Correlation of immune fitness with response to teclistamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in MajesTEC-1

Teclistamab, an off-the-shelf B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) × CD3 bispecific antibody that mediates T-cell activation and subsequent lysis of BCMA-expressing myeloma cells, is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). As a T-cell redirection therapy, clinical outcomes with teclistamab may be influenced by patient immune fitness and tumor antigen expression. We correlated tumor characteristics and baseline immune profiles with clinical response and disease burden in patients with RRMM from the pivotal phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study, focusing on patients treated with 1.5 mg/kg of teclistamab (N = 165). Peripheral blood samples were collected at screening and bone marrow samples were collected at screening and cycle 3. Better clinical outcomes to teclistamab correlated with higher baseline total T-cell counts in the periphery. In addition, responders (partial response or better) had a lower proportion of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells, T cells expressing co-inhibitory receptors (CD38, PD-1, PD-1/TIM-3), and soluble BCMA, and a T-cell profile suggestive of a more cytolytic potential, compared with nonresponders. Neither frequency of baseline bone marrow BCMA expression nor BCMA receptor density were associated with clinical response to teclistamab. Improved progression-free survival was observed in patients with a lower frequency of T cells expressing exhaustion markers and immunosuppressive regulatory T cells. Overall, response to teclistamab was associated with baseline immune fitness; nonresponders had immune profiles suggestive of immune suppression and T-cell dysfunction. These findings illustrate the importance of the contribution of the immune landscape to T-cell redirection therapy response. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03145181/NCT04557098.

Teclistamab impairs humoral immunity in patients with heavily pretreated myeloma: importance of immunoglobulin supplementation

ABSTRACT

Teclistamab and other B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeting bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have substantial activity in patients with heavily pretreated multiple myeloma (MM) but are associated with a high rate of infections. BCMA is also expressed on normal plasma cells and mature B cells, which are essential for the generation of a humoral immune response. The aim of this study was to improve the understanding of the impact of BCMA-targeting BsAbs on humoral immunity. The impact of teclistamab on polyclonal immunoglobulins and B cell counts was evaluated in patients with MM who received once-weekly teclistamab 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously. Vaccination responses were assessed in a subset of patients. Teclistamabinduced rapid depletion of peripheral blood B cells in patients with MM and eliminated normal plasma cells in ex vivo assays. In addition, teclistamab reduced the levels of polyclonal immunoglobulins (immunoglobulin G [IgG], IgA, IgE, and IgM), without recovery over time while receiving teclistamab therapy. Furthermore, response to vaccines against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was severely impaired in patients treated with teclistamab compared with vaccination responses observed in patients with newly diagnosed MM or relapsed/refractory MM. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) use was associated with a significantly lower risk of serious infections among patients treated with teclistamab (cumulative incidence of infections at 6 months: 5.3% with IVIG vs 54.8% with observation only [P < .001]). In conclusion, our data show severe defects in humoral immunity induced by teclistamab, the impact of which can be mitigated by the use of immunoglobulin supplementation. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT04557098.

Teclistamab: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable despite improvements in treatment options. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) is predominantly expressed in B-lineage cells and represents a promising new target for MM. Teclistamab (TECVAYLITM ) is the first T-cell redirecting bispecific antibody approved for patients with MM. Targeting both CD3 receptor complex on T cells and BCMA on myeloma cells, teclistamab leads to T-cell activation and subsequent lysis of BCMA+ cells. The recommended dose of teclistamab is 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneous weekly after two step-up doses of 0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg, which was selected after review of safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic data. Exposure-response analyses of efficacy and safety data were also used to confirm the teclistamab dose. Teclistamab resulted in a high rate of deep and durable responses (63% overall response, 45.5% complete response or better, with 22 months median duration of response) in patients with triple-exposed relapsed/refractory MM. Common adverse reactions included cytokine release syndrome, hematologic abnormalities, and infections. Teclistamab is currently being investigated as monotherapy as well as combination therapy across different MM indications.

Detailed overview of incidence and management of cytokine release syndrome observed with teclistamab in the MajesTEC-1 study of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody, demonstrated an overall response rate of 63.0% in 165 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), a known manifestation of T-cell redirection, was observed in 119 of 165 patients (72.1%).

METHODS

Patients received once-weekly teclistamab 1.5 mg/kg subcutaneously after two step-up doses (0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg). CRS was graded according to American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy criteria and managed according to the study protocol, including use of tocilizumab and/or steroids.

RESULTS

Most cases of CRS occurred during the step-up dosing schedule of teclistamab and were grade 1 (50.3% of patients) or grade 2 (21.2% of patients); a single case of grade 3 CRS was reported in a patient with concurrent grade 3 pneumonia. All CRS cases resolved and none led to treatment discontinuation. Overall, 33.3% of patients had >1 CRS event; CRS recurrence was reduced when tocilizumab was administered for the first CRS event compared with when it was not (20.0% vs. 62.2%, respectively). Baseline characteristics such as tumor burden and cytokine levels did not appear to predict CRS incidence or severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this study support the need for preemptive planning and prompt management of CRS in patients treated with T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies. Intervention with tocilizumab for CRS appears to decrease the likelihood of patients experiencing subsequent CRS events without compromising response to teclistamab.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS), observed in 72.1% of patients treated with teclistamab in the MajesTEC-1 study, was mostly grade 1 or 2 and manageable, without requiring treatment discontinuation. Most CRS occurred during the step-up schedule, requiring vigilance during treatment initiation. Ensure fever is resolved and patients have no signs of infection before initiating the teclistamab step-up schedule or administering the next teclistamab dose, to avoid exacerbating CRS. Tocilizumab reduced the risk of subsequent CRS in patients receiving it for their first CRS event (20.0% vs. 62.2% in those not receiving it), without affecting response to teclistamab. No baseline characteristics, including tumor burden or cytokine levels, appeared to clearly predict for CRS occurrence or severity.

Plain language summary of the MajesTEC-1 study of teclistamab for the treatment of people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?

This is a summary of a phase 1-2 clinical trial called MajesTEC-1. This trial tested the cancer drug teclistamab in people with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a cancer that forms in a certain type of white blood cells known as plasma cells. Most participants who took part in the study had at least 3 prior treatments for multiple myeloma before their cancer came back.

HOW WAS THE STUDY IN THIS SUMMARY CONDUCTED?

A total of 165 participants from 9 countries were included in this study. All participants were given teclistamab once per week and monitored for side effects. Once participants started taking teclistamab, they were checked regularly to monitor if their cancer had no change, improved (responded to treatment), or worsened or spread (known as disease progression).

WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY?

After approximately 14.1 months of follow-up (from 2020 to 2021), 63% of participants who were given teclistamab had a decrease in myeloma burden, meaning that they responded to treatment with teclistamab. Participants who responded to teclistamab lived without their myeloma coming back for approximately 18.4 months. The most common side effects were infections, cytokine release syndrome, abnormally low white and red blood cell counts (neutropenia, lymphopenia, and anemia), and low platelet cell counts (thrombocytopenia). Approximately 65% of participants experienced serious side effects.

WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THIS STUDY MEAN?

Overall, more than half of the participants (63%) in the MajesTEC-1 study responded to treatment with teclistamab despite previous myeloma treatment failures. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03145181, NCT04557098 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Teclistamab in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

BACKGROUND

Teclistamab is a T-cell-redirecting bispecific antibody that targets both CD3 expressed on the surface of T cells and B-cell maturation antigen expressed on the surface of myeloma cells. In the phase 1 dose-defining portion of the study, teclistamab showed promising efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

METHODS

In this phase 1-2 study, we enrolled patients who had relapsed or refractory myeloma after at least three therapy lines, including triple-class exposure to an immunomodulatory drug, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody. Patients received a weekly subcutaneous injection of teclistamab (at a dose of 1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight) after receiving step-up doses of 0.06 mg and 0.3 mg per kilogram. The primary end point was the overall response (partial response or better).

RESULTS

Among 165 patients who received teclistamab, 77.6% had triple-class refractory disease (median, five previous therapy lines). With a median follow-up of 14.1 months, the overall response rate was 63.0%, with 65 patients (39.4%) having a complete response or better. A total of 44 patients (26.7%) were found to have no minimal residual disease (MRD); the MRD-negativity rate among the patients with a complete response or better was 46%. The median duration of response was 18.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.9 to not estimable). The median duration of progression-free survival was 11.3 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 17.1). Common adverse events included cytokine release syndrome (in 72.1% of the patients; grade 3, 0.6%; no grade 4), neutropenia (in 70.9%; grade 3 or 4, 64.2%), anemia (in 52.1%; grade 3 or 4, 37.0%), and thrombocytopenia (in 40.0%; grade 3 or 4, 21.2%). Infections were frequent (in 76.4%; grade 3 or 4, 44.8%). Neurotoxic events occurred in 24 patients (14.5%), including immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome in 5 patients (3.0%; all grade 1 or 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Teclistamab resulted in a high rate of deep and durable response in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cytopenias and infections were common; toxic effects that were consistent with T-cell redirection were mostly grade 1 or 2. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; MajesTEC-1 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03145181 and NCT04557098.).

Efficacy and safety of teclistamab (tec), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after exposure to other BCMA-targeted agents

8013

Background: Tec (JNJ-64007957) is a BCMA x CD3 bispecific antibody (Ab) that redirects CD3+ T cells to mediate T-cell activation and subsequent lysis of BCMA-expressing myeloma cells. MajesTEC-1 is a multicohort, open-label phase 1/2 study of tec in pts with RRMM who previously received ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOT). Results from a pooled analysis of phase 1 and phase 2 cohort A (median follow-up 7.8 mo) demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 62.0% in pts with no prior anti-BCMA treatment (tx). We present initial results from cohort C, in which pts had prior exposure to an anti-BCMA tx. Methods: Eligible pts (age ≥18 y) had documented MM per IMWG criteria and had received ≥3 prior LOT including a PI, an IMiD, an anti-CD38 Ab, and an anti-BCMA tx (chimeric antigen receptor T [CAR-T] or Ab drug conjugate [ADC]). Pts were enrolled into a Simon’s stage design, receiving weekly subcutaneous tec 1.5 mg/kg preceded by step-up doses of 0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg. Primary endpoint was ORR (per IMWG 2016 criteria). AEs were graded per CTCAE v4.03; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded per ASTCT guidelines. Results: As of Sep 7, 2021, 38 pts in cohort C received tec (63% male; median age 63.5 y [range 32–82]; median prior LOT 6 [range 3–14]). 32 (84%) pts were refractory to last LOT; 25 (66%) were refractory to an anti-BCMA tx. Of 25 pts evaluated for efficacy, 16 (64%) had prior ADC, 11 (44%) prior CAR-T (2 pts received both). With median follow-up of 6.9 mo (range 0.7–8.7), ORR was 40% (95% CI 21–61). 5 pts (20%) achieved a complete response or better. The ORR (95% CI) was 38% (15–65) in ADC-exposed pts and 45% (17–77) in CAR-T–exposed pts. Most responses occurred rapidly; 7/25 pts had responses that deepened over time. Median time (range) to first and best response was 1.2 mo (0.2–4.9) and 2.1 mo (1.1–5.7), respectively. Median duration of response was not reached. The safety profile was comparable with that observed in BMCA tx-naive pts, with no new safety concerns. 16 pts (42%; grade 3/4 26%) had infections. Most common AEs (n = 38) were CRS (63%; all grade 1/2; median [range] time to CRS onset: 3 d [2–6], duration of CRS: 2 d [1–4]), neutropenia (55%; grade 3/4 50%), thrombocytopenia (42%; grade 3/4 29%), anemia (39%; grade 3/4 29%), and lymphopenia (40%; grade 3/4 37%). One pt had grade 3 ICANS that resolved with supportive care; pt remains on tx. No pts developed anti-tec Abs. Baseline BCMA expression was comparable with that observed in BCMA tx-naive pts. Updated efficacy and safety data will be presented for 40 pts. Conclusions: Initial results of serial targeting of BCMA with tec following ADC or CAR-T tx suggest a promising ORR with responses occurring early and deepening over time. A well-tolerated safety profile was observed in pts previously treated with anti-BCMA tx. Clinical trial information: NCT04557098.

Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Updated efficacy and safety results from MajesTEC-1

8007

Background: The BCMA × CD3 bispecific antibody teclistamab (tec; JNJ-64007957) redirects CD3+ T cells to mediate T-cell activation and subsequent lysis of BCMA-expressing myeloma cells. The multicohort, open-label, phase 1/2 MajesTEC-1 study is investigating safety/efficacy of tec in patients (pts) with RRMM who previously received ≥3 lines of therapy (LOT). In phase 1, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of tec was identified as a weekly subcutaneous dose of 1.5 mg/kg preceded by step-up doses of 0.06 and 0.3 mg/kg. Initial results from pts treated with the tec RP2D in phase 1/2 (no prior exposure to an anti–BCMA-targeted treatment), demonstrated that tec was well tolerated with encouraging efficacy. Here we present updated results from pts treated at the RP2D, including additional pts and longer follow-up. Methods: Eligible pts were aged ≥18 years, had documented MM (per IMWG criteria), and had received ≥3 prior LOT including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 antibody. Prior BCMA-targeted therapy was not permitted in Phase 1. Pts received tec at the RP2D. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (assessed per IMWG 2016 criteria). Adverse events (AEs) were graded per CTCAE v4.03 (cytokine release syndrome [CRS] and ICANS graded per ASTCT guidelines). Data cutoffs for safety and efficacy (N = 165) were Sep 7 and Nov 9, 2021, respectively. Results: Median pt age was 64 y (range 33–84); 58% were male, and median prior LOT was 5 (range 2–14); 100% were triple-class exposed, 70% were penta-drug exposed, 78% were triple-class refractory, and 30% were penta-drug refractory. ORR was 64% (95% CI 56–72), with a complete response or better achieved in 30% of pts. Responses were durable and deepened over time; median duration of response (DOR) was not reached. The 12-mo DOR rate was 66% (95% CI 49–79). The majority of pts who responded to treatment in the first cycle had a reduction in soluble BCMA. The most common hematologic AEs were neutropenia (65%; grade 3/4: 57%), anemia (50%; grade 3/4: 35%), thrombocytopenia (38%; grade 3/4: 21%), and lymphopenia (34%; grade 3/4: 32%). Infections occurred in 104 pts (63%; grade 3/4: 35%). The most common nonhematologic AE was CRS (72%; grade 3: 0.6%; no grade 4/5); median time to CRS onset (range) was 2 days (1–6) and median duration was 2 days (1–9). Five pts (3%) reported a total of 9 ICANS events (all grade 1/2; 7 were concurrent with CRS; all resolved). There were no treatment-related deaths. No pts required a teclistamab dose reduction due to AEs. Conclusions: Current data with ̃9 months of follow-up reaffirm the deep and durable responses that have been observed with tec in pts with highly refractory MM, with no new safety signals. Additional data with longer follow-up, including subgroup analyses and PFS, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT04557098.

Blood Transfusion Management and Transfusion-Related Outcomes in Daratumumab-Treated Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Daratumumab, a human CD38 monoclonal antibody approved for multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, binds red blood cells (RBCs), resulting in panagglutination in compatibility tests. Published mitigation methods avoid additional testing, ensuring timely release of blood products. Blood transfusion management and transfusion-related outcomes of daratumumab-treated patients in the SIRIUS study are reported, with emphasis on 2 clinical sites.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had MM treated with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, including a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug, or were refractory to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug. RBC typing and alloantibody screening were performed in gel cards. Antibody identification using RBC panels was performed on patients with positive antibody screens. Hematology panels and serum chemistry were analyzed ≤ 2 days before each daratumumab infusion and the first daratumumab dose within each treatment cycle, respectively. Pre- and posttransfusion hemoglobin values were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

At clinical cutoff, patients received 236 transfusions; 47 (37.9%) of 124 patients received 147 packed RBC transfusions, and 17 (13.7%) received 89 platelet transfusions. No hemolysis was reported, and 1 platelet transfusion reaction was observed. At Mount Sinai, no transfusion adverse events were observed, no new unexpected RBC alloantibodies were identified, and transfusions increased hemoglobin values (median, 1.2 g/dL). At Levine Cancer Institute, 6 of 7 patients responded to transfusions, with a median hemoglobin change of 1.7 g/dL.

CONCLUSION

In SIRIUS, no RBC transfusion reactions, including hemolysis, were observed. Observations from Mount Sinai and Levine Cancer Institute confirm that transfusions may be administered safely to daratumumab-treated patients.

RanBP9 at the intersection between cofilin and Aβ pathologies: rescue of neurodegenerative changes by RanBP9 reduction

Molecular pathways underlying the neurotoxicity and production of amyloid β protein (Aβ) represent potentially promising therapeutic targets for Alzheimer's disease (AD). We recently found that overexpression of the scaffolding protein RanBP9 increases Aβ production in cell lines and in transgenic mice while promoting cofilin activation and mitochondrial dysfunction. Translocation of cofilin to mitochondria and induction of cofilin–actin pathology require the activation/dephosphorylation of cofilin by Slingshot homolog 1 (SSH1) and cysteine oxidation of cofilin. In this study, we found that endogenous RanBP9 positively regulates SSH1 levels and mediates Aβ-induced translocation of cofilin to mitochondria and induction of cofilin–actin pathology in cultured cells, primary neurons, and in vivo. Endogenous level of RanBP9 was also required for Aβ-induced collapse of growth cones in immature neurons (days in vitro 9 (DIV9)) and depletion of synaptic proteins in mature neurons (DIV21). In vivo, amyloid precursor protein (APP)/presenilin-1 (PS1) mice exhibited 3.5-fold increased RanBP9 levels, and RanBP9 reduction protected against cofilin–actin pathology, synaptic damage, gliosis, and Aβ accumulation associated with APP/PS1 mice. Brains slices derived from APP/PS1 mice showed significantly impaired long-term potentiation (LTP), and RanBP9 reduction significantly enhanced paired pulse facilitation and LTP, as well as partially rescued contextual memory deficits associated with APP/PS1 mice. Therefore, these results underscore the critical importance of endogenous RanBP9 not only in Aβ accumulation but also in mediating the neurotoxic actions of Aβ at the level of synaptic plasticity, mitochondria, and cofilin–actin pathology via control of the SSH1-cofilin pathway in vivo.

Phase 2 randomized study of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone with or without siltuximab (anti-IL-6) in multiple myeloma

Because interleukin-6 (IL-6) is considered important in the proliferation of early multiple myeloma (MM), we hypothesized that the addition of the anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody siltuximab to the bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone (VMP) regimen would improve outcomes in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed MM. One hundred and six patients were randomized to receive 9 cycles of VMP or VMP plus siltuximab (11 mg/kg every 3 weeks) followed by siltuximab maintenance. Baseline characteristics were well balanced except for immunoglobulin A subtype and 17p deletions. With a complete response (CR) rate of 27% on siltuximab plus VMP (S+VMP) and 22% on VMP, the study did not confirm its hypothesis that the addition of siltuximab would increase the CR rate by at least 10%. Overall response rate was 88% on S+VMP and 80% on VMP, and at least very good partial response rates were 71% and 51% (P = .0382), respectively. Median progression-free survival (17 months) and 1-year overall survival (88%) were identical in the 2 arms. Grade ≥3 adverse-event incidence was 92% on S+VMP and 81% on VMP (P = .09), with trends toward more hematologic events and infections on S+VMP. Maintenance therapy with siltuximab was well tolerated. In conclusion, the addition of siltuximab to VMP did not improve the CR rate or long-term outcomes. This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00911859.

Evaluation of the QTc prolongation potential of a monoclonal antibody, siltuximab, in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, or low-volume multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

A phase 1 study evaluated the QTc prolongation potential of siltuximab, a chimeric, anti-interleukin-6 mAb, in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), or low-volume MM.

METHODS

Patients with baseline QTcF and QTcB ≤ 500 ms, QRS < 100 ms, PR < 200 ms and no significant cardiac disease received siltuximab 15 mg/kg q3w, the highest dosage used in clinical studies, for 4 cycles. Twelve-lead ECGs obtained at multiple time points pre- and post-infusion at cycles 1 and 4 were evaluated by central cardiology laboratory. No effect on QTc interval was concluded if the upper limit of least square (LS) mean 90 % CI for QTc change from baseline at each time point was <20 ms.

RESULTS

An effect on QTc prolongation was ruled out, as the upper bound of 90 % CI was <10 ms at each time point in 27 evaluable patients (13 MGUS, 13 SMM, 1 low-volume MM) with no differences between disease types. Maximum mean QTc increase from baseline occurred 3 h after cycle 1 infusion (QTcF = 3.2 [LS mean 90 % CI -0.01, 6.45] ms; QTcB = 2.7 [-0.69, 6.14] ms). At all other time points, mean QTcF and QTcB increase from baseline was ≤1.5 ms and upper bound 90 % CI was ≤5.1 ms. Twenty patients had mostly low-grade AEs, including nausea, fatigue (20 % each); thrombocytopenia, headache (each 13 %); dyspnea, leukopenia, neutropenia, paresthesia, abnormal hepatic function, URTI (each 10 %). Three MGUS patients achieved 50 % M-protein reduction. There was no association between siltuximab pharmacokinetics and QTc interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Siltuximab did not affect the QTc interval. Overall safety was similar to other single-agent siltuximab studies.

Randomized phase II study of the safety and efficacy of a human anti-αv integrin monoclonal antibody (CNTO 95) alone and in combination with dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma: 12-month results

9029

Objectives: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of CNTO 95, a human anti-αv integrin monoclonal antibody, when administered alone or in combination with dacarbazine (DTIC). Methods: Patients with Stage IV metastatic melanoma were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive 5 or 10mg/kg CNTO 95 alone, or DTIC (1000mg/m2) + either 10mg/kg CNTO 95 or placebo administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for 8 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. DTIC arms were blinded; single-agent arms were open-label. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included partial response (PR), complete response (CR), stable disease (SD) and overall survival (OS). Major safety endpoints included the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Results: Patients were randomized to receive 5mg/kg CNTO 95 (n=32), 10mg/kg CNTO 95 (n=33), CNTO 95+DTIC (n=32), or placebo+DTIC (n=32). Baseline demographics were similar across groups. The median PFS for CNTO 95+DTIC was 75 days, placebo+DTIC was 54 days and both CNTO 95 alone arms were 42 days. Six patients achieved PR (2–10mg/kg CNTO 95, 1-CNTO 95+DTIC, 3-placebo+DTIC); one patient achieved CR (CNTO 95+DTIC). A higher proportion (43.3%) of patients achieved SD ≥ 12 wks in the CNTO 95+DTIC group compared with the other 3 groups (<20.0%). The median survival was 11.0 months for the patients in the CNTO 95+DTIC arm, 9.8 months and 14.9 months for the 5mg/kg and 10mg/kg arms, and 8.0 months for those in the DTIC control arm. The most common AEs were headache, nausea, fatigue, pyrexia, vomiting and transient uveitic reactions. Three patients (1–5mg/kg, 2-CNTO 95+DTIC) discontinued treatment due to AEs. A higher proportion of patients experienced SAEs in the placebo+DTIC group (29.0%) than in the 5mg/kg (12.9%), 10mg/kg (16.2%) or CNTO 95+DTIC (18.8%) groups. Conclusions: CNTO 95 alone or combined with DTIC was generally well tolerated. In patients with Stage IV metastatic melanoma, a trend toward improvement in PFS, OS and disease control was demonstrated with CNTO 95+DTIC.

Centocor, Centocor Research and Development, Inc.

Centocor Research and Development, Inc.

Johnson & Johnson

Centocor Research and Development, Inc.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.