Phase I study of the sequential administration of edatrexate and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The antifolate edatrexate and the microtubule-stabilizing agent paclitaxel have both demonstrated single-agent activity in lung and breast cancer. In vitro, the sequential combination of edatrexate followed by paclitaxel produced synergistic antitumor effects. This trial was designed to find the maximum tolerated doses of edatrexate and paclitaxel when given every two weeks utilizing this sequential schedule.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with solid tumors received edatrexate intravenously on days 1 and 15 and paclitaxel intravenously as a three-hour infusion on days 2 and 16 of each 28-day cycle. Edatrexate was escalated from 40 to 120 mg/m2 and the paclitaxel dose fixed at 135 mg/m2. When the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, edatrexate was fixed at 120 mg/m2 and paclitaxel escalated to 175 and 210 mg/m2.

RESULTS

All 34 patients were assessable. The maximum tolerated doses were 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate and 210 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Grade 3 myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, and an infusion-related reaction occurred. Eight patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and one with bladder cancer achieved major objective responses.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II doses are 120 mg/m2 of edatrexate days 1 and 15 and 175 mg/m2 of paclitaxel as a three-hour infusion days 2 and 16 of a 28 day cycle. These results warrant phase II trials of the combination leading to phase III studies comparing the two drugs to a single agent to confirm the preclinical evidence of synergy.

Dose escalation of paclitaxel with high-dose carboplatin using peripheral blood progenitor cell support in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

A phase I study of escalating doses of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) given in combination with high-dose carboplatin was conducted to identify the antitumor efficacy and maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel in patients who had received sequential cycles of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide as prior treatment for ovarian carcinoma. Eighteen patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated in this study. Induction therapy consisted of two cycles of cyclophosphamide 3.0 g/m2 plus high-dose paclitaxel 300 mg/m2 plus filgrastim and leukapheresis to harvest peripheral blood progenitor cells, followed by four courses of rapidly cycled high-dose carboplatin with planned dose escalation of paclitaxel (150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/m2) rescued with peripheral blood progenitor cells. The study was amended after accrual of 11 patients, and the remaining seven patients received a single cycle of induction therapy with paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide, followed by four courses of rapidly cycled high-dose carboplatin with planned dose escalation of paclitaxel through levels 200 and 250 mg/m2. All 18 patients have completed therapy. Of the 15 who are evaluable for response, the pathologic complete response was 33% (five of 15 patients). The administration of escalating doses of paclitaxel in combination with high-dose carboplatin following sequential cycles of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide induction resulted in significant nonhematopoietic toxicity. Induction with a single cycle of paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide resulted in excellent progenitor cell mobilization, and significantly ameliorated the toxicity of this approach. The response rates thus far obtained are promising and warrant further evaluation.

A phase II trial of extracorporeal plasma immunoadsorption of patient plasma with PROSORBA columns for treating metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Circulating immune complexes (CIC) have been implicated as a cause of malignancy-associated immunosuppression and disease progression. Previous attempts to remove CIC by pheresis or immunoadsorption over a Staphylococcus aureus protein A column have resulted in a few clinical responses, however the relationship between removal of CIC and tumor response in these trials is not clear. Based on these data, a Phase II trial of immunoadsorption over a Staphylococcus aureus protein A column was initiated for patients with metastatic breast cancer. The authors sought to correlate clinical response with amount of CIC eluted from the columns after immunoadsorption.

METHODS

The potential role of extracorporeal immunoadsorption was determined using protein A columns in treating patients with advanced breast cancer. An immunoadsorbent column composed of protein A was bound covalently to an inert silica matrix (PROSORBA [IMRE Corporation, Seattle, WA] column). Patients underwent a 3-hour on-line procedure phlebotomizing 2000 ml of whole blood. Patient plasma was passed over PROSORBA columns to remove immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG-related CIC. The treated plasma then was reunited with formed elements and reinfused into the patient. Patients were treated three times per week for a total of 4 weeks. Analyses of tumor-associated Le(x)-containing CIC adsorbed on PROSORBA columns were performed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique with a monoclonal antibody specific for the Le(x) moiety.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were entered in this Phase II study, with a mean age of 57 years (range, 40-69 years). All patients received prior treatment for Stage IV breast cancer. The median number of PROSORBA treatments was 12 (range, 1-15 treatments). No toxicities or major objective responses were seen noted the 16 patients. One patient with severe chest wall pain had a symptomatic response. The remaining patients all had disease progression. Analyses of column eluates from 11 patients in this study revealed no detectable Le(x)-containing immune complexes when compared with control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunoadsorption over a Staphylococcus aureus Protein A column had no meaningful antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer. In this cohort of patients, an elevated level of Le(x) CIC was not confirmed in the eluates of the column compared with a control group of patients without cancer.