The role of diltiazem in treating hypertension and coronary artery disease: new approaches to preventing first events

OBJECTIVE

To review the role of diltiazem in treating and preventing a group of cardiovascular diseases, including painful and silent cardiac ischemia, stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death, by modulating certain physiological causes that they appear to share.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was conducted for all clinical articles on the use of diltiazem for hypertension and coronary artery disease. When clinical data were not available, basic research findings were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Because many cardiovascular events show a marked daily periodicity--which appears to coincide with circadian peaks in the ability of platelets to aggregate, sympathetic activity, coronary tone, blood pressure, heart rate and hematocrit, and a trough in fibrinolytic activity--the impact of diltizazem on these physiological changes was assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

Diltiazem influences many of these events by increasing myocardial bloodflow, and reducing myocardial oxygen demand and cardiac workload. However, it differs from other calcium antagonists in its mild negative inotropic and moderate negative dromotropic effects, without apparent stimulation of cardiac performance or contractility. In addition, it inhibits platelet aggregation, decreases catecholamine release, diminishes coronary tone and blocks the vasoconstrictive actions of endothelin-1. This appears to translate into a beneficial effect on ischemia, thrombolysis, arrhythmias, infarct parameters, atherosclerosis and hypertension. Diltiazem has a relatively favourable safety and tolerability profile, and is available in a once-daily dosage form. The most common adverse effects are related to vasodilation (eg, edema and headache), and the most frequent serious adverse event is atrioventricular block, which occurs rarely. In summary, diltiazem appears to be well suited to preventing the first occurrence of cardiovascular events and may even have a role in preventing certain types of secondary events. The data accumulated so far indicate the need for a large scale random clinical trial addressing these outcomes.

24 hour blood pressure control with once-daily versus twice-daily formulations of diltiazem

The antihypertensive effects of once-daily diltiazem CD over a 24 hour period were compared with twice-daily diltiazem SR in 95 patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. This trial was designed as a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study. Following a 2 to 4 week placebo run-in period, diltiazem was administered as once-daily CD or twice-daily SR, starting with 180 mg daily and increasing to a maximum of 360 mg daily, to achieve a seated diastolic blood pressure goal of < or = 90 mmHg as measured by cuff between 08:00 and 10:00 in the morning. Following drug titration, patients received a maintenance dose of diltiazem for an additional 6 week follow-up phase. Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring recordings were obtained at the end of the placebo, titration, and maintenance phases. Both diltiazem CD and diltiazem SR significantly reduced both systolic and diastolic blood pressure over the 24 hour day and maintained a normal circadian pattern. As well, treatment with once-a-day diltiazem CD significantly decreased the slope of the early morning rise of diastolic and mean blood pressure. Thus, diltiazem CD is as effective as diltiazem SR in lowering diastolic blood pressure over a 24 hour period and has the advantage of a once-daily formulation.

Clinical efficacy and safety of once-daily diltiazem in patients with stable angina pectoris switched from twice-daily diltiazem

The maintenance of angina control was assessed in this multicenter (three sites), randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Patients with stable angina pectoris receiving twice-daily sustained-release (SR) diltiazem were switched to equivalent doses of once-daily controlled-delivery (CD) diltiazem or to diltiazem SR. Patients who were switched from diltiazem SR to diltiazem CD (n = 28) experienced a 5% increase in time to termination (p = 0.0004) on the exercise tolerance test (ETT), as well as an 8% improvement in time to onset of angina (p < 0.0001) on the ETT. A similar trend was observed in patients randomized to diltiazem SR (n = 7), which suggested a training effect, and, therefore, equal efficacy between diltiazem SR and diltiazem CD. During exercise testing in the diltiazem SR baseline phase, 77% of the patients did not experience angina, whereas 60% of the patients did not experience ST-segment depression. Following transfer to diltiazem CD, 79 and 61% of patients, respectively, remained angina- and ST-segment depression free. No significant changes in the number of angina attacks, nitroglycerin use, or any hemodynamic-related parameters were observed following transfer to diltiazem CD. Eleven percent of the patients receiving diltiazem CD experienced treatment-related adverse events, which were limited to headache and abdominal pain; these adverse events did not lead to discontinuation of treatment. These findings suggest that patients whose angina is controlled with twice-daily diltiazem SR can be safely and effectively switched to an equivalent daily dose of the once-daily diltiazem CD.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily versus twice-daily formulations of diltiazem in the treatment of systemic hypertension. The Canadian Multicenter Diltiazem-CD Hypertension Trial Group

The efficacy and safety of optimally titrated once-daily (CD) and twice-daily (SR) diltiazem were compared in 111 patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension [seated diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 95 mmHg and < or = 114 mmHg] in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo run-in, parallel-group trial. Following a 4 week washout and placebo-controlled run-in period, patients were randomized to receive diltiazem CD 180 mg and matching placebo (n = 54), or diltiazem SR 90 mg bid (n = 57). Total daily doses were titrated from 180 mg to 360 mg to achieve a goal of seated DBP < 90 mmHg during a 6 week titration period. The patients continued to receive their optimal dose for a 6 week follow-up period. Ninety-six (96) patients (diltiazem CD: 47, diltiazem SR: 49) completed the study protocol, with 60% of the diltiazem CD and 55% of the diltiazem SR patients achieving the goal of seated DBP of < 90 mmHg (p = 0.685). Although significant decreases occurred in seated and standing measurements of diastolic and systolic BP and heart rate with treatment in both groups, there were no significant differences between treatment groups. Both medications were well tolerated, with a similar frequency of adverse effects [diltiazem CD: 24/54 (37%) patients; diltiazem SR: 24/57 (42.1%) patients] with the most frequently reported adverse effects being headache and edema.

Three-month efficacy and safety of once-daily diltiazem in chronic stable angina pectoris

The 3-month efficacy and safety of a once-daily controlled formulation of diltiazem (180 to 360 mg/day) were assessed in a study of 54 patients with angina pectoris. This multicenter study was a nonrandomized, placebo run-in, open-label, 3-month trial followed by a 1-week, double-blind, randomized period during which most patients (89%) received placebo. There were only minimal changes in the time to termination (mean change +/- SEM -5.8 +/- 9.6 seconds), time to onset of angina (10.5 +/- 12.2 seconds), and the time to 1 mm ST-segment depression (2.9 +/- 12.5 seconds) from the end of the titration phase to the end of the open-label study. There were, however, statistically significant differences between the end of the 3-month treatment phase and the end of the 1-week randomized placebo phase for those 3 efficacy parameters (-37.3 +/- 11.2, -58.6 +/- 13.6, and -45.6 +/- 16.4 seconds, respectively). Diltiazem significantly decreased the frequency of anginal attacks and nitroglycerin use at the end of the 3-month treatment phase compared with results at the end of the randomized double-blind placebo phase. No new or unusual adverse events were reported during treatment. The present results suggest that there is no loss of efficacy of once-a-day diltiazem when administered for a long period to patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

Chronic aortic regurgitation: a demonstration of the effect of bradycardia on left ventricular function

A 50-year-old man with previously asymptomatic aortic regurgitation presented with clinical, echocardiographic and hemodynamic deterioration secondary to bradycardia. The effects of prolonged diastolic time were demonstrated in the catheterization laboratory; immediate improvement in left ventricular end diastolic and aortic diastolic pressures were noted after the insertion of a temporary pacemaker at a heart rate of 70 beats/min. In patients with aortic regurgitation and unexpected deterioration, bradycardia should be considered.

Hemodynamic and coronary effects of intravenous labetalol in coronary artery disease

Labetalol, an alpha and beta receptor blocking agent, was evaluated in 11 patients with documented coronary artery disease and stable angina. The mean dose of labetalol was 1.5 (range 1 to 2) mg/kg. Cardiovascular effects began within 1 minute after injection and were maximal within 10 minutes. Mean arterial pressure decreased from 105 +/- 13 to 81 +/- 10 mm Hg (p less than 0.0001), heart rate from 70 +/- 10 to 66 +/- 7 beats/min (p less than 0.05) and the pressure-rate product from 10,322 +/- 2,344 to 7,171 +/- 1,650 (p less than 0.001). Cardiac output and pulmonary wedge pressure did not change significantly. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure decreased from 20 +/- 3 to 16 +/- 2 mm Hg (p less than 0.005). Systemic and pulmonary resistances also decreased significantly (p less than 0.0001 and p less than 0.01, respectively). Coronary sinus flow increased from 107 +/- 26 to 118 +/- 25 ml/min (p less than 0.01) and coronary vascular resistance decreased from 1.0 +/- 0.2 to 0.77 +/- 0.1 mm Hg/ml per min (p less than 0.001). Labetalol may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of angina not only because it diminishes myocardial oxygen requirements but also because it improves coronary hemodynamics. Thus, labetalol appears to have some advantage compared with the usual beta blocking agents with their potentially detrimental effects on coronary hemodynamics.

[The feeling of eternity.]

Under this somewhat unusual title, the article deals with a theme developed in several religious traditions (Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Shamanism) and taken up again by a few "secular" authors (Artaud, Jung, Proust, Romain Rolland, Maslow), the theme of a modified perception of time giving rise to a form of time "exit", an extra-temporal style of existence, a "feeling of eternity". It is as if existence could be grasped other than in relation to its ephemeral aspect, as it escapes time, or, as it is said, in its eternal contenance. According to religious tradition and to the authors, this "other" grasp of existence requires that we move from ordinary consciousness to another mode of consciousness, which they all apply themselves to describe. The article does not seek to account for the different interpretations of the feeling of eternity originating in the most diverse of disciplines. It seeks rather to put viewpoints and testimonies into a parallel plane, in the hope that they will be mutually illuminating and enriching, and that they will succeed in making more accessible to us an experience that is worthy, at least, of serious consideration, and about which our dominant cultural currents do not speak to us very often.