The changing trend of diverticular disease in a developing nation

AIM

Left-sided diverticular disease (LDD) is associated with reduced dietary intake, whereas right-sided diverticular disease (RDD) is more common amongst Oriental populations. We aimed to determine whether the prevalence, site and distribution of diverticular disease in our Oriental population has changed over the past two decades.

METHOD

A total of 1663 barium enema studies performed between January 2001 and August 2002 were reviewed retrospectively. The site of disease was correlated with age, gender and ethnicity of the patient.

RESULTS

Forty-five per cent of patients in the study population had diverticular disease. Older patients were more likely to have LDD, whereas the Chinese ethnic group was more likely to have RDD. Right-sided diverticular disease peaks at in the sixth decade, while for LDD this occurred in the seventh and eighth decades. Right-sided diverticular disease was more common in all age groups overall. When compared with two barium enema studies carried out in Singapore two decades earlier, there was a statistically significant increase in the incidence of RDD and LDD.

CONCLUSION

There is a positive association of RDD and LDD with Chinese race and increasing age. There is an increasing incidence of both LDD and RDD compared with two decades previously.

Cystic degeneration of ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic tail

We present a 54-year-old Chinese man with a tumour at the pancreatic tail associated with a presumed cystic splenic lesion. Histological examination showed a pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with extensive cystic degeneration and invasion of the spleen, a rare imaging presentation for such a tumour.

Laparoscopic-assisted colon and rectal surgery - lessons learnt from early experience

INTRODUCTION

Current evidence shows that laparoscopic bowel surgery is associated with a lower incidence of postoperative ileus, lower postoperative pulmonary and wound complication rates, shorter hospital stays and a quicker return to activity than open surgery. This paper aims to report our early experience with laparoscopic-assisted colorectal procedures in our Centre for Advanced Laparoscopic Surgery and the important lessons we have learnt from this.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All laparoscopic-assisted colon and rectal surgical (LAC) procedures performed between January 2000 and December 2003 were reviewed. Clinical and operative records of these patients were reviewed. Data retrieved included patient demographics, selected intraoperative parameters, and postoperative outcomes. In order to provide a comparable reference, an equal number of matched open procedures over the same period were accrued and similarly analysed. All patients were managed on a standard carepath. All data were entered into a database and analysed using a statistical software package.

RESULTS

Forty-two laparoscopicassisted colorectal procedures were performed from June 2000 to December 2003. A similar number of diagnosis-matched patients with open colorectal procedures were used as comparison. The diagnoses included cancer (68.5% versus 73.8%), diverticulosis (5.7% versus 9.5%) and polyps (14.3% versus 9.5%). Seven were converted to open surgery because of bleeding, adhesions and locally advanced disease. Laparoscopic-assisted procedures performed included 1 right hemicolectomy, 5 left hemicolectomies, 9 anterior resections, 1 abdominal-perineal resection, 3 sigmoid colectomies, 11 colostomies and 1 Hartmann's procedure. Mean perioperative time (146 min versus 125 min, P = 0.173) was comparatively longer. Mean duration for analgesic requirement (2.25 days versus 2.64 days, P = 0.05), mean length of stay (5.31 days versus 9.07 days, P < 0.05), mean time to commencement of diet (2.91 days versus 4.05 days, P < 0.001) and mean time to first bowel movement (2.57 days versus 4.10 days, P < 0.001) were all comparatively shorter. General morbidity rates (17.1% versus 21.4%, P = 0.35) were lower. No local wound complications were found in our laparoscopic-assisted group. Patients who had undergone open surgery instead of the planned laparoscopic-assisted procedures fared more poorly.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal procedures performed in well-selected patients are associated with shorter hospital stays, quicker return of bowel function and lower morbidity when compared to the matched open procedures. Early experience should be acquired from performing technically simple procedures in patients with benign conditions before progressing to definitive resections in those with cancer.