Male perspectives on clinical communication about sexual health in spina bifida

AIM

To assess perspectives on clinical communication about sexual health in young adult males with spina bifida.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted between February and May 2021 with males at least 18 years of age with spina bifida to assess their perspectives and experiences of sexual health communication with clinicians. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from chart review and a survey of patients. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and conventional content analysis was used for transcript coding.

RESULTS

Twenty individuals participated with a median age of 22 years 6 months (range 18-29 years). Sixteen had myelomeningocele. Most identified as heterosexual (n = 17) and not sexually active (n = 13). Barriers and facilitators of successful interactions were identified. Barriers for participants included general discomfort with talking about sex and variability in individual preferences for how conversations occur. Facilitators included participants' comfort with their urologist and discussing sex in relation to disability. Suggestions for improving discussions included (1) notifying individuals that discussion about sex will occur before clinic visits; (2) creating space for discussions; (3) respecting individuals' readiness to discuss; and (4) making discussions disability specific.

INTERPRETATION

Young adult males with spina bifida are interested in discussing sexual health with their clinicians. Great variability exists about conversation preferences, emphasizing the need to individualize clinical communication about sex. Current health guidelines for males may not be in line with individuals' wishes.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Great variability exists in individual preference around sexual health communication. Patient-level barriers hinder successful conversations about sex. Individuals have great insight into how conversations about sex can be improved.

Patient and physician decision-making dynamics in overactive bladder care: A mixed methods study

AIMS

Overactive bladder management includes multiple therapeutic options with comparable efficacy but a range of administration modalities and side effects, creating an ideal setting for shared decision-making. This study investigates patient and physician health beliefs surrounding decision-making and expectations for overactive bladder with the aim of better understanding and ultimately improving decision-making in overactive bladder care.

METHODS

Patient and physician participants completed a questionnaire followed by a semi-structured interview to assess health beliefs surrounding decision making and expectations for overactive bladder treatment. The semi-structured interview guide, developed in an iterative fashion by the authors, probed qualities of overactive bladder therapies patients and physicians valued, their process of treatment selection, and their experiences with therapies.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 20) frequently cited treatment invasiveness, efficacy, and safety as the most important qualities that influenced their decision when selecting overactive bladder therapy. Physicians (n = 12) frequently cited safety/contraindications, convenience, cost/insurance, and patient preference as the most important qualities. In our integration analysis, we identified four key themes associated with decision making in overactive bladder care: frustration with inaccessibility of overactive bladder treatments, discordant perception of patient education, diverging acceptability of expected outcomes, and lack of insight into other parties' decisional priorities and control preferences.

CONCLUSIONS

While both patients and physicians desire to engage in a shared decision-making process when selecting therapies for overactive bladder, this process is challenged by significant divergence between patient and physician viewpoint across key domains.

"I Just Haven't Done Any of That": Applicability of the International Index of Erectile Function in Young Men With Spina Bifida

PURPOSE

We evaluate the applicability of the International Index of Erectile Function in young men with spina bifida and identify spina bifida-specific sexual experiences not captured by this measure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Semistructured interviews were conducted between February 2021 and May 2021 with men ≥18 years of age with spina bifida. The International Index of Erectile Function was completed by participants, and perspectives on its applicability were discussed. Participant experiences and perspectives around sexual health were discussed to identify aspects of the sexual experience not well captured by the International Index of Erectile Function. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from a patient survey and chart review. Conventional content analysis framework was used for transcript coding.

RESULTS

Of 30 eligible patients approached, 20 participated. Median age was 22.5 years (range 18-29), and 80% had myelomeningocele. Most identified as heterosexual (17/20, 85%), were not in a relationship (14/20, 70%), and were not currently sexually active (13/20, 65%). Some perceived the International Index of Erectile Function as applicable, while others reported it was not, as they do not define themselves as sexually active. Aspects of the sexual experience not captured by the International Index of Erectile Function included (1) lack of control over sexual function, (2) poor lower body sensation, (3) urinary incontinence, (4) spina bifida-specific physical limitations, and (5) psychosocial barriers. Participant suggestions for improving the International Index of Erectile Function to increase its applicability were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

While many perceived the International Index of Erectile Function as applicable, the measure inadequately captures the diverse sexual experiences of young men with spina bifida. Disease-specific instruments to evaluate sexual health are needed in this population.