Genetic determinants of chromatin reveal prostate cancer risk mediated by context-dependent gene regulation

Many genetic variants affect disease risk by altering context-dependent gene regulation. Such variants are difficult to study mechanistically using current methods that link genetic variation to steady-state gene expression levels, such as expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs). To address this challenge, we developed the cistrome-wide association study (CWAS), a framework for identifying genotypic and allele-specific effects on chromatin that are also associated with disease. In prostate cancer, CWAS identified regulatory elements and androgen receptor-binding sites that explained the association at 52 of 98 known prostate cancer risk loci and discovered 17 additional risk loci. CWAS implicated key developmental transcription factors in prostate cancer risk that are overlooked by eQTL-based approaches due to context-dependent gene regulation. We experimentally validated associations and demonstrated the extensibility of CWAS to additional epigenomic datasets and phenotypes, including response to prostate cancer treatment. CWAS is a powerful and biologically interpretable paradigm for studying variants that influence traits by affecting transcriptional regulation.

Single Versus Multi-visit Endodontic Treatment of Teeth with Apical Periodontitis: An in vivo Study with 1-year Evaluation

Background:

Apical periodontitis (AP) is one of the most prevalent diseases of the teeth. Treatment of AP is based on the removal of the cause, i.e., bacteria from the root canals. Achievement of adequate bacterial eradication in one appointment treatment remains a controversy.

Aim:

This prospective study was conducted with the objective to compare the periapical healing of teeth with AP treated in (a) single visit versus (b) two visits, either with or without Vitapex as an intracanal medicament.

Subjects and Methods:

Patients were selected randomly from the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. Forty-three patients (81 teeth) met the inclusion criteria, i.e., AP (both symptomatic and asymptomatic) visible radiographically size ≥2 mm × 2 mm, not suffering from any immune-compromising disease, age between 16 and 65 years and tooth not accessed previously. Patients were randomly divided into three groups, i.e., single-visit group (Group 1), multi-visit group without any intracanal medicament (Group 2), and multi-visit group with Vitapex as interim intracanal medicament (Group 3). Comparison was done radiographically using periapical index (PAI). The primary outcome measure was the change in periapical radiolucency after 1 year assessed by PAI scores. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to evaluate differences between groups at baseline (immediate postoperative) and at the 12-month follow-up evaluation. Change in PAI score for each group from baseline to 12-month follow-up evaluation was tested with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The secondary outcome measures, proportion of teeth in each group that could be considered improved (decreased PAI score) or healed (PAI <2), were assessed with the Chi-square test.

Results:

No statistically significant difference in periapical healing was found between three groups.

Conclusion:

After 1-year evaluation, no difference in periapical healing was found between single-visit treatment and multi-visit treatment groups with the given sample size.

Dose-effect study of intranasal administration of growth hormone-releasing hormone-44-NH2 in healthy subjects

Intranasal (in) administration of GH-releasing hormone-40- (GHRH-40) has been demonstrated to be efficient in stimulating GH secretion at doses equal to or higher than 30 micrograms/kg in man. We performed a dose-response study with GHRH-44-NH2 (GHRH) given by nasal spray and closely monitored local tolerance. Twelve normal young men were given 5 GNRH doses (125, 250, 500, 750, and 1000 micrograms) and placebo in random order according to a latin square design. Mild symptoms of local intolerance, subjective, objective, or both, were noted in the first 20 min after spray in 30 of 72 tests, and a significant difference (P = 0.003) was obtained in their frequency between the group placebo plus the lowest dose and the group of the other doses. The areas under the GH curves were significantly different between the subjects and the doses (by analysis of variance, P = 0.001 and P = 0.025, respectively). Multiple comparison tests showed a significant difference between the 3 highest doses and the placebo (P = 0.005, P = 0.05, and P = 0.02, respectively) and a significant difference between the highest dose and the 2 lowest doses (P = 0.005). By weighted linear regression between GH areas under the curve and GHRH doses the dose-response relationship was established as: y = 1.226x + 457. The magnitude of the GH peaks induced by in GHRH was significantly lower than that induced by iv GHRH. We conclude that in the normal young men tested, who were high responders to GHRH (as demonstrated by iv test), a 500-micrograms dose is sufficient to elicit GH secretion. Local tolerance, although imperfect, appears satisfactory to permit a clinical trial in children.