1
|
Sessa C, Balmaña J, Bober SL, Cardoso MJ, Colombo N, Curigliano G, Domchek SM, Evans DG, Fischerova D, Harbeck N, Kuhl C, Lemley B, Levy-Lahad E, Lambertini M, Ledermann JA, Loibl S, Phillips KA, Paluch-Shimon S. Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. Ann Oncol 2023; 34:33-47. [PMID: 36307055 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- C Sessa
- Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - J Balmaña
- Medical Oncology Hospital Vall d'Hebron and Hereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S L Bober
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - M J Cardoso
- Champalimaud Foundation, Breast Unit and Faculdade de Medicina, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - N Colombo
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia e IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - G Curigliano
- Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapies Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - S M Domchek
- Basser Center for BRCA, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution Infection and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, MAHSC, Manchester, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, MAHSC, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D Fischerova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - N Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - C Kuhl
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Aachen, University Hospital Aachen (UKA), RWTH Aachen, Germany
| | - B Lemley
- KIU - Patient Organisation for Women with Gynaecological Cancer, Copenhagen, Denmark; Clinical Trials Project, ESGO ENGAGe, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - E Levy-Lahad
- Medical Genetics Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - J A Ledermann
- Department of Oncology, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London and UCL Hospitals, London, UK
| | - S Loibl
- GBG Forschungs GmbH, Neu-Isenburg, Germany
| | - K-A Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - S Paluch-Shimon
- Sharett Institute of Oncology Department, Hadassah University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Loveday C, Garrett A, Law P, Hanks S, Poyastro-Pearson E, Adlard JW, Barwell J, Berg J, Brady AF, Brewer C, Chapman C, Cook J, Davidson R, Donaldson A, Douglas F, Greenhalgh L, Henderson A, Izatt L, Kumar A, Lalloo F, Miedzybrodzka Z, Morrison PJ, Paterson J, Porteous M, Rogers MT, Walker L, Eccles D, Evans DG, Snape K, Hanson H, Houlston RS, Turnbull C. Analysis of rare disruptive germline mutations in 2,135 enriched BRCA-negative breast cancers excludes additional high-impact susceptibility genes. Ann Oncol 2022; 33:1318-1327. [PMID: 36122798 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.09.152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer has a significant heritable basis, of which approximately 60% remains unexplained. Testing for BRCA1/BRCA2 offers useful discrimination of breast cancer risk within families, and identification of additional breast cancer susceptibility genes could offer clinical utility. PATIENTS AND METHODS We included 2,135 invasive breast cancer cases recruited via the BOCS study, a retrospective UK study of familial breast cancer. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA female, BRCA-negative, white European ethnicity, and one of: i) breast cancer family history, ii) bilateral disease, iii) young age of onset (<30 years), iv) concomitant ovarian cancer. We undertook exome sequencing of cases and performed gene-level burden testing of rare damaging variants against those from 51,377 ethnicity-matched population controls from gnomAD. RESULTS 159/2135 (7.4%) cases had a qualifying variant in an established breast cancer susceptibility gene, with minimal evidence of signal in other cancer susceptibility genes. Known breast cancer susceptibility genes PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM were the only genes to retain statistical significance after correcting for multiple testing. Due to the enrichment of hereditary cases in the series, we had good power (>80%) to detect a gene of BRCA1-like risk (odds ratio = 10.6) down to a population minor allele frequency of 4.6 x 10-5 (1 in 10,799, less than one tenth that of BRCA1)and of PALB2-like risk (odds ratio = 5.0) down to a population minor allele frequency of 2.8 x 10-4 (1 in 1,779, less than half that of PALB2). Power was lower for identification of novel moderate penetrance genes (odds ratio = 2-3) like CHEK2 and ATM. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest case-control whole-exome analysis of enriched breast cancer published to date. Whilst additional breast cancer susceptibility genes likely exist, those of high penetrance are likely to be of very low mutational frequency. Contention exists regarding the clinical utility of such genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Loveday
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - A Garrett
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - P Law
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - S Hanks
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - E Poyastro-Pearson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - J W Adlard
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - J Barwell
- Leicestershire Genetics Centre, University Hospitals of Leicester National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - J Berg
- Division of Medical Sciences, Human Genetics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - A F Brady
- North West Thames Regional Genetics Service, Kennedy Galton Centre, London, UK
| | - C Brewer
- Peninsula Regional Genetics Service, Royal Devon & Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| | - C Chapman
- West Midlands Regional Genetics Service, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Cook
- Sheffield Regional Genetics Service, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - R Davidson
- West of Scotland Regional Genetics Service, Ferguson Smith Centre for Clinical Genetics, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Donaldson
- South Western Regional Genetics Service, University Hospitals of Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - F Douglas
- Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - L Greenhalgh
- Cheshire and Merseyside Clinical Genetics Service, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - A Henderson
- Northern Genetics Service (Cumbria), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - L Izatt
- South East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Guy's and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Kumar
- North East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond St. Hospital, London, UK
| | - F Lalloo
- University Department of Medical Genetics & Regional Genetics Service, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Z Miedzybrodzka
- University of Aberdeen and North of Scotland Clinical Genetics Service, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - P J Morrison
- Belfast Health and Social Care (HSC) Trust & Department of Medical Genetics, Northern Ireland Regional Genetics Service, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - J Paterson
- East Anglian Regional Genetics Service, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - M Porteous
- South East of Scotland Clinical Genetics Service, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - M T Rogers
- All Wales Medical Genetics Service, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - L Walker
- Oxford Regional Genetics Service, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | -
- Individual collaborators and their affiliations are listed in the Appendix
| | - D Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - D G Evans
- University Department of Medical Genetics & Regional Genetics Service, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - K Snape
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.; South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - H Hanson
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.; South West Thames Regional Genetics Service, St. George's Hospital, London, UK
| | - R S Houlston
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - C Turnbull
- Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.; Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Speight B, Colvin E, Epurescu ED, Drummond J, Verhoef S, Pereira M, Evans DG, Tischkowitz M. Low-level constitutional mosaicism of BRCA1 in two women with young onset ovarian cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:32. [PMID: 36068545 PMCID: PMC9446595 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00237-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 cause hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. The vast majority of these variants are inherited from a parent. De novo constitutional pathogenic variants are rare. Even fewer cases of constitutional mosaicism have been reported and these have mostly been described in women with breast cancer. Here we report low-level constitutional mosaicism identified by Next Generation Sequencing in two women with ovarian cancer. A BRCA1 c.5074G > A p.(Asp1692Asn) variant detected in the first female at 42 years, classed as likely pathogenic, was found in ~ 52% of reads in DNA extracted from tumour, ~ 10% of reads in DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and ~ 10% of reads in DNA extracted from buccal mucosa. The second BRCA1 c.2755_2758dupCCTG p.(Val920AlafsTer6) variant was detected in a female aged 53 years, classed as pathogenic, and was found in ~ 59% of reads in DNA extracted from tumour, ~ 14% of reads in DNA extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes and similarly in ~ 14% of reads in both DNA extracted from buccal mucosa and urine sample. Sanger sequencing confirmed the presence of these variants at a corresponding low level consistent with mosaicism that may not have been detected by this method alone. This report demonstrates the clinical benefit for two women of BRCA1/BRCA2 germline NGS testing at a depth that can detect low-level mosaicism. As well as informing appropriate treatments, tumour sequencing results may facilitate the detection and interpretation of low-level mosaic variants in the germline. Both results have implications for other cancer risks and for relatives when providing a family cancer risk assessment and reproductive risk. The implications for laboratory practice, clinical genetics management and genetic counselling for constitutional mosaicism of BRCA1/BRCA2 are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Speight
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 134, Level 6, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - E Colvin
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - E D Epurescu
- Oncology & Haematology Directorate, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital, Colney Lane, Norwich, NR4 7UY, UK
| | - J Drummond
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 134, Level 6, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - S Verhoef
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - M Pereira
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M Tischkowitz
- East Anglian Medical Genetics Service, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Box 134, Level 6, Addenbrooke's Treatment Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.,Academic Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gandhi A, Duxbury P, Murphy J, Foden P, Lalloo F, Clancy T, Wisely J, Kirwan CC, Howell A, Evans DG. Patient reported outcome measures in a cohort of patients at high risk of breast cancer treated by bilateral risk reducing mastectomy and breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 75:69-76. [PMID: 34219040 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.06.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many women with increased lifetime risk of developing breast cancer, due to pathogenic gene variants or family history, choose to undergo bilateral risk reducing mastectomies (BRRM). Patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) are an increasingly important part of informed consent but are little studied in women undergoing BRRM. METHODS We used a validated PROMS tool for breast reconstruction (BREAST-Q) in 297 women who had BRRM and breast reconstruction, 81% of whom had no malignancy (Benign Group, BG) and 19% in whom a perioperative breast cancer was diagnosed (Cancer Group, CG). 128 women also completed a Hospital Anxiety & Depression Score (HADS) questionnaire to test if preoperative HADS score could predict PROMS outcomes. RESULTS Women in the CG had lower PROMS scores for satisfaction with their breasts, nipple reconstruction and sexual wellbeing. Both groups reported equal satisfaction with BRRM outcome and psychosocial well-being. Physical well-being PROMS of the abdomen and chest were high in women in both groups as were scores for satisfaction with the care they received. The CG group reported suboptimal quality of patient information. A higher presurgical HADS anxiety score predicted less favourable postoperative psychosocial well-being despite similar levels of satisfaction with aesthetic outcome. CONCLUSION We show a high degree of patient reported satisfaction by woman undergoing BRRM and reconstruction. There was a negative association with a cancer diagnosis on quality of life PROMS and higher preoperative anxiety levels negatively affected postoperative psychosocial well-being. These important findings should be part of the informed consent process during preoperative counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Gandhi
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| | - P Duxbury
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J Murphy
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P Foden
- Department of Medical Statistics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - F Lalloo
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Marys Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - T Clancy
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Marys Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J Wisely
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Laureate House, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - C C Kirwan
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - A Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seppälä TT, Latchford A, Negoi I, Sampaio Soares A, Jimenez-Rodriguez R, Sánchez-Guillén L, Evans DG, Ryan N, Crosbie EJ, Dominguez-Valentin M, Burn J, Kloor M, Knebel Doeberitz MV, Duijnhoven FJBV, Quirke P, Sampson JR, Møller P, Möslein G. European guidelines from the EHTG and ESCP for Lynch syndrome: an updated third edition of the Mallorca guidelines based on gene and gender. Br J Surg 2021; 108:484-498. [PMID: 34043773 PMCID: PMC10364896 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lynch syndrome is the most common genetic predisposition for hereditary cancer but remains underdiagnosed. Large prospective observational studies have recently increased understanding of the effectiveness of colonoscopic surveillance and the heterogeneity of cancer risk between genotypes. The need for gene- and gender-specific guidelines has been acknowledged. METHODS The European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG) and European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) developed a multidisciplinary working group consisting of surgeons, clinical and molecular geneticists, pathologists, epidemiologists, gastroenterologists, and patient representation to conduct a graded evidence review. The previous Mallorca guideline format was used to revise the clinical guidance. Consensus for the guidance statements was acquired by three Delphi voting rounds. RESULTS Recommendations for clinical and molecular identification of Lynch syndrome, surgical and endoscopic management of Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer, and preventive measures for cancer were produced. The emphasis was on surgical and gastroenterological aspects of the cancer spectrum. Manchester consensus guidelines for gynaecological management were endorsed. Executive and layperson summaries were provided. CONCLUSION The recommendations from the EHTG and ESCP for identification of patients with Lynch syndrome, colorectal surveillance, surgical management of colorectal cancer, lifestyle and chemoprevention in Lynch syndrome that reached a consensus (at least 80 per cent) are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T T Seppälä
- Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore Maryland, USA
| | - A Latchford
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, UK.,St Mark's Hospital, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - I Negoi
- Department of Surgery, Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - R Jimenez-Rodriguez
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - L Sánchez-Guillén
- Colorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Elche University General Hospital Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - N Ryan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Centre for Academic Women's Health, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - E J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - M Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumour Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Burn
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - M Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Applied Tumour Biology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M von Knebel Doeberitz
- Department of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.,Cooperation Unit Applied Tumour Biology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - F J B van Duijnhoven
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J R Sampson
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff, UK
| | - P Møller
- Department of Tumour Biology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - G Möslein
- Centre for Hereditary Tumours, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany.,University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Seppälä TT, Dominguez-Valentin M, Crosbie EJ, Engel C, Aretz S, Macrae F, Winship I, Capella G, Thomas H, Hovig E, Nielsen M, Sijmons RH, Bertario L, Bonanni B, Tibiletti MG, Cavestro GM, Mints M, Gluck N, Katz L, Heinimann K, Vaccaro CA, Green K, Lalloo F, Hill J, Schmiegel W, Vangala D, Perne C, Strauß HG, Tecklenburg J, Holinski-Feder E, Steinke-Lange V, Mecklin JP, Plazzer JP, Pineda M, Navarro M, Vida JB, Kariv R, Rosner G, Piñero TA, Pavicic W, Kalfayan P, Ten Broeke SW, Jenkins MA, Sunde L, Bernstein I, Burn J, Greenblatt M, de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH, Della Valle A, Lopez-Koestner F, Alvarez K, Büttner R, Görgens H, Morak M, Holzapfel S, Hüneburg R, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Loeffler M, Redler S, Weitz J, Pylvänäinen K, Renkonen-Sinisalo L, Lepistö A, Hopper JL, Win AK, Lindor NM, Gallinger S, Le Marchand L, Newcomb PA, Figueiredo JC, Thibodeau SN, Therkildsen C, Wadt KAW, Mourits MJE, Ketabi Z, Denton OG, Rødland EA, Vasen H, Neffa F, Esperon P, Tjandra D, Möslein G, Rokkones E, Sampson JR, Evans DG, Møller P. Uptake of hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: a Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database report. Eur J Cancer 2021; 148:124-133. [PMID: 33743481 PMCID: PMC8916840 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to report the uptake of hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) to prevent gynaecological cancers (risk-reducing surgery [RRS]) in carriers of pathogenic MMR (path_MMR) variants. Methods: The Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD) was used to investigate RRS by a cross-sectional study in 2292 female path_MMR carriers aged 30–69 years. Results: Overall, 144, 79, and 517 carriers underwent risk-reducing hysterectomy, BSO, or both combined, respectively. Two-thirds of procedures before 50 years of age were combined hysterectomy and BSO, and 81% of all procedures included BSO. Risk-reducing hysterectomy was performed before age 50 years in 28%, 25%, 15%, and 9%, and BSO in 26%, 25%, 14% and 13% of path_MLH1, path_MSH2, path_MSH6, and path_PMS2 carriers, respectively. Before 50 years of age, 107 of 188 (57%) BSO and 126 of 204 (62%) hysterectomies were performed in women without any prior cancer, and only 5% (20/392) were performed simultaneously with colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Conclusion: Uptake of RRS before 50 years of age was low, and RRS was rarely undertaken in association with surgical treatment of CRC. Uptake of RRS aligned poorly with gene- and age-associated risk estimates for endometrial or ovarian cancer that were published recently from PLSD and did not correspond well with current clinical guidelines. The reasons should be clarified. Decision-making on opting for or against RRS and its timing should be better aligned with predicted risk and mortality for endometrial and ovarian cancer in Lynch syndrome to improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toni T Seppälä
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom.
| | - Mev Dominguez-Valentin
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester and St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK; Directorate of Gynaecology, Manchester University, NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Christoph Engel
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Stefan Aretz
- Institute of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; National Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | - Finlay Macrae
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Ingrid Winship
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gabriel Capella
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Institut Catal. D'Oncologia-IDIBELL Institut D'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - Huw Thomas
- St Mark's Hospital, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Eivind Hovig
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Rolf H Sijmons
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - Lucio Bertario
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernardo Bonanni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria G Tibiletti
- Ospedale di Circolo ASST Settelaghi, Centro di Ricerca Tumori Eredo-familiari, Università Dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Giulia M Cavestro
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Miriam Mints
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nathan Gluck
- Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Research Center for Digestive Disorders and Liver Diseases; Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Lior Katz
- High Risk and GI Cancer Prevention Clinic, Gatro-Oncology Unit, The Department of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Israel
| | - Karl Heinimann
- Medical Genetics, Institute for Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carlos A Vaccaro
- Hereditary Cancer Program (PROCANHE) Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingenieria Biomedica (IMTIB), Argentina
| | - Kate Green
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - James Hill
- Department of Surgery, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Wolff Schmiegel
- Department of Medicine, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Deepak Vangala
- Department of Medicine, Knappschaftskrankenhaus, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Claudia Perne
- Institute of Human Genetics, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany; National Center for Hereditary Tumor Syndromes, University Hospital Bonn, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Strauß
- Department of Gynaecology, University Clinics, Martin-Luther University, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany
| | | | - Elke Holinski-Feder
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany; MGZ- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - Verena Steinke-Lange
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany; MGZ- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany
| | - Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
- Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland & Department of Surgery, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - John-Paul Plazzer
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK
| | - Marta Pineda
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Institut Català D'Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matilde Navarro
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Institut Català D'Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan B Vida
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Institut Català D'Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Revital Kariv
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Guy Rosner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | - Tamara A Piñero
- Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingenieria Biomedica (IMTIB), Argentina
| | - Walter Pavicic
- Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingenieria Biomedica (IMTIB), Argentina
| | - Pablo Kalfayan
- Instituto de Medicina Traslacional e Ingenieria Biomedica (IMTIB), Argentina
| | - Sanne W Ten Broeke
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Mark A Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lone Sunde
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Inge Bernstein
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - John Burn
- Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Greenblatt
- University of Vermont, Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
| | | | - Adriana Della Valle
- Grupo Colaborativo Uruguayo, Investigación de Afecciones Oncológicas Hereditarias (GCU), Hospital Fuerzas Armadas, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Francisco Lopez-Koestner
- Lab. Oncología y Genética Molecular, Unidad de Coloproctología Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Karin Alvarez
- Lab. Oncología y Genética Molecular, Unidad de Coloproctología Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Heike Görgens
- Department of Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Monika Morak
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Campus Innenstadt, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany; MGZ- Medical Genetics Center, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Robert Hüneburg
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
- Department of Applied Tumour Biology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Cooperation Unit Applied Tumour Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Loeffler
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Silke Redler
- Heinrich-Heine-University, Medical Faculty, Institute of Human Genetics, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Department of Surgery, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kirsi Pylvänäinen
- Department of Education and Science, Central Finland Health Care District, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Applied Tumour Genomics Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna Lepistö
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Applied Tumour Genomics Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - John L Hopper
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Aung K Win
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia; Genetic Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia
| | | | - Steven Gallinger
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto
| | | | - Polly A Newcomb
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA
| | - Jane C Figueiredo
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA
| | - Stephen N Thibodeau
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Christina Therkildsen
- The Danish HNPCC Register, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Karin A W Wadt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Marian J E Mourits
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Zohreh Ketabi
- Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Oliver G Denton
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Einar A Rødland
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hans Vasen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Florencia Neffa
- Lab. Oncología y Genética Molecular, Unidad de Coloproctología Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Patricia Esperon
- Lab. Oncología y Genética Molecular, Unidad de Coloproctología Clínica Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Douglas Tjandra
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gabriela Möslein
- Department of Surgery, Ev. Krankenhaus Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - Erik Rokkones
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Julian R Sampson
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Division of Cancer and Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| | - D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Pål Møller
- Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT), The Polyposis Registry, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ, UK; European Hereditary Tumour Group (EHTG), C/o Lindsays, Caledonian Exchange, 19A Canning Street, Edinburgh, EH3 8HE, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant condition caused by pathogenic variants in the NF2 gene. The pathogenic variant is either inherited or obtained by de novo mutation, characterised by the presence of schwannomas, meningiomas and ependymomas. Here we report the presence of NF2 in one twin, with bilateral vestibular schwannomas and a pathogenic variant of the NF2 gene identified in both tumour and lymphocytes, while his monozygous brother remains asymptomatic. Imaging of the unaffected twin showed no tumour load and genetic testing via Sanger sequencing and Amplification Refractory Mutation System assay demonstrated low levels of expression of the NF2 variant in lymphocytes. Further testing on non-haemopoietic tissue showed little expression or absence of the pathogenic variant. Given there is no family history and the low level of the variant, we assume the pathogenic variant is a de novo mutation during embryogenesis. De novo mutations have been described as occurring at three possible time points in the creation of monozygous twins with different genetic make-up; prior to the twinning event, as a cause of the event, or after the twinning event. Of these options, we hypothesise that the discordance in the expression of the NF2 variant between these twins is likely due to a mutational event that occurred as a result of either of the latter two possibilities, between which we cannot determine. The pathogenic variant in lymphocytes was likely transferred between the twins through a shared blood supply in utero, and the non-haemopoietic samples that showed low levels of expression, were likely due to the presence of lymphocytic cells. Therefore, we have a discordance between monozygous twins at the NF2 gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Amico
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, Department of Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - P Smith
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, Department of Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Tobi
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, Department of Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M Perry
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, Department of Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A Wallace
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, Department of Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, Department of Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), University of Manchester, Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frühwald MC, Nemes K, Boztug H, Cornips MCA, Evans DG, Farah R, Glentis S, Jorgensen M, Katsibardi K, Hirsch S, Jahnukainen K, Kventsel I, Kerl K, Kratz CP, Pajtler KW, Kordes U, Ridola V, Stutz E, Bourdeaut F. Current recommendations for clinical surveillance and genetic testing in rhabdoid tumor predisposition: a report from the SIOPE Host Genome Working Group. Fam Cancer 2021; 20:305-316. [PMID: 33532948 PMCID: PMC8484234 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00229-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The rhabdoid tumor (RT) predisposition syndromes 1 and 2 (RTPS1 and 2) are rare genetic conditions rendering young children vulnerable to an increased risk of RT, malignant neoplasms affecting the kidney, miscellaneous soft-part tissues, the liver and the central nervous system (Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors, ATRT). Both, RTPS1&2 are due to pathogenic variants (PV) in genes encoding constituents of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex, i.e. SMARCB1 (RTPS1) and SMARCA4 (RTPS2). In contrast to other genetic disorders related to PVs in SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 such as Coffin-Siris Syndrome, RTPS1&2 are characterized by a predominance of truncating PVs, terminating transcription thus explaining a specific cancer risk. The penetrance of RTPS1 early in life is high and associated with a poor survival. However, few unaffected carriers may be encountered. Beyond RT, the tumor spectrum may be larger than initially suspected, and cancer surveillance offered to unaffected carriers (siblings or parents) and long-term survivors of RT is still a matter of discussion. RTPS2 exposes female carriers to an ill-defined risk of small cell carcinoma of the ovaries, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), which may appear in prepubertal females. RT surveillance protocols for these rare families have not been established. To address unresolved issues in the care of individuals with RTPS and to propose appropriate surveillance guidelines in childhood, the SIOPe Host Genome working group invited pediatric oncologists and geneticists to contribute to an expert meeting. The current manuscript summarizes conclusions of the panel discussion, including consented statements as well as non-evidence-based proposals for validation in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M C Frühwald
- Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Swabian Children's Cancer Center, University Medical Center Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
| | - K Nemes
- Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Swabian Children's Cancer Center, University Medical Center Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany
| | - H Boztug
- St. Anna Children's Hospital and Children's Cancer Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M C A Cornips
- Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, MAHSC, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R Farah
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, LAU Medical Center-Rizk Hospital, Ashrafieh, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - S Glentis
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit, First Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Aghia Sofia" Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Jorgensen
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, UK
| | - K Katsibardi
- Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Unit, First Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, "Aghia Sofia" Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - S Hirsch
- Institute of Human Genetics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - K Jahnukainen
- Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - I Kventsel
- Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, The Edmond and Lily Safra Children's Hospital, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Tel-Hashomer, Israel
| | - K Kerl
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Children's Hospital Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149, Münster, Germany
| | - C P Kratz
- Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - K W Pajtler
- Hopp Children's Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.,Division of Pediatric Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, and Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Kordes
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V Ridola
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Haematology, Mitera Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Stutz
- Department of Oncology, University Children's Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - F Bourdeaut
- Institut Curie, SIREDO Pediatric Cancer Center, INSERM U830, Laboratory of Translational Research in Pediatric Oncology, Paris Sciences Lettres Research University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hannan CJ, Lewis D, O'Leary C, Donofrio CA, Evans DG, Stapleton E, Freeman SR, Lloyd SK, Rutherford SA, Hammerbeck-Ward C, Brough D, Allan SM, Coope D, King AT, Pathmanaban ON. Beyond Antoni: A Surgeon's Guide to the Vestibular Schwannoma Microenvironment. Skull Base Surg 2020; 83:1-10. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are histologically benign tumors arising from cranial nerve VIII. Far from a homogenous proliferation of Schwann cells, mounting evidence has highlighted the complex nature of the inflammatory microenvironment in these tumors.
Methods A review of the literature pertaining to inflammation, inflammatory molecular pathways, and immune-related therapeutic targets in VS was performed. Relevant studies published up to June 2020 were identified based on a literature search in the PubMed and MEDLINE databases and the findings were synthesized into a concise narrative review of the topic.
Results The VS microenvironment is characterized by a dense infiltrate of inflammatory cells, particularly macrophages. Significantly higher levels of immune cell infiltration are observed in growing versus static tumors, and there is a demonstrable interplay between inflammation and angiogenesis in growing VS. While further mechanistic studies are required to ascertain the exact role of inflammation in angiogenesis, tumor growth, and Schwann cell control, we are beginning to understand the key molecular pathways driving this inflammatory microenvironment, and how these processes can be monitored and targeted in vivo.
Conclusion Observational research has revealed a complex and heterogeneous tumor microenvironment in VS. The functional landscape and roles of macrophages and other immune cells in the VS inflammatory infiltrate are, however, yet to be established. The antiangiogenic drug bevacizumab has shown the efficacy of targeted molecular therapies in VS and there is hope that agents targeting another major component of the VS microenvironment, inflammation, will also find a place in their future management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathal J. Hannan
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology Manchester (SNO-MAN) Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Lewis
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology Manchester (SNO-MAN) Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Claire O'Leary
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology Manchester (SNO-MAN) Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Carmine A. Donofrio
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology Manchester (SNO-MAN) Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Dafydd G. Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Stapleton
- Department of Otolaryngology, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Simon R. Freeman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Simon K. Lloyd
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology, Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Scott A. Rutherford
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Hammerbeck-Ward
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David Brough
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart M. Allan
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Lydia Becker Institute of Immunology and Inflammation, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David Coope
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology Manchester (SNO-MAN) Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew T. King
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology Manchester (SNO-MAN) Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Omar N. Pathmanaban
- Surgical Neuro-Oncology Manchester (SNO-MAN) Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cell Matrix Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gaba F, Blyuss O, Chandrasekaran D, Osman M, Goyal S, Gan C, Izatt L, Tripathi V, Esteban I, McNicol L, Ragupathy K, Crawford R, Evans DG, Legood R, Menon U, Manchanda R. Attitudes towards risk-reducing early salpingectomy with delayed oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: a cohort study. BJOG 2020; 128:714-726. [PMID: 32803845 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine risk-reducing early salpingectomy and delayed oophorectomy (RRESDO) acceptability and effect of surgical prevention on menopausal sequelae/satisfaction/regret in women at increased ovarian cancer (OC) risk. DESIGN Multicentre, cohort, questionnaire study (IRSCTN:12310993). SETTING United Kingdom (UK). POPULATION UK women without OC ≥18 years, at increased OC risk, with/without previous RRSO, ascertained through specialist familial cancer/genetic clinics and BRCA support groups. METHODS Participants completed a 39-item questionnaire. Baseline characteristics were described using descriptive statistics. Logistic/linear regression models analysed the impact of variables on RRESDO acceptability and health outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES RRESDO acceptability, menopausal sequelae, satisfaction/regret. RESULTS In all, 346 of 683 participants underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). Of premenopausal women who had not undergone RRSO, 69.1% (181/262) found it acceptable to participate in a research study offering RRESDO. Premenopausal women concerned about sexual dysfunction were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9, 95% CI 1.2-7.7, P = 0.025). Women experiencing sexual dysfunction after premenopausal RRSO were more likely to find RRESDO acceptable in retrospect (OR = 5.3, 95% CI 1.2-27.5, P < 0.031). In all, 88.8% (143/161) premenopausal and 95.2% (80/84) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO, respectively, were satisfied with their decision, whereas 9.4% (15/160) premenopausal and 1.2% (1/81) postmenopausal women who underwent RRSO regretted their decision. HRT uptake in premenopausal individuals without breast cancer (BC) was 74.1% (80/108). HRT use did not significantly affect satisfaction/regret levels but did reduce symptoms of vaginal dryness (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, P = 0.025). CONCLUSION Data show high RRESDO acceptability, particularly in women concerned about sexual dysfunction. Although RRSO satisfaction remains high, regret rates are much higher for premenopausal women than for postmenopausal women. HRT use following premenopausal RRSO does not increase satisfaction but does reduce vaginal dryness. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT RRESDO has high acceptability among premenopausal women at increased ovarian cancer risk, particularly those concerned about sexual dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - O Blyuss
- School of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.,Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Applied Mathematics, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
| | - D Chandrasekaran
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M Osman
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - S Goyal
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK
| | - C Gan
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - L Izatt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - V Tripathi
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - I Esteban
- Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | - L McNicol
- Ninewells Hospital, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK
| | | | - R Crawford
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, MAHSC, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - R Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - U Menon
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - R Manchanda
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Cancer Research UK, Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, UK.,Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.,MRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ryan N, Nobes M, Sedgewick D, Teoh SN, Evans DG, Crosbie EJ. A mismatch in care: results of a United Kingdom-wide patient and clinician survey of gynaecological services for women with Lynch syndrome. BJOG 2020; 128:728-736. [PMID: 32725920 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the current testing practice, referral pathways and gynaecological services available to women with Lynch syndrome (LS) in the UK. DESIGN Cross-sectional nationwide survey of gynaecological oncologists and women with LS. SETTING United Kingdom. METHODS Gynaecological oncologists were contacted directly. Women with LS were identified from national and regional clinical databases and the patient support group, Lynch syndrome UK. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Gynaecological oncologists were asked to report rates of LS testing and current practice regarding risk-reducing strategies and gynaecological surveillance for women with LS. Women with LS were asked to describe their experiences of gynaecological care. RESULTS In total, 41 gynaecological oncologists and 298 women with LS responded to the survey. Of the gynaecological oncologists surveyed, 37% were unfamiliar with any clinical guidelines for the management of LS. Only 29% of gynaecological oncologists supported universal testing of endometrial cancer for LS; one centre routinely performed such testing. In all, 83% said they perform risk-reducing gynaecological surgery and 43% were aware of a local gynaecological surveillance service for women with LS. Of women with LS, most had undergone a hysterectomy (n = 191/64.1%), most frequently to reduce their gynaecological cancer risk (n = 86/45%). A total of 10% were initially referred for LS testing by their gynaecologist and 55% of those eligible regularly attended gynaecological surveillance; however, 62% wanted more regular surveillance. Regional variation was evident across all standards of care. CONCLUSIONS There is widespread variation in the services offered to women with LS in the UK. As a community, gynaecological oncologists should move towards a nationally agreed provision of services. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT A mismatch in care for mismatch repair. Survey finds significant variation in gynaecological care for #Lynchsyndrome in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naj Ryan
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - M Nobes
- Severn Post Graduate Medical Education Foundation School, Bristol, UK
| | | | - S-N Teoh
- University of Manchester Medical School, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Division of Gynaecology, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dunnett-Kane V, Burkitt-Wright E, Blackhall FH, Malliri A, Evans DG, Lindsay CR. Germline and sporadic cancers driven by the RAS pathway: parallels and contrasts. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:873-883. [PMID: 32240795 PMCID: PMC7322396 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.03.291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Somatic mutations in RAS and related pathway genes such as NF1 have been strongly implicated in the development of cancer while also being implicated in a diverse group of developmental disorders named the 'RASopathies', including neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), Noonan syndrome (NS), Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines (NSML), Costello syndrome (CS), cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome (CFC), and capillary malformation-arteriovenous syndrome (CM-AVM). It remains unclear why (i) there is little overlap in mutational subtype between Ras-driven malignancies associated with sporadic disease and those associated with the RASopathy syndromes, and (ii) RASopathy-associated cancers are usually of different histological origin to those seen with sporadic mutations of the same genes. For instance, germline variants in KRAS and NRAS are rarely found at codons 12, 13 or 61, the most common sites for somatic mutations in sporadic cancers. An exception is CS, where germline variants in codons 12 and 13 of HRAS occur relatively frequently. Given recent renewed drug interest following early clinical success of RAS G12C and farnesyl transferase inhibitors, an improved understanding of this relationship could help guide targeted therapies for both sporadic and germline cancers associated with the Ras pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Dunnett-Kane
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Burkitt-Wright
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - F H Blackhall
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, London and Manchester, UK; Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - A Malliri
- Cancer Research UK Manchester Institute, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Biology and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - C R Lindsay
- Department of Medical Oncology, the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Cancer Research UK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, London and Manchester, UK; Division of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ramchander NC, Ryan NAJ, Walker TDJ, Harries L, Bolton J, Bosse T, Evans DG, Crosbie EJ. Distinct Immunological Landscapes Characterize Inherited and Sporadic Mismatch Repair Deficient Endometrial Cancer. Front Immunol 2020; 10:3023. [PMID: 31998307 PMCID: PMC6970202 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Around 30% of endometrial cancers (EC) are mismatch repair (MMR) deficient, mostly as a consequence of mutations acquired during tumorigenesis, but a significant minority is caused by Lynch syndrome (LS). This inherited cancer predisposition syndrome primes an anti-cancer immune response, even in healthy carriers. We sought to explore the intra-tumoral immunological differences between genetically confirmed LS-associated MMR-deficient (MMRd), sporadic MMR-deficient, and MMR-proficient (MMRp) EC. Endometrial tumors from women with known LS were identified (n = 25). Comparator tumors were recruited prospectively and underwent microsatellite instability (MSI) testing, immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR expression and MLH1 methylation testing. Those found to have MLH1 hypermethylation formed the sporadic MMR-deficient group (n = 33). Those found to be mismatch repair proficient and microsatellite stable formed the MMR-proficient group (n = 35). A fully automated monoplex IHC panel was performed on sequential formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sections to identify CD3+, CD8+, CD45RO+, FoxP3+, and PD-1+ immune cells, and PD-L1 expression by tumor/immune cells. Two independent observers quantified immune marker expression at the tumor center and invasive margin. Mean and overall compartmental T-cell counts generated standard (binary: Low/High) and higher resolution (quaternary: 0-25, 25-50, 50-75, 75-100%) immune scores, which were used as explanatory features in neural network, support vector machine, and discriminant predictive modeling. Overall T-cell counts were significantly different between the three cohorts: CD3+ (p = <0.0001), CD8+ (p = <0.0001), CD45RO+ (<0.0001), FoxP3+ (p = <0.0001), and PD1+ (p = <0.0001), with LS-associated MMR-deficient tumors having highest infiltrations. There were significant differences in CD8+ (p = 0.02), CD45RO+ (p = 0.007), and PD-1+ (p = 0.005) T-cell counts at the invasive margin between LS-associated and sporadic MMR-deficient tumors, but not between sporadic MMR-deficient and MMR-proficient tumors. Predictive modeling could accurately determine MMR status based on CD8+ T-cell counts within the tumor center alone. This study shows that LS-associated and sporadic MMR-deficient EC are distinct immunological entities, which has important implications for treatment and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neal C Ramchander
- University of Manchester Medical School, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Neil A J Ryan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas D J Walker
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Lauren Harries
- Department of Histopathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - James Bolton
- Department of Histopathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, St. Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Flaum N, Crosbie EJ, Edmondson RJ, Smith MJ, Evans DG. Epithelial ovarian cancer risk: A review of the current genetic landscape. Clin Genet 2019; 97:54-63. [PMID: 31099061 PMCID: PMC7017781 DOI: 10.1111/cge.13566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 03/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related death in women in the developed world, and one of the most heritable cancers. One of the most significant risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Combined risk factors can be used in models to stratify risk of EOC, and aid in decisions regarding risk-reduction strategies. Germline pathogenic variants in EOC susceptibility genes including those involved in homologous recombination and mismatch repair pathways are present in approximately 22% to 25% of EOC. These genes are associated with an estimated lifetime risk of EOC of 13% to 60% for BRCA1 variants and 10% to 25% for BRCA2 variants, with lower risks associated with remaining genes. Genome-wide association studies have identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) thought to explain an additional 6.4% of the familial risk of ovarian cancer, with 34 susceptibility loci identified to date. However, an unknown proportion of the genetic component of EOC risk remains unexplained. This review comprises an overview of individual genes and SNPs suspected to contribute to risk of EOC, and discusses use of a polygenic risk score to predict individual cancer risk more accurately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Flaum
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Emma J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard J Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Miriam J Smith
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - Dafydd G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Cancer Genetics, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ryan NAJ, Glaire MA, Blake D, Cabrera-Dandy M, Evans DG, Crosbie EJ. The proportion of endometrial cancers associated with Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Genet Med 2019; 21:2167-2180. [PMID: 31086306 PMCID: PMC8076013 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0536-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 118] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Endometrial cancer (EC) is often the sentinel cancer in women with Lynch syndrome (LS). However, efforts to implement universal LS screening in EC patients have been hampered by a lack of evidence detailing the proportion of EC patients that would be expected to screen positive for LS. Methods Studies were identified by electronic searches of Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL and Web of Science. Proportions of test positivity were calculated by random and fixed-effects meta-analysis models. I2 score was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Results Fifty-three studies, including 12,633 EC patients, met the inclusion criteria. The overall proportion of endometrial tumors with microsatellite instability or mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency by immunohistochemistry (IHC) was 0.27 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25–0.28, I2: 71%) and 0.26 (95% CI 0.25–0.27, I2: 88%), respectively. Of those women with abnormal tumor testing, 0.29 (95% CI 0.25–0.33, I2: 83%) had LS-associated pathogenic variants on germline testing; therefore around 3% of ECs can be attributed to LS. Preselection of EC cases did increase the proportion of germline LS diagnoses. Conclusion The current study suggests that prevalence of LS in EC patients is approximately 3%, similar to that of colorectal cancer patients; therefore our data support the implementation of universal EC screening for LS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A J Ryan
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - M A Glaire
- Tumor Genomics and Immunology Group, The Oxford Centre for Cancer Gene Research, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D Blake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St James's University Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - M Cabrera-Dandy
- Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Blackburn, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - E J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK. .,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Evans DG, Woodward ER, Lalloo F, Møller P, Sampson J, Burn J, Moeslein G, Capella G. Are women with pathogenic variants in PMS2 and MSH6 really at high lifetime risk of breast cancer? Genet Med 2019; 21:1878-1879. [PMID: 30631111 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0401-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. .,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - E R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - F Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine and NW Laboratory Genetics Hub, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - P Møller
- The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Sampson
- Institute of Medical Genetics, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - J Burn
- Biomedicine West Wing, Centre for Life, Newcastle, UK
| | - G Moeslein
- Surgical Center for Hereditary Tumors, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, University of Witten/Herdecke Germany, Witten, Germany
| | - G Capella
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Institut Catal. d'Oncologia-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Donnelly LS, Shaw RL, Pegington M, Armitage CJ, Evans DG, Howell A, Harvie MN. 'For me it's about not feeling like I'm on a diet': a thematic analysis of women's experiences of an intermittent energy restricted diet to reduce breast cancer risk. J Hum Nutr Diet 2018; 31:773-780. [PMID: 29926996 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Weight-loss programmes requiring intermittent energy restriction offer an alternative to continuous energy restriction programmes that typically have low adherence. We reported greater weight loss, better adherence and spontaneous reduced energy intake on healthy eating days with intermittent as opposed to continuous energy restriction. The present study aims to explore why intermittent energy restriction diets exert these positive effects. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 13 women aged 39-62 years, who followed a 4-month intermittent energy restriction (2 days of low energy/low carbohydrate, 5 days of healthy eating). Nine of the 13 women successfully lost >5% of their total body weight. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The intermittent regimen redefined the meaning of dieting and normal eating. Women reconceptualised dieting as only two low energy days per week, even though this often differed from their pre-diet eating patterns. Women reported that they could adhere more closely to the rules of the intermittent diet compared to previously attempted continuous diets. They found that the intermittent diet was less cognitively demanding because the restrictive and clear rules of the intermittent diet were easier to understand and easier to follow than with continuous dieting. CONCLUSIONS Many participants found intermittent dieting preferable to previous experiences of continuous dieting. The findings provide some insight into the ways in which intermittent dieting is successful, and why it could be considered a viable alternative to continuous energy restriction for weight loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Donnelly
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK
| | - R L Shaw
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK
| | - M Pegington
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK
| | - C J Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Psychological Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.,Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester and Central Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester, UK
| | - A Howell
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester, UK
| | - M N Harvie
- Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Prevention Breast Cancer Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - R Edmondson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E J Crosbie
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
See MH, Bhoo-Pathy N, Jamaris S, Kiran A, Evans DG, Yip CH, Taib NA. Low Lifetime Risk of Contralateral Breast Cancer in a Middle-Income Asian Country: Evidence to Guide Post-treatment Surveillance. World J Surg 2017; 42:1270-1277. [PMID: 29124356 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4319-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The rate of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) is increasing in the West with controversial evidence of improved survival in early breast cancer patients. Although uptake of CRRM in Asia appears low, the trends may rise, and there is currently an urgent need to provide evidence for informed decision-making in clinical practice. This study aims to determine the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and its associated factors in an Asian setting. METHOD A total of 2937 newly diagnosed patients with stage I and stage II breast cancer in University Malaya Medical Centre between Jan 1993 to Dec 2012 were included in the study. Multinomial logistic regression analysis allowing death to compete with CBC as a study outcome was used; patients with unilateral breast cancer who were alive were taken as reference. A stepwise backward regression analysis including age at diagnosis, ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, TNM stage, hormonal receptor status, HER2 status, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormone therapy was conducted. RESULTS Fifty women developed CBC, over a median follow-up of 6 years. The 5- and 10-year cumulative risk of contralateral breast cancer was 1.0% (95% CI 0.6-1.4%) and 2.8% (95% CI 2.0-3.6%), respectively. Young age at diagnosis of first cancer, positive family history, and stage I disease were independent predictors of CBC. DISCUSSION The current study suggests that the risk of CBC is very low in a Southeast Asian setting. Any recommendations or practice of CRRM should be reviewed with caution and patients must be counseled appropriately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M H See
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - N Bhoo-Pathy
- Faculty of Medicine, Julius Centre University of Malaya, University of Malaya, 50603, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - S Jamaris
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - A Kiran
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - D G Evans
- Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - C H Yip
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - N A Taib
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603, Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evans DG, Harkness EF, Howel S, Woodward ER, Howell A, Lalloo F. Young age at first pregnancy does protect against early onset breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 167:779-785. [PMID: 29116468 PMCID: PMC5807493 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4557-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Previous research assessing the impact of pregnancy and age at first pregnancy on breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers has produced conflicting results, with some studies showing an increased risk following early first pregnancy in contrast to the reduced risk in the general population of women. The present study addresses these inconsistencies. Methods Female BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers from North West England were assessed for breast cancer incidence prior to 50 years of age comparing those with an early first full-term pregnancy (< 21 years) to those without a full-term pregnancy. Breast cancer incidence per decade from 20 years and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed. Results 2424 female mutation carriers (1278 BRCA1; 1146 BRCA2) developed 990 breast cancers under the age of 50 years. Women who had their first term pregnancy prior to age 21 (n = 441) had a lower cancer incidence especially between age 30–39 years. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed an odds ratio of 0.78 for BRCA1 (p = 0.005) and 0.73 for BRCA2 (p = 0.002). Conclusions The present study demonstrates a clear protective effect of early first pregnancy on breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Institute of Human Development, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. .,Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. .,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. .,Manchester Breast Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
| | - E F Harkness
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK
| | - S Howel
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - E R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Institute of Human Development, St Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - A Howell
- Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - F Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Halliday
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Scott A. Rutherford
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott Lane, Salford, Manchester, UK
| | - Martin G. McCabe
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dafydd G. Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, MAHSC, Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ruggieri M, Praticò AD, Serra A, Maiolino L, Cocuzza S, Di Mauro P, Licciardello L, Milone P, Privitera G, Belfiore G, Di Pietro M, Di Raimondo F, Romano A, Chiarenza A, Muglia M, Polizzi A, Evans DG. Childhood neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and related disorders: from bench to bedside and biologically targeted therapies. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2017; 36:345-367. [PMID: 27958595 PMCID: PMC5225790 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-1093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 2 [NF2; MIM # 101000] is an autosomal dominant disorder characterised by the occurrence of vestibular schwannomas (VSs), schwannomas of other cranial, spinal and cutaneous nerves, cranial and spinal meningiomas and/or other central nervous system (CNS) tumours (e.g., ependymomas, astrocytomas). Additional features include early onset cataracts, optic nerve sheath meningiomas, retinal hamartomas, dermal schwannomas (i.e., NF2-plaques), and (few) café-au-lait spots. Clinically, NF2 children fall into two main groups: (1) congenital NF2 - with bilateral VSs detected as early as the first days to months of life, which can be stable/asymptomatic for one-two decades and suddenly progress; and (2) severe pre-pubertal (Wishart type) NF2- with multiple (and rapidly progressive) CNS tumours other-than-VS, which usually present first, years before VSs [vs. the classical adult (Gardner type) NF2, with bilateral VSs presenting in young adulthood, sometimes as the only disease feature]. Some individuals can develop unilateral VS associated with ipsilateral meningiomas or multiple schwannomas localised to one part of the peripheral nervous system [i.e., mosaic NF2] or multiple non-VS, non-intradermal cranial, spinal and peripheral schwannomas (histologically proven) [schwannomatosis]. NF2 is caused by mutations in the NF2 gene at chromosome 22q12.1, which encodes for a protein called merlin or schwannomin, most similar to the exrin-readixin-moesin (ERM) proteins; mosaicNF2 is due to mosaic phenomena for the NF2 gene, whilst schwannomatosis is caused by coupled germ-line and mosaic mutations either in the SMARCB1 gene [SWNTS1; MIM # 162091] or the LZTR1 gene [SWNTS2; MIM # 615670] both falling within the 22q region and the NF2 gene. Data driven from in vitro and animal studies on the merlin pathway [e.g., post-translational and upstream/downstream regulation] allowed biologically targeted treatment strategies [e.g., Lapatinib, Erlotinib, Bevacizumab] aimed to multiple tumour shrinkage and/or regression and tumour arrest of progression with functional improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ruggieri
- Unit of Rare Diseases of the Nervous System in Childhood, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Catania, Italy
| | - A D Praticò
- Unit of Rare Diseases of the Nervous System in Childhood, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Pediatrics and Child Neuropsychiatry, University of Catania, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Italy
| | - A Serra
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - L Maiolino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - S Cocuzza
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - P Di Mauro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - L Licciardello
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - P Milone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Radiology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - G Privitera
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Radiology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - G Belfiore
- Unit of Paediatric Radiology, AOU "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", Catania, Italy
| | - M Di Pietro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "G. Ingrassia", Institute of Ophthalmology, University of Catania, Italy
| | - F Di Raimondo
- Division of Hematology, AOU "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Italy
| | - A Romano
- Division of Hematology, AOU "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Italy
| | - A Chiarenza
- Division of Hematology, AOU "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Italy
| | - M Muglia
- Unit of Genetics, Institute of Neurological Sciences, National Research Council, Piano Lago di Mangone, Italy
| | - A Polizzi
- National Centre for Rare Disease, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.,Institute of Neurological Sciences, National Research Council, Catania, Italy
| | - D G Evans
- Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lloyd SKW, King AT, Rutherford SA, Hammerbeck-Ward CL, Freeman SRM, Mawman DJ, O'Driscoll M, Evans DG. Hearing optimisation in neurofibromatosis type 2: A systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2017; 42:1329-1337. [PMID: 28371358 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is common for patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 to develop bilateral profound hearing loss hearing loss, and this is one of the main determinants of quality of life in this patient group. OBJECTIVES The aim of this systematic review was to review the current literature regarding hearing outcomes of treatments for vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 including conservative and medical management, radiotherapy, hearing preservation surgery and auditory implantation in order to determine the most effective way of preserving or rehabilitating hearing. SEARCH STRATEGY A MESH search in PubMed using search terms (('Neurofibromatosis 2' [Mesh]) AND 'Neuroma, Acoustic'[Mesh]) AND 'Hearing Loss' [Mesh] was performed. A search using keywords was also performed. Studies with adequate hearing outcome data were included. With the exception of the cochlear implant studies (cohort size was very small), case studies were excluded. EVALUATION METHOD The GRADE system was used to assess quality of publication. Formal statistical analysis of data was not performed because of very heterogenous data reporting. RESULTS Conservative management offers the best chance of hearing preservation in stable tumours. The use of bevacizumab probably improves the likelihood of hearing preservation in growing tumours in the short term and is probably more effective than hearing preservation surgery and radiotherapy in preserving hearing. Of the hearing preservation interventions, hearing preservation surgery probably offers better hearing preservation rates than radiotherapy for small tumours but recurrence rates for hearing preservation surgery were high. For patients with profound hearing loss, cochlear implantation provides significantly better auditory outcomes than auditory brainstem implantation. Patients with untreated stable tumours are likely to achieve the best outcomes from cochlear implantation. Those who have had their tumours treated with surgery or radiotherapy do not gain as much benefit from cochlear implantation than those with untreated tumours. CONCLUSIONS This review summarises the current literature related to hearing preservation/rehabilitation in patients with NF2. Whilst it provides indicative data, the quality of the data was low and should be interpreted with care. It is also important to consider that the management of vestibular schwannomas in NF2 is complex and decision-making is determined by many factors, not just the need to preserve hearing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K W Lloyd
- Department of Otolaryngology, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Department of Otolaryngology, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - A T King
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S A Rutherford
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - C L Hammerbeck-Ward
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S R M Freeman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.,Department of Otolaryngology, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - D J Mawman
- Richard Ramsden Auditory Implant Centre, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M O'Driscoll
- Richard Ramsden Auditory Implant Centre, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Department of Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Evans DG, Woodward ER, Howell SJ, Verhoef S, Howell A, Lalloo F. Risk algorithms that include pathology adjustment for HER2 amplification need to make further downward adjustments in likelihood scores. Fam Cancer 2016; 16:173-179. [PMID: 27796713 PMCID: PMC5357509 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9942-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
To assess the need for adjustment in the likelihood of germline BRCA1/2 mutations in women with HER2+ breast cancers. We analysed primary mutation screens on women with breast cancer with unequivocal HER2 overexpression and assessed the likelihood of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations by age, oestrogen receptor status and Manchester score. Of 1111 primary BRCA screens with confirmed HER2 status only 4/161 (2.5%) of women with HER2 amplification had a BRCA1 mutation identified and 5/161 (3.1%) a BRCA2 mutation. The pathology adjusted Manchester score between 10 and 19% and 20%+ thresholds resulted in a detection rate of only 6.5 and 15% respectively. BOADICEA examples appeared to make even less downward adjustment. There is a very low detection rate of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in women with HER2 amplified breast cancers. The Manchester score and BOADICEA do not make sufficient downward adjustment for HER2 amplification. For unaffected women, assessment of breast cancer risk and BRCA1/2 probability should take into account the pathology of the most relevant close relative. Unaffected women undergoing mutation testing for BRCA1/2 should be advised that there is limited reassurance from a negative test result if their close relative had a HER2+ breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. .,Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. .,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK. .,Manchester Breast Centre, School of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.
| | - E R Woodward
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - S J Howell
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, School of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - S Verhoef
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - A Howell
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, School of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - F Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ostrow KL, Bergner AL, Blakeley J, Evans DG, Ferner R, Friedman JM, Harris GJ, Jordan JT, Korf B, Langmead S, Leschziner G, Mautner V, Merker VL, Papi L, Plotkin SR, Slopis JM, Smith MJ, Stemmer-Rachamimov A, Yohay K, Belzberg AJ. Creation of an international registry to support discovery in schwannomatosis. Am J Med Genet A 2016; 173:407-413. [PMID: 27759912 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Schwannomatosis is a tumor suppressor syndrome that causes multiple tumors along peripheral nerves. Formal diagnostic criteria were first published in 2005. Variability in clinical presentation and a relative lack of awareness of the syndrome have contributed to difficulty recognizing affected individuals and accurately describing the natural history of the disorder. Many critical questions such as the mutations underlying schwannomatosis, genotype-phenotype correlations, inheritance patterns, pathologic diagnosis of schwannomatosis-associated schwannomas, tumor burden in schwannomatosis, the incidence of malignancy, and the effectiveness of current, or new treatments remain unanswered. A well-curated registry of schwannomatosis patients is needed to facilitate research in field. An international consortium of clinicians and scientists across multiple disciplines with expertise in schwannomatosis was established and charged with the task of designing and populating a schwannomatosis patient registry. The International Schwannomatosis Registry (ISR) was built around key data points that allow confirmation of the diagnosis and identification of potential research subjects to advance research to further the knowledge base for schwannomatosis. A registry with 389 participants enrolled to date has been established. Twenty-three additional subjects are pending review. A formal process has been established for scientific investigators to propose research projects, identify eligible subjects, and seek collaborators from ISR sites. Research collaborations have been created using the information collected by the registry and are currently being conducted. The ISR is a platform from which multiple research endeavors can be launched, facilitating connections between affected individuals interested in participating in research and researchers actively investigating a variety of aspects of schwannomatosis. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K L Ostrow
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - A L Bergner
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - J Blakeley
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - D G Evans
- University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | - R Ferner
- Guy's Hospital in London, London, England
| | - J M Friedman
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - G J Harris
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J T Jordan
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - B Korf
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - S Langmead
- Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - V Mautner
- University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - V L Merker
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - L Papi
- University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - S R Plotkin
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - J M Slopis
- MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - M J Smith
- University of Manchester, Manchester, England
| | | | - K Yohay
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Evans DG, Harkness EF, Howell A, Wilson M, Hurley E, Holmen MM, Tharmaratnam KU, Hagen AI, Lim Y, Maxwell AJ, Moller P. Intensive breast screening in BRCA2 mutation carriers is associated with reduced breast cancer specific and all cause mortality. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2016; 14:8. [PMID: 27087880 PMCID: PMC4832454 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-016-0048-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The addition of annual MRI screening to mammography has heightened optimism that intensive screening along with improved treatments may substantially improve life expectancy of women at high risk of breast cancer. However, survival data from BRCA2 mutation carriers undergoing intensive combined breast screening are scarce. Methods We have collated the results of screening with either annual mammography or mammography with MRI in female BRCA2 mutation carriers in Manchester and Oslo and use a Manchester control group of BRCA2 mutation carriers who had their first breast cancer diagnosed without intensive screening. Results Eighty-seven BRCA2 mutation carriers had undergone combined (n = 34) or mammography (n = 53) screening compared to 274 without such intensive screening. Ten year breast cancer specific survival was 100 % in the combined group (95 % CI 82.5–100 %) and 85.5 % (95 % CI 72.6–98.4 %) in the mammography group compared to 74.6 % (95 % CI 66.6–82.6 %) in the control group. Better survival was driven by lymph node status (negative in 67 % of screened vs 39 % of unscreened women; p < 0.001) and a significantly greater proportion of intensively screened women had invasive breast cancers <2 cm at diagnosis (74.6 % vs 50.4 %; p = 0.002). Conclusion Intensive combined breast cancer screening with annual MRI and mammography appears to improve survival from breast cancer in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Data from larger groups are required to confirm the effectiveness of combined screening in BRCA2 carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT UK ; Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester Institute of Human Development, Central, Manchester Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL UK
| | - E F Harkness
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT UK ; Centre for Imaging Sciences, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - A Howell
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - M Wilson
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - E Hurley
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - M M Holmen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - K U Tharmaratnam
- Department of Mathematics, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | - A I Hagen
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Y Lim
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - A J Maxwell
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre and Nightingale Breast Screening Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - P Moller
- Inherited Cancer Research Group, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Department for Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ; Department of Tumour Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway ; Department of Human Medicine, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Evans DG, Bowers N, Burkitt-Wright E, Miles E, Garg S, Scott-Kitching V, Penman-Splitt M, Dobbie A, Howard E, Ealing J, Vassalo G, Wallace AJ, Newman W, Huson SM. Comprehensive RNA Analysis of the NF1 Gene in Classically Affected NF1 Affected Individuals Meeting NIH Criteria has High Sensitivity and Mutation Negative Testing is Reassuring in Isolated Cases With Pigmentary Features Only. EBioMedicine 2016; 7:212-20. [PMID: 27322474 PMCID: PMC4909377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2016] [Revised: 04/05/2016] [Accepted: 04/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The detection rate for identifying the underlying mutation in neurocutaneous syndromes is affected by the sensitivity of the mutation test and the heterogeneity of the disease based on the diagnostic criteria. Neurofibromatosis type (NF1) has been defined for 29 years by the National Institutes for Health (NIH) criteria which include ≥ 6 Café au Lait macules (CAL) as a defining criterion. The discovery of SPRED1 as a cause of Legius syndrome which is manifested by CAL, freckling and learning difficulties has introduced substantial heterogeneity to the NIH criteria. Methods We have defined the sensitivity of comprehensive RNA analysis on blood of presumed NF1 patients meeting NIH criteria with at least one nonpigmentary criterion and determined the proportion of children with ≥ 6 CAL and no family history that has an NF1 or SPRED1 genetic variant. RNA analysis was carried out from 04/2009–12/2015 on 361 NF1 patients. Findings A presumed causative NF1 mutation was found in 166/171 (97.08%–95% CI 94.56–99.6%) of familial cases and 182/190 (95.8%–95% CI 92.93–98.65%) sporadic de novo cases. Two of thirteen (15%) mutation negative individuals had dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour (DNET) compared to 2/348 (0.6%) with an NF1 variant (p = 0.007). No SPRED1 variants were found in the thirteen individuals with no NF1 variant. Of seventy-one individuals with ≥ 6 CAL and no non-pigmentary criterion aged 0–20 years, 47 (66.2%) had an NF1 variant six (8.5%) a SPRED1 variant and 18 (25.3%) no disease causing variant. Using the 95.8% detection rate the likelihood of a child with ≥ 6 CAL having constitutional NF1 drops from 2/3 to 1/9 after negative RNA analysis. Interpretation RNA analysis in individuals with presumed NF1 has high sensitivity and includes a small subset with DNET without an NF1 variant. Furthermore negative analysis for NF1/SPRED1 provides strong reassurance to children with ≥ 6 CAL that they are unlikely to have NF1. RNA testing for NF1 mutations has very high sensitivity (c.96%) and is significantly more sensitive than DNA testing. Mosaicism is not a major feature in those with classical NF1. Around two thirds of children with just 6 or more café au lait spots have NF1, 8% Legius syndrome. Patients with normal RNA testing who meet NF1 criteria but also have a DNET may have a fault in a yet to be identified gene.
Identifying the underlying genetic mutation is of benefit to patients and their families as it clarifies the diagnosis, can give information on the likely disease course and allow predictive testing in pregnancy and early childhood. The present study has shown that testing of blood RNA has very high sensitivity (96%) and allows substantial reassurance to parents whose children have multiple Café au lait birthmarks that they are unlikely to have the poorer outcomes of NF1 if they test negative. Furthermore the study suggests that a different mechanism may underlie the association of NF1 features and a rare benign brain tumour called DNET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK.
| | - N Bowers
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - E Burkitt-Wright
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - E Miles
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - S Garg
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - V Scott-Kitching
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - M Penman-Splitt
- Northern Genetics Service, Institute for Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 3BZ, UK
| | - A Dobbie
- Yorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds LS7 4SA, UK
| | - E Howard
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - J Ealing
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - G Vassalo
- Paediatric Neurology, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - A J Wallace
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - W Newman
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9WL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - S M Huson
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Eccles DM, Li N, Handwerker R, Maishman T, Copson ER, Durcan LT, Gerty SM, Jones L, Evans DG, Haywood L, Campbell I. Genetic testing in a cohort of young patients with HER2-amplified breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2016; 27:467-73. [PMID: 26681682 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 11/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young age at diagnosis for breast cancer raises the question of genetic susceptibility. We explored breast cancer susceptibility genes testing on ≤40-year-old patients with HER2-amplified invasive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were selected from a large UK cohort study. The inclusion criterion was age ≤40 at diagnosis with confirmed HER2-amplified breast cancer. The probability of finding a BRCA gene mutation was calculated based on family history. Genetic testing used was either clinical testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2, with a subset also tested for TP53 mutations, or research-based testing using a typical panel comprising 17 breast cancer susceptibility genes (CSGs) including BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53. RESULTS Of the 591 eligible patients, clinical testing results were available for 133 cases and an additional 263 cases had panel testing results. BRCA testing across 396 cases found 8 BRCA2 (2%) and 6 BRCA1 (2%) pathogenic mutations. Of the 304 patients tested for TP53 mutations, overall 9 (3%) had deleterious TP53 mutations. Of the 396 patients, 101 (26%) met clinical criteria for BRCA testing (≥10% probability), among whom 11% had pathogenic BRCA mutations (6 BRCA2, 5 BRCA1). Where the probability was calculated to be <10%, only 4 of 295 (1%) patients had BRCA mutations. Among the 59 patients who had TP53 testing meeting the 10% threshold, 7 had mutations (12%). Likely functionally deleterious mutations in 14 lower penetrance CSGs were present in 12 of 263 (5%) panel-tested patients. CONCLUSION Patients aged <41 at diagnosis with HER2+ breast cancer and no family history of breast cancer can be reassured that they have a low chance of being a high-risk gene carrier. If there is a strong family history, not only BRCA but also TP53 gene testing should be considered. The clinical utility of testing lower penetrance CSGs remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - N Li
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia Cancer Biology Research Center Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - R Handwerker
- Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - T Maishman
- Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - E R Copson
- Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - L T Durcan
- Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S M Gerty
- Faculty of Medicine and Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - L Jones
- Barts Cancer Institute (CRUK) and Centre for Tumour Biology, Queen Mary University of London, London
| | - D G Evans
- Genomic Medicine Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester and St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - L Haywood
- Barts Cancer Institute (CRUK) and Centre for Tumour Biology, Queen Mary University of London, London
| | - I Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Australia Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is a complex disease characterized by the development of multiple schwannomas, especially vestibular schwannomas, as well as other types of benign tumours including meningioma and spinal ependymoma. Due to its multisystem nature, the management of NF2 requires a multidisciplinary approach. In England, the delivery of care for NF2 patients has been centralized to four-"hub" centres in Manchester, Cambridge, Oxford and London each having associated "spoke" centres. Each centre has a core multidisciplinary team consisting of genetics, otolaryngology, neurosurgery, paediatrics, neurology, audiology, radiology, psychology, physiotherapy, specialist nurses and administrative staff. In addition, the core team has access to plastic surgery, ophthalmology, peripheral nerve surgery and adult and paediatric oncology. There are weekly multidisciplinary clinics each with six to eight patients. Each patient is discussed during a team meeting and the management decisions that are made are then discussed with the patients. All patients are reviewed at least annually and have annual head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and three yearly spinal MRI. Annual audiological assessment is performed. Cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation are offered if indicated. Surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery and bevacizumab therapy are available for the management of intracranial and spinal tumours. The integration of the service in England has provided significant benefits to patient care and, in the long term, will provide robust patient outcome data that will provide an evidence base to assist in optimizing management of patients with NF2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S K Lloyd
- Institute of Cancer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK; Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.
| | - D G Evans
- Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK; Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gerkes EH, Fock JM, den Dunnen WFA, van Belzen MJ, van der Lans CA, Hoving EW, Fakkert IE, Smith MJ, Evans DG, Olderode-Berends MJW. A heritable form of SMARCE1-related meningiomas with important implications for follow-up and family screening. Neurogenetics 2016; 17:83-9. [PMID: 26803492 PMCID: PMC4794526 DOI: 10.1007/s10048-015-0472-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/22/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Childhood meningiomas are rare. Recently, a new hereditary tumor predisposition syndrome has been discovered, resulting in an increased risk for spinal and intracranial clear cell meningiomas (CCMs) in young patients. Heterozygous loss-of-function germline mutations in the SMARCE1 gene are causative, giving rise to an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern. We report on an extended family with a pediatric CCM patient and an adult CCM patient and several asymptomatic relatives carrying a germline SMARCE1 mutation, and discuss difficulties in genetic counseling for this heritable condition. Because of the few reported cases so far, the lifetime risk of developing meningiomas for SMARCE1 mutation carriers is unclear and the complete tumor spectrum is unknown. There is no surveillance guideline for asymptomatic carriers nor a long-term follow-up recommendation for SMARCE1-related CCM patients as yet. Until more information is available about the penetrance and tumor spectrum of the condition, we propose the following screening advice for asymptomatic SMARCE1 mutation carriers: neurological examination and MRI of the brain and spine, yearly from diagnosis until the age of 18 and once every 3 years thereafter, or in between if there are clinical symptoms. This advice can also be used for long-term patient follow-up. More data is needed to optimize this proposed screening advice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E H Gerkes
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - J M Fock
- Department of Neurology, Child neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - W F A den Dunnen
- Department of Pathology and Medical Biology, Pathology division, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M J van Belzen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - C A van der Lans
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - E W Hoving
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - I E Fakkert
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M J Smith
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), St. Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Institute of Human Development, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre (MAHSC), St. Mary's Hospital, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - M J W Olderode-Berends
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Basu NN, Littlechild S, Barr L, Ross GL, Evans DG. Attitudes to contralateral risk reducing mastectomy among breast and plastic surgeons in England. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2016; 98:121-7. [PMID: 26741657 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rates of contralateral risk reducing mastectomy (CRRM) are rising despite a paucity of data to support this practice. Surgeons work as part of the multidisciplinary team (MDT). They may counsel women on these requests without the benefit of established guidelines or agreed protocol. This study assessed the practices and perceptions of breast and plastic surgeons in England on CRRM. METHODS A postal questionnaire was sent to 455 breast and 364 plastic surgeons practising in England. Basic demographics, trends in CRRM, risk assessment, role of the MDT and knowledge base were assessed. RESULTS The response rate among breast surgeons was 48.3% (220/455) and 12.6% (46/364) among plastic surgeons. Nearly half (44%) of the respondents felt there had been an increase in rates of CRRM over the last three years. Seventy-one per cent of those surveyed performed 1-5 CRRMs annually while sixteen per cent did not perform this procedure at all. A third (32%) of respondents correctly quoted their patients an annual risk of 0.5-0.7%. Funding was refused in 4% of cases and 43% of the surgeons felt that in the future they would have to apply to relevant clinical commissioning groups. Over half (58%) of all respondents reported that decisions for CRRM are always discussed in the MDT meeting but 6% stated that these cases are never discussed by the MDT. BRCA mutation was perceived as the main risk factor for contralateral breast cancer by 81% of respondents. Surgeons felt that women requested CRRM mainly to alleviate anxiety. The next most common reasons were carriage of BRCA mutation and a desire to have reconstructions match. CONCLUSIONS A wide variation of surgical practices and perceptions exist in assessing women for CRRM. Guidelines to standardise practices are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N N Basu
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK.,University of Manchester , UK.,Queen Elizabeth Hospital , Birmingham , UK
| | - S Littlechild
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK
| | - L Barr
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK
| | | | - D G Evans
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre , Manchester , UK.,University of Manchester , UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Evans DG, Maxwell AJ. MRI Screening in Women With a Personal History of Breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015; 108:djv373. [DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
34
|
Basu NN, Ross GL, Evans DG, Barr L. The Manchester guidelines for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13:237. [PMID: 26245209 PMCID: PMC4527227 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-015-0638-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Accepted: 06/30/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Rates of contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) are rising, despite a decreasing global incidence of contralateral breast cancer. Reasons for requesting this procedure are complex, and we have previously shown a variable practice amongst breast and plastic surgeons in England. We propose a protocol, based on a published systematic review, a national UK survey and the Manchester experience of CRRM. Methods We reviewed the literature for risk factors for contralateral breast cancer and have devised a 5-step process that includes history taking, calculating contralateral breast cancer risk, cooling off period/counselling, multi-disciplinary assessment and consent. Members of the multi-disciplinary team included the breast surgeon, plastic surgeon and geneticist, who formulated guidelines. Results A simple formula to calculate the life-time risk of contralateral breast cancer has been devised. This allows stratification of breast cancer patients into different risk-groups: low, above average, moderate and high risk. Recommendations vary according to different risk groups. Conclusion These guidelines are a useful tool for clinicians counselling women requesting CRRM. Risk assessment is mandatory in this group of patients, and our formula allows evidence-based recommendations to be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narendra Nath Basu
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. .,Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - G L Ross
- The Institute of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,St. Mary's Hospital, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - L Barr
- Nightingale and Genesis Prevention Centre, University Hospital South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Higgs JE, Harkness EF, Bowers NL, Howard E, Wallace AJ, Lalloo F, Newman WG, Evans DG. TheBRCA2polymorphic stop codon: stuff or nonsense? J Med Genet 2015; 52:642-5. [DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 05/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
36
|
Evans DG, Thomas S, Caunt J, Roberts L, Howell A, Wilson M, Fox R, Sibbering DM, Moss S, Wallis MG, Eccles DM, Duffy S. Mammographic surveillance in women aged 35-39 at enhanced familial risk of breast cancer (FH02). Fam Cancer 2015; 13:13-21. [PMID: 23733252 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-013-9661-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Although there have been encouraging recent studies showing a potential benefit from annual mammography in women aged 40-49 years of age with an elevated breast cancer risk due to family history there is little evidence of efficacy in women aged <40 years of age. A prospective study (FH02) has been developed to assess the efficacy of mammography screening in women aged 35-39 years of age with a lifetime breast cancer risk of ≥ 17 % who are not receiving MRI screening. Retrospective analyses from five centres with robust recall systems identified 47 breast cancers (n = 12 in situ) with an interval cancer rate of 15/47 (32%). Invasive tumour size, lymph node status and current vital status were all significantly better than in two control groups of unscreened women (including those with a family history) recruited to the POSH study. Further evaluation of the prospective arm of FH02 is required to assess the potential added value of digital mammography and the cancer incidence rates in moderate and high risk women in order to inform cost effectiveness analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Evans DG, Freeman S, Gokhale C, Wallace A, Lloyd SK, Axon P, Ward CL, Rutherford S, King A, Huson SM, Ramsden RT. Bilateral vestibular schwannomas in older patients: NF2 or chance? J Med Genet 2015; 52:422-4. [PMID: 25725045 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2015] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) is an autosomal dominant condition with high spontaneous mutation rate which predisposes to the development of multiple nerve sheath tumours (schwannomas), meningiomas and ependymoma. The cardinal feature and main diagnostic criterion for the diagnosis of NF2 remains the development of bilateral vestibular schwannoma (BVS). With increasing use of MRI screening the possibility of a 'chance' diagnosis of BVS has been mooted with a potential frequency of one in two million people in their lifetime. Until now, however, no evidence for such an event has been published. We aimed to demonstrate that chance occurrence can occur and to estimate its frequency among those with just BVS late in life. METHODS Two vestibular schwannomas from the same patient were DNA sequenced and underwent loss of heterozygosity analysis. RESULTS We show that a man who developed BVS, at ages 52 and 67 years developed these tumours sporadically by demonstrating that there were no molecular events in common between the two tumours. Furthermore from a database of over 1200 patients with NF2, we have estimated that ~25% of cases of BVS over 50 years and 50% over 70 years of age where no other features of NF2 are present represent a chance occurrence rather than due to an underlying mosaic or constitutional NF2 mutation. CONCLUSIONS Patients presenting with BVS later in life should be appraised of the potential likelihood they may not have NF2 and the resultant further reduction in risks of transmission to offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D G Evans
- Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - S Freeman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - C Gokhale
- Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - A Wallace
- Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - S K Lloyd
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - P Axon
- Depertment of Otolaryngology, Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - C L Ward
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Rutherford
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - A King
- Department of Neurosurgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S M Huson
- Genomic Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | - R T Ramsden
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Institute of Human Development, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Newton K, Green K, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Hill J. Colonoscopy screening compliance and outcomes in patients with Lynch syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17:38-46. [PMID: 25213040 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2014] [Accepted: 07/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM Colonic surveillance reduces the lifetime risk of colorectal cancer in patients with Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) from 60 to 80% to 10% and confers a 7-year survival advantage. The British Society of Gastroenterologists recommends colonoscopy at least every 2 years from the age of 25. Currently in the UK, genetic diagnosis is made by a regional genetics service, and screening recommendations are made to the referring clinician. The aim of this study was to investigate compliance with and the effectiveness of large bowel surveillance in Lynch syndrome. METHOD A retrospective longitudinal study of Lynch syndrome mutation carriers on the Regional Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry under and not under screening was conducted. To investigate screening compliance, patients were included if they were alive at the start of the study. Data were gathered on timeliness, quality and outcome of screening. To examine the effectiveness of screening, the cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer was estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves and the screened population compared with patients not being screened. RESULTS A total of 227 Lynch syndrome mutation carriers were under screening at 26 hospitals. We assessed 439 colonoscopies for timeliness, of which 68% were compliant (interval < 27 months). Compliance on the 1 November 2011 was 87%. The cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer to the age of 70 was 25% (95% CI 17-32%) in the surveillance population and 81% (95% CI 78-84%) in 689 mutation-positive patients not being screened (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Overall, 68% of colonoscopies were on time. The incidence of colorectal cancer was greatly reduced by screening but remained significant. Patients with Lynch syndrome need proactive surveillance management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Newton
- Department of General Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Sivagnanam L, Hufton A, Berks M, Harkness E, Lim Y, Maxwell A, Wilson M, Bydder M, Gadde S, Evans DG, Howell A, Stavrinos P, Astley S. PB.23. Breast density in previous screening mammograms of women with and without breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2014. [PMCID: PMC4244072 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
40
|
Otsuka M, Harkness E, Chen X, Moschidis E, Bydder M, Gadde S, Lim Y, Maxwell A, Evans DG, Howell A, Stavrinos P, Wilson M, Astley S. Local breast density at lesion sites in diagnostic and previous screening mammograms. Breast Cancer Res 2014. [PMCID: PMC4243105 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
41
|
Daniels J, Harkness E, Lim Y, Maxwell A, Morris J, Stavrinos P, Wilson M, Bydder M, Evans DG, Howell A. PB.24. How does volumetric breast density change with time? Breast Cancer Res 2014. [PMCID: PMC4243094 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
|
42
|
Ali FR, Collier NJ, Evans DG, Costello M, Webster S, Lear JT. National survey of patients with Gorlin syndrome highlights poor awareness, multiple treatments and profound psychosocial impact of disease. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014; 30:371-3. [PMID: 25351930 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- F R Ali
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Dermatology Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - N J Collier
- Dermatology Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Department of Medical Genetics, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | - J T Lear
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Dermatology Department, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Newton K, Jorgensen NM, Wallace AJ, Buchanan DD, Lalloo F, McMahon RFT, Hill J, Evans DG. Tumour MLH1 promoter region methylation testing is an effective prescreen for Lynch Syndrome (HNPCC). J Med Genet 2014; 51:789-96. [PMID: 25280751 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Lynch syndrome (LS) patients have DNA mismatch repair deficiency and up to 80% lifetime risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Screening of mutation carriers reduces CRC incidence and mortality. Selection for constitutional mutation testing relies on family history (Amsterdam and Bethesda Guidelines) and tumour-derived biomarkers. Initial biomarker analysis uses mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability. Abnormalities in either identify mismatch repair deficiency but do not differentiate sporadic epigenetic defects, due to MLH1 promoter region methylation (13% of CRCs) from LS (4% of CRCs). A diagnostic biomarker capable of making this distinction would be valuable. This study compared two biomarkers in tumours with mismatch repair deficiency; quantification of methylation of the MLH1 promoter region using a novel assay and BRAF c.1799T>A, p.(Val600Glu) mutation status in the identification of constitutional mutations. METHODS Tumour DNA was extracted (formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, FFPE tissue) and pyrosequencing used to test for MLH1 promoter methylation and presence of the BRAF c.1799T>A, p.(Val600Glu) mutation 71 CRCs from individuals with pathogenic MLH1 mutations and 73 CRCs with sporadic MLH1 loss. Specificity and sensitivity was compared. FINDINGSS Unmethylated MLH1 promoter: sensitivity 94.4% (95% CI 86.2% to 98.4%), specificity 87.7% (95% CI 77.9% to 94.2%), Wild-type BRAF (codon 600): sensitivity 65.8% (95% CI 53.7% to 76.5%), specificity 98.6% (95% CI 92.4% to 100.0%) for the identification of those with pathogenic MLH1 mutations. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative MLH1 promoter region methylation using pyrosequencing is superior to BRAF codon 600 mutation status in identifying constitutional mutations in mismatch repair deficient tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Newton
- Department of General Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - N M Jorgensen
- Genomic Diagnostics Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - A J Wallace
- Genomic Diagnostics Laboratory, Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - D D Buchanan
- Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Queensland, Australia Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - F Lalloo
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - R F T McMahon
- Department of Histopathology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK Manchester Medical School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - J Hill
- Department of General Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Saint Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Donnelly LS, Evans DG, Wiseman J, Fox J, Greenhalgh R, Affen J, Juraskova I, Stavrinos P, Dawe S, Cuzick J, Howell A. Uptake of tamoxifen in consecutive premenopausal women under surveillance in a high-risk breast cancer clinic. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:1681-7. [PMID: 24594998 PMCID: PMC3974072 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2013] [Revised: 01/31/2014] [Accepted: 02/01/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised trials of tamoxifen versus placebo indicate that tamoxifen reduces breast cancer risk by approximately 33%, yet uptake is low. Approximately 10% of women in our clinic entered the IBIS-I prevention trial. We assess the uptake of tamoxifen in a consecutive series of premenopausal women not in a trial and explore the reasons for uptake through interviews. METHODS All eligible women between 33 and 46 years at ≥17% lifetime risk of breast cancer and undergoing annual mammography in our service were invited to take a 5-year course of tamoxifen. Reasons for accepting (n=15) or declining (n=15) were explored using semi-structured interviews. RESULTS Of 1279 eligible women, 136 (10.6%) decided to take tamoxifen. Women >40 years (74 out of 553 (13.4%)) and those at higher non-BRCA-associated risk were more likely to accept tamoxifen (129 out of 1109 (11.6%)). Interviews highlighted four themes surrounding decision making: perceived impact of side effects, the impact of others' experience on beliefs about tamoxifen, tamoxifen as a 'cancer drug', and daily reminder of cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS Tamoxifen uptake was similar to previously ascertained uptake in a randomised controlled trial (IBIS-I). Concerns were similar in women who did or did not accept tamoxifen. Decision making appeared to be embedded in the experience of significant others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L S Donnelly
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
- Department of Genomic Medicine, MAHSC, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
| | - J Wiseman
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - J Fox
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - R Greenhalgh
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - J Affen
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - I Juraskova
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-Making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - P Stavrinos
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, University of Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - S Dawe
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - J Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - A Howell
- Nightingale and Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Brentnall AR, Evans DG, Cuzick J. Distribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UK. Br J Cancer 2014; 110:827-8. [PMID: 24448363 PMCID: PMC3915120 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A R Brentnall
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - D G Evans
- Genesis Breast Cancer Prevention Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Trust, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, UK
| | - J Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, Barts and The London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Barrow P, Khan M, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Hill J. Systematic review of the impact of registration and screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in familial adenomatous polyposis and Lynch syndrome. Br J Surg 2014; 100:1719-31. [PMID: 24227356 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The British Society of Gastroenterology recommends that all familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and Lynch syndrome (LS) families are screened in the context of a registry. This systematic review was performed to appraise the published evidence for registration and screening in relation to colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. METHODS Five electronic databases were searched using a combination of medical subject heading terms and free-text keywords. Titles and abstracts were scrutinized by two independent reviewers. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies describing CRC incidence and/or mortality in patients with FAP or LS, with comparison of either: screened and unscreened patients, or time periods before and after establishment of the registry. RESULTS Of 4668 abstracts identified, 185 full-text articles were selected; 43 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No randomized clinical trial evidence was identified. For FAP, 33 of 33 studies described a significant reduction of CRC incidence and mortality with registration and screening. For LS, nine of ten studies described a reduction of CRC incidence and mortality with registration and screening. Five studies (FAP, 2; LS, 3) provided evidence for complete prevention of CRC-related deaths during surveillance. Clinical and statistical heterogeneity prevented pooling of data for meta-analysis. CONCLUSION Studies consistently report that registration and screening result in a reduction of CRC incidence and mortality in patients with FAP and LS (level 2a evidence, grade B recommendation). Funding and managerial support for hereditary CRC registries should be made available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Barrow
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Basu NN, Evans DG, Barr L. Prophylactic mastectomy and breast cancer-- reply. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2013; 74:595. [PMID: 24273773 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2013.74.10.595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
48
|
Sergeant JC, Wilson M, Barr N, Beetles U, Boggis C, Bundred S, Bydder M, Gadde S, Hurley E, Jain A, Lim Y, Lord L, Reece V, Evans DG, Howell A, Astley SM. PB.17: Inter-observer agreement in visual analogue scale assessment of percentage breast density. Breast Cancer Res 2013. [PMCID: PMC3980893 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
|
49
|
Sergeant JC, Sperrin M, Bardwell L, Buchan I, Evans DG, Howell A, Astley SM. PB.11: Identifying women at high risk of developing breast cancer: implications of adjusting for inter-observer variability in visual analogue scale assessment of percentage breast density. Breast Cancer Res 2013. [PMCID: PMC3980277 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|
50
|
Dunn R, Astley S, Bydder M, Evans DG, Howell A, Sergeant J, Maxwell AJ. PB.44: Audit of interval cancers from family history breast screening. Breast Cancer Res 2013. [PMCID: PMC3980311 DOI: 10.1186/bcr3544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
|