Dilated cardiomyopathy is associated with significant changes in collagen type I/III ratio

BACKGROUND

It is controversial whether myocardial fibrosis in end-stage dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is associated with altered collagen type I/type III (Col I/Col III) ratio.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with DCM (ejection fraction [EF] <50%, n=12) and with mild global left ventricular dysfunction (EF >50%, n=18) were examined. Col I, Col III, and transforming growth factors-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and -beta2 (TGF-beta2) gene expression in endomyocardial biopsies was evaluated by quantitative competitive reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Collagen content was quantified after picrosirius red and immunohistological staining and by hydroxyproline assay. In patients with EF <50%, there was a pronounced 2- to 6-fold increase of myocardial Col I mRNA abundance (P<0.01), with a corresponding 1.6-fold increase at the protein level versus that found in patients with EF >50%. The Col III mRNA abundance showed a 2.0-fold increase (P<0.04). There was a relevant shift in the Col I/Col III mRNA ratio for DCM patients (Col I/Col III, 8.2) compared with patients with an EF >50% (Col I/Col III, 6. 4). In addition, total collagen content was increased in patients with EF <50% (n=3) (4.3+/-0.1%) compared with patients with EF >50% (n=8) (2.7+/-0.9%) (P<0.004). The biochemically determined ratio of hydroxyproline/total protein (n=12) was correlated to the Col I mRNA abundance (P<0.05, r=0.77). TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta2 showed elevated myocardial mRNA abundances (1- to 7-fold and 4- to 5-fold, respectively) in DCM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Differential increase of Col I and Col III leads to an increased Col I/Col III ratio in DCM myocardium. Because Col I provides substantial tensile strength and stiffness, this may contribute to systolic and in particular diastolic dysfunction in DCM.

Performance-based management in local health departments: measuring the success of implementation

Six of eight local health departments in North Carolina's Southwest Perinatal Region III participated in a PBMS demonstration project also involving the state health department, the Centers for Disease Control, and the School of Public Health of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In all six counties the problem of reducing prematurity and low birthweight was selected to test this innovation. Using standardized instruments, staff awareness of and concern for low birthweight problems and programs were measured, as was level of success of implementation of PBMS. Factor analysis of three rounds of Awareness and Concern responses produced three uncorrelated factors: awareness of low birthweight problems, awareness of low birthweight programs, and concern for low birthweight. The results suggest that the PBMS increased awareness of the problem and the program, and that the project succeeded in half of the counties, helped some counties achieve some goals, and provided some benefits to some counties. The implications for Total Quality Management are discussed.

Patient, parent, and physician perspectives on pediatric oncology rounds

To provide data to guide physicians regarding the extent to which pediatric patients and their families should be involved in decision-making discussions by their health care teams, we compared the standard rounding procedure in a pediatric oncology unit (rounds conducted out of earshot) with bedside rounds in which management was discussed in front of patients and parents. Type of rounds was alternated in 2-week blocks for 4 months. The impact of the two types of rounds of 35 parents and children was studied. Parents preferred bedside rounds to standard rounds, and perceived increased opportunities to obtain information and ask questions. Parents and children differed in their reports of how much bedside rounds upset children. Older children, compared with younger children, more strongly disliked standard rounds; this appeared to be related to feelings of exclusion. The two types of rounds differed in their effectiveness in providing specific types of education to residents. The findings suggest that bedside rounds have a positive impact on parents' attitudes toward physicians, that they do not dilute the child's sense of relationship with the primary attending physician, and that they contribute to certain aspects of resident education.