Mechanical valve thrombosis: current management and differences between guidelines

All foreign bodies inserted in the circulatory system are thrombogenic and require temporary or lifelong antithrombotic therapies to prevent thrombosis. The adequate level of anticoagulation during the first few months determines the long-term durability, particularly for mechanical prostheses;2 however also for biological valves. Suboptimal anticoagulation is the most frequent source of mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT). The patient's clinical presentation decides how mechanical prosthetic valve obstruction is managed. If the mechanical valve thrombosis is obstructive and the patient is in a critical condition with hemodynamic instability, an immediate surgical intervention should be performed. The thrombolytic treatment is an option for left mechanical valve thrombosis in patients who have high surgical risk and no contraindications and also for right heart valve thrombosis. In non-obstructive thrombosis on the mechanical valve, patients can be asymptomatic, requiring optimization of the anticoagulant treatment. Both obstructive and non-obstructive thrombus generated on the mechanical prosthesis can result in embolic events. After anticoagulant treatment, if the thrombus persists the indication is for thrombolytic treatment or redo surgery. Pannus can also cause obstruction of the prosthesis for which surgical treatment is the only option. All these clinical scenarios seem to have a simple solution in terms of surgery vs thrombolysis vs effective anticoagulation, but the real-world clinical experience could be different. For example, the same patient with some common comorbidities, non-obstructive mechanical valve thrombosis, and symptomatic only by repeated systemic embolizations, can go through all these 3 therapeutic options, due to MVT's unpredictable nature. Therefore, treatment indications can intersect both on the time axis and depending on the patient's clinical status and the expertise of the center where he is hospitalized. Moreover, the European and American guidelines show subtle but important differences. The aim of this review was to compare these differences, comment on recent studies and evidence gaps, propose a more pragmatic algorithm combining all current indications, and highlight important research directions for this disease that has dominated already the cardiovascular landscape for more than five decades, but for which there have been no significant recent changes in management.

Diagnosis of Left-Sided Mechanical Prosthetic Valve Thrombosis: A Pictorial Review

Although transcatheter valve therapy is rapidly evolving, surgical valve replacement is still required in many patients with severe left-side valve stenosis or regurgitation, the mechanical bi-leaflet heart valve being the standard prosthesis type in younger patients. Moreover, the prevalence of valvular heart disease is steadily increasing, especially in industrialized countries, and the problem of lifelong efficient anticoagulation of these patients remains fundamental, especially in the context where vitamin K antagonists continue to be the current standard of anticoagulation despite a level of oscillating anticoagulation. In this setting, avoiding prosthetic valve thrombosis after surgery is the number one objective for both the patient and the responsible physicians. Although rare, this complication is life threatening, with the sudden onset of acute cardiac failure such as acute pulmonary edema, cardiogenic shock, or sudden cardiac death and inadequate anticoagulation remaining the leading cause of prosthesis thrombosis, along with other risk factors. The availability of multimodal imaging techniques enables and encompasses to a full extent the diagnosis of mechanical valve thrombosis. The gold-standard diagnostic methods are transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Moreover, 3D ultrasound has undoubted value in giving a more accurate description of the thrombus's extension. When transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography are uncertain, the multidetector computer tomography examination is an important complementary imaging method. Fluoroscopy is also an excellent tool for evaluating the mobility of prosthetic discs. Each method complements the other to differentiate an acute mechanical valve thrombosis from other prosthetic valve pathologies such as pannus formation or infective endocarditis and aids the physician in accurately establishing the treatment method (surgical or pharmaceutical) and its optimal timing. The aim of this pictorial review was to discuss from an imagistic perspective the mechanical prosthetic aortic and mitral valve thrombosis and to provide an overview of the essential role of non-invasive exploration in the treatment of this severe complication.

The value of the axial view in assessing calcaneal fractures

We studied the value of the axial view of the calcaneum in diagnosing fractures. Fifty sets calcaneal radiographs were studied by four senior trauma staff and four orthopeadic trainees on two occasions 2-3 weeks apart. On the first occasion only the lateral view was studied; on the second, both lateral and axial views were studied. The axial view did not improve the sensitivity or specificity of the lateral view alone. Senior staff were more accurate in assessing the radiographs. We suggest that the axial view should not be used routinely in assessing a patient with a possible calcaneal fracture.