Outcome of pregnancies complicated by severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a follow-up beyond the second trimester

The main aim of this study was to assess the obstetric complications for those pregnancies that are complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and continue beyond the first trimester. We checked also for other related serious events that occurred during the first trimester.

METHODS

We included only patients whose pregnancies continued beyond the first trimester and compared them with IVF-treated patients displaying moderate ovarian response.

RESULTS

We studied 165 patients with OHSS (101 singletons and 64 twins) and 156 IVF control patients (85 singletons and 71 twins). Two serious complications, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), were noted in both groups. However, the incidence of these two complications did not differ significantly between the groups. In the OHSS group, GDM presented with an incidence of 9.9% for singletons and 9.4% for twins, and 12.9% and 7.0%, respectively, for the control group. PIH presented as 6.9% for singletons and 10.9% for twins in the OHSS group, and 8.2% and 7.0%, respectively, for the control groups. During the first trimester laparoscopies for suspected ovarian torsion were performed in 13 patients, and in 10 patients the diagnosis were confirmed.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients with OHSS-complicated pregnancies previously reported a relatively high risk of GDM and PIH, the occurrence rates do not differ from a matched control group of normally responding patients who conceived after IVF.

[Sonographic demonstration of a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD (Mirena)]

Mirena, a new intra-uterine device (IUD) introduced in Israel during the past year, releases 20 mcg/day of levonorgestrel for 5 years. It has the advantages of reduced pregnancy rates and diminished menstrual blood loss, together with a low risk of pelvic inflammatory disease compared with current IUD's. It has a typical sonographic appearance, differing from that of regular IUD's, which was demonstrated in all 15 women examined in this study. Its sonographic appearance includes both proximal and distal ends of the vertical arm of the device, which extend into the internal cervical os and fundal region, respectively. Acoustic shadowing between both ends defines the location of the device, which should help avoid consultations due to "lost IUD's."

Intraperitoneal pressures and clinical parameters of total paracentesis for palliation of symptomatic ascites in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

The present study was designed to prospectively evaluate the intraperitoneal pressure, as well as clinical and hemodynamic effects of total paracentesis, as palliation of symptomatic ascites in ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

Prospective study of 35 sequential total paracenteses was performed using a Veres cannula on patients with advanced recurrent ovarian cancer with symptomatic tense ascites. Relevant clinical symptoms and patient well-being were evaluated. Vital signs, abdominal parameters, and hydrostatic intraperitoneal pressure were recorded before, during, and after the procedure.

RESULTS

Intraperitoneal pressure dropped from 30 +/- 7 cmH2O before paracentesis to 13 +/- 6 cmH2O after the procedure (P < 0.0001). Marked symptomatic improvement was observed in all patients (89% complete relief, 11% partial relief), while all the patients tolerated the procedure well without any complications. The mean volume of ascitic fluid removed was 4800 ml. Mean respiratory rate and mean heart rate were both significantly decreased following the procedure (29.3 to 21.4 respirations per min and 101.5 to 93.6 beats per min, respectively). Mean systolic blood pressure mildly decreased (6.6 mmHg), while the mean diastolic blood pressure did not significantly change. None of the patients presented signs or symptoms of hypovolemia during or after the total paracentesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of intraperitoneal pressures during total paracentesis for tense ascites in ovarian cancer patients indicated that the severity of symptoms correlated with the intraperitoneal pressure prior to paracentesis, but not with the volume of ascites. Intraperitoneal pressures measured following total paracentesis in patients with ovarian cancer were similar to the baseline intraperitoneal pressure measured in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.