Implementation framework for income generating activities identified by community health volunteers (CHVs): a strategy to reduce attrition rate in Kilifi County, Kenya

BACKGROUND

Despite the proven efficacy of Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) in promoting primary healthcare in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), they are not adequately financed and compensated. The latter contributes to the challenge of high attrition rates observed in many settings, highlighting an urgent need for innovative compensation strategies for CHVs amid budget constraints experienced by healthcare systems. This study sought to identify strategies for implementing Income-Generating Activities (IGAs) for CHVs in Kilifi County in Kenya to improve their livelihoods, increase motivation, and reduce attrition.

METHODS

An exploratory qualitative research study design was used, which consisted of Focus group discussions with CHVs involved in health promotion and data collection activities in a local setting. Further, key informant in-depth interviews were conducted among local stakeholder representatives and Ministry of Health officials. Data were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed using MAXQDA 20.4 software. Data coding, analysis and presentation were guided by the Okumus' (2003) Strategy Implementation framework.

RESULTS

A need for stable income was identified as the driving factor for CHVs seeking IGAs, as their health volunteer work is non-remunerative. Factors that considered the local context, such as government regulations, knowledge and experience, culture, and market viability, informed their preferred IGA strategy. Individual savings through table-banking, seeking funding support through loans from government funding agencies (e.g., Uwezo Fund, Women Enterprise Fund, Youth Fund), and grants from corporate organizations, politicians, and other donors were proposed as viable options for raising capital for IGAs. Formal registration of IGAs with Government regulatory agencies, developing a guiding constitution, empowering CHVs with entrepreneurial and leadership skills, project and group diversity management, and connecting them to support agencies were the control measures proposed to support implementation and enhance the sustainability of IGAs. Group-owned and managed IGAs were preferred over individual IGAs.

CONCLUSION

CHVs are in need of IGAs. They proposed implementation strategies informed by local context. Agencies seeking to support CHVs' livelihoods should, therefore, engage with and be guided by the input from CHVs and local stakeholders.

The cost and intermediary cost-effectiveness of oral HIV self-test kit distribution across 11 distribution models in South Africa

BACKGROUND

Countries around the world seek innovative ways of closing their remaining gaps towards the target of 95% of people living with HIV (PLHIV) knowing their status by 2030. Offering kits allowing HIV self-testing (HIVST) in private might help close these gaps.

METHODS

We analysed the cost, use and linkage to onward care of 11 HIVST kit distribution models alongside the Self-Testing AfRica Initiative's distribution of 2.2 million HIVST kits in South Africa in 2018/2019. Outcomes were based on telephonic surveys of 4% of recipients; costs on a combination of micro-costing, time-and-motion and expenditure analysis. Costs were calculated from the provider perspective in 2019 US$, as incremental costs in integrated and full costs in standalone models.

RESULTS

HIV positivity among kit recipients was 4%-23%, with most models achieving 5%-6%. Linkage to confirmatory testing and antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation for those screening positive was 19%-78% and 2%-72% across models. Average costs per HIVST kit distributed varied between $4.87 (sex worker model) and $18.07 (mobile integration model), with differences largely driven by kit volumes. HIVST kit costs (at $2.88 per kit) and personnel costs were the largest cost items throughout. Average costs per outcome increased along the care cascade, with the sex worker network model being the most cost-effective model across metrics used (cost per kit distributed/recipient screening positive/confirmed positive/initiating ART). Cost per person confirmed positive for HIVST was higher than standard HIV testing.

CONCLUSION

HIV self-test distribution models in South Africa varied widely along four characteristics: distribution volume, HIV positivity, linkage to care and cost. Volume was highest in models that targeted public spaces with high footfall (flexible community, fixed point and transport hub distribution), followed by workplace models. Transport hub, workplace and sex worker models distributed kits in the least costly way. Distribution via index cases at facility as well as sex worker network distribution identified the highest number of PLHIV at lowest cost.

Costs of integrating HIV self-testing in public health facilities in Malawi, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe

INTRODUCTION

As countries approach the UNAIDS 95-95-95 targets, there is a need for innovative and cost-saving HIV testing approaches that can increase testing coverage in hard-to-reach populations. The HIV Self-Testing Africa-Initiative distributed HIV self-test (HIVST) kits using unincentivised HIV testing counsellors across 31 public facilities in Malawi, South Africa, Zambia and Zimbabwe. HIVST was distributed either through secondary (partner's use) distribution alone or primary (own use) and secondary distribution approaches.

METHODS

We evaluated the costs of adding HIVST to existing HIV testing from the providers' perspective in the 31 public health facilities across the four countries between 2018 and 2019. We combined expenditure analysis and bottom-up costing approaches. We also carried out time-and-motion studies on the counsellors to estimate the human resource costs of introducing and demonstrating how to use HIVST for primary and secondary use.

RESULTS

A total of 41 720 kits were distributed during the analysis period, ranging from 1254 in Zimbabwe to 27 678 in Zambia. The cost per kit distributed through the primary distribution approach was $4.27 in Zambia and $9.24 in Zimbabwe. The cost per kit distributed through the secondary distribution approach ranged from $6.46 in Zambia to $13.42 in South Africa, with a wider variation in the average cost at facility-level. From the time-and-motion observations, the counsellors spent between 20% and 44% of the observed workday on HIVST. Overall, personnel and test kit costs were the main cost drivers.

CONCLUSION

The average costs of distributing HIVST kits were comparable across the four countries in our analysis despite wide cost variability within countries. We recommend context-specific exploration of potential efficiency gains from these facility-level cost variations and demand creation activities to ensure continued affordability at scale.

[Structure of hospital care for COVID-19 patients up to July 2020 in Germany]

Hintergrund

Hospitalisierte COVID-19-Patienten weisen eine hohe Morbidität und Mortalität auf und sind häufig auf eine intensivstationäre Behandlung und hier vor allem auf eine Beatmungstherapie angewiesen. Bisher ist wenig über die Patientenallokation bekannt.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die Darstellung der Strukturen der Krankenhausversorgung der COVID-19-Patienten zwischen dem 26. Februar bis zum 31. Juli 2020

Daten und Methoden

Für die Analyse der Versorgungsstrukturen wurden die Abrechnungsdaten der Allgemeinen Ortskrankenkassen (AOK) ausgewertet. Es wurden ausschließlich abgeschlossene somatische COVID-19-Fälle ausgewertet, bei denen das Virus durch einen Labortest nachgewiesen wurde. Die Stichprobe umfasst 17.094 COVID-19-Fälle, deren Behandlung in 1082 Krankenhäusern erfolgte.

Ergebnisse

An der Versorgung der COVID-19-Fälle waren 77 % aller Krankenhäuser beteiligt, an der intensivmedizinischen Behandlung 48 % aller Krankenhäuser. Von den Krankenhäusern, die COVID-19-Fälle behandelt haben, versorgte eine Hälfte 88 % aller Fälle. Das deutet zwar auf einen Zentrierungseffekt der COVID-19-Fälle auf bestimmte Krankenhäuser hin, jedoch verteilten sich die übrigen 12 % der Fälle auf viele Krankenhäuser mit oftmals sehr kleinen Fallzahlen. Des Weiteren wurde knapp ein Viertel der beatmeten COVID-19-Fälle in Krankenhäusern behandelt, die eine unterdurchschnittliche Beatmungserfahrung aufweisen.

Diskussion

Im Rahmen steigender Infektionszahlen ist es sowohl notwendig die Versorgungsstrukturen von COVID-19-Fällen durch klar definierte und zentral gesteuerte Stufenkonzepte zu verbessern als auch die Versorgung der Patienten ohne COVID-19 weiterhin aufrechtzuerhalten. Ein umfassendes Stufenkonzept mit stärkerer Konzentration erscheint für die Versorgung dieser komplex erkrankten Patienten sinnvoll.

Zusatzmaterial online

Die Onlineversion dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00063-021-00776-6) enthält die Tabelle S1 und die Abbildungen S1 bis S3. Beitrag und Zusatzmaterial stehen Ihnen auf www.springermedizin.de zur Verfügung. Bitte geben Sie dort den Beitragstitel in die Suche ein, das Zusatzmaterial finden Sie beim Beitrag unter „Ergänzende Inhalte“.

Depression associated with antiretroviral drug therapy in HIV: case report and overview

Depression is the main psychiatric symptom in patients living with HIV. Genetic predisposition, stress from disease as well as the antiretroviral therapy itself are discussed as pathogenic factors. We report a 35-year-old HIV-positive man suffering from bipolar disorder who developed major depression shortly after commercing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) on three occasions. The first two times the patient ceased therapy autonomously, and the depression disappeared completely. The close connection between cART and major depression in the present case supports the depression-inducing potential of cART. Additionally, we present an overview of literature.