A systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of statins and their intensity in peripheral artery disease

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects more than eight million Americans. However, several studies have shown that those patients are often undertreated, and that statin utilization is suboptimal.  American Heart Association guidelines highlight statins as the first-line lipid-lowering therapy to treat patients with PAD. Our objective with this meta-analysis was to further explore the impact of statins on PAD outcomes and examine whether the actual statin (high vs low intensity) dose impacts outcomes.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the PRISMA guidelines. Any study that presented a comparison of statins vs no statins for PAD patients or compared high vs low intensity statins and provided outcomes with hazard ratio was considered as potentially eligible. The Medline (PubMed) database was searched up to August 30, 2020. A random effects meta-analysis was performed.

Results

In total, 38 studies and 275,670 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In total, 136,025 (49.34%) were on statins vs 139,645 (50.66%) who were not on statins. Statins had an association with a reduction in all cause-mortality by 42% (HR:0.58, 95% CI: 0.49-0.67, I2= 96.26%) and cardiovascular death by 43% (HR:0.57, 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, I2= 80.39%). Statins use was associated with an increase in amputation-free survival by 56% (HR:0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.58, I2 = 15%). The risk of amputation and loss of patency was reduced by 35% (HR:0.65, 95% CI:0.41-0.89, I2 = 86.91%), 46% (HR:0.54, 95% CI: 0.34-0.74, Ι2 = 0%), respectively. Statins use was also associated with a reduction in the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 35% (HR:0.65, 95% CI: 0.51-0.80, I2= 93.22%) and the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) by 41% (HR:0.59, 95% CI: 0.33-0.86, I2 = 76.78%). Among patients treated with statins, high-intensity treatment group was associated with a reduction in all cause-mortality by 36% (HR:0.64, 95% CI: 0.54-0.74, I2 = 96.49%) compared to patients treated with low intensity statins.

Conclusion

Statin treatment among patients with PAD was associated with a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, MI, MACE, risk for amputation or loss of patency. Statins were also associated with a higher amputation free survival.

Meta-analysis of risk factors and complications associated with atrial fibrillation after oesophagectomy

Background

Oesophagectomy is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. New-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is a frequent complication following oesophagectomy. Several studies have explored whether new-onset AF is associated with adverse events after oesophagectomy.

Methods

This review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases up to 25 November 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted with the use of random-effects modelling. The I2 statistic was used to assess for heterogeneity.

Results

In total, 53 studies including 9087 patients were eligible for analysis. The overall incidence of postoperative AF was 16·5 per cent. Coronary artery disease and hypertension were associated with AF, whereas diabetes, smoking and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were not. Patients with AF had a significantly higher risk of overall postoperative adverse events than those without fibrillation (odds ratio (OR) 5·50, 95 per cent c.i. 3·51 to 8·30), including 30-day mortality (OR 2·49, 1·70 to 3·64), anastomotic leak (OR 2·65, 1·53 to 4·59) and pneumonia (OR 3·42, 2·39 to 4·90).

Conclusion

Postoperative AF is frequently observed in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer. It is associated with an increased risk of death and postoperative complications.