1
|
Brouwers J, Seys D, Claessens F, Van Wilder A, Bruyneel L, De Ridder D, Eeckloo K, Vanhaecht K. Effect on hospital incentive payments and quality performance of a hospital pay for performance (P4P) programme in Belgium. J Healthc Qual Res 2024; 39:147-154. [PMID: 38594161 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Belgium initiated a hospital pay for performance (P4P) programme after a decade of fixed bonus budgets for "quality and safety contracts". This study examined the effect of P4P on hospital incentive payments, performance on quality measures, and the association between changes in quality performance and incentive payments over time. METHODS The Belgian government provided information on fixed bonus budgets in 2013-2017 and hospital incentive payments as well as hospital performance on quality measures for the P4P programmes in 2018-2020. Descriptive analyses were conducted to map the financial repercussion between the two systems. A difference-in-difference analysis evaluated the association between quality indicator performance and received incentive payments over time. RESULTS Data from 87 acute-care hospitals were analyzed. In the transition to a P4P programme, 29% of hospitals received lower incentive payments per bed. During the P4P years, quality performance scores increased yearly for 55% of hospitals and decreased yearly for 5% of hospitals. There was a significant larger drop in incentive payments for hospitals that scored above median with the start of the P4P programme. CONCLUSIONS The transition from fixed bonus budgets for quality efforts to a new incentive payment in a P4P programme has led to more hospitals being financially impacted, although the effect is marginal given the small P4P budget. Quality indicators seem to improve over the years, but this does not correlate with an increase in reward per bed for all hospitals due to the closed nature of the budget.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Brouwers
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium.
| | - D Seys
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Claessens
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Van Wilder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Bruyneel
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - D De Ridder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Eeckloo
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, UGent & Strategic Policy Unit, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Claessens F, Seys D, Van der Auwera C, Castro EM, Jans A, Schoenmakers B, De Ridder D, Bruyneel L, Van Wilder A, Vanhaecht K. The FlaQuM-Quickscan: A starting point to include primary care professionals' perspectives in the evaluation of hospital quality priorities. J Healthc Qual Res 2024; 39:89-99. [PMID: 38195377 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhqr.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Today, primary care professionals' (PCPs) perspectives on hospital quality are unknown when evaluating hospital quality priorities. The aims of the present study were to identify key healthcare quality attributes from PCPs' perspective, to validate an instrument that measures PCPs' experiences of healthcare quality multidimensionally and to define hospital quality priorities based on PCPs' experiences. MATERIAL AND METHODS Focus groups with PCPs were conducted to identify quality attributes through a qualitative in-depth analysis. A multicentre study of 18 hospitals was used to quantitatively assess construct, discriminant and criterion validity of the FlaQuM-Quickscan, an instrument that measures 'Healthcare quality for patients and kin' (part 1) and 'Healthcare quality for professionals' (part 2). To set quality priorities, scores on quality domains were analyzed descriptively and between-hospital variation was examined by evaluating differences in hospitals' mean scores on the quality domains using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). RESULTS Identified key attributes largely corresponded with Lachman's multidimensional quality model. Including 'Communication' as a new quality domain was recommended. The FlaQuM-Quickscan was completed by 550 PCPs. Confirmatory factor analyses showed reasonable to good fit, except for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) in part 2. The 'Equity' domain scored the highest in parts 1 and 2. Domains 'Kin-centred care' and 'Accessibility and timeliness' scored the lowest in part 1 and 'Resilience' and 'Partnership and co-production' in part 2. Significant variation in hospitals' mean scores was observed for eleven domains in part 1 and sixteen domains in part 2. CONCLUSIONS The results gained a better understanding of PCPs' perspective on quality. The FlaQuM-Quickscan is a valid instrument to measure PCPs' experiences of hospital quality. Identified priorities indicate that hospital management should focus on multifaceted quality strategies, including technical domains, person-and kin-centredness, core values and catalysts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Claessens
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - D Seys
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - C Van der Auwera
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - E M Castro
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, Regionaal Ziekenhuis Heilig Hart Tienen, Tienen, Belgium
| | - A Jans
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, Sint-Trudo Ziekenhuis, Sint-Truiden, Belgium
| | - B Schoenmakers
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - D De Ridder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - L Bruyneel
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Van Wilder
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Vanhaecht
- Leuven Institute for Healthcare Policy, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Quality Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Seys D, Panella M, VanZelm R, Sermeus W, Aeyels D, Bruyneel L, Coeckelberghs E, Vanhaecht K. Care pathways are complex interventions in complex systems: New European Pathway Association framework. International Journal of Care Coordination 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/2053434519839195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Care pathway implementation is characterised by a dual complexity. A care pathway itself represents a complex intervention with multiple interacting and interdependent intervention components and outcomes. The organisations in which care pathways are being implemented represent complex systems that need to be directed at change through an in-depth understanding of their external and internal context in which they are functioning in. This study sets out a new evidence-based and pragmatic framework that unpacks how intervention mechanisms, intervention fidelity and care context are converge and represent interacting processes that determine success or failure of the care pathway. We recommend researchers looking to increase the effectiveness of care pathway implementation and accelerate improvement of desired outcomes to adopt this framework from inception to implementation of the intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Seys
- KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Panella
- KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Belgium
- University of Eastern Piedmont ‘A. Avogadro’, Italy
| | - R VanZelm
- KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - W Sermeus
- KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Belgium
| | - D Aeyels
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Belgium
| | - L Bruyneel
- KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Belgium
- University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - K Vanhaecht
- KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Belgium
- University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Seys D, Duker P, Salemink W, Franken-Wijnhoven J. Resident behaviors and characteristics as determinants of quality of residential care: an observational study. Res Dev Disabil 1998; 19:261-273. [PMID: 9653802 DOI: 10.1016/s0891-4222(98)00007-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
The effects of resident behaviors and resident characteristics on the quantity and quality of care they receive from direct-care staff was examined. Four hundred and fifty-two residents with severe and profound mental retardation and 416 direct care staff members were involved. Naturalistic observations were conducted on direct-care staff behavior, that is, staff-resident initiatives, staff affection, staff communicative behavior, on resident behaviors (i.e., maladaptive, stereotypic, and adaptive behavior, position, attending, and communicative behavior), and on resident characteristics (i.e., gender, age, ambulancy, sensory handicaps, and seizure disorder). By importance, residents' ambulancy/motoric skills, their communicative behavior, and attending behavior accounted for the greatest differences in the quality and quantity of the care they receive from direct-care staff. Given that certain resident characteristics can be ameliorated through training, residents themselves may control, to a certain extent, the care they receive from direct-care staff in residential facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Seys
- University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seys D, Duker P. Effects of staff management on the quality of residential care for mentally retarded individuals. Am J Ment Retard 1988; 93:290-9. [PMID: 3228522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Effects of two interventions on the quality of residential care for severely and profoundly mentally retarded individuals were assessed. Four living groups (N = 39 residents) were involved. Effects of assigning one extra staff member on staff's distribution of activities were evaluated as were effects of assigning extra tasks (including organizing daily staff meetings, providing feedback, and prompting self-recording) to the extra staff member on staff's distribution of activities, on staff's initiatives towards residents, and on residents' behavior. Results showed that assigning one extra staff member to living groups did not produce any change in staff's distribution of activities. Assigning extra tasks to the extra staff member, however, produced significant changes in the direction of more time spent on training residents. Also, several changes in staff's initiatives towards residents were recorded, whereas few changes in resident behavior were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Seys
- University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|