.4 years-old (SD, 11.1); female, 63.7%; mean body mass index (BMI), 27.1 (SD, 5.6). Distribution of patients by follow-ups includes preoperative 100%; postoperative (1-3 weeks), 100%; 11-13 months. 90%; 22-26 months, 58%; and revision: 24%. Pre- versus postoperative PI (∆PI) changed both positively and negatively and the absolute value of change|∆PI| exceeded measurement error (P ≤ 0.05) reaching as high as 31°, and progressed with time; R2 dropped from 0.73 to 0.45 (P < 0.001); ∆PI depended on disproportional changes of SS and PT, preoperative PI, and change of LL. Obesity, DS, and absence of sacroiliac fixation increased |∆PI|. The risk of LL insufficient correction (PI-LL > 10°) associated with a |∆PI|> 6°, P = 0.05. Sacroiliac fixation diminished PI variability only during the first postoperative year. CONCLUSION Preoperative variability and postoperative instability of PI diminish the applicability of the PI-LL < 10° goal to plan correction of LL. An alternative method is offered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Kleck
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop B202, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Andriy Noshchenko
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop B202, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.
| | - Evalina L Burger
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop B202, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Christopher M J Cain
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop B202, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Vikas V Patel
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12631 E. 17th Ave., Mail Stop B202, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hollenbeck JFM, Fattor JA, Patel V, Burger E, Rullkoetter PJ, Cain CMJ. Validation of Pre-operative Templating for Total Disc Replacement Surgery. Int J Spine Surg 2019; 13:84-91. [PMID: 30805290 DOI: 10.14444/6011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives This was an analytic retrospective observational study. The aims were (1) to validate patient-specific templating process by comparing postoperative range of motion (ROM) with that predicted by the model, (2) to retrospectively determine the ideal implant size, height, configuration, and location to evaluate if the ROM achieved could have been improved, and (3) to correlate postoperative ROM and clinical outcome. Background Previous research revealed that after total disc replacement surgery, 34% of patients with less than 5° of postoperative ROM developed adjacent segment disease. The match between patient anatomy (size, facet orientation, disc height) and implant parameters are likely to affect postoperative ROM and clinical outcomes. Methods Seventeen consecutive patients were implanted with 22 ProDisc-L devices between 2008 and 2015. Three-dimensional finite element (FE) models of the implanted segment were constructed from preoperative computed tomography scans and virtually implanted with the ProDisc-L implant. ROM was determined with the endpoints of facet impingement in flexion and implant contact in extension. FE templating was used to determine the optimal implant size and location. ROM was then measured directly from flexion and extension radiographs and compared to predicted ROM. Pre and postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) data were used to correlate ROM with clinical outcomes. Results No significant difference was found between the actual and predicted ROM. The computational templating procedure identified an optimal ROM that was significantly greater than actual ROM. The ROM in our cohort could have been improved by an average of 1.2° or 12% had a different implant size or position been used. Conclusions FE analyses accurately predicted ROM in this cohort and can facilitate selection of the optimal implant size and location that we believe will increase the chance of achieving clinical success with the application of this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jill A Fattor
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Vikas Patel
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Evalina Burger
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Paul J Rullkoetter
- Center for Orthopaedic Biomechanics, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bozzio AE, Johnson CR, Fattor JA, Kleck CJ, Patel VV, Burger EL, Noshchenko A, Cain CMJ. Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody, Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody, and Anterior/Posterior Fusion: Analysis of Fusion Outcomes and Costs. Orthopedics 2018; 41:e655-e662. [PMID: 30011051 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20180711-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Fusion outcomes and costs of stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in association with posterior fusion, and anterior/posterior (A/P) fusion were compared using clinical, radiographic, and billing data. Adult patients with symptomatic 1- or 2-level degenerative disk disease in isolation or in association with a grade 1 or 2 degenerative or lytic spondylolisthesis and canal and/or foraminal stenosis who underwent elective stand-alone ALIF, TLIF, or A/P fusion were compared. The analysis focused primarily on fusion rates and costs and secondarily on radiographic and clinical parameters. One hundred six patients at least 2 years beyond surgery (ALIF, 53; TLIF, 17; A/P fusion, 36) were reviewed. Demographics were similar except for age, with the ALIF group being younger (mean, 37.8 years) than the other groups (TLIF, 53.1 years; A/P fusion, 48.2 years). There were no differences between the groups in fusion rates or outcomes as assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale. Compared with the other 2 groups, the ALIF group had a significantly shorter operative time, less blood loss, and a shorter stay (P<.0001). Evaluation of radiographic parameters revealed significant differences regarding disk angle (P<.001), disk height (P<.0001), and pelvic tilt (P=.001) favoring ALIF and A/P fusion over TLIF. Stand-alone ALIF should be considered in the management of patients with 1- or 2-level lumbar degenerative disk disease for which the pathology can be addressed adequately via this approach. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(5):e655-e662.].
Collapse
|
4
|
Barton C, Noshchenko A, Patel VV, Cain CMJ, Kleck C, Burger EL. Different types of mechanical complications after surgical correction of adult spine deformity with osteotomy. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5:132-149. [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2017] [Revised: 11/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To determine the incidence and risk factors for mechanical complications (MC) after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD) with osteotomy.
METHODS A retrospective study was performed. Inclusion criteria: Surgical correction of ASD using osteotomy; male or female; > 20 years old; follow-up ≥ 24 mo or revision. The MC of spine and spinal instrumentation were studied separately. Risk analysis included assessment of the association between more than 50 different characteristics (demographic, clinical, radiographic, and instrumentation) with different types of MC.
RESULTS The medical records of 94 operations in 88 subjects were analyzed: Female (68%), mean age 58.6 (SD, 12.7) years. Cumulative incidence of MC at 2 year follow-up was 43.6%. Of these, 78% required revision (P < 0.001). The following characteristics had significant (P ≤ 0.05) association with MC: (1) Preoperative: osteoporosis, smoking, previous spinal operation, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) > 100 mm, lumbar lordosis (LL) < 34°; (2) postoperative: SVA > 75 mm; operative correction: SVA > 75 mm, LL > 30°, thoracic kyphosis > 25°, and pelvic tilt > 9°; a fall; pseudarthrosis; and (3) device and surgical technique: use of previously implanted instrumentation; use of domino and/or parallel connectors; type of osteotomy (PSO vs SPO) if preoperative SVA < 100 mm; lumbar osteotomy location; in-situ rod contouring > 60°; and fixation to sacrum/pelvis.
CONCLUSION Risk of MC after surgical correction of ASD is substantial. To decrease this risk over- and/or insufficient correction of the sagittal imbalance should be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Barton
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States
| | - Andriy Noshchenko
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Vikas V Patel
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Christopher M J Cain
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Christopher Kleck
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Evalina L Burger
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kleck CJ, Illing D, Lindley EM, Noshchenko A, Patel VV, Barton C, Baldini T, Cain CMJ, Burger EL. Strain in Posterior Instrumentation Resulted by Different Combinations of Posterior and Anterior Devices for Long Spine Fusion Constructs. Spine Deform 2017; 5:27-36. [PMID: 28038691 DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.09.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Revised: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 09/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Clinically related experimental study. OBJECTIVE Evaluation of strain in posterior low lumbar and spinopelvic instrumentation for multilevel fusion resulting from the impact of such mechanical factors as physiologic motion, different combinations of posterior and anterior instrumentation, and different techniques of interbody device implantation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Currently different combinations of posterior and anterior instrumentation as well as surgical techniques are used for multilevel lumbar fusion. Their impact on risk of device failure has not been well studied. Strain is a well-known predictor of metal fatigue and breakage measurable in experimental conditions. METHODS Twelve human lumbar spine cadaveric specimens were tested. Following surgical methods of lumbar pedicle screw fixation (L2-S1) with and without spinopelvic fixation by iliac bolt (SFIB) were experimentally modeled: posterior (PLF); transforaminal (TLIF); and a combination of posterior and anterior interbody instrumentation (ALIF+PLF) with and without anterior supplemental fixation by anterior plate or diverging screws through an integrated plate. Strain was defined at the S1 screws, L5-S1 segment of posterior rods, and iliac bolt connectors; measurement was performed during flexion, extension, and axial rotation in physiological range of motion and applied force. RESULTS The highest strain was observed in the S1 screws and iliac bolt connectors specifically during rotation. The S1 screw strain was lower in ALIF+PLF during sagittal motion but not rotation. Supplemental anterior fixation in ALIF+PLF diminished the S1 strain during extension. Strain in the posterior rods was higher after TLIF and PLF and was increased by SFIB; this strain was lowest after ALIF+PLF, as supplemental anterior fixation diminished the strain during extension, in particular, cages with anterior screws more than anterior plate. Strain in the iliac bolt connectors was mainly determined by direction of motion. CONCLUSIONS Different devices modify strain in low posterior instrumentation, which is higher after transforaminal and posterior techniques, specifically with spinopelvic fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Kleck
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Damian Illing
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Emily M Lindley
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Andriy Noshchenko
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Vikas V Patel
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Cameron Barton
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Todd Baldini
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Christopher M J Cain
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - Evalina L Burger
- Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17th Pl, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kleck CJ, Perry JM, Burger EL, Cain CMJ, Milligan K, Patel VV. Sacroiliac Joint Treatment Personalized to Individual Patient Anatomy Using 3-Dimensional Navigation. Orthopedics 2016; 39:89-94. [PMID: 27023416 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160304-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
During the past 10 years, the sacroiliac (SI) joint has evolved from being barely recognized as a source of pain, to being a joint treated only nonsurgically or with great surgical morbidity, to currently being a joint treated with minimally invasive techniques that are personalized to the individual patient. The complex 3-dimensional anatomy of the SI joint and lack of parallel to traditional imaging planes requires a thorough understanding of the structures within and around the SI joint that may be at risk of injury. Thus, the SI joint is ideally suited for intraoperative 3-dimensional imaging and surgical navigation when being treated minimally invasively.
Collapse
|
7
|
Fattor JA, Hollenbeck JFM, Laz PJ, Rullkoetter PJ, Burger EL, Patel VV, Cain CMJ. Patient-Specific Templating of Lumbar Total Disk Replacement to Restore Normal Anatomy and Function. Orthopedics 2016; 39:97-102. [PMID: 27023417 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20160304-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a tool to determine optimal placement and size for total disk replacements (TDRs) to improve patient outcomes of pain and function. The authors developed a statistical shape model to determine the anatomical variables that influence the placement, function, and outcome of lumbar TDR. A patient-specific finite element analysis model has been developed that is now used prospectively to identify patients suitable for TDR and to create a surgical template to facilitate implant placement to optimize range of motion and clinical outcomes. Patient factors and surgical techniques that determine success regarding function and pain are discussed in this article.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lindley EM, Barton C, Blount T, Burger EL, Cain CMJ, Seim HB, Turner AS, Patel VV. An analysis of spine fusion outcomes in sheep pre-clinical models. Eur Spine J 2016; 26:228-239. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4544-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Revised: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
9
|
Kleck CJ, Cullilmore I, LaFleur M, Lindley E, Rentschler ME, Burger EL, Cain CMJ, Patel VV. A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy. Eur Spine J 2015; 25:1764-74. [DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4235-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 09/07/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
10
|
Schleicher P, Gerlach R, Schär B, Cain CMJ, Achatz W, Pflugmacher R, Haas NP, Kandziora F. Biomechanical comparison of two different concepts for stand alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2008; 17:1757-65. [PMID: 18841399 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0797-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2008] [Revised: 07/15/2008] [Accepted: 09/08/2008] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Segmental instability in degenerative disc disease is often treated with anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Current techniques require an additional posterior approach to achieve sufficient stability. The test device is an implant which consists of a PEEK-body and an integrated anterior titanium plate hosting four diverging locking screws. The test device avoids posterior fixation by enhancing stability via the locking screws. The test device was compared to an already established stand alone interbody implant in a human cadaveric three-dimensional stiffness test. In the biomechanical test, the L4/5 motion segment of 16 human cadaveric lumbar spines were isolated and divided into two test groups. Tests were performed in flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, right and left axial rotation. Each specimen was tested in native state first, then a discectomy was performed and either of the test implants was applied. Finite element analysis (FE) was also performed to investigate load and stress distribution within the implant in several loading conditions. The FE models simulated two load cases. These were flexion and extension with a moment of 5 Nm. The biomechanical testing revealed a greater stiffness in lateral bending for the SynFix-LR compared to the established implant. Both implants showed a significantly higher stiffness in all loading directions compared to the native segment. In flexion loading, the PEEK component takes on most of the load, whereas the majority of the extension load is put on the screws and the screw-plate junction. Clinical investigation of the test device seems reasonable based on the good results reported here.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schleicher
- Center for Spinal Surgery and Neurotraumatology, BG Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cain CMJ, Schleicher P, Gerlach R, Pflugmacher R, Scholz M, Kandziora F. A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:2631-6. [PMID: 16319749 DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000187897.25889.54] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Established lumbar fixation methods were assessed biomechanically, and a comparison was made with a new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody cage device incorporating integrated anterior fixation. OBJECTIVES To compare the stability of a new stand-alone anterior implant (Test-device) with established fixation methods to assess its suitability for clinical use. Our hypothesis being that the Test-device would provide stability comparable to that provided by an anterior cage when supplemented with posterior pedicle screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA It is accepted that the use of rigid pedicle screw instrumentation increases the chance of achieving a solid fusion, but its use may be associated with a significant increase in postoperative morbidity caused by disruption of the posterior musculature. It is also evident that this increased fusion rate is generally not associated with increased clinical success. This dilemma has led to a search for a solution and to the development of the Test-device anterior lumbar interbody device. METHODS The kinematic properties of either the L3-L4 or L4-L5 lumbar motion segment of 8 cadaveric lumbar spines have been tested using the following sequence of fixation: intact, Test-device, Test-device and translaminar facet screws (TS), Cage and TS, Cage and Universal Spine System (USS), and Cage and small stature USS. RESULTS All fixation techniques except the cage and TS decreased (P < 0.05) range of motion (ROM), neutral zone (NZ), and elastic zone (EZ), and increased (P < 0.05) stiffness in comparison to the intact motion segment in all test modes. There was a significant increase (P < 0.01) in the ROM, NZ, and EZ, and decrease in the stiffness of the cage and TS group in comparison to all other stabilization techniques in flexion and rotation. There was no significant difference in the ROM, NZ, EZ, and stiffness between the Test-device and cage and USS groups in flexion, extension, and bending. The Test-device resulted in a significantly lower EZ (P < 0.05) and a significantly higher stiffness (P < 0.05) in rotation than all other fixation methods. CONCLUSIONS The Test-device alone provided similar and the Test-device and TS higher stability than the pedicle screw constructs evaluated. These results support progression to clinical trials using the Test-device as a stand-alone implant.
Collapse
|
12
|
Freeman BJC, Fraser RD, Cain CMJ, Hall DJ, Chapple DCL. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30:2369-77; discussion 2378. [PMID: 16261111 DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000186587.43373.f2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 161] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain (CDLBP). OBJECTIVES To test the safety and efficacy of IDET compared with a sham treatment (placebo). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA In North America alone, more than 40,000 intradiscal catheters have been used to treat CDLBP. The evidence for efficacy of IDET is weak coming from retrospective and prospective cohort studies providing only Class II and Class III evidence. There is one study published with Class I evidence. This demonstrates statistically significant improvements following IDET; however, the clinical significance of these improvements is questionable. METHODS Patients with CDLBP who failed to improve following conservative therapy were considered for this study. Inclusion criteria included the presence of one- or two-level symptomatic disc degeneration with posterior or posterolateral anular tears as determined by provocative computed tomography (CT) discography. Patients were excluded if there was greater than 50% loss of disc height or previous spinal surgery. Fifty-seven patients were randomized with a 2:1 ratio: 38 to IDET and 19 to sham procedure (placebo). In all cases, the IDET catheter was positioned to cover at least 75% of the annular tear as defined by the CT discography. An independent technician connected the catheter to the generator and then either delivered electrothermal energy (active group) or did not (sham group). Surgeon, patient, and independent outcome assessor were all blinded to the treatment. All patients followed a standard postprocedural rehabilitation program. Independent statistical analysis was performed. OUTCOME MEASURES Low Back Outcome Score (LBOS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), Zung Depression Index (ZDI), and Modified Somatic Perceptions Questionnaire (MSPQ) were measured at baseline and 6 months. Successful outcome was defined as: no neurologic deficit, improvement in LBOS of greater then 7 points, and improvement in SF-36 subsets (physical function and bodily pain) of greater than 1 standard deviation. RESULTS Baseline demographic data, initial LBOS, ODI, SF-36, ZDI, and MSPQ were similar for both groups. No neurologic deficits occurred. No subject in either arm showed improvement of greater than 7 points in LBOS or greater than 1 standard deviation in the specified domains of the SF-36. Mean ODI was 41.42 at baseline and 39.77 at 6 months for the IDET group, compared with 40.74 at baseline and 41.58 at 6 months for the placebo group. There was no significant change in ZDI or MSPQ scores for either group. CONCLUSIONS The IDET procedure appeared safe with no permanent complications. No subject in either arm met criteria for successful outcome. Further detailed analyses showed no significant change in outcome measures in either group at 6 months. This study demonstrates no significant benefit from IDET over placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J C Freeman
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamat AS, Freeman BJ, Cain CMJ, Hall DJ. Laminated multi-segment rib graft in anterior column reconstruction. Eur Spine J 2002; 11:465-6. [PMID: 12384755 PMCID: PMC3611308 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-001-0348-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2000] [Revised: 08/21/2001] [Accepted: 08/25/2001] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Rib harvested during thoracotomy can be effectively used for anterior column reconstruction. An innovative technique is described to convert multiple individual rib segments into a robust single anterior column reconstruction graft using cortical screws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A S Kamat
- Spinal Unit, Dept of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|